Revolutions and Post-revolutions?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Revolutions and Post-revolutions?
by vildemose
23-Feb-2011
 

 

The bitter truth of deep inequality has been disguised by an era of cheap imported goods and the anyone-can-make-it celebrity myth - Polly Toynbee

It is pretty clear that the proximate cause for the tidal wave of uprising is the dramatic rise in food prices.  While there are other, longer term issues, it appears to me that economic desperation has been converted brilliantly into political revolution.  

 Now, how do you entrust a regime that oppressed  its people and looted  its national wealth  for 30 years with reforms? How do we entrust a regime that kills its opponents in the name of GOD and rightousness?


This regime should be in jail to answer to the people for the crimes (murdering and theft) committed against Iranian nation.  How could Khamenie et al comes to be worth billions of dollars? We need a revolution and we need it now.

I tend to think of political revolutions as like crimes, in that a means, motive, and opportunity are required. Means are the resources would-be revolutionaries employ to achieve their ends such as social networking sites or, more traditionally, guns. The motive is the ideological foundation revolutionaries draw upon--why is this power structure illegitmate? I don't think if you ask average Iranians, they will be able to give you a solid answer. We constantly complain about the symptoms of this abomination called IRI but never really quite articulate why the regime's  ideological foundations and goals are a path to destruction of Iran.

We never really discuss what other goals and ideological visions should replace the ones indoctrinated into the fabric of the society for the past 32 years? Democracy and secularism in abstractions are too vague for the average joe. What does democracy and secularism translate into in tangeable and concrete ways to improve the daily struggle of making ends meet?

Opportunity is the event or series of events that allow for the revolution to occur in the first place. Opportunities are external and structural more often then not, such as international pressure on the state, the threat or continuance of war, and yes, most common, economic crisis or complete collapse. Iran is ripe for a revolution at this time.

 It's unreasonab­le to expect upheavals/uprising to have well-defin­ed game plan from the beginning. The American revolution happened in 1776, but the federalist papers weren't published until 1787.The most important thing about the American revolution­aries was their determinat­ion to avoid despotism. That's really all that's needed for these revolution­s to succeed. It was, by the way, lacking in Iran in 1979.

The most important thing about the American revolution­aries was their determinat­ion to avoid despotism. That's really all that's needed for these revolution­s to succeed. It was, by the way, lacking in Iran in 1979. I also have to mention that the rAmerican evolutionaries were minority educated elite who who mobilized/infomred/educated  the rest of the uneducated colonies on why and how they needed to save themselves from the shackles of British Empire.

"Revolutions are rarely, if ever, carried out by the "People," the "Mob," of the "Masses." You need elites, you need organizational structure, you need firm ideological cohesion, and you need an effective strategy in motivating actors and replicating your message for a "successful" revolution."

The French, operating under vague, yet lofty-sounding Enlightenment ideals, almost immediately tore themselves apart over who should take power in the republic and how it should take shape. The Bolsheviks, on the other hand, had built an extremely effective party aparatus and a means of applying Marxist thought to the Russian reality far before 1917. They had a chain of command, they had a clear message, they had an army.

It is undeniable that the Egyptian military, as the only legitimate governmental institution left, will play a significant, if not primary, role in rebuilding the country. It'll be interesting to see if they can hold it together, and do so while preserving "democratic" principles. There has been no class transfer of power and wealth. It is yet to be known whether we can call it a revolution.

 

Nature abhors a vacuum.  That's why "organizer­s" will fill it. As we clearly saw in 1979.

No meaningful transforma­tion of Middle East is possible without addressing those two evil twins whcih hinder progress and developmen­t -- religious archaic superstiti­ons and political oppression­.  

Just my two-cents.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by vildemoseCommentsDate
Lies, Lies, and more Lies
68
Dec 26, 2011
Emmanuel Kelly The X Factor 2011 Auditions Emmanuel Kelly FULL
4
Sep 02, 2011
Mousavi on Syria
16
Aug 07, 2011
more from vildemose
 
Anahid Hojjati

You are welcome Vildemose

by Anahid Hojjati on

You are welcome, darling.


Cost-of-Progress

Vildemose jaan

by Cost-of-Progress on

Great blog.

"determination to avoid despotism"

As you noted, we didn't have it in 1979, and we sure as hell don't have it now. Just look at what they are trying to prop up for us: the MEK. Need I say more?

____________

IRAN FIRST

____________


Darius Kadivar

Yes ... Well ... I'm afraid it's called a "Restoration" ... ;0)

by Darius Kadivar on

Bound to happen in Iran too in the future:    

RESTORATION: Shapour Bakhtiar advocates Restoring the Monarchy





As it happened in Great Britain the point at which Parliamentary Democracy Took Root:


HISTORY FORUM:Monarchy - Revolution -Republic -Restoration with David Starkey (6 Parts)


RESTORATION: Britain's 'Glorious Revolution' of 1688 and the 'Bill of Rights'

  Which by the Way was an Ideal form of Government for one of France's most popular Enlightened Philosophers Voltaire who happened to advocate a Constitutional Monarchy for FRance just like England at the time:

HISTORY OF IDEAS: Ian Davidson on Voltaire's "English Exile"

Related Blogs:



HISTORY FORUM: Franco's Ghost- Spain's Painful Road Towards National Reconciliation

Viva España, Viva El Rey !!

 
 
RESTORATION: King Simeon II of Bulgaria, The Republican Prince




RESTORATION: Belgium King Baudouin takes Oath Amidst Republican Animosity (31st July ,1950)             As you can see there are Many Options to a Nation's Political Future and the World is not particularly inspired by PAX AMERICANA and it's Political Model: PAX AMERICANA: Hitchens VS Kondracke on Reality or Fantasy of American "Imperialism" (1991)


At Best good for Comic Book Bubble Gum Afisionados:




PAX AMERICANA: A first look at "Captain America: The First Avenger"



  So allow me to conclude with a GENUINE Irandokht's Assessment:

 

 

 

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPHW-ldSeqY

 

 

Hee Hee

   


vildemose

Thank you RG Aziz. Your

by vildemose on

Thank you RG Aziz. Your approval means a great deal to me. I'm a happy camper now...lol

Anahid jan: Thank you, Nazanin.


Anahid Hojjati

.

by Anahid Hojjati on

.


Roozbeh_Gilani

We need more of your blogs vildemose

by Roozbeh_Gilani on

 This is a very nicely written blog. I really enjoyed reading it. After reading it, I remebered what the Grand father of all revolutions, the short, bald ugly, yet super intelligent Slavic guy said. This is the exact wordings as underlined by myself in one of his articles:

"It is impossible to predict the time and progress of a revolution. A Revolution is ruled by its own mysterious laws."

                                        


vildemose

Samad Aghas do not do

by vildemose on

Samad Aghas do not do revolution

Thank you Anahid. That was priceless..ROFL. I'm going to use it with your permission in the future.

 Thank you for reading my blog.


Anahid Hojjati

Great blog, Vildemose

by Anahid Hojjati on

.


vildemose

I don't normally read your

by vildemose on

I don't normally read your blogs?? I don't write to be read.


Examiner

Will “irrelevance” lead to indifference?

by Examiner on


Or, will you care to read my blogs, and continue to post your malicious comments about them?


vildemose

 I hate being long winded

by vildemose on

 I hate being long winded like some people.  I abhor when self-rightous people contemplate the unknown, we can fall so easily into dichotomies.  When comparing two things simultaneously, it is easy to believe that everything must belong to one part or the other, or, failing that, nothing can belong simultaneously to both parts.  And I don't really care whether yout think I'm cerebral or dense as as mule. You are irrelevant to me.


Examiner

Well done, Vildemose

by Examiner on


This piece displays the more cerebral side of yours, in particular when contrasted with other shoot-and-run exercises you engage in.  Nevertheless, I still find your last paragraph rather impetuous.  Religious superstitions and political oppression are but two tools (one is a vulnerability, the other a tactic) utilized by the symbiotic evil twins in the contemporary ME, namely the hegemonic plutocracy and the inbred tyranny –religious or secular – in order to retrograde the “average joe”, and deny him his fair share.