Beyond Top Secret - Iran

rottengods
by rottengods
09-Nov-2007
 


Iran's nuclear weapons program remains so top secret that intelligence sources still don't know exactly how soon Iran could produce a bomb. At the height of their eight-year war with Iraq, Iran decided it needed nuclear weapons and, U.S. and Israeli intelligence were busy trying to thwart them. Learn about secret activity of the Mossad, Israel's secret intelligence agency, as well as a clandestine war the CIA is waging inside Iran right now. As the confrontation between Iran and the United States escalates, the question remains: will either country find a way to move back from the brink? In a fast-paced, graphic-intense style viewers will take a fascinating journey inside Iran. Please watch following videos:

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5

But conclusion at the end of part 5 of these series, is very much wrong. If the US attacks Iran, people in Iran won't involve in war with US just because people have had enough of the Islamic Republic of Iran and it's puppets.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by rottengodsCommentsDate
An Expriment: Another Iranian is burning quran
3
Oct 22, 2008
What should Iranians do with Quran in Ramadan?
4
Sep 02, 2008
Set Fire on Quran
72
Dec 20, 2007
more from rottengods
 
rottengods

!

by rottengods on

!


default

The POINT - 1 in 4 US Citezens infected with genital herpes

by The Point (not verified) on

It is TRUE.
One out of 4 of the total USA adolescent and adult population is infected with genital herpes.

FEEL the Pain, physical suffering or distress.


default

No secrets on Iran Nuc

by Faribors Maleknasri M.D. (not verified) on

Not at all. all clear. Uncle sam wants the conditions of the time befoer 1978/79. But, sorry, those days will never never come back.
Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ended their latest round of talks on P1 and P2 centrifuges in Tehran on November 1st after four days of talks.

The conclusion of the talks came as the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany met in London on Friday to try to strengthened sanctions against Iran under a third UN resolution.

The head of Iran's negotiating team, Javad Vaeedi termed the recent talks as 'very constructive' adding that Tehran provided the UN's nuclear watchdog with all necessary information on P1 and P2 centrifuges.

Speaking ahead of the recent talks, the IAEA's deputy chief for safeguards, Olli Heinonen said cooperation with Iran was "good".

The results of Iran-IAEA meetings will be included in a report by the agency's chief, Mohamed ElBaradei, which is to be published and submitted to IAEA's board of governors in mid November.

Iran and the Vienna-based nuclear watchdog agreed in August on a plan of action which aims to remove all technical ambiguities by the IAEA over Iran's nuclear projects.

In September, the permanent members of the Security Council and Germany agreed to delay a vote on further sanctions against Iran until the publication of the report.

The UN atomic agency has been investigating Iran's nuclear facilities for the past four years and Mr. ElBaradei is on record, multiple times, as saying there is no evidence that Iran weaponizing the program. In his words 'there is no clear and present danger'.

In an interview with CNN on October 28, ElBaradei said "he has not received any information that there is a concrete active nuclear program going on right now."

On October 1, he said Tehran was still years away from having the ability to produce a nuclear weapon reiterating that the IAEA had no evidence it was building a bomb.

The US and France were quick to brush aside remarks by the IAEA chief. French defense minister Herve Morin said "Our information, which is backed up by other countries, is contrary (to ElBaradei's comments)."

The instant dismissal by Washington and Paris seems to show their determination to sanction Iran into submission. In spite of their repeated claims that they have evidence Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, they have so far failed to share that evidence with the IAEA an indication that such intelligence does not exist.

At Friday's meeting in London, the officials agreed to ask the EU's foreign policy chief Javier Solana to hold a further meeting with Iran's chief nuclear negotiator and report back. A spokesman from the British Foreign Office said the officials "agreed to finalize a text for a third UN Security Council sanctions resolution with the intention of bringing it to a vote in the UN Security Council unless the November reports of ElBaradei and Solana show a positive outcome
of the efforts.

On October 25, Washington announced unilateral sanctions against more than 20 Iranian companies, banks and individuals as well as the Defense Ministry, hoping to increase pressure on Tehran to stop its nuclear program.

The sanctions followed a sharpening of rhetoric by the Bush administration on Iran, including a controversial remark by President George W. Bush that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to "World War III".

In an October 17 news conference, Mr. Bush said he had "told people that if you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing Iran from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon."

US Vice President Dick Cheney said on October 21 that Iran would face "serious consequences" if it continued to enrich uranium. Cheney said Iran ought to know that if it stayed on its present course, the international community was prepared to impose serious consequences."

The belligerent remarks, which came on the heels of reports that Tehran and the IAEA were making progress over Iran's nuclear case, indicate that the US and to some degree France seem opposed to a negotiated settlement of the issue.

In reaction to the threats, former Iranian President, Hashemi Rafsanjani, said talks between Iran and the IAEA were making progress. Rafsanjani said dialogue should be given more time and warned that any military action against Iran would create another quagmire for the United States".

The US's tough rhetoric against Iran comes as glaring inconsistencies are seen in its foreign policy. Washington is engaged in nuclear cooperation with India, which unlike Iran is not a member of the non-proliferation treaty (NPT), Pakistan, which already has nuclear bomb and is considered a key ally and of course there is Israel. But nobody in the US or Europe takes them to task for their nuclear weapons arsenal.

The IAEA chief has said he would continue to work through "creative diplomacy" to try to resolve Iran's nuclear issue. He has also said that he does not see any other solution than diplomacy and inspections." But as Iran and the IAEA move along the path to a negotiated settlement, the US shows no hesitation to rock the boat and sabotage a peaceful resolution of the issue. The tendency does not bode well for the future of a region which is already fraught with tension and insecurity.


default

Iran NUc top secret?

by Faribors Maleknasri M.D. (not verified) on

Nuclear Energy

WDC supports Iran's nuclear rights
Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:48:40
WDC says Iran has the right to develop nuclear power for peaceful purposes.
The World Disarmament Campaign (WDC) has announced that there is no evidence to indicate that Iran aims at developing nuclear weapons.

The London-based group called for annihilation of the nuclear arsenals across the world and declared that intimidating Iran and Imposing sanctions on the country will not be constructive, IRNA reported.

In a letter to the Guardian newspaper on Tuesday, the WDC co-chair, Frank Jackson said that "according to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, it is Iran's right to produce nuclear energy for peaceful purposes,"

Jackson said that the only way to prevent proliferation of the nuclear weapons is to realize the provisions of the NPT, according to which countries that have nuclear arsenals should annihilate them.

The co-chair of the WDC said that if the permanent members of the UN Security Council had realized their undertakings, so many lives could have been saved and the world could have been a safer place.

The WDC was established in 1979 to campaign for nuclear and non-nuclear disarmament of the world countries.

The group also has fight against poverty, environment preservation and promoting development plans worldwide on its agenda.
and where is any secret? Greeting


default

Rotten reports

by Raha (not verified) on

Are those reports/video's from Fucks-News or BB"See"?

"Adel Asadinia, a former Iranian diplomat"
//www.abdolian.com/thoughts/?p=96


default

This can happen anytime!

by Kamangir on

Thanks for the links.  It goes withou saying that there're real chances of such attack. I despise the IRI like the vast majority of Iranians but do not see this as a good idea. The Iranian regime is looking forward to the attack and war as it needs it to survive.


Jahanshah Rashidian

The Point

by Jahanshah Rashidian on

Bush recently warned of "World War Three" if the Islamic republic acquired a nuclear weapon -- a description which alarmed some European allies now specifically received in Bush’s ranch. This warning may approach as “the month with long nights, in clips” will be just next month! 

I do not know how many percent of Iranian grass roots prefer a US attack as a life-boat, but I know that most people know the Yankees are not their crusaders! They righteously and impilcitly claim that the Iranian intellectual lame duck cannot lead people to sweep away the IRI. This is the point we may miss.