PLAY

خدمت استاد فرح روستا

در صفحه ۲۸ کتاب مورد اشاره، نویسنده محترم به ویرانی لوط و نظر
شوروی‌ها در مورد آن حدیث اشاره کرده اند، بی‌ آنکه ماخذ را ذکر بفرمایند.
تا آنجا که این حقیر از همه جا بی‌ خبر میداند، اولین و شاید تنها کسی‌ که
حدیث لوط را به موجودات فضایی ربط داده، اریک فون دنیکن است که دست بر قضا 
اهل سوئیس بود.

plebs

"1) Le Rosey was a very prestigious private school at that time."

Too funny!

" Thank god for botox; my facial expressions are wearing rather thin...."

و اما چرا قجر‌ها از پهلوی تنفر دارند؟

شازده جون اومدی "درستش" کنی‌ خراب ترش کردی عزیز  :)

آقای شهریار زاهدی نکته جالبی‌ را مطرح کردند. واقعا علت پیزاری قجرا از پهلوی‌ها چیست.سوای این‌که هیچ کس از تیپا خوردن خوشش نمیاد قجرا چه مشکل دیگه‌ای با پهلوی‌ها می‌تونن داشته باشند؟ جوابش رو در این مقاله تحقیقی زیر که بخشی از آن را نقل میکنم میتوان یافت:

در
عصر قاجار نیز لواط بسیار رایج بوده. از معروفترین بچه بازها و لواط گران
آن سلسله را میتوان ناصرالدین شاه قاجار را نام برد که با "ملیجک" از اوان
کودکی تا زمان کشته شدن آن پادشاه، لواط میکرده است .   
به دوران پهلوی می‌رسیم که لواط اندک اندک به سبب رشد فرهنگ و حضور زن در
جامعه، از عادات و رسوم مردم رخت بربست.شاید بتوان از مهمترین علل دشمنی
پانترکان با سلسله پهلوی را اینگونه دانست. دیدیم
که روحیه ترکی و زن ستیزی مفرط ایشان، رواج لواط را به دنبال داشت. زن
ستیزی این قوم هم اکنون نیز مفرط است. طرز برخورد با دگر اندیشان و بکار
بردن واژگان زن ستیز پانترکان در قبال مادر و خواهر دگراندیشان، بیانگر و
مؤید این حقیقت است. یک ضرب المثل ترکی میگوید: قرخ آروادین بیر قره تویوخ
جان عقلی اولماز. " چهل زن به اندازه یک مرغ سیاه عقل ندارند "

اینها را آقای سیروس شمیسا میگوید در کتاب ممنوع شده " شاهد بازی در ادبیات فارسی" .

از اینکه با طرح این نمایشنامه فرصتی دادید که   مبحث شیرین لواط در میان خاندان شریف قجر را مطرح کنم متشکرم و امیدوارم به سبک همین نمایش ما را از مغازلات ملیجک و ناصرالدین شاه محظوظ بفرمایید.

FR

baz in Capitan mast bargasht!

and now he is using 3 of his old usernames!

Khoda har che bikareh shafa bedeh.

I don't flag your stupid comment.

You went so much bankrupt that I only pity your little mind.

You will be blocked soon, anyway.

Suzie's Maid Service

$pecial offer for Christmas and the New Year  to monarchists only!

Cleaning your home so shiny you will not believe your own royal eyes.

Cleaning your messy bedrooms and stinky bathrooms are my $pecialty.

Shazdeh(reposted)

I know that it was first the ministry of Etela'at (SAVAK) who has accused Khomeini of having some personal issues.

But this does not justify in anyway, to give back the same accusation to Shah!

This is only childish. 

Secondly, Abas Milani is stupid to say such thing like this:

"At La Rosey, the young Mohammed Reza, for once free from the claustrophobic domination of his father, had a chance to choose a friend on his own. He chose a poor young boy, a Swiss national, and in an uncanny coincidence, he
was, like Fardust, also the soon of a gardener of La Rosey. His name was Ernest Perron and he was, even as a child, openly
gay(1). Over the next fifteen years, he would remain the King¹s constant
companion. Every day, for about two hours, the two would be closeted
together, behind closed doors. But when, in 1954, the intimate friend became a political liability, the Shah showed no compunction in suddenly cutting
off all contact with him. He did not meet with or speak to Perron for the
rest of the latter¹s lonely and tormented life........................

"Mohammed Reza Shah¹s strange choice of friends was not limited
to these callow and youthful indiscretions. Even in the last two decades of his rule, at the zenith of his power, when he considered himself a statesman of world stature, his choice of friends was no less unusual, and no less
dizzyingly destructive(2). "

1) Le Rosey was a very prestigious private school at that time. Not everybody's son could attend to that school. So the statement about Ernest Perron and his father and his background are false, for sure. Please read more about Le Rosey and also take a look at the Notable Alumni

//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_Le_Rosey

********* oh I forgot to add this*********

When I talk too much, I almost forget my main point, sorry :)

He said : Ernest Perron was an "openly gay boy"

This just can't be true! I mean, we have to use our brain. At that time, in Europe, there was NO WAY an OPENLY GAY BOY could attend a prestigious school like Le Rosey! 

The society was too strict and the homophobia existed so strongly at the educational system. How could an "openly gay little boy" attend such a school and nobody opposed it?

akheh baba! We might be uninformed but we are not dumb to accept such things.

***********************

2) This is again another baseless free accusation. He mention something without givin any suit to support this accusation. who are those "no less unusual and no less dizzyingly destructive"

The more I hear these bigotries about the guy, the more I feel sorry for his dead soul and feel more respectful toward him/

One should be more  vigilant when reading those absurdities. Nowadays, any Mr Joe comes out of his well and suddenly becomes a historian on Iran and launch their baseless theory about the past, to mislead the West and the media about Iran.
Not only this, this stupid Milani is pretending to be a psychanalys too:

"He turned out to be, not surprisingly, a
shy and timid man, one who rarely looked anyone in the eye(3). In his youth, as
in much of his life, he was gaunt in countenance, vulnerable in physique,
haunted by the specter of his imposing father.........Having received little love from his father, he craved the
affection and adoration of others, and thus begot a spirit of sycophancy in
those around him."

3) A king is not supposed to look in the eye of anybody! Maybe only his wife and his children.

Sorry, a true Iranian should not fall in these traps.

Souri dear

I don't think that you have had time to fully read and understand this play, otherwise you wouldn't have been so quick to judge. Give it a good read and then see who first accused whom of "personal issues" in the newspaper (etelaat).

Dear S.A.M

Today I have plenty of time and started to read lots of blogs and articles here.

Unfortunately I must say that I didn't like this one from you (as an exception to your previous articles).

Your late blogs and articles were fabulous. But this one  doesn't measure up to your great talent.

You are a smart and knowledgeable writer.

This kind of stories, belong and interest only the ignorant layer of a society. As I have always mentioned to Noosh Afarin and Manoucher, I can't understand what is it with the private life of a Royal family who are no more in power and also (despite everything) have yet done a great deal of good things for the country.

Although I am an anti-Monarchist, but I still don't support the propaganda of this kind. The rumors, are nothing else but baseless accusation, otherwise they wouldn't be called rumors!

While politics and having political opinion, is something serious and should not be mixed and based on the rumors and supposition.

All in all, I wish I wouldn't have seen your big talent wasted on this kind of stories which don't bring anything but the hate and disgust to some people who are still supporting the Pahlavis.

Let's put our time and energy on more constructive debates or entertaining subjects.

Agree?

شازده و کَم راد توجه

So javadshah jaan

Guess it seems you delete my challenging civil comment to these claims yet "my blogs" were fair games for your thugs to come and talk about my mother & sisters .

Path of Kiaan Resurrection of True Iran Hoisting Drafshe Kaviaan //iranianidentity.blogspot.com //www.youtube.com/user/samsamsia

He earned Earnie

In early 1350's this gay-friendly billboard was erected in some European countries and perhaps in some US cities. The timing was very critical, as Iran's (or I should say the Shah's) military expenditure was far exceeding that of Israel which was a nation at war. Eyebrows were slowly but surely rising here and there...

This is a well-written play. 

Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.

Nader: if you want more information about Ernest Perron

"His name was Ernest Perron and he was, even as a child, openly gay. Over the next fifteen years, he would remain the King's constant companion. Every day, for about two hours, the two would be closeted together, behind closed doors."

From: //iranianstudies.ca/privatelives/000422.html

تمامش کشک بود

اول انقلاب یک سری تهی مغز شروع کردن به این چرندیات بافتن که شاه رفیقش که ارنست پرون بود رو آورده بود ایران و به همجنس باز بودن متهمش می کردن، عینآ از ذهن بیمار روانی مثل شیخ صادق خلخالی که رساله علمیه اش این بود که کوروش لواط کار بود. یک مشت بی سواد و لات برای مردم داستان سرایی شروع کردن و هئیت تحریریه روزنامه کیهان از همین اباطیل نویسی شکل گرفت. ببخشید شازده منظورم شوما نبودید، بلا نسبت شوما.

Lets be fair

The father and son did a lot for the people. At least modernized their clothing and gave them surname. What Ghajar did? Nothing just shrunk the size of the motherland.

قجرها

نمیدونم، ولی‌ انگاری قجرها یه جور بخصوصی از اون پدر و پسر متنفرن. تنفرشون با مال بقیه ملت فرق داره

شراب سرخ عزیز - خوشحالم که پسندیدید

به یاد دکتر مصدق افتادم که میگفت

"عاقبت گرگ زاده گرگ شود

گر‌ چه با آدمی‌ بزرگ شود"

...

قزاق و قزاقزاده، شیطان زاده اند و افسوس که مملکت به باد رفت و دیگر هیچ باقی‌ نماند.

منتظر بقیه ماجرا هستیم.

حضرت شازده سلامت.