The Iranian jigsaw puzzle

The US should adopt a strategy that deepens and expands the reform movement


The Iranian jigsaw puzzle
by AmirAshkan Pishroo

Like a bad dream, Iran’s uranium enrichment program and sponsorship of Hezbollah continue plague the United States night after night, while no one really knows how to make it go away. This is why the Bush administration has adopted a policy of “kicking the can down the road,” meantime hoping that the International Atomic Energy Agency and the EU do something about Iran.

But as we all know, if you want a thing done right, do it yourself, especially where the European allies are concerned; they have no interest in looking out for Iran's and America’s best interests.

When dealing with Iran, the Democratic policy elites have no alternative policy, either. Their difference with Republicans over Iran is literally about whose turn it is for kicking the can of “no-option-can-be-taken-off-the-table” down the road.

Take Obama, for example, who have made too much fuss about Iraq and little of Iran by repeating exactly what Vice President Cheney once said that the
administration had not “taken any options off the table”. Obama pretty much
repeated the same, “we should take no option, including military action, off
the table,” reported in the New York Times.

Although all serious analysts agree that there are a variety of possible options to deal with Iran, they usually accord the primacy of some type of alternative over the others, treating the rest as background. Logically, we need a policy that brings together options that by themselves are insufficient conditions. That is, “X,” “Y,” and “Z” may be necessary conditions but will not be sufficient condition unless they occur simultaneously or in a particular sequence. In dealing with Iran, three options appear to be necessary and sufficient: (1) economic cooperation; (2) diplomacy; and (3) security.

The United States must be prepared to take the lead and synthesizes these three options into a smart diplomacy, in which the economic incentives and security guarantees are treated as integral part to diplomatic bargaining. The reluctance to offer sanction relief, trade and investment, and new security arrangement in the Persian Gulf while talking to Tehran, brings about little if any strategic result on those issue America seeks to influence, since the Iranian regime believes rightly that it is the United Stated who is intruder the region and not the other way around. In other words, coercive diplomacy based on threats is never a good idea.

Equally bad idea, it is to go to war against Iran since it will engulf the entire region and it might lead to a change in the regional balance of power that would be disastrous for the United States. War would perpetuate violence and instability, not reduce them.

Indeed, Iran today is one of the few countries in the entire Middle East where the people are pro-American. Invading Iran would also unite all Iran against the United States. More importantly, Iran is undergoing rapid socio-political changes, in which demand for reform and more participation in politics and decision-making have become constitutive features of Iranian politics.

The US should adopt a strategy that deepens and expands this reform movement, with canceling its containment strategy and embark on a policy of unconditional dialogue and sanctions relief. Financial tool of sanction alone would never rise to the level of hardship that the regime cannot endure. During its 8-year war with Iraq, Iran has faced stronger sanctions than those now under discussion, yet never conceded to a single Iraqis demand or the international community’s demand for that matter.

The smart diplomacy proposed here is an effective policy toward Iran:
forceful yet peaceful, less risky than war, and more assertive than toothless


Recently by AmirAshkan PishrooCommentsDate
The assassination of an author
Oct 16, 2008
Americans: A nation of givers
Oct 10, 2008
John McCain & the making of a financial crisis
Oct 07, 2008
more from AmirAshkan Pishroo

Dear Mr Pishroo

by IRANdokht on

Could it be that you only see contradiction when you compare me to the person that you imagined I was?

Smile my dear friend, when you get right down to it, we're all on the same side...

Pirooz bashid


PS: I don't have a bad side let alone "the worst" :0)

AmirAshkan Pishroo

Dear IRANdokht

by AmirAshkan Pishroo on

Since I've seen the best and the worst of you, I must confess: You’re a miracle of divine contradictions, a hell of a woman. I am disarmed by your compliment, as Oscar Wilde once said:

“women are never disarmed by compliments. Men always are.”


Farhad Kashani

AmirAshkan aziz, I'm with

by Farhad Kashani on

AmirAshkan aziz, I'm with whoever is on the people's side. Obviously you are on their side, so I'm with you all the way aziz.




what a great article

by IRANdokht on

I am pleasantly surprised that I totally agree with you (this time)  :0)

This is exactly what we need to do: bring up the more reasonable options that would save our country without foreign military attacks and hopefully no bloodshed.

Peaceful and logical approach.

Thank you


AmirAshkan Pishroo

Dear Sadegh

by AmirAshkan Pishroo on

We have an amazing extended group of intellectuals in this site, people like yourself, Farhad Kashani, and many others, who give their time and talent, and freely share their thoughts, irrespective of their differences.

Peace be with you always, bro!


Excellent article Mr.

by sadegh on

Excellent article Mr. Pishroo...I'm definitely on the same page...only smart diplomacy can yield leverage with the regime...war and violence are almost never the answer...

Ba Arezu-ye Movafaghiat, Sadegh


AmirAshkan Pishroo

Mr. Kashani, It is a noble

by AmirAshkan Pishroo on

Mr. Kashani, It is a noble act to leave kind words for an article which one does not agree with its general tenets.

In any case, I am grateful for your support.


Who are you speaking to?

by XerXes (not verified) on

The American government?
When was the last time that the US came to help Iran and democracy in Iran? Why are some Iranians know so little or forget so much about the pillars that make the US policies in the Middle East. Are you really this naive or are do you honestly believe that the United States wants a democratic or stable Iran?
Since when? Did I miss the memo?
Why do you think Israel was created? to help advance democracy in the region?

I wonder how many of you truly believe that the US and the west want what's best for Iran.

Instead of wasting your time and my time, investigate and write pieces of article and posts that would give information to the Iranian people how to stand up on their own two feet and either build, fix or change what's they got. It's our problem not the US or anyone else. Get that in to your head.

Farhad Kashani

Mr. Pishroo, good article.

by Farhad Kashani on

Mr. Pishroo, good article.