Iran Deposes Another King

Larry vs. Mahmoud


Share/Save/Bookmark

Iran Deposes Another King
by eroonman
03-Oct-2008
 

Once again, the cowardice and ignorance of modern American journalism allowed the wrong idea to seem like a fantastic solution.

Well, all I can say is, that I'm just glad I ate before I sat down to watch last week's CNN Larry King interview with Iran's pseudo President Ahmadinejad, or as I now call him A@*H&%$#.

Hours before the interview, the "submit your questions" page of CNN that was sent around the internet for Iranians to fill in, was most surely filled in, with great submissions that King could have chosen any one of to really put the non-leader of Iran on the spot with, and grind the logic-failure of Iran's great Islamic proposition with. Instead though, King showed why he is the epitome of the lackluster, ignorant, lazy, and "feed the beast your children", of American journalism.

Why we would expect anything short of a "if it bleeds it leads" mentality from King is beyond me. King seems to be beyond the twilight of his career, apparently more concerned with the state if his corned beef and pastrami on rye sandwich at his local daily deli visit, and when he is finally going to die, than leaving any lasting legacy of journalistic integrity through insightful observation and putting evil on the spot.

No, capitulate instead, Larry. By all means!

As if verily mastered by Iran's ministry of dis-information's head puppet master, each question was masterfully delivered with the softest of touches, so that A@*H&%$# could gay-swing and smack each one out of the proverbial ballpark, like Barry Bonds after a freshly injected cocktail of Hank Aaron's man juice, with a Babe Ruth DNA chaser. If he was a girly Bonds.

Moronic questions like; (I am paraphrasing here for effect, not accuracy, if you want accuracy you'll have to be bi-lingual, listen to both versions the sexy English translation by that sexy female translator, against his own words in Farsi . For now, trust me, here's the gist.)

King: "Do you think there can be peace with the US and Iran?"

Obviously A@*H&%$# answered, "Yes". But with the brilliant added tome, "Of course the hostility is not from us! It is America that is hostile. We have no issues with the American people, but when America uses the language of war, we have to be ready to defend ourselves."

More idiocy by King: "Has the President (Bush) responded to your letter?" (Referring to the moronic rambling letter by A@*H&%$# asking Americans to "Can't we all just get along" as  long as you essentially convert to and embrace Eslam)

Of course A@*H&%$#'s  answer would be, "No". which makes it look like A@*H&%$# is the peace loving end of the donkey, and has reached out his hand.

King goes on to dig himself into the ground even further, "Why do you think Bush, Obama, or McCain don't want to talk to you?"

A@*H&%$#: "You should ask them, we are willing to talk."

Brilliant.


King: "You would agree that they consider you to be a hostile state, would you not?"

A@*H&%$#: "Iran has never ever attacked anyone, the only war we have been involved in was to defend ourselves against Iraq, which everyone knows was encouraged and instigated by America. Our defense was our legal right, our human right."

Genius.

King: "Can you tell us what you are doing with regards to Nuclear weapons?"

A@*H&%$#:  "Look, it is fundamentally against our fundamentalist religion to seek weapons of mass destruction of any kind."

Can this guy run for US President? Because with answers like that, I think he could win.

King finally got down and dirty, asking a series of questions on the Middle east conflict, even though it was only to stand up for his fellow Jews by asking the consummate question that no Israeli lobbyist has ever been able to get an answer to: "But you will allow Israel to exist?"

To which A@*H&%$# masterfully responded: "Look, this is something for the people of Palestine to decide. There should be an election, a democratic election, and the people should be allowed to decide for themselves. The thing to remember is that it is not the fault of the Palestinians that the Jews were displaced by Europeans and the West. This is like throwing a party for yourselves, using the pocket of someone else to pay for it."

I have said it before, and I will say it again, other than China, Iran is the smartest country on the planet right now. They have convinced the world of the validity of an obvious invalid position, through expert showmanship like this, the new naked Persian Emperor, against even the most obvious opponent, will in fact convince you to agree with their ill-argued proposition, feigned as it may be.

Meanwhile China has convinced the world that it's oppressive regime and subjugation of a third of the world's people, is in fact the happiest place on earth, with a full blown child labor factory knockoff of a Disneyland theme park as Disneycountry, complete with backlot secret stage doors, and "Characters" you can only take pictures with, but cannot talk to.

Next time Larry, if you can get yourself to take off your Israeli Boy Scouts suspenders for a minute, consider asking A@*H&%$# this question: "Mr. President, if Iran's constitution prohibits amendments, and if all of the power rests in the hands/turban of the Supreme Leader for life, Ayatollah Khamenei, who has the power to declare war, set foreign policy, and who the military, the secret police, and the Revolutionary Guard of Iran reports to, and who also appoints the president of Iran, a president in name only, that has no decision-making power whatsoever, what pray tell, are you doing here? And a quick follow up- Can you arrange to have Mr. Khamanei come here next time, because this is a UN meeting of world leaders, and clearly you can't even fix a parking ticket in Tehran."

That would make it really "lead if it bleeds", because it is very likely A@*H&%$#'s head would explode. Live. In HD. That would even put that whippersnapper blackberry blogging punk Anderson Cooper in his place!


Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by eroonmanCommentsDate
You know it's coming...
-
May 02, 2011
Open letter to Ulmann
2
Jan 04, 2011
Arab-Islam? Have Faith!
2
Nov 06, 2010
more from eroonman
 
default

An offer to write for a well respected magazine

by Payam Magazine (not verified) on

Hi eroonman,

I loved your article! You are smart and funny. Please email me and let me know if you are interested in writing for a bilingual Iranian- American magazine in Orange County, CA. We would love for you to contribute articles to our magazine.

Please email me for more details.


default

I saw most of Ahmadinejad's

by smhb (not verified) on

I saw most of Ahmadinejad's interviews with various anchor people and TV personalities. Some outright hostile and rude and others a bit more diplomatic in their approach.

In all of them I thought that Iran's President handled himself very well. He got his point across, and when necessary he was sarcastic and humorous and turned the table around very well.

The problem that the zionists and their lackies have is that Ahmadinejad has broken their hold and grip on an important subject through which they have instilled guilt in the mind and heart of the average American and through which they silence all their opponents by labeling them as anti-semites.

Iran's President has done all of us a great service by breaking the zionist lies and propaganda and opening the needed space for direct questioning, criticism and discussion of the zionist myth of that little thieving lying murderous state we provide our tax dollars and political and moral support.


aaminian

Private Pilot

by aaminian on

I couldn't help noticing that your discussion is way too long, 2-3 as long as the article itself. Have you thought about listing it as a whole new article?! Also, it is very difficult to follow because you don't separate arguments/ideas by paragraphs.

Nevertheless, I believe you have some very valid arguments specially the one on a high number of fundamentalist Muslims living in the West wanting to change our ways of life.

One thing that I have to disagree with you though is the struggle of the Palestinians against the Zionist regime. The state of Israel was forcefully established in 1948 by the British after World War II as a means to relocate Hollocust survivors. As a result of that illegal state establishment, many Palestinians were forced out of their homes and their lands were taken away from them. To this date the Palestinian struggle has been more nationalistic than religious in nature.

I do have to admit though that, today, Israel has become the scapegoat for many problems that tyrant regimes of the ME have. That way, these regimes can divert attention whenever it suits them!

 

A general observation about King/Ahmadinejad interview:

Ahmadinejad seemed to avoid his usual anti-Israel rethoric as though he was instructed by his Mullahs bosses (before getting on the plane) that he's over-doing it! Overall, I didn't buy into anything he said that night.


default

I agree, king is an embicile

by ali1 (not verified) on

this guy should not be on tv....i've watched him a couple of times, and he doesn't know his hand from his butt!
I really don't know what they think is so special about this guy.....compare him with fareed zacharia.
I remember he was even asking seinfeld whether he was still on tv!!!!
king is a senile old man....give me his 7 mil a year and I'll show u how to interivew antarinejad!!
javid iran


default

It was a good interview for antar-i-nejad

by Anonymousssss (not verified) on

No one hates antar-i-nejad more than I do, in this world. But, I am being honest here, either he was well trained, or he is just a smart guy, he did well on the interview. I noticed larry (a Jew) tried to get antar-i to basically say "we want Israel destroyed", but he was smarter than to fall into Larry’s trap so he said let the Palestinian decide on the faith of Israel.
Also, I liked the last question in particular, when larry, who himself has been married 7 times, twice to the same person, asked antar-i about his personal life and family and was shocked to see two of antar-i's children are already married.


default

And the U.S. takes one more step closer to losing Europe

by Faribors Maleknasri M.D. (not verified) on

Please just a question: Is it not so that the europians are taking steps to get rif of the american imperialism? Since 1978/79 and the Islamic Revolution in Iran as the hionorable Iranian Nation founded the Islamic Republic of Iran they europians suffer more under the "friendship" with their Uncle sam and have allready taken many steps to get rid of him. My be it can be made sure if american imperialism takes steps to loose or the europians take steps to get free. Greeting


Private Pilot

And the U.S. takes one more step closer to losing Europe

by Private Pilot on

In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe?" Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, chairman Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem (which I hope to be attending). The speech was sponsored by the Hudson Institute on September 25. Dear friends, Thank you very much for inviting me. Great to be at the Four Seasons. I come from a country that has one season only: a rainy season that starts January 1st and ends December 31st. When we have three sunny days in a row, the government declares a national emergency. So Four Seasons, that’s new to me. It’s great to be in New York. When I see the skyscrapers and office buildings, I think of what Ayn Rand said: “The sky over New York and the will of man made visible.” Of course. Without the Dutch you would have been nowhere, still figuring out how to buy this island from the Indians. But we are glad we did it for you. And, frankly, you did a far better job than we possibly could have done. I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The danger I see looming is the scenario of America as the last man standing. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe. In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe? Patriots from around Europe risk their lives every day to prevent precisely this scenario form becoming a reality. My short lecture consists of 4 parts. First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. Thirdly, if you are still here, I will talk a little bit about the movie you just saw. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem. The Europe you know is changing. You have probably seen the landmarks. The Eiffel Tower and Trafalgar Square and Rome’s ancient buildings and maybe the canals of Amsterdam. They are still there. And they still look very much the same as they did a hundred years ago. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world, a world very few visitors see – and one that does not appear in your tourist guidebook. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration. All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corner. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city. There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule. Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities. In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims. Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear “whore, whore”. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin. In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can in many cases no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity. In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan. Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization. A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century. Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. A Dutch study reported that half of Dutch Muslims admit they “understand” the 9/11 attacks. Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. Our elites are willing to give in. To give up. In my own country we have gone from calls by one cabinet member to turn Muslim holidays into official state holidays, to statements by another cabinet member, that Islam is part of Dutch culture, to an affirmation by the Christian-Democratic attorney general that he is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey. Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. Some prefer to see these as isolated incidents, but I call it a Muslim intifada. I call the perpetrators “settlers”. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies, they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers. Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighbourhoods, their cities, their countries. Politicians shy away from taking a stand against this creeping sharia. They believe in the equality of all cultures. Moreover, on a mundane level, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored. Our many problems with Islam cannot be explained by poverty, repression or the European colonial past, as the Left claims. Nor does it have anything to do with Palestinians or American troops in Iraq. The problem is Islam itself. Allow me to give you a brief Islam 101. The first thing you need to know about Islam is the importance of the book of the Quran. The Quran is Allah’s personal word, revealed by an angel to Mohammed, the prophet. This is where the trouble starts. Every word in the Quran is Allah’s word and therefore not open to discussion or interpretation. It is valid for every Muslim and for all times. Therefore, there is no such a thing as moderate Islam. Sure, there are a lot of moderate Muslims. But a moderate Islam is non-existent. The Quran calls for hatred, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. The Quran calls for Muslims to kill non-Muslims, to terrorize non-Muslims and to fulfil their duty to wage war: violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every Muslim, Islam is to rule the world – by the sword. The Quran is clearly anti-Semitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs. The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behaviour is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. He advised on matters of slavery, but never advised to liberate slaves. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side. Quran as Allah’s own word and Mohammed as the perfect man are the two most important facets of Islam. Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ‘submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies. This is what you need to know about Islam, in order to understand what is going on in Europe. For millions of Muslims the Quran and the live of Mohammed are not 14 centuries old, but are an everyday reality, an ideal, that guide every aspect of their lives. Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam “the most retrograde force in the world”, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. Which brings me to my movie, Fitna. I am a lawmaker, and not a movie maker. But I felt I had the moral duty to educate about Islam. The duty to make clear that the Quran stands at the heart of what some people call terrorism but is in reality jihad. I wanted to show that the problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, and do not belong to its fringes. Now, from the day the plan for my movie was made public, it caused quite a stir, in the Netherlands and throughout Europe. First, there was a political storm, with government leaders, across the continent in sheer panic. The Netherlands was put under a heightened terror alert, because of possible attacks or a revolt by our Muslim population. The Dutch branch of the Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir declared that the Netherlands was due for an attack. Internationally, there was a series of incidents. The Taliban threatened to organize additional attacks against Dutch troops in Afghanistan, and a website linked to Al Qaeda published the message that I ought to be killed, while various muftis in the Middle East stated that I would be responsible for all the bloodshed after the screening of the movie. In Afghanistan and Pakistan the Dutch flag was burned on several occasions. Dolls representing me were also burned. The Indonesian President announced that I will never be admitted into Indonesia again, while the UN Secretary General and the European Union issued cowardly statements in the same vein as those made by the Dutch Government. I could go on and on. It was an absolute disgrace, a sell-out. A plethora of legal troubles also followed, and have not ended yet. Currently the state of Jordan is litigating against me. Only last week there were renewed security agency reports about a heightened terror alert for the Netherlands because of Fitna. Now, I would like to say a few things about Israel. Because, very soon, we will get together in its capitol. The best way for a politician in Europe to loose votes is to say something positive about Israel. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I, however, will continue to speak up for Israel. I see defending Israel as a matter of principle. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense. Samuel Huntington writes it so aptly: “Islam has bloody borders”. Israel is located precisely on that border. This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War. The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming. Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West. It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. Therefore, it is not that the West has a stake in Israel. It is Israel. It is very difficult to be an optimist in the face of the growing Islamization of Europe. All the tides are against us. On all fronts we are losing. Demographically the momentum is with Islam. Muslim immigration is even a source of pride within ruling liberal parties. Academia, the arts, the media, trade unions, the churches, the business world, the entire political establishment have all converted to the suicidal theory of multiculturalism. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’. The entire establishment has sided with our enemy. Leftists, liberals and Christian-Democrats are now all in bed with Islam. This is the most painful thing to see: the betrayal by our elites. At this moment in Europe’s history, our elites are supposed to lead us. To stand up for centuries of civilization. To defend our heritage. To honour our eternal Judeo-Christian values that made Europe what it is today. But there are very few signs of hope to be seen at the governmental level. Sarkozy, Merkel, Brown, Berlusconi; in private, they probably know how grave the situation is. But when the little red light goes on, they stare into the camera and tell us that Islam is a religion of peace, and we should all try to get along nicely and sing Kumbaya. They willingly participate in, what President Reagan so aptly called: “the betrayal of our past, the squandering of our freedom.” If there is hope in Europe, it comes from the people, not from the elites. Change can only come from a grass-roots level. It has to come from the citizens themselves. Yet these patriots will have to take on the entire political, legal and media establishment. Over the past years there have been some small, but encouraging, signs of a rebirth of the original European spirit. Maybe the elites turn their backs on freedom, the public does not. In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat to our national identity. I don’t think the public opinion in Holland is very different from other European countries. Patriotic parties that oppose jihad are growing, against all odds. My own party debuted two years ago, with five percent of the vote. Now it stands at ten percent in the polls. The same is true of all smililary-minded parties in Europe. They are fighting the liberal establishment, and are gaining footholds on the political arena, one voter at the time. Now, for the first time, these patriotic parties will come together and exchange experiences. It may be the start of something big. Something that might change the map of Europe for decades to come. It might also be Europe’s last chance. This December a conference will take place in Jerusalem. Thanks to Professor Aryeh Eldad, a member of Knesset, we will be able to watch Fitna in the Knesset building and discuss the jihad. We are organizing this event in Israel to emphasize the fact that we are all in the same boat together, and that Israel is part of our common heritage. Those attending will be a select audience. No racist organizations will be allowed. And we will only admit parties that are solidly democratic. This conference will be the start of an Alliance of European patriots. This Alliance will serve as the backbone for all organizations and political parties that oppose jihad and Islamization. For this Alliance I seek your support. This endeavor may be crucial to America and to the West. America may hold fast to the dream that, thanks tot its location, it is safe from jihad and shaira. But seven years ago to the day, there was still smoke rising from ground zero, following the attacks that forever shattered that dream. Yet there is a danger even greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America - as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem. Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so. This is not the first time our civilization is under threat. We have seen dangers before. We have been betrayed by our elites before. They have sided with our enemies before. And yet, then, freedom prevailed. These are not times in which to take lessons from appeasement, capitulation, giving away, giving up or giving in. These are not times in which to draw lessons from Mr. Chamberlain. These are times calling us to draw lessons from Mr. Churchill and the words he spoke in 1942: “Never give in, never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy”.

default

Ahmadinejad did great on the Interview!

by Real Iranian (not verified) on

Excellent Interview with the President of Iran...there needs to be MORE DIALOGUE WITH IRAN. Don't listen to the Israeli lobby: www.prothink.org


default

If you think Larry King and his interview skills are the problem

by Shadooneh (not verified) on

you've missed the point, completely. The author of this "humor" piece, if he really means what is posted here wins the grand prize for "charand-o-char" - a far cry from humor. I don't know why Larry King, whom I rarely watch, is the target here! Larry does what he's told by the CNN editors who sign his time sheet, or BS sheet, so he can get paid. Let's forget Larry for a moment and stick with Mahmoud. He was here as Iran's president to spin the IRI's policies by obfuscating and conducting a charm offensive. The US administration is a willing participant in these shenanigans, and fairly smart people know this, except eroonman and few other posters on this site who seem to be clueless. I have no idea what's going on behind the closed doors of the US and Iran administrations who seem to have found new common ground with each other on a host of issues, but if I were a betting man, I would bet there's a sea change in the US-Iran relations. erooniman's statement, "the new naked Persian Emperor, against even the most obvious opponent, will in fact convince you to agree with their ill-argued proposition, feigned as it may be" is proof that he is very naive and he is afraid that others are as gullible as he is. Otherwise why would he even consider that Ahamdinejad would make anyone to agree with him just by giving interviews or speeches?!!!


default

I disagree

by nojan the great (not verified) on

I as Aryan was so impress by his interviews on Larry king show and also on Charlie. He spoke well and answered all the questions very well.
Most of my friend at job and school were interested to know more about him and his background.
In last 5 years Iran has been in eyes of westerner so often that for two years was the # 1 searched words on yahoo. So what is the true problem of you guys? As long as I remember Iran belongs to Aryans and if you are not one why you care about our country? You didn’t like living in Iran so you immigrated to west or east. You choose not to be involved in daily life of Persians so why now start to care?
I ask you to seat behind your desk and write the list of the thinks that you have done to support, help and improve life of Iranians or their country. Then you can judge yourself. And for you who don’t live in Iran you need to go there and see peoples life then Wright this articles.


default

I'm not a fan of

by Sam B (not verified) on

I'm not a fan of Ahmadinejad, but I thought he did a pretty good job in handling the questions.


default

I'm really impressed......

by Luciferous (not verified) on

so i am because:احمدي نژاد در سفر خود به آمريکا به هر آنچه
مي خواست دست يافت .


default

Fantastic article. Thanks.

by Anonymous... (not verified) on

Fantastic article. Thanks. Your keen observations are refreshing.


default

Food for men's thought

by Professor Abol Danesh (not verified) on

...

Quiz:

If you inverse (up side down)this emblem then what do you get in its place?

//content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en-comm...

If cann't answer the quiz then click on the following address for a hint to find the answer.

//www.payvand.com/news/07/jan/Ferdowsi-by-Mas...


default

Well Said!

by Outraged! (not verified) on

Brilliant title and great article, reflecting the outrage many of us feel at the useless American "journalists" and their cushy questioning of Ahmadinejad (Anderson Cooper & Larry King). The day after the interview, two non-Iranians expressed to me how they now felt an admiration for president of Iran and his common sense answers. Alas!


default

Iran Deposes Another King

by Faribors Maleknasri M.D. (not verified) on

Now it is europian`s turn to do the same to further kings. The honorable Iranian Nation has done enough. I think that Nation will of course continue only if it will be everagain neccessary. The signs speak for their Will.
Regarding Lary: He has formulated only very silly questions. That is all what he has learned. The politicians which he regulary gets for an interview can not answer substantial questions anyway. However he got for his silly questions every time the appropriate answer. How can Mr. President know if Hinz or Kunz - hier U BA MA and co. - could be interessted in negotition with the Islamic Republic of Iran? This was one of the Lary`s Questions. Greeting


Farhad Kashani

eroonman, wow, I'm really

by Farhad Kashani on

eroonman, wow, I'm really impressed. Great article.

What you said about " I have said it before, and I will say it again, other than China, Iran is the smartest country on the planet right now. They have convinced the world of the validity of an obvious invalid position, through expert showmanship like this, the new naked Persian Emperor, against even the most obvious opponent, will in fact convince you to agree with their ill-argued proposition, feigned as it may be." ...can't be more true.

This is the core problem when it comes to the world confronting the IRI. They can't understand the evil it does.


FACEBOOK