Baby boomers

Iranian society is not expected to continue to be governed the way it is, given its demography


Share/Save/Bookmark

Baby boomers
by KamranBehnia
22-Oct-2007
 

A revolution occurred in Iran in the late 20th century. This statement does not refer to the Islamic revolution of 1979. Another event, not as noisy and much more gradual took place a while after. Its consequences are arguably deeper and certainly more durable than the installation of the Islamic Republic.

The bottom line of the story can be found deep inside the 2007 edition of the CIA Factbook. Among many other facts about the countries of Earth, you can check that Iran's Fertility rate is now 1.71.

This is amazing.

Let us recall the definition: the fertility rate of a given population is calculated by dividing the number of birth to the number of women in the age of possible procreation. Obviously, in the long term in order to have a steady population, this number should remain close to 2. If for a long time, it becomes significantly larger or less than 2, you need to worry about an exploding or a declining population.

The figure of 1.71 for Iran leads us to a number of obvious observations.

First of all, astonishingly enough, according to the CIA, Iran's fertility rate is the lowest in the whole Moslem world. Tunisia (1.73) is a close second. Fertility in Turkey, Malaysia and Indonesia (with their secular legal systems, business-friendly governments and westernized institutions) is significantly higher than in Persia with its notoriously incompetent theocracy.

Please note that Iran's figure is even lower than France (who has recently experienced a modest baby boom, in contrast to most of Western Europe), the United States (whose birth rate never declined as sharply as the post-sixties Europe or Japan) or Israel (whose society has been engaged in a population race with Palestinians).

Until very recently, it has not been so! As late as 1984, the fertility rate in Iran was close to 7. In 1999, it had already dropped to 2.2. This decrease by a factor of 3.3 within 15 years is the sharpest drop in the entire history of demography for any society with recorded data.

Two textbook cases come to mind: QuÈbec during what was dubbed la rÈvolution tranquille (that is, during the sixties) and the post-Franco Spain (following the dictator's death in 1975). In both these cases, within an interval of 15 years, the fertility rate was divided by two. The political and sociological context were far from identical. Yet, in both cases, what happened was a conservative society with a powerful church and numerous faithful evolving towards a liberal society with tolerant (one may say hedonistic) values.

In Iran, the brutality of the drop is significantly stronger than both Spain and QuÈbec. How come? What happened in 1984? What mysterious force, then, in the height of that bloody war with Iraq, started the whole process? To the best of my knowledge, nobody has provided a satisfactory answer to this question.

One thing appears crystal clear, however. All of us hear and read here and there that the Iranian women are more emancipated than their counterparts elsewhere in the Middle East (much more than the archaic legal system of the Islamic Republic would suggest), that hedonism is wide spread among the young people in Iran. Now, the barely-noticed statistics are supporting this anecdotic evidence.

I cannot resist the temptation of noting that Mr. Khamenei and company do not fit in to this picture. If there is a Goddess of History, she is supposed to take care of the iron laws who made her famous in the first place. To put it more prosaically, Iranian society is not expected to continue to be governed the way it is, given its demography.

Just recall that Spain (the country who would not allow abortion three decades ago) is now the largest political entity in the world to recognize gay marriage! Watch again one of those Almodovar movies (a mainstream director in Spain)! Then, you may grasp the kind of aesthetic, moral and irreligious tsunami History is preparing for the land of Mollah Hassani!


Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by KamranBehniaCommentsDate
«همه» و «با هم»
5
Aug 17, 2009
Seyyed Ali Shah
16
Jun 23, 2009
می تونی مشت منو وا بکنی
-
Jan 29, 2009
more from KamranBehnia
 
default

Rosie Rosie Rosie

by Roudabah (not verified) on

Oh dear I wish growing of children could be that fast, bam wham good bye Haj khanom, and there is your future soldier for the up coming confrontation by the next season.
Come on, a little intelligence does not hurt. Do you realize what you are saying does not make sense on any level?
1- children do not grow over night, to raise another crop of soldiers it take at minimum 16 years, 3months of banging the wife, 9 months of pregnancy, 15 years to be war ready.
2- socialogically, if you create a trend you can NOT reverse it ad hoc
3-Iranian people are not robots to be told go to bed make babies , or stay away form Haj Khanom tonight.
4- Does it kill any one to admit that population control in Iran via Government programs has WORKED.


default

IRI Family Planning

by Rosie T. (not verified) on

Except for the prohibition on abortion, IRI's family planning policies were considered for about a decade to be the third most comprehensive in the world, after China and I don't remember somewhere else by UN and various NGO's. The original IRI go forth and be fruitful Catholic style pro-reproduction campaign was not religious in nature to my understanding, but designed to provide bodies for the military. After Iran-Iraq War ended, Mullahs had to face the devastating economic consequences of this campaign, overpopulation, underemployment, etc. and pragmatically, as always, speedily and efficiently reversed the trend. They knew now that they had no enemy to rally the people around, they would have to deliver some of the economic promises of the Revolution, or they would be ousted. Unfortunately it seems that the flanking of Iran by U.S. occupation on both sides has caused a return to the status quo ante of go forth and be fruitful in preparation for the new battle, along with the other concomitant miseries of hardliner policy the miserable policies of George W. Bush have unleashed on the people of Iran.
My take on it,
Rosie T.


default

Baby Boomer's puzzle solved.

by Roudabah (not verified) on

The reason Iranian population is under control and and actually will be declining by 2015 to 67million, is the massive campaign of education and advertisement against multiple births by the government of Iran. I think due to cooperation of expat IRI haters and American media demonizing Iranian government, positive news out of Iran becomes a puzzle. Every one runs around chasing their tail and wondering how to interpret the news. If you have traveled to Iran in past 15 years you would have seen numerous posters advocating small family, plus family planning centers and a fatwa issued by one of the Ayatollahs to give women the right of abortion when mothers health is in danger. There is your answer, you did not need to look at CIA's stat. The only thing you Anglophiles believe is CIA The source of lies and deceit.


default

REPY TO: Islam =

by AstrayIranians (not verified) on

REPY TO:
Islam = Oppression
by Anonymoos (not verified) on Mon Oct 22, 2007 08:47 PM PDT

You are not Iranian.....You'rea Lost Identity soul trying to define your new being. Soon your generation will be offrooted by tremendous force of wester culture. All you have left for you from persian culture is Chelo-kabob and a name.........Wake up and be a real persian who repects 70Million people who don't even give a damn to what you're. Don't tell me you found your true persian identity in the west.....hahahahaha.

I have no idea when we're going to give up all this racist attitude and put all our energy in making the world a good place for us and others!


default

just to clarify!!!

by ali (not verified) on

I just wanted to clarify some point about your conclusion!!!
Population growth rate has nothing to do with immigration rate!!! you compared the IRaq situation and the fact that 3.5 M people have left the country!!!! but,thats a seperate fact from new born rate!!!! I thought you should know that.
CIA fact is not the best source ,but yet it is a very reliable and up to date resource. I am currently a graduate student in management and my academic colleages and many professors rely on CIA fact for many referenecs... If you suggest any other resources that might be more reliable that CIA fact,,then please share it with us instead of critizing others for using this site.


default

This is a fantastic discussion

by Rosie T. (not verified) on

This is a fantastic discussion. Can't you stop insulting each other and just keep discussing for the benefit of yourselves and others who want to learn? You're all well-educated and well-equipped with sources and ideas to discuss the complex confluence of history, politics and demographic trends (except AnonyMOOSE). You're obviously the best and the brightest. Why spoil it with name-calling?


default

Question the statistics

by bughouse (not verified) on

Just did some quick research in CIA Factbook pages.

To compare apples-to-apples, I looked at only one category, "Population growth rates" for:

Iran .663%
Canada .869%
USA .894%
Turkey 1.04%
Israel 1.154%
Saudi Arabia 2.06%
Iraq 2.618%
West Bank 2.985%
Gaza 3.66%
UAE 3.997%

The only conclusion I can draw from these figures is that the CIA is as incompetent at compiling population facts as it was in understanding what was going on in Iran in 1979 and as it is in understanding what is going on in Iran in 2007.

In 2007 Iraq has a higher rate of population growth than the USA? Has anybody in the CIA noticed that nearly 3 million Iraqis have left the country and another half-a-million have become dead Iraqis?

Why should CIA numbers be trusted?

Iran's rate of population growth is only somewhat smaller than Canada's rate of population growth, which is only marginally smaller than that of the USA. Is Canada undergoing some destabilizing revolution? Is Canada ruled by religious fanatics?

Back to the drawing board, Kamran.
Perhaps you could look at growth rates in Europe post-WWII; perhaps it is the case that wars create long tails of depression as people deal with rebuilding their cities, their homes, businesses, institutions; as they deal with the ravages to their bodies and their health; as they try to heal from the attacks on their psyches and their confidence.

That's what warmongers foresee and plan for as warmongers condemn a nation and a people, like the Iranians, to war and fear of war.


default

sahar - you sound like a retard

by Anonymous-haha (not verified) on

it's one thing to engage in a debate.but it's another thing to be an emotional freak that attacked other people's intelligence. there you have it.
anti-persian bigotry? wuhahaha.

Idiot,I didn't say whether I support secularism or not.You might want to read carefully while putting aside your emotion. I was just pointing out that secularism has little support in Iran. The problem is that, that argument sounds like a blasphemy to most secularists. So they attacked the poll and worst, called those who pointed this out as people who are brainwashed by the IR.


Sahar Dastmalchi

You are deluded

by Sahar Dastmalchi on

Iranians didnt embrace Islam , it was shoved down our troaths by the force of the sword... pick up a history book not published by the IRI.

No body is telling people to drop their religion, just keep it out of the government. again a miscomprehension. Secularism is not a anti religiouse movement, its a movement pro seperation of church and state.

if you are against the mullah regime the first principal you should be defending is secularism.

Governments should be charged with the well being of its citizens in this life regardless of their religion, not their situation in the afterlife.

seriousely anti arab bigotry? are you kidding me?  how about your anti persian bigotry?... have your religion just keep out of the domain of my personal life in MY home country.

Dude, please stop using big words you cant possibly start to comprehend... obviousely you know how to read and write...pick up a book start educating your self... that is your prime responsibility in a democracy..

 


default

missing the point

by Anonymous-haha (not verified) on

you guys are missing the point.
Yes, Iranians considered themselves as Muslims first but that does not mean they support the Mullahs. 43% of Turks considered themselves as Muslims first too ( even in a secular fascist nation that deprived Muslims/Kurds their rights..Islam is not dead).
Islam is a religion that transcends race,ethnicities and borders. When Iranians considered themselves as Muslims first, they are refusing to succumb to racism and nationalism ( not that anti-arab bigotry is dead in Iran).
The problem with secularists is that while they are eager to bash the IR, their hatred was pointed at Islam.This is where they were out of touch with the complex nature of Iran.
Some secularists went a bit unhinged when they suggested Iran should return back to Zoroastrinism so that we could taste our golden years back.( Hello,have you not read how Iranians rebelled against the priest of Zoroastrinism before the coming of Islam?). Some idiots suggested we should return back to the years of Pahlavis.
In the journey to seek justice in Iran and Islam, the least we want is injustice towards Iran and Islam. It is a religion that is Iran. We embraced it, we moulded it and we spread it. It is a religion of Bosnians and Indonesians alike - not just Arabs.To assume that Iranians are either backward/stupid to believe in Islam is the first reason why secularists have no future among Iranians.


Sahar Dastmalchi

Wrong link?

by Sahar Dastmalchi on

In Sociology it is also a well known fact that fertility rates drop during times of economic recession, or the times when the outlook on the future is not so bright. basically the people in a society that would under "normal circumstances" form a family are not secure enough in their social and economical standing to do so. The largest demographic in Iran today could be said are at an age where in most societies one would start a  family. however their economical standing is not what one would expect of a prosperouse society. look at the unemployment rates for the ages 24- 35

The raise in fertility in 1984 was due to Khomeini calling on his ommat to reproduce, and create the muslim militairy force.to fight with the infidels...

you are right about one thing the social revolution, revolution being significant change... there is a significant demographic change in iran that has its roots in the 80's

And to anonymouse an Islamic Democracy is an oxymoron, itsa controversy in it self that can not exist.  Any form of government based on religion has been proven in the history of man to be highly discriminatory and dictatorial. And than their is such thing as Islam ... well the word it self translates to submission. not the best basis for a democracy.

The notion that a democracy is solely the will of the majority is a miscomprehension on so many levels ..  a true Democracy is the will of the majority while not trampling on the rights of the minority.

I am no political scientist, but even I have that one figured out. please pick up a book before you start polluting cyberspace with political notions that are comparable to a discussion about wether or not Sataclause exists, and if he would be willing to run for office..


default

Islam = Oppression

by Anonymoos (not verified) on

Can you Akhoond lovers keep your f'n stats to yourselves. Let the rest of us who are Persians first at least bask in the thought of a secular democratic Iran. Besides, why wouldn't most of these reeshoo losers want a Moslem identity--considering that guys are running the show, essentially running an institutionalized gender slavery system.


default

I think haha is right

by Anonymous-123421354 (not verified) on

If you look at all the data, the numbers on other questions kind of match with reality. So, I do not think this report is totally wrong or off the mark. It is an unfortunate fact that Iran is a religious society and Mullah's will be around for a very long time. It is also a sad fact that Iranians consider themselves Muslim first and Iranian second. May be some day that changes.


default

USIP

by Kermanshan4life (not verified) on

If your only source is USIP who facilitated organization such as the Iraq Study Group (ISG), co-chaired by James A. Baker, then I have to say that I feel sorry for you and others who rely only on that site which supports bureaucrats with no credibility.I'll rest my case...


default

To kermanshah4life

by Anonymous-haha (not verified) on

nah, it's you who are delusional.

the poll is from here:
//www.usip.org/iran/iran_presentation.pdf

I assumed you have met 4% Iranians who identified themselves first based on their ethnic groups and extrapolate it to a hysterical level.


default

To Anonymous-haha

by Kermanshan4life (not verified) on

I'm not sure where you are from nor where you get your polls from so I guess you are delusioned. As far as the Iranian kurds, baluch and even some azeri's are concerned they want a secular federal Iran. So please don't speak on behalf of all Iranians. Get your fact straight. Peace....


default

Islamic democracy

by Anonymous-haha (not verified) on

okay..but did you go through the latest pew poll too?

62% Iranians identified themselves as Muslims first, Iranians second. ( I doubt christians and bahai will identify themselves based on their religions). 35% of Iranians, most of them young wanted Iran to be a more conservative nation while 15% want the country to stay the same. 31% on the other hand want Iran to be more secular/liberal.

Granted, the secular left in Iran has the loudest and sanest voice, but they do not have the strongest voice.

I believe Iran will choose to be an Islamic democracy with both the principle of democracy, such as the right to choose your leaders and the right to criticize them are combined with the principle of Islam such as against usury, immoral acts.

Those students protesting Ahmadinejad at Amir Kabir university were the ones who coined this term. So,not to let you guys down but Iran will never be a secular liberal democracy.

well it might, if Iranians are sick with Islam.but that will not happen till the end of time.


default

where's the logic

by mani11 (not verified) on

Where's the connection between low fertility rates and changes in government and/or social attitudes. Just because it happened in two other countries, it does not mean that it will happen to Iran. Did I miss something?


Mehdi

Totally!

by Mehdi on

I think a lot of us feel that only a rather violent revolution could change the scene in Iran, and bring about some sort of democratic system. Some people are so engrossed in that type of thinking that when they notice improvements in Iran they get mad! Some get mad only because they think that this is some sort of stamp of approval of the current regime. But the reality is, it has nothing to do with this regime. The fact is, a society normally moves on a course of progress all by itself. A repressive government can do a lot to slow such progress down or even reverse it, and the mullahs did quite well in slowing down the progress of Iran. But Iranians pushed forward anyway. Some Iranians, having fought with this regime in many different ways and for so long, sometimes fail to realize that their efforts have in fact paid off. There was a time when the mullahs were very intent on taking the country back by 1000 years or more but let's realize that people didn't allow it. Sure, there was much damage done but not nearly as much as what was in the plans! Today, with a potential US attack on Iran, we are at the verge of another disaster, just like the one that brought mullahs in power (created by the same shabby character too). If Iranians proceed in averting such a war, Iran gradually and steadily will continue to move towards a better state. It is a falsehood that a strong government in Iran could cause disaster in the area. Only weak governments bring about disasters and degraded conditions. One should not be afraid of change. Don't listen to the threats uttered by Ahmadinejad and the likes. As soon as more of the oil money pours into that country, and as soon as such characters get used to luxury, they'll stop advocating destruction. Revolutions have never really helped a country, if we look closely. Only evolution and hard work can cause progressive motion forward. Let's realize that we have all had a win here. Iran is in fact moving forward, even if still a little slow. But even the speed will pick up as things gradually improve. Even when you look at Israel, sure they established their existence by overwhelming force but if they ever want to have peace, tey will have to make sure their neighbors have as stable and strong a agovernment as they do, otherwise it is not going to happen. Just look at how much trouble the US has with Mexican over-immigration and all the problems that comes with it. They can build a wall (like they did in germany) but the real solution is too look into Mexico and decide to take responsibility for that area.


FACEBOOK