A very interesting Video about the relationship of thugs and Mullahs going back for centuries.
Recently by ramintork | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Shamloo and T.S. Elliot | 2 | Sep 18, 2012 |
بختک | 1 | Aug 27, 2012 |
My very Iranian Art | 3 | Aug 21, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Vigilantes
by alimostofi on Tue May 24, 2011 03:18 AM PDTThank you Ramintork for this video. These vigilantes were born at a time when Iran was broken up after Islam was literally wiped out by the Monguls. The Seyyeds proselytized very effectively. Al-Hilli was the first person to go back to Iran and reintroduce Islam again. Converting the King to be Shah Ismail whose mother was a Catholic, was done by stealing the young Prince and bring him up as a Seyyed King. This then laid down the return of Shiite Seyyeds. Historian are actually to blame for all this. Wrong words have been used. Seyyeds are just another lineage. They want their own Kingdom. They should all have a place like Vatican City in Iraq and do their preaching in peace there. Leave Iran alone. Go to your own Kingdom of Ayatollah.
The flip side to wiping out Islam by the Nestorian Christian Monguls in Iran was that we had three hundred years of glorious art and poetry from Molana to Saadi and Hafez. They would not have been able to write their books of Koran was not thrown out. And it was thrown out. Islam was not tolerated at all. These thugs were decieved by the Seyyedsto abuse their strength and valour against the public good.
All of them loved Iran but had no education in the Zoroastrian peaceful spiritualism and so got muddled and that conflict within them drove their anger. We need to rise above that anger and have a formal Iranian spiritual awareness created by proper historians so that the Ayatollahs and their Seyyed system can be within its own boundaries without infringing what is Iranian.
Ali Mostofi
//www.alimostofi.com
The significance is this is for the future
by ramintork on Mon May 23, 2011 11:37 AM PDTMullahs are good at stiring up mob mentality. They have utilized an unruly society where it is force rather than law that Governs.
If and when they get forced out, a new Iran would have to be on the guard for a new generration of thugs that enforce the future Mullahs.
So ....!!!!
by amirkabear4u on Mon May 23, 2011 04:28 AM PDTin all this discussion there was no mention of british involvement or maybe I missed it. It seems the historian was more interested in rohany bashing!
Also there are original mafia (italians) who do believe in christianity and historically they even had a hand in chosing the pop as well.
Fairness and Equality in Justice
Interesting indeed!
by Kaveh V on Sun May 22, 2011 09:35 PM PDTInteresting indeed! Although, I might choose a slightly different title i.e. "Mullah's Mafia, then and now".
Mr. Amini's recount of these thugs from Qajar period and beyond, closely parallels today's IRI with Sepah and its various other parasitic organizations are now formally the "Laat-O- Obaash". Such is the story of the migrant Jebel-Amel descendents in Iran, four centuries later!
The sad part is that the IRI play script would have been very clear back in '79, had more people been aware of this history. IRI was the logical evolution of what Mr. Amini describes of the Qajar time.
Part 2:
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ssnc5erBvgA&feature=related