Persian Westender

Captain, application of

Captain, application of these various forms of asses in the new proposed cyber-language is unlikely. However, we reserve them in the appendix part of the encyclopedia, just in case some people would like to asspeak  :-D

 Natalia: I personally like smiling first, and then tongue sticking out. It makes me feel better :-)))

che?

Hey! Mine are very mild compared to capt_ayhab. I was just sticking out my tongue at PW and then smiled.

Yes, I know, how immature of me. hahahaha

blushing !

(_!_) = Normal @ss

(__!__) = Fat @ss

(!) = Tight @ss[or Fengheli @ss]

(_*_) = Soar @ss

(_0_) = @ss that has been arround

(_e=mc2_) = Smart @ss

-YT

...........

این «کُد ها» منو یاد یک جوک انداخت که  باید  بگم......

یه بنده خدا که نابینا بوده میره تو آشپزخونه اش و یک کشو رو باز میکنه و دست میکشه به اطراف و محتویات کشو........دستش میره روی "رنده".......لمس میکنه......یه خورده پس و پیش میره.......با کنجکاوی دوباره لمس میکنه......یکهو با عصبانیت فریاد میکشه که........این دری وری ها و مزخرفات رو کدوم بی پدر و مادری  اینجا نوشته؟؟

  کاپیتان،

  کاپیتان، حرفای بد بد نداشتیم ها؟!!خودت باید بگی‌، من روم نمیشه!!:-D

decifer these !

(_!_)

(__!__)

(!)

(_*_)

(_0_)

(_e=mc2_)

-YT

PW.............:op :o) lol

ناتاليا

PW, I agree with you

PW, I just wanted to write that I agree with what you wrote about constructive criticism and basically all you wrote in your last comment addressed to me. :-)

Mrs: I never thought of

Mrs: I never thought of that..good point!

Nilo: I’m not sure what I’m saying is very relevant to your comment or to online communication, as it seems to me as a general matter in and out of cyberspace. But I always believe that by criticizing someone, people in fact do a big favour to them. Not to mention that, this criticizing is only constructive, when it is not mean, and is not a way for belittling someone or not an excuse for proving hidden personal agenda of the criticizer. On the other hand some people take any criticizing message as an insult and attack to their fragile egos. Apparently, for the one who dishes out more often, the same capacity of being criticized should be existed. Otherwise, they have real problems and agree with you that these people should be avoided.

dear Mina dadvar, the numbers are striking! Intersting. 

People who dish it out the most, are the most easily offended

This comment is not about smiley faces.  One thing I have noticed in my online communication is that many times, people who are the most outrageous in their own writings/comments, are the ones most easily offended when you try to respond to them.  In my online communication, if I am communicating with someone who is a writer who freely criticizes every one and everything, then I respond to them more freely. I don't agonize over my every word.  However, sometimes, I am surprised to see the same person become very sensitive all of a sudden.  To me, that does not seem right.  A person who dishes it out more, should be able to take some dishing out themselves. Usually, when I get this kind of response, I just make my responses to that person more conservative and try to be more considerate of their sensitive nature.  However,  I make a mental note of it and I am reminded of it when I read something written by them in a very critical language.

No one thought about this

No one thought about this one???

+_)(*&^%$#@!

Bah! Inaro bash.

What!!! You’re not a doctor!!!

All that time I thought you were a doctor. You could’ve clarified the misunderstanding a long time ago. So for the record, what is your qualification for giving advice in regard to marital issues?

Never the less, I’ll try to look up your references. However even what you have said so far does not seem credible the way they are stated. I’ll give you an example of my own routine life. First thing in the morning I turn on the radio, it is set at NPR, and all I hear is WORDS coming out of the radio. Then, I turn of my computer and check my personal emails, which are all WORDS displayed on the monitor. Then, I drive myself to work while I’m listening to the radio, which as before are all WORDS coming out of the radio. At work, one of the first thing I is to check my professional email, which is again all WORDS. And then, I get on my colleagues and with words I go over what needs to be done. So, in this context, unscientifically, I’d say 99% percent of exchanges of communication have been done by words.

But, what you’re quoting that others are saying is most likely refers to two individual having an exchange with each other, which in that case I even have a problem with that, about how these thing were quantified to begin with.

BDM

I can give you the names of many books/articles. However due to lack of time, I limit my suggestion to the following books:

1)  Messages :  The Communication Skills Book .  Names of the authors :  Matthew McKay, Ph.D. Martha Davis, Ph.D.  Patrick Fanning. On page 53 it states "Albert Mehrabian (interestingly enough the name sounds Iranian) has found that the total impact of a message breaks down like this: 

7 percent   verbal (words)

38 percent  vocal (volume, pitch, rythm, etc.)

55 percent  body movements ( mostly facial expressions) "

The second book is Interviewing Strategies For Helpers.  Authors are William Cormier and Sherilyn Cormier     On page 65 you may find this statement:"In communicating, we tend to emphasize the spoken word.  Yet much of the meaning of a message , 65% or more, is conveyed by our nonverbal behavior." 

By the way I am not a Doctor. 

Dear Doctor Dadvar

I'm interested to know, based on what scientific study you're saying that only 7% of communication (assuming human communication) is done through words? Thank you.

Persian Westender

Dear PW you are right.  Only 7% of communication is done through words.  The other 93% is through body language, facial expression, tone of voice....  The interesting thing is that the most common and powerful way of communicating hurt/angry feelings is silent treatment (ghahr), especially among Iranian couples .

No comment on your codes!!!!  Too challenging for me. 

My avatar has been automatically changed to fishes.  I will fix it later.

It’s not Da Vinci code but...

Dear Nilo:   %)(_+}..._)),Q< -)  However, *_Z:-} ^^:+)!

Dear Natalia:   00+-&?’­-)0:’’|_) %>-**... Sorry!

Majid agha : aziz jan, yeki yeki, ,mardom aadat nadaaran hanooz...They are people's eyes in different levels of addiction to iranian.com.

just want to write two things

I am too tired and have to go to bed.  just two things to write:

:-Q

;-)

Name them....if you can....LOL

1)       (.) (.)

2)       (O) (O)

(3)      (-) (-)

4)       ($) ($)

5)       \o/  \o/

6)       (+) (+)

7)       \_/ \_/

8)       (  .  )  (  .  )

9)       (^)  (^)

10)      (@) (@)

11)      (*) (*)

12)      (x) (x)

Okay

I was able to figure out most of the symbols. Do I get partial credit?

MPD and PW, assistance is needed

Dear MPD, I am simply not as intellectually gifted as you and/or PW.  Also I am too sleepy to even try to understand MPD's poem.  Something about money adds to money and brings happiness?  You guys really need to write in language of rest of humanity. : - )))  

MPD you're ahead of your time...

 :-O!

:O)

(.)(.)

\ 

(o)(o)

\ 

( O ) ( O ) 

/   :o)   ?

$

+$   /  /  /  :O)   +$   /  /  /  :O)   +$   /  /  /  :O) 

$ ? 

:-(

:-(