MeyBokhor_Manbarbesuzan

You're the idiot for calling Americans idiots

If Americans are indeed such idiots and awful, why are people literally dying to come here? We have problems, like Iran, but we're still a great country. The people here made a mistake in electing Bush. That's part of democracy. MISTAKES. But look at the margin Obama won by. Stop dissing Americans. I can never tolerate people who do that. The world depends on America in a lot of ways. Stop hating on America! There are a lot of good things happening here, not to mention the opportunities.... thank you very much. How dare you say that? Two elections make a country stupid? That is exactly the problem I have with Iran. You can't call Iranians stupid because of the mess they are in either. There are lots of factors and you are being a jerk by oversimplifying it and calling us "idiots". As for the crooks? Are you joking? Europe wrote the book on crooked politics and economics. 

A little clarification is due

What I meant was not that things will absolutely get better for Iran or the Middle East, but that at least we won't hear these political whores that often. They will not have a monopoly over the airwaves and other media -- even if it is temporary.

Pushing water upstream demands a lot of energy and the end result is the exhaustion of the pusher (See the economic situation of the US) and accomulation of a lot of potential energy in the water.  Once the river starts flowing downwards, it destroys everything on its path, good or bad (See global economy).

But it was these frogs singing Abu Ata that was the salt on injury. That we can do without.

American Idiots

who voted the crooks, morons and criminals in power in the first place. Now it is all different? How?

نظر ِ شخص ِ بنده

والله در كلاس ِ طبيعى ياد گرفتيم كه دگر ديسى ِ غورباغه فقط ده روز طول ميكشه.بعد از اون صدا مون در مياد

Dear Meybokhor,

My fear is that you won't be resting too long before Iranian frogs would start singing abu-atta! Why am I worried? and this relates also to your #3 re. changing bulb joke, the fact that it is true that Clinton's foreign policy towards Iran was in fact worse than that of Bush. 

Excuse my disturbing your relative clam and meygosari by reminding you to read Martin Indyk's article, his bringing out his ugly head on Iranian.com already:

//iranian.com/main/2008/time-diplomatic-r...

Here was one of my comments in there, reflecting my unease with the precursor of neo-cons: 

by Jaleho on Sun Dec 07, 2008 06:12 AM PST

I tried to explain this in detail in my blog:

//iranian.com/main/blog/jaleho/will-obama...

Please read that to see in what sense Mr. Indyk might have considered his "dual containment" needing some changes. The
neo-conservative idea of using pre-emptive force to change the regime
in Iraq was in a sense part of Mr. Indyk announced idea since 1994. It
was part of his version of Dual Containment. 

He does not come up with any now-regretted form of policy. He
is merely advising Obama to focus attention to Iran, now that his Iraqi
part of the equation is taken out for Israel's sake, and Iran remains
the unbalanced power threatening Israeli hegemony.

My point is that, now that Hillary has come to foreign policy power,
Indyk is trying to do the same monkey buisness that he did when bunch
of "Clintonites" ruled, and started the dirty foreign policy against
Iran-Iraq.

Under Bush, despite some verbal wrath like "axis of evil" that you're referring to, the REAL wrath was towards Iraq. The real biting sanctions against Iran and its isolation, all started with Clinton, and with direct hand of Martin Indyk. And he was an element throwing stones in US-Iran dialogue in the past. 

In my comment here, I specifically gave you an example of how he
tried to BUY and tap Iraqi opposition to advance his idea of
overthrowing Saddam, and nominated Adnan Pachachi to lead the
opposition.

I am suggesting that he's here to start work early and check out
some Iranian easily selling whores, the likes of Pachachi, Chalabi, or
Allawi!

MMMM Aziz

You said it all my friend!.

Acutally Rumy is recovering in his 8 million dollar mansion he bought 2 yearts ago in Saint Michael,East Shore,MD.

BTW

Due to unprecident orders by the Bush & his ousted gang,"Preparation Itch" factory's shares are hot !!.

Speaas 

Also, global warming will not equal "phony science"

As someone who loves science and science geek stuff, I'm glad science will be restored to gain a degree of respect. Bush appointment people to these science posts who had degrees in government. God damn it!! "phony science?" who says that? Only a Bush appointee to the EPA. 

GREAT blog.  

Wonderful!

Thanks for brightening my morning with your "feel good" blog and your light bulb joke :0)  That is just hilarious!

Good Morning to you too!

IRANdokht

A little joke about Bush & Co

How the Bush Administration Changes a Light Bulb


How many members of the Bush administration does it take to change a light bulb?

1. One to deny that a light bulb needs to be changed;

2. One to attack the patriotism of anyone who says the light bulb needs to be changed;

3. One to blame Clinton for burning out the light bulb;

4. One to arrange the invasion of a country rumored to have a secret stockpile of light bulbs;

5. One to give a billion dollar no-bid contract to Halliburton for the new light bulb;

6. One to arrange a photograph of Bush, dressed as a janitor, standing on a step ladder under the banner: Light Bulb Change Accomplished;

7. One administration insider to resign and write a book documenting in detail how Bush was literally in the dark;

8. One to viciously smear #7;

9. One surrogate to campaign on TV and at rallies on how George Bush has had a strong light-bulb-changing policy all along;

10. And finally one to confuse Americans about the difference between screwing a light bulb and screwing the country.