BP's Caspian Disaster

Share/Save/Bookmark

JalilBahar
by JalilBahar
05-May-2010
 

Azerbaijan is the new colonial cow being milked by Britain. 15 British oil companies have set up shop, and are siphoning Iranian oil from the Caspian Sea through Azerbaijan.It would be nice if Azerbaijan received some benefit from this oil exploitation (or even Iranians) – but once again the Brtis have installed a puppet dictator to assist them in their milking process.

Mr. Aliev, Azerbaijan’s President, installed himself in power in a rigged election in 2003 – upon the death of this father (a former KGB officer).

 The tale of how Britain gained full access to Azeri oil is a sordid one.  There are several reports of how BP executives working for Lord Browne spent millions of pounds on champagne-fuelled sex parties to help secure lucrative international oil contracts.  The company also worked with MI6 to help bring about changes in foreign governments, according to an astonishing account of life inside the oil giant.  Les Abrahams, who led BP’s successful bid for a multi-million-pound deal with one of the former Soviet republics, today claims that Browne - who was forced to resign as chief executive recently after the collapse of legal proceedings against The Mail on Sunday - presided over an “anything goes” regime of sexual license, spying and financial sweeteners. He also claims that Home Secretary John Reid was arrested at gunpoint on a BP-funded foreign trip for being out on the streets after a military curfew had been imposed.  Mr. Abrahams tells how he spent £45 million in expenses over just four months of negotiations with Azerbaijan’s state oil company. Armed with a no-limit company credit card, he ordered supplies of champagne and caviar to be flown on company jets into the boomtown capital, Baku, to be consumed at the “sex parties. The result is an almost mirror reflection of how Iran was exploited for decades by the Brits before Iran’s democratic government was established and Iranian Oil nationalized in the 50’s. Oil gets extracted and a pittance in royalties is handed over to the “locals”. For the poor idiots running Azerbaijan any cash from these oil companies is more than they ever had – but the reality is they are being skimmed. Azeris are being hozed. And as we all know, the Brits who to a large extent were behind the rise of the Mullahs in Iran are at work again.

The Caspian region is the largest untapped hydrocarbon reserve in the world. The wealth under the sea is measured in trillions - not billions of dollars. The world is hungry for more energy. Consider for example that China will be adding 110 million cars to its existing stock of 30 million cars by 2020.

There is over 200 billion barrels of oil, and over three trillion cubic meters of natural gas under there. These riches are at stake in a new economic and political 'great game.' Now that North Sea oil is depleted and more Alaskan Oil (where BP was a 50% stake holder) is shut out (because of US Congressional protection of Alaska's wildlife reserves), Britain and the United States have partnered up to get their hands on Iraqi and Caspian region oil in full force. What's $100 billion dollars for the Iraq war when there's trillions out there? Interestingly, Iraq awarded a contract to BP and China National Petroleum Corp to exploit the Rumaila oilfield, a giant field that first entered production in 1955. The field currently produces slightly less than 1 million barrels per day; the contract with BP targets a production plateau of around 2.85 million barrels per day. The BP deal for Rumaila was the only contract awarded in Iraq’s first bidding round in summer 2009.

BP operates 29,000 stations throughout the world, including 15,000 in the United States operating under the BP, Amoco, and ARCO trade names. BP is the second-largest integrated oil company in the world. In 2001, it had fixed U.S. assets totaling approximately $40 billion. With revenues of $174.2 billion in 2001, BP employs 110,159 workers worldwide, including 42,000 in the United States.

Quite clearly, BP is at the heart of political and economic manipulations to exploit global oil. And the Caspian Sea’s littoral states are the victims of these dealings.

This is a new high-stakes scramble of vital long-term geopolitical significance. Basically, the very future of Britain's economy and US economic leadership are at stake -- with for example China and India's long-term dependence on Western controlled energy resources at issue.

But, this time it’s not just about the theft of wealth. The very survival of the Caspian Sea is in question -- and the future of over 400 unique biological species. Much of the biological focus has been on the high value Sturgeon populations, yet for example there is unprecedented death among the Caspian's seal population with thousands dying as a result of poisoning from oil pollution. The carcasses are there for every one to witness.

There is simply NO environmental regulation in the whole Caspian region. Not only are there large off shore oil rigs pumping out millions of barrels of oil, but there are major pipelines being built to transport the oil.

The only option to transport this oil is to build large pipelines across the Caspian Sea bed to Southern Turkey - crossing 4 countries each. Two pipelines are now on the drawing board across the Caspian Sea (one from Turkmenistan and the other from Kazakhstan) to ports on the Mediterranean.

To get a sense of what these pipelines might do to the Caspian, let’s look at two smaller pipelines operating today. Already the Baku-Novarisk and the Baku-Sepia pipelines have caused major leaks. And then there is the issue of discharges from actual oil and gas drilling into the Sea. And finally, there is the issue of operating refineries and chemical plants on the perimeter of the Sea. Interestingly, all southern land-based pipeline options to Iranian markets have been rejected, although it is by far the cheapest and most environmentally benign option…i.e. the shortest route! Iran could purchase oil and gas for its major cities in the North and in exchange ship out product from its southern ports.

In any case, the Absheron Peninsula refinery (in Azerbaijan) has already been sited with major environmental abuses. There is simply no environmental regulation in the region, which is very openly designed to attract foreign investment and maintain cash flow for the region’s corrupt dictatorships that are heavily interested in signing multibillion dollar deals with foreign companies. (ref: Azerbaijani's recent $4Bn deal with BP)!

The issue of environmental regulation is important in many ways. On the one hand disasters need to be prevented. There has to be clear oversight, inspections, engineering and operational reviews.

But on the other hand, there has to be an international (cross-border), multilateral way to deal with disasters if they happen. And there is currently NO coordination between the Caspian Sea’s littoral states in disaster management. This issue not only impacts oil and gas exploration, but is also significant in dealing with over-fishing, and protection and promotion of the Caspian’s Biological heritage.

BP is the most significant player in the Caspian Sea. If BP could not operate safely in a heavily regulated US operating environment, you have to wonder what corners they are cutting in the Caspian Sea. As the world’s most profitable Oil Company, with record 3.5 Billion dollars in profits last quarter (that’s on track for about $14 Billion dollars annually) …you just can’t help wonder? And with that much money at stake, to continue to buy off politicians in these puppet Caspian States …would simply be the equivalent of us throwing quarters into a beggars bowl at the train station.

It’s simply a disaster waiting to happen.

Share/Save/Bookmark

more from JalilBahar
 
Monda

Enlightening and very alarming

by Monda on

Thanks for posting this.


fozolie

very interesting

by fozolie on

thanks


oktaby

and that's just Oil

by oktaby on

This the wild East the next frontier for all kinds of conflicts, and game has just begun. Throw in the mix 7000 kilometer Chinese gas pipeline going thru central Asia (the real wild east now). The pipeline is the first significant independent gas link connecting the former Soviet region with eastern markets while bypassing Russia. Gazprom is currently the main buyer of Central Asian gas. Project will be implemented in five stages for completion by 2013. Kazakh link is part of a route that links Turkmenistan's natural gas deposits with China via Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. China's CNPC, has signed deals with Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan giving them 50 percent stakes in their respective parts of the pipeline. Turkmenistan with Central Asia's largest gas reserves is major supplier of the 7,000 kilometer pipeline. Kazakhstan hosts 1,300 kilometers and plans to extend its part in the future, connecting it to its own gas fields near the Caspian. Russia has signed agreements with Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan to build a new pipeline along the Caspian.

The usual suspects are present in the region with evolving economic and military deals with highest bidders winning style. fanciest hotels in the world are now being built in that region. Meanwhile, the atrocities in these former tribes, now countries continue. There are documented reports of dissidents being cooked live in boiling water.  

OKtaby


Ari Siletz

Highly informative response

by Ari Siletz on

 Thank you JalilBahar. 

 

"None of these reasons however, apply to the pipelines heading eastward through Afghanistan. Which means, that the United States is in fact taking substantial environmental, political, economic and technical risks trying to 'go arround' Iran with the pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan."

Good point! Sheds light on some of the fundamentals of the Afghan war.


MRX1

Nothing you can do

by MRX1 on

If they tell you over night that your share of Caspian sea is reduced from 50% to 10% and you accept it with out any argument, war, protest, because after all it's more important to save the regime than saving any Iranian teritory, then there is no room to complain my friend!  This is like those so called palestenian bozo's who sold their land and/or just decided to leave and now they are putting a claim on that land, good luck............................

BP is extracting oil that was part of Iranian  territory (Alborz oil field) but since our beloved regime relinqguished that right over night, then you can't put a claim on it can you? what ever else the Brits do to others is irrelevant, unless of course you are under some dopey illusion that the so called Republic of Azarbijan is part of Iran......  


benross

Very interesting

by benross on

Thank you.


JalilBahar

Reasons

by JalilBahar on

I was advised by Turkish 'engineering insiders' several years ago of this 'conclusion'. On the one hand Iran was considered high risk politically. On the other hand, it was believed that it would be putting too many eggs in an Iranian basket. On the third hand it was thought that these pipelines might bring some cash to countries like Georgia (no resources) that have fallen under western influence, and need hard cash to survive independently. On the fourth hand shipping route to Western markets would be shorter through the mediteranean and avoid major hot spots like the Persian Gulf and Suez Canal. All of this makes sense, until, you factor in environmental risk. Also, if Iran does transform, and the conditions are established for the formation of a regional 'Central Asian' Union (like the European Union) many resources could be shared within regional grids (as in the US and Europe) and as a result many of these 'factors' would vanish and eliminate the need for pipelines (at least in the way they are being designed and built today). None of these reasons however, apply to the pipelines heading eastward through Afghanistan. Which means, that the United States is in fact taking substantial environmental, political, economic and technical risks trying to 'go arround' Iran with the pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan. There is a new 2.5 Billion dollar railroad being built by the IRGC (pasdaran) from Sarakhs to Chah Bahar that is supposed to be a joint Iranian/Indian financed counter option to the pipeline. Meanwhile, Pakistan is also expanding a competitor port to Chah Bahar (Gwadar) where the pipeline is supposed to terminate with financing from the Chinese. Its all a stupid game! Meanwhile BP seems to be pumping almost all of Iraq's Oil and Azerbaijan's Oil for now with no supervision or regulation!!!!


Ari Siletz

Important points, timely delivery

by Ari Siletz on

Thank you.

 

 "Interestingly, all southern land-based pipeline options to Iranian markets have been rejected, although it is by far the cheapest and most environmentally benign option…i.e. the shortest route! Iran could purchase oil and gas for its major cities in the North and in exchange ship out product from its southern ports."

Could you expand on the history and reasons as to why this option is rejected?


Midwesty

Thanks for your article

by Midwesty on

I think Iran should help BP to install safety relief rigs on Iran side in case the main pipeline ruptures. In an emergency, Iran can open the valves on her side and let the pressure out from oil bed, resulting in no or minimum oil leak to the sea.
At least this is what BP is doing now in the Gulf of Mexico situation but it'll take some time to drill, about 3 months!