What side to back in the war?

Fred
by Fred
08-Nov-2011
 

Over the upcoming IAEA report detailing some of its findings about the illegal weaponized nuke program of the Islamist Rapist Republic (IRR), the normally less than friendly back-and-forthts between the sane world and IRR have taken a turn for the worse.

In that light, the triumvirate of Islamists/rabid anti-Semites and their likeminded lap poodles of lefty allies who are now super-duper nationalists as well, have also ratchet up their venomous tripe.

Promising to side with IRR in a hot war, some of these Johnny- come-lately nationalists have taken off their anti-war mask. In other words, they’re acting as a fifth column would.

Questions:

1- Is this a calculated strategy to cast the shadow of suspicion on the multitude of law-abiding, sane world residing, vehemently anti-IRR Iranians?

2- If so, what is the optimum way to counter it?

3-What is the legitimate line between anti-war rhetoric and actively siding with IRR?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by FredCommentsDate
ادا اطوار اسلامی
5
Dec 05, 2012
مسجد همجنسگرایان
1
Dec 05, 2012
Iranians are legitimate target
10
Dec 04, 2012
more from Fred
 
G. Rahmanian

And I Tell You:

by G. Rahmanian on

Enjoy licking mullas' asses while the licking lasts! In the meantime, start looking around for a real job!


MeyBokhor_Manbarbesuzan

Facilitators

by MeyBokhor_Manbarbesuzan on

Earlier today, there was this gentleman who called your type "facilitators."

Since I am not as literary as he is, I'll suffice with the phrase KY jelly of diaspora.


G. Rahmanian

MeyBokhor:

by G. Rahmanian on

Are you the ignorant type or the agent? Are you drunk or afraid of losing your pachecks? What part of what I wrote bothered you most? The part I did not brag about progress under the rule of your Islamist masters? A piece of advice: Go get a real job since IR may not last much longer!!!


MeyBokhor_Manbarbesuzan

@ G. Rahmanian

by MeyBokhor_Manbarbesuzan on

All I can say to your foaming around the mouth comment is: "Berberis"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berberis

 

Khoda shafatun bede. 


AMIR1973

Re: some self-described pacifists/antiwar people

by AMIR1973 on

Christopher Hitchens once observed about a number of Stalinist and Trotskyist "antiwar" groups in the US: 

 It is really a disgrace that the liberal press refers to such enemies of liberalism as "antiwar" when in reality they are straight-out pro-war, but on the other side.


G. Rahmanian

Iran's Enemy Number One!

by G. Rahmanian on

Let's hope IR will fail in its bid to provoke yet another war. Anyone who defends IR criminals by refusing to squrely put all the blame on the regime in Tehran for trying to provoke a war is a traitor! Anyone who, under the pretext of defending Iran and its territorial integrity, advocates siding with the regime in case a war breaks out, is either an enemy of the people of Iran or is simply ignorant! Anyone who uses the pretext of an "imminent war" to mobilize support for the regime, but consciously ignores the sufferings of Iranians under the rule of IR, is committing a treasonable act! Only the ignorant, traitors or demagogues would champion defending Iran under the current circumstances where Iranians are ruled by their staunchest enemy since the takeover of their country by Arabs in the seventh century. It is incumbent on all patriotic Iranians and those who care about Iran and oppose IR's murderous rule to prioritize their fight against the regime regardless of how many "foreign enemies" are out there planning to unleash wars against Iran. It is also the duty of all freedom-loving Iranians to expose those hypocrites who regard Iraqis siding with IR against Saddam's forces during the 8-year war as heroes while calling patriotic Iranians who oppose the regime, "traitors." Two years ago, tens of millions of Iranians demonstrated to the whole world that the Islamist regime in Tehran is Iran's number one enemy. We must unite and take our country back from its enemy number one!