My secret sources

Fred
by Fred
15-Sep-2010
 

First read this verbatim passage:

“the information was actually provided by Israeli intelligence services and my sources at that time when I was writing about it told me that the Israelis actually offered these to Iranian monarchists who also oppose the Islamic regime in Tehran.  But Iranian monarchists out of their nationalism refused to go with the information and publicize it and then they offered it to Mujahidin, and Mujahedin made public the information about the Natanz facility.”

Needless to say it is all about the Islamist Rapist Republic’s nuke program. Above passage deals with how after nearly two decades of operating clandestinely it was revealed to the sane and civilized world.

According to this narrative, the nuke information was first offered to the Iranian monarchists who out of “nationalism” refused it and then Mujahedin were chosen by default to break the news.

My questions are:

1-What would the Israelis get from having a terrorist organization revealing IRR’s nuke secrets?

2-What would the western intelligence agencies get from the giant egg on their face by admitting they had no clue about the vast nuke program and it took a terrorist organization to enlightened them?

3- At what point the entire narrative which is based on uncorroborated anonymous “sources” start to resemble Bush’s anonymous sources on Iraq?

4- Is it nationalistic to want IRR nuke capable?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by FredCommentsDate
ادا اطوار اسلامی
5
Dec 05, 2012
مسجد همجنسگرایان
1
Dec 05, 2012
Iranians are legitimate target
10
Dec 04, 2012
more from Fred
 
Q

FredCo: answers to all 5 questions

by Q on

1-What would the Israelis get from having a terrorist organization revealing IRR’s nuke secrets?

It's a valient affort to save your boss' reputation, but the reality of the world is that even a despicable terrorist organization is actually more credible than Israel. That was the calculation.

2-What would the western intelligence agencies get from the giant egg on their face by admitting they had no clue about the vast nuke program and it took a terrorist organization to enlightened them?

American Intelligence agencies have lost any reliable sources in Iran years ago. They really have no clue.

3- At what point the entire narrative which is based on uncorroborated anonymous “sources” start to resemble Bush’s anonymous sources on Iraq?

You're right the entire nuke case against Iran is uncorroborated and unsubstantiated BS, promoted by traitors and pro-War neocons. That's why FredCo's services are needed.

4- Is it nationalistic to want IRR nuke capable?

It's nationalistic to defend any national rights, especially those being unfairly taken away by global bullies and local hypocrites like the Israeli government.

Does FredCo think Iranians are stupid? Yes. That's why it asks questions that have long been settled and answered in the hopes of making gullible Tehrangelesi's think it has a real case.


mahmoudg

Good job Fred

by mahmoudg on

We already Knew that the Israeli's are on top of the Iranian Nuke program and know precisely where every piece of equipment is.  Which is why they are the best people to go in and destroy these sites, and that they will do, rest assured my friend. 


Sargord Pirouz

Well, we're no longer going

by Sargord Pirouz on

Well, we're no longer going to identify writing types for this effort, beyond those already identified.

And, I don't know what "sources" this Fred effort is relying upon, but people in the US intelligence and wonk community know that the Natanz facility was known to such well before the NEK/NCRI "announcement."

Since then, it's even been reported by a journalist working for Newsweek Magazine. 

http://guests.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/517/exil...

This isn't new. I suppose disseminating false or distorted news and perspectives is par for the course, for a propaganda effort, but this one conducted here on IC by "Fred" really takes the cake. Doesn't the "Fred" effort give the audience of Iranian.com the slightest credit for being informed? Or do the folks at "Fred" think we're of the same low intellect as themselves? These are the questions this post should be asking.