Who Is Occupying Whose Land?

Share/Save/Bookmark

DW Duke
by DW Duke
05-Jan-2009
 

I posted this brief history in response to a question about Israel, "Who is Occupying Whose Land?"  I was then asked to post it as a blog because it might be helpful to others discussing this issue.  In my opinion, that answer is a little more complicated than one might first believe.  This article, which brings us through the last major exodus of Palestinians, is part of a series on the Palestinian/Israeli conflict.  I will start by saying that we do not really need to determine who is occupying whose land.  There is enough room for everyone if people can overcome fears and prejudices.  Therein lies to secret to peace in the Holy Land. 

The region of the world we now call Israel has been the subject of a disputed claim of entitlement for thousands of years. For the Jewish people, the land of Israel is the promise land given to Moses and the Israelites by G-d around 1250 BCE.  Israel did not always remain under the control of the Jewish people though there has never been a time when Jews were not in Israel since the recorded first arrival.  Proof of the Jews in Israel has been found in archealogical digs dating back to 900 BCE.  

In 578 BCE Israel was invaded by the Babylonians and came under the control of the Persians. The Jews were taken into captivity and removed to Babylon where there remained until the reign of Cyrus the Great, who returned Israel to Jews and gave them passage from Babylon to Israel. Alexander the Great conquered this Israel in 333 BCE which brought it under the government of the Greeks.  In the year 165 BCE the Jews reclaimed Judea though within one hundred years the land had been conquered by the Romans. During this period the second temple was built in Jerusalem. In 70 CE the Jews revolted but were subdued and during this revolt the second temple was destroyed. In 133 CE during another revolt the Jews were banished from the land and taken into slavery. This was the beginning of the modern Jewish diaspora.

In the year 638 CE the Muslims conquered Jerusalem. Approximately 20 years later Omar, the second caliph of Islam, built the al-Aqsa mosque which is considered the third holiest place in all Islamdom. Other than in the years 1099-1187, the brief period when Jerusalem came under control of the Crusaders, the area we today call Israel remained under Muslim control until the 20th Century when it was reclaimed by the Jews.  However, even during the period it was under Muslim control there were always Jews in Israel.   

In the late 1800's European anti-semitism was on the increase. Jews were subject to various forms of persecution and were often deprived of basic opportunities of life. As persecution became increasingly intense a decision was made that the time had come to reclaim the land originally given to the Jews at the time of Moses. Impetus for this migration was largely a response to a book by Jewish journalist Theodor Herzl, written in 1896, called Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State). In light of this desire to secure a Jewish state, Jews began migrating from Europe to Palestine (today known as Israel) and by the beginning of the 20th century there was an estimated 25,000 Jews living in Palestine. As 1915 approached, that number had increased to over 70,000. These early immigrants became known as the Zionists. In 1917 British Foreign Minister Arthur Balfour sent a letter to Zionist leader Lord Rothschild which became known as the Balfour Declaration. In this letter, Balfour assured the Zionists that Britain would support the establishment of Palestine as the national home of the Jewish people.

By 1935 the number of Jews in Palestine had reached 300,000 which was nearly half the number of the native Palestinians living in the region. Some Palestinians welcomed the Jews and saw this as an opportunity to enrich their culture and commerce and to benefit from the Jewish connections to Europe. Others however, who did not wish to see the Jews moving into their homeland, sought to prevent them from immigrating to Palestine. Some believed for religious and others for ethnic reasons that the Jews were not entitled to live in the land that had been the home of Islam for over a thousand years.  It is here that the seed of disharmony was planted hand in hand with ethnic discrimination in both the Arabs and the Jews.

On the side of the Jews at this time there were the secular Zionists and the religious Zionists. Many of the secular Zionists felt that the land had to be cleansed of all non-Jews in order to avoid the threat of persecution that was experienced in Europe. And many religious Zionists were of the belief that the Oral Torah precluded the possibility that non-Jews should be permitted to live in the reformed land of Israel.From 1920 until 1947 Britain had governed Palestine. In an effort to remove itself from the enigma of governing such a tumultuous region, Britain surrendered its control to the United Nations in 1947. In an effort to address the conflict, the United Nations proposed two separate nations, Palestine and Israel. Under this plan 56.47% of Palestine was to be given to the Jews and 43.53% was to be given to the Arabs. Jerusalem was to be treated as international territory. Meanwhile hundreds of thousands of Jews were fleeing Europe to immigrate to Israel.

Over time Arab resistance to the immigration of Jews began to increase. Much of the Arab resistance to Jewish immigration was the result of the actions of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Muhammed Amin al-Huseini.  Al-Huseini who was born in the 1890's. He was the son of the Mufti of Jerusalem who was a member of one of the most powerful families of Palestine. Muhammed Amin al-Huseini studied at al-Azhar University in Cairo and the Istanbul School of Administration. He quickly became known as an extremist whose instructions were to slaughter all Jews. The Palestinian High Commissioner from Britain was heavily influenced by anti-Zionists in Britain and he appointed Muhammed Amin al-Huseini to serve as the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in 1922, despite his known hatred and violence toward Jews. As time passed the Grand Mufti became extremely powerful. He issued an edict called "Izbah Al-Yahud" which means "slaughter the Jews." But it was even worse for Arabs who would not support his plan. They were tortured and killed by the thousands until there was almost no one left who opposed the Mufti except those who remained silent for their own safety. With the support of Britain, Muhammed Amin al-Huseini was simply too powerful for anyone to oppose and his murdering of the Jews grew increasingly difficult to prevent.

In April of 1936 six very powerful Arab men formed an organization called the "Arab Higher Committee." This organization was created to oppose the immigration of Jews into Palestine and to oppose those in Britain who had begun to turn their support toward the Zionists. In that year Arab revolts broke out all over Palestine and many Jews were killed along with Arabs who had befriended the Jews. The Grand Mufti joined forces with Adolph Hitler in 1937 appealing to Hitler's own hatred of Jews.  Although the record is unclear it has been alleged that the Grand Mufti was an influential figure in persuading Hitler to begin the concentration and extermination of the Jews in Europe in what we today call the "holocaust." The plan was that if Hitler succeeded in Europe he would take his armies to Palestine to kill all the Jews there.  Eventually, the "Arab Higher Committee" was declared a terrorist organization by Britain after assassinating the British Inspector General of Palestine and killing scores of both Arabs and Jews.

The Grand Mufti Muhammed Amin al-Huseini was forced into exile in Syria then in 1941 he moved to Berlin where he worked closely with Adolph Hitler in the concentration and extermination the Jews. Muhammed Amin al-Huseini never returned to Palestine after his 1937 departure and he died in 1974 in exile from Palestine which by then had become known as Israel. During his life he was in strong opposition to the Hashemite family of Jordan and in 1951, he arranged the assassination of King Abdullah of Jordan because he had given the title of Grand Mufti of Jerusalem to another person. In 1969 the organization of Muhammed Amin al-Huseini, which became known in 1964 as the Palestine Liberation Organization, was taken over by his nephew Mohammed Abdel-Raouf Arafat As Qudwa al-Hussaeini, better known as Yasser Arafat. Until his death Yasser Arafat still referred to his uncle as "our hero al-Huseini."

Jewish forces and Arab forces were in constant clash with the Israeli forces showing the greatest success. On April 9, 1948 the Irgun and Lehi malitia groups massacred hundreds of Arabs at the village of Deir Yassin near Jerusalem. On May 14, 1948 Israel officially declared itself to be a nation and the Declaration became effective on May 15, 1948. On that same day, armies from five Arab nations, Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq attacked Israel but were defeated. Subsequent to this confrontation, Egypt retained control of the Gaza Strip and Jordan retained control of the area today called the West Bank. Tension between Israel and the Arab nations continued to grow until June 5, 1967 at which time a major military conflict ensued which became known as the Six Day War because it only lasted six days. The attack was intended to be a secret attack by the Arab forces against Israel but Israel learned of the plan and issued a preemptive strike against Egypt disabling the Egyptian Air Force. By the end of the conflict Israel had seized control of Gaza and Sinai from Egypt and Golan Heights from Syria in the north. Jordanian forces had also been forced out of East Jerusalem and the West Bank. As a result of the Six Day War, Israel's territory of control nearly doubled and the United Nations estimated that over 500,000 Arabs had been displaced from their homes.

Copyright 2008 DW Duke 

I have interviewed Palestinians and Jews who lived in Israel at the time of first exodus of Arabs.  There is dispute as to what actually took place.  Some say that the Palestinians left voluntarily out of fear and others say they were forced out at gun point.  We will probably never know.  But in my view they should not have been forced to leave regardless of the motivation.  The fact remains that they have left and whatever is done to resolve this situation must look forward and not backward.

The United Nations has proposed a two nation state which has been the theme of all peace efforts between the Palestinians and the Jews.  Indeed, Oslo was designed to implement the two nation plan.  Oslo and the two nation plan is doomed from the start because it is based on religious and ethnic discrimination.  In the next segment of this series, we will see how Oslo violates numerous provisions of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 

The secret to peace in the Holy Land lies a deep change in attitudes of the people.  It is only by overcoming religious and ethnic prejudices that the crisis in Palestine and Israel will be permanently resolved.  It ironic that the fight over who is entitled to the Holy Land, the land of the three major religons who share the same G-d, is based upon religious and ethnic discrimination and prejudice.  What do you suppose G-d, whose primary message in all three religions is love and forgiveness, would say about the hatred and prejudice that spills so much human blood on this Holy Land?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by DW DukeCommentsDate
Touching Thoughts
4
Aug 07, 2011
If I were a Palestinian Leader. . .
31
Jan 02, 2010
Can Anyone Tell Me Who Said This?
3
Mar 21, 2009
more from DW Duke
 
Artificial Intelligence

Good Balanced Article

by Artificial Intelligence on

Did not know Mufti was that involved with the Germans. Interesting.


Zion

DW

by Zion on

It's a good thing you donated that money. There is no debate. What is there to say to someone with such level of historical "literacy" who says things like: 'Babylonians were Assyrian too'(!) Someone who evidently has no clue that the Assyrian empire was defeated and superseded by the Neo-Babylonian (Chaldean ) and Median Empires, and who is not even willing to learn something so elementary when it is pointed out. Give me a break. :-)


Arash Monzavi-Kia

Excellent, thanks DW

by Arash Monzavi-Kia on

So beautiful to help children. Thanks for your generous act, which is an encouragement for us all.

In light of the significant uncertainty about that Palestinian Imam's active guidance to Hitler; you may want to tone down the corresponding passages.

Cheers, Arash


DW Duke

Reply to Arash

by DW Duke on

Thanks Arash,

You wrote:  "The Jews were taken into captivity and removed to Babylon where there remained until the reign of Cyrus the Great", which implies that Persians occupied Israel and took Jews captive."

Yes, I need to clarify that.  The handwriting is on the wall so to speak.  :)

I will donate $100. to Stop Child Executions and say it is a donation from our friends at Iranian.com.  :)


Arash Monzavi-Kia

Zion is not worth a debate, even at $100

by Arash Monzavi-Kia on

Babylonians were Assyrian too, and Babylon was a major city-state of the Assyrian civilization, with the same overall culture and ethnicity.     Just as the Greek civilization encompassed Athens, Sparta, etc; the Assyrian civilization encompassed both the Babylon and Ashur. One sister-state was more militaristic, the other one more religious, etc; similar to the differences between Sparta and Athens.     Now, Zion (this site's master hate-monger) is not worth debating, even at $100.     If you have some extra cash, consider donating it to a charity of your choosing.       A good reference for the history of ancient Iraq is: http://www.amazon.com/Ancient-Iraq-Third-Penguin-History/dp/014012523X

Again my main objection is the usage of Persian in your note: "In 578 BCE Israel was invaded by the Babylonians and came under the control of the Persians. The Jews were taken into captivity and removed to Babylon where there remained until the reign of Cyrus the Great", which implies that Persians occupied Israel and took Jews captive.


Mehdi Mazloom

DW Duke

by Mehdi Mazloom on

you asked:

Mehdi,
What do you think of Ma'at's comment?  I thought it was an interesting idea

It will never work.

1. As we see, unfortunately the Arab & Muslims don't even get along among themselves. Nor the ability to settle any political, or religious disagreement w/o resorting to violence. (How do respect another human being, whom your holly book instruct you to view him / her as Ape and pigs. Or rocks and trees tell you here is a Jews hiding behind me (the rest you probably know....).

On the other hand, Israelis have become accustomed to seeing Arabs as intellectually lazy, with little incentive to work hard to advance himself.  

2. Once Muslims will become the majority in the population and government, kiss democracy and freedom of expression goodbye. Sharia law will supersede the laws of the infidels. Polygamy will be allowed to increase the Muslim population, at the expense of the Jews. No Israeli will accept the new paradigm.

3. Israelis will never give up their hard earned freedom of expression, and free press. They will never allow an semi-illiterate imam to tell them what they can say or do, or not do. The same situation could exist for Muslims refusing to accept diktats from the Jews.

4. Yes, from there respective principal of religion, Jews and Muslims have lot in common. However, the cultural, mind set and over all philosophy of life, they are different. Not better, or superior to the other, but just different.

Too many variables in the equation to overcome.


DW Duke

Reply to Arash

by DW Duke on

You wrote: "3. The Grand Mufti Muhammed Amin al-Huseini was forced into exile in Syria then in 1941 he moved to Berlin where he worked closely with Adolph Hitler in the concentration and extermination the Jews. [incredible claim, any references]"

I have actually read about his association with Hitler in a number of accounts.  As, I mentioned though the the record is unclear.  I read in one source that there was testimony by Wilensky in the Nuremburg trials to that effect, but having reviewed the entire transcript of those trials I could not any reference to the Mufti at all.  I discovered that there was an out of court comment by Wilensky that was overheard wherein he said that it was the MUfti who persuaded Hitler to begin the concentration and extermination of the Jews.  Again it was an out of court statement that was overheard by a third party so it is not completely reliable.      

Here is a comment by Lenni Brenner in "Zionism in the Age of Dictators." 

"Once the looming reality of the State of Israel was before him, the Mufti spared no effort at influencing Hitler to murder as many Jews as possible in the shortest amount of time. This shameful episode, where the founders and early leaders of the State were clearly a factor in the destruction of many Jews, has been completely suppressed and expunged from the record."

There are numerous other authors that make such claims but I do not believe that it came out in the Nuremburg Trials, at least not that I could find.  I have not reviewed the transcript of the Eichmann trials.   I have seen a number of photos showing the Mufti with Hitler on several different occasions.  In fact, I think you can find them on the internet.  No doubt the two men shared a common goal of exterminating the Jews. It only makes sense that they would have encouraged each other.  However, I do not know the extent to which the Mufti actually persuaded Hitler to do this or whether he simply shared a common belief that it was a great idea.  WHo would have suppressed it from the record and for what reason I do not know. 


DW Duke

To Zion

by DW Duke on

You wrote:

"You are disputing what I said about Babylonians, Medes and Assyrians or what?"

No, I was noticing that you and Arash appear to differ on this point if I understand both of you.   I was interested in hearing a dialogue on this issue with a $100. prize to the best supported (documented)conclusion.  :) 


David ET

you r welcome DW

by David ET on

Also you need to fix this:

In 578 BCE Israel was invaded by the Babylonians and came under the control of the Persians. The ...

well your article may have been qualified for Newsweek but for iranian.com remember to say juicy things, attack somebody, be ridiculous or at least entertaining and regardless of quality you will be published on front page too

anyway, it is interesting that the same people who question UK involvement in formation of Israel have no issue with British forming many other countries in Middle East that did not exist before such as Iraq, Kuwait, etc etc

 


Zion

DW

by Zion on

No worries man. I don't necessarily agree with all of your essay, but it is good summary.
---
You are disputing what I said about Babylonians, Medes and Assyrians or what?


DW Duke

Thanks for Input

by DW Duke on

Thanks Arash and Zion for your input.  Yes, the 200 years is a typo, should be 20.  I will correct it.  On another issue, if the two of you would pound out the following I will pay $100. to the best answer. Seriously. :) 

By Zion:
"The Assyrians were already been defeated by the alliance of Babylonians and the Medes, The Assyrians defeated the kingdom of Israel years before this and took its elite to exile never to return."

Mehdi,
What do you think of Ma'at's comment?  I thought it was an interesting idea. 

Zion, you are correct the al-Aqsa mosque is considered the third holiest place in all of Islamdom. 

David:
Thanks for your comments. Not to worry though, Newsweek has already picked it up.  :)


David ET

Very informative article..

by David ET on

Thank you

Sorry it was not published as an article or featured blog, the way things are decided in iranian.com has nothing to do with the quality and has to do with favoritism among many other things

Very informative , unbiased and well written (yes there are couple of typos and errors which I do all the time too, unintentional I am sure)

I wrote more but when I pressed preview all disappeared ...., so I will leave more comments to the follow up article that I am looking forward to


Zion

Facts

by Zion on

[I hope you forgive me this time DW. :-)]

'In the year 638 CE the Muslims conquered Jerusalem. Approximately 200 years later Omar, the second caliph of Islam, built the al-Aqsa mosque which is considered the holiest place in all Islamdom.'

200 years later? Jerusalem was conquered in Omar's life time.
And the al-Aqsa mosque is not considered the holiest place in all Islamdom. The holiest place is Kaaba and the second holiest is the mosque in Medina. So at best, the al-Aqsa mosque would be the third.
Oh, and it was not "Israel", but the kingdom of Judah that was conquered by Babylonians and under the Persians was rebuilt as the Satrapy of Judah. Judah later became under the dominion of the Ptolemies and then the Seleucids in the Hellenistic period, and the Romans (where it was known as Judea.)
... and I don't have time to read the rest of the article now.

[You might also want to use your knowledge in Jewish genealogy and J2 haplogroups and the Kohen lines etc. in the discussion going on in the comment section here, btw:]
http://iranian.com/main/node/52255
----
To Arash, the resident "historian" on this site:

The Assyrians were already been defeated by the alliance of Babylonians and the Medes, The Assyrians defeated the kingdom of Israel years before this and took its elite to exile never to return.
[sigh]

Also see here on the Mufti of Jerusalem:
http://iranian.com/main/blog/zion/today-s-simi...


Arash Monzavi-Kia

couple of mistakes / doubts

by Arash Monzavi-Kia on

1. In 578 BCE Israel was invaded by the Babylonians and came under the control of the Assurians.

2. In the year 638 CE the Muslims conquered Jerusalem. Approximately 20 years later Omar, the second caliph of Islam, built the al-Aqsa mosque.

3. The Grand Mufti Muhammed Amin al-Huseini was forced into exile in Syria then in 1941 he moved to Berlin where he worked closely with Adolph Hitler in the concentration and extermination the Jews. [incredible claim; any references?]

Arash M-K


default

Reply to Mehdi, Re: Three Nation State

by Ma'at (not verified) on

Perhaps the answer is not in a three nation state, but rather a three state nation. How else will we ever see the full Eretz Yisrael? :)


Mehdi Mazloom

A bit too late

by Mehdi Mazloom on

By advocating a one state solution, you are trying to overcome 1350 years of Arab hatred of Jews, where (in Muslims conviction), Jews will be better off living under Islamic rule.

That is not going to happen anytime soon my good man. Most Israelis living in Israel today, either themselves, or their parents are holocaust survivors. The other large population who came from the Arab countries, they also have the memories of their horrible persecution which you were talking about, etched into their collective memories. Jews in Israel will never ever relinquish their religious, and cultural heritage to nether Muslims nor Christians.

Besides, Israel is a democratic state, where freedom of expression rain supreme. All matter of public interest - including religion and politics are open for discussion. Once Jews become minorities, they will not sit around to be told, what to read, or what to say in public (little thing like that blaring Allah-u-akhbar from the nearby Mosque in 5:00 AM in their respective cities and towns. Or Taboo any discussion about Muhammad, Islam, Judaism, etc., Worse yet, having to endure backward tenants of Sharia Law.

The very reason they established Israel as homeland for Jews (as you had articulated above) it was because of their continued rejection by Muslims and Christians during which they had to endure for over 1350 year under Islam and 1900 under Christianity.

The best solution is two (or even 3) state for two nations. living side by side with mutual respect and tolerance ot the other. 

1) Israel proper (with minor border adjustment along the WB)

2) West bank for Moderate Pals (Patahland)

3. Hamastan for the Arabs in Gaza.

There is a very little chance Pals in gaza & WB will see things eye to eye anytime soon. Each has already developed its own distinct cultural and political agenda which fits its time. Such that, they are called "Palestinians" only by name. and little else.