Capt Ayhab

Q

It is OK to be rude and offensive, as long as it is against regime supporters. Why do I say this? Because of the despicable acts the IRI commit against the people of Iran, such as "taking the liberty to go after oppostion's family members". Support the regime and you have earned for others the right to call you anything they wish.

If you don't like this argument, don't write back to me in here. Instead write back to your folks in charge in Iran to change their behavior. After all, in your own words, the IRI is even a bigger democarcy than the USA is.

IC = Fox News of Blogsphere

nuf said  Q . .. ;-)

-YT 

Ayhab, my own "case study" in slander and defamation

which involves our mutual "friend" is here, if you want to review it.
//iranian.com/main/blog/q/case-study-defa...

I did read a previous thread where you were attacked. It was laughably unfair and biased. An echo chamber of congratulatory hate-filled BS combined with fake "outrage". These people have no concept of objectivity, but then, what else is new?

People like DK, Vildemose, Jamshid and countless others who pretend they care about insults and personal attacks are utterly and profusely hypocritical on this issue, especially when they ganged up on you. It's clear to anyone who reads that thread that the "logic" (if I may be generous for a moment) goes like this when considering things like slander, allegations, personal attacks, and profanity:

* If the speaker is someone who mirrors my political beliefs: the subject of the speech is childish, immature, unfair and sinister. He should "grow up" and "take it like a man", and I will lecture him on "freedom of speech" and he should quit wasting our time. JJ are you reading?

* If the speaker is someone who I disagree with politically, then the subject of his speech is "being attacked" in an "unfair way", and is surely a "valuable memeber of this community". We must not let the speaker "abuse freedom of speech" and engage in "personal attacks". The speaker should stop polluting the site with nonsense and wasting our time. JJ are you reading?

The funniest part (Besides people defending DK calling anyone else a "clown", is their appeals to Javid, whom they constantly attack and slander and accuse him of crazy conspiracies! They rarely respect his decisions and rules, yet at the end of the day, still spend hours on his site.

I gave up on spending time directly confronting the ususal mob of digital "chomaghdars" on their vicious treatment of myself. I still point it out but get involved in a serious way only when I see them do this to other people with a straight face. That's why I exposed DK and Fred on their NIAC double standards. But it happens with just about anyone they perceive as being "different".

Ahyab

"remember, my pen is mightier than your hate."

No, it's the other way around. Your hate is mightier than your pen. 

Grow up kid. And for once, for god sake, for once, instead of polluting this site with your childish jiberish, write something with substance that could be thought provoking.

People are really getting tired of you using this site as your personal school backyard to settle your personal scores.

JJ, are you reading this? For your own site's sake, please set new blogging rules that would stop folks like this Ahyab fellow to pollute and degrade the site and therefore indirectly degrade the work of other valuable contributors.

Rats @ss pretty much sums it up

;-)

-YT 

Capt:

I did not follow your previous thread mainly because it had become a cat fight with no valuable exchanges that I found beneficial.

However regarding your current subject, I think part of your problem is that you give rats a$$ as what DK says. He is a man of soooooooo many words with sooooooooo little substance. Just watch he will be here in less then 2 seconds to give me his usual "bilakh" that he has learned recently. One needs to remind him, bache shahi ke az in harfaye bad bad nemeezane…

Just move on and don't let it bother you.

Mehrdad