Amir Parviz for secular monarchy

How does the Hot Today Link Work?

I posted this blog today "THE IMPORTANCE OF THE JUBILEE FOR IRANIANS," together we have like 15 comments yet we are not even listed on Hot Today.  Then I see An article, just 5 posts after this one on Mossadegh with only 10 posts and is #1,

Poor Mossadegh, he didn't even have good luck in his given name, MOSSAD egh, yet he has love from IC somehow.

SK so true

They love the US Govt too much to be communists.  My opposition to the USA Govt got me attacked a few months ago for being a communist which is a pity for people like me that have no issue with American People who are wonderful.  The thing is those who slander others have no idea that what they are trying to do is to shut them up instead of listen to their views and experience the richness that we all have to share with one another.

Soosan Khanoom,

Soosan Khanoom,

Have you read Fifty Shades of Gray?

Zia jan I disagree

You are saying that IC is full of Communists.  I think some here at one point in their lives when they were young and passionate; when both genders, the male and female comrades, could actually grow a mustache, some here indeed were communists.  But NOT NOW ... the magic is gone. I mean the mustache is gone. Now they love Uncle Sam. They no longer read Russian novels but fifty shades of gray !! 

LOL

mousa67 I am a regime supporter too

The Pahlavi's and the Monarchy , I would love to bring out my Iran/USA flag pin one day, however for the moment all I have seen in 33 years has been the USA & Allies Supporting these Terrorist groups like IRI & PMOI, while hypocritically openly condemning them and attacking them publiclly.  So I disagree with your view that the USA wishes to help secular democratic forces which are the majority of Iran to remove the IRI, what better alternative does the USA have to meet her real goals for Iran, which the USA keeps Secret and coveted, as discussed in Limit to Growth by the Club of Rome?

zia joon: nothing wrong with being called a "regime supporter"

i get called a "regime supporter" all the time. and i'm proud of it. you see, i support the great regimes of israel and the united states of america & theirleading roles & partnership in fighting islamist terrorism. in fact i wear a US/israeli flag pin

how about you "Z" joon. what flag pin do you wear?

LOL

Can you believe Vildemouse congratulated MK

And Labelled me, you or anglophile as pmoi/mek?

Look I don't agree with labelling people something opposite to what they say they are, its childish and uncivilized.  I can't believe so much labelling goes on here on IC with the aim of attacking a person.  Maintain higher standards it distinguishes you from others.

I enjoy both yours Zia111 and Anglophiles company online, as humans we continuously need to work on the rarest attribute being understanding towards one another, in place of having understanding, If you can appreciate the difference and the distinction, it will cause a positive change for you and far greater power & clarity zia.  Among each of these groups there are good and harmful for Iranians as a whole.  If our goal is to heal and transform Iranians of their treasonous character that harms iran worse than any foreign enemy then lets praise and celebrate those who do change themselves and are patriotic towards their neighbour in Iran.

Zia, lets face it, at this point in time we can only attack the character of the IRI and Mek as they are terrorists above all the other issues, they are actually far worse than all the others, and at no pont in time can we attack individual people for their views, though we can attack their views/beliefs themselves if we have good sound reason.

IC is full of Communists

The irreverent anti-Shah mentality here is the classic mentality of Communists. These same people destroyed Iran and handed it to the mollahs. Now they're here trying to sow dissension among people by labeling them as regime supporters when they have no answer to anything we say.

Blame versus actual facts: Shazde Asdola Mirza

Shazde Asdola Mirza  I disagree with your analysis, I will give you my reasons and you are free to attack my values/ beliefs and reasons all you like.  Please no personal attacks on the late shah, views/beliefs that allow one to do such things are trashy, undemocratic, as well as uncivilized.    

If I were to Blame the late Shah as you suggest, thats what it would be, just blame.  Blame makes no sense, now that 33 years after 1979 have passed.  We need to give reasons that academics can look at and debate and come to a more definitive answer.

You will notice today in the USA/UK etc many angles of this subject are debated and much evidence is submitted, but entire topics are excluded from debate, they are intentionally not covered as it would show that their analysis was misleading.  At this point, No One Should be discussing 1979 in any book intended to make academic conclusions while completely leaving out the subject of the identical deaths, by the same type of cancer, for the Shah, his prime minister and doctor.

A cancer that can be scientifically proven was not part of each individuals genetic hereditary make up from.  It is not honest to call a person, me, a blamer, when I am in the process of trying to open peoples minds out of the deceptions they are still victims of today.  Untrue Beliefs that they are willing to fight me and personally insult me, to keep a hold of.

Can you see how harmful it is for academia to be making conclusions on the past without this Important piece of information on how he died and by who's hand?

Would you like me to discuss my case further with you, beyond the murder, towards the highly coveted reason, the real justification, for why Iran was destroyed?

FYI-Also it is highly coveted, because the USA does not want Iranians to be able to read their hand and know their plans and intentions for Iran, so they can continue manipulating and deceiving first western intellectuals and then in turn Iranians, in order to achieve their aims.

Thanks Asdola but when it come to being comedic ...

you are peerless.

"Mosaddegh's only fault: He was blinded by hatred of British ..."

LOL 

He served them in Fars and they returned the favour generously by putting in a good word for their good servant. He duely respected his benefactors when he was asked to be the prime minister by saying: no one becomes a prime minister unless approved by the Brits!

Now you see what I mean Asdola! 

This book proves the Shah was set-up for a fall by the USA

//www.amazon.com/The-Oil-Kings-Changed-Balance/dp/1439155178

"Shah ... murdered ... at the hands of USA"

Thanks for this comic relief, Amir.

"Absolutely right dear Amir" - AngloPhile ... Thanks for your supporting role on this comedy!

Blame USA, blame everyone and anyone, but the stupid Shah himself ... LOL.

People are slowly expanding their wisdom within Iran, really

They know Iran was worse before the Pahlavi's came.

They know Iran is worse after they left.

They know Iran was good though not perfect and continuously getting better with the Pahlavi's.

They know the people were the same after they left in 79 and the only difference was their Leadership.  Those the Pahlavi's worked with and cultivated were good and far better than most of the others.

Iranians by nature like stability, continuity & progress and they realize the Pahlavi's gave these to the majority of the people.  

Their awakened wisdom 30 years on question leaders more and has made it obvious to them that the enemies the pahlavi's made, like the mullahs, were a direct result of the Pahlavi's Pursuing the democratic good of the majority of the people over the interests of a few mullahs. 

Absolutely right dear Amir

If only

That Air France had been shot down over the Alborz mountains and the military had shown more manhood.