Putting Green

alimostofi
by alimostofi
18-Oct-2007
 

Russia may not be with Iran, but it is not with America and Europe either.

More at:

http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displaystory...

So where is Russia? Is it everything to everyone, or nothing to no one. The funny part is that everyone thinks that the Russians are with them.

The Seyyeds will rejoice that the Russians have not disagreed about anything, and of course we all know that they have not agreed to anything either.

The US will also go on about how their relationship
is fine, and yet the Russians will cut them down. Finally look at the number of deals that the multinationals are doing in Iran, Russia and China.

So it has nothing to do with governments. It is all about the various companies. And the US has got it right by limiting the transaction with the Seyyeds.

It does not matter whether corporations or nations are dealing with the Seyyeds, they will get a warning and eventually forced to make a choice like the German banks had to a couple of months ago.

The Russians and Chinese, need to make a choice between the Seyyeds and the US. And that is the bottom line. It is strictly business, and the US Treasury is quite right to put the world corporations on the spot.

Mr Putin can come and go as much as he likes. But if the US Treasury does not allow some of those US corporation to trade with Russia, then who is Mr Putin going to go to?

Share/Save/Bookmark

more from alimostofi
 
alimostofi

Reply to: Anti-Rajavi, Anti-Pahlavi,

by alimostofi on

Anti-Rajavi, Anti-Pahlavi, Anti-neocon, some Monarchist do believe in fighting their way back, not me. I believe in non-violent resistance. Otherwise what would be the difference?

.

Time and time again, I have said, that General Strike is the only way. But it does not have to happen, to have regime change. If the media talked about it more, and the politicians brought the subject up, when they spoke to the Seyyeds, then the power of the silent majority would become apparent, and more importantly, would become public.

.

Once it is apparent and public, then the public would realise that the Seyyeds' bluff has been called, and they would be drawn into the discussions about General Strikes. Once more and more discussions take place, then they would be more and more dumb founded and weak. Quite simple really.

.

This recipe has worked in all human societies, and Iran is no exception.

.

Ali Mostofi

http://www.alimostofi.com


masoudA

Cyrus

by masoudA on

Info is one thing - knowing what to do with it is another.  

I was paying attention - but let's digest your perception of the events - maybe we can all learn from it.

You say CNN pushed America into helping Moslems in Bosnia !! Let's say you are right.  Would'nt that make America that much a better system ?  isn't it the idea ?  isn't this more of a reason why we must defferentiate America from the rest ? 

 

 


default

masoudA

by Cyrus- (not verified) on

masoudA;
you probably were not paying attention to the news back then , it was our own Christian Amanpour who bombarded Clinton in the news conference asking him how many Bosnian moslems ahve to be ethnically cleansed before US could get involved??
Read first and then put the pen on paper.


masoudA

Cyrus - Who forced America

by masoudA on

Cyrus - Who forced America into sending troops to Bosnia ?  How ? 

The web is not a place you can make dubious comments and get away with it - especialy when you start so streong as if you know something the rest of the world does not !!! you see my young friend - this is not a forum for jokers and fast talkers - here you need to have info and logic to form valid opinions.

 Mr. Anti everything -  You seem to be anti everything - except for anti theocracy !!!  How can one be Iranian and show no sensitivity towrds the geonicide taking place by the mullahs.   I have a feeling you have the Islamist "Firewall" installed and have a hard time deleting it.   You may require a system reformat, since you seem to carry so many bad sectors. 


default

Attacking Iran is the only hope for Pahlavists & Rajavists

by Anti-Rajavi, Anti-Pahlavi, Anti-neocon (not verified) on

The first step for Washington and Tel Aviv's Iranian puppets will be to advocate sanctions. They know that they can't openly support attacking Iran because the vast majority of Iranians will oppose these traitors, just like they opposed Rajavi's gang for fighting on Saddam's side during the American- and European-backed invasion of Iran in the 1980s. Instead, they will tell their owners in the U.S. and Israel that they secretly support an attack against Iran. They put out propaganda against the IRI "Seyyeds" and advocate "peaceful" solutions, such as sanctions (since economic strangulation of a country is "peaceful"). But most Iranians know that a U.S. and/or Israeli attack on Iran is the only desperate hope that the Pahlavists, Rajavists, and Iranicons have of coming to power after being on the outs since 1979. They want Evin Prison to be run by its former wardens from among the ranks of Ashraf Pahlavi's cronies. After 28 years of waiting for someone to overthrow the current regime (their hope that Uncle Saddam could do it was disappointed), they have become crazy with desperation. Don't worry folks, next year in Niavaran Palace! The Aryamehr will make his Second Coming.


default

masoudA

by Cyrus- (not verified) on

baba chert migi, amrica ro be zoor varede jange Bosnia kardan , ageh amrica rast mige khob bood as aval varede jang beshe , na bad as koshte shodane hezaran bi gonah


masoudA

Hi Mostofi

by masoudA on

Hi Mostofi -

I think you are somewhat unfair to America and Americans.   I think what is needed win the war against terror and in Iran is indeed the Cowboy Menatlity - just as it was needed in Bosnia.   If it was not for America, moslems would have been masacared to the point of distinction - right under the noses of liberalists and socialists in Europe.