Pretentious flexiblity

alimostofi
by alimostofi
03-Nov-2007
 

Russia and China did not comment, and the agreement seemed at odds with weeks of public opposition, primarily by the Kremlin, to new sanctions against Iran.

.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380...

.

Why have the Russians and Chinese suddenly complied? Or is it, that in two weeks time, Ayatollah ElBaradei will say that there has been some "flexibility", as was just expressed in the Chinese press below:
.
Wen said peaceful negotiation would be the best way to resolve the nuclear issue and he hoped that Iran could further demonstrate its flexibility according to a press release from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2007-11/03/cont...

.

And then the Seyyeds would just carry on as normal.

Share/Save/Bookmark

more from alimostofi
 
alimostofi

Q, the people of Iran, and

by alimostofi on

Q, the people of Iran, and I mean the real Iranians, have no qualms with the npt and openness, and would greet an offer from the west, to make a plant there for civil uses. And no one would care, if the Mahdi arrived, and asked why the enrichment came from the Saudis.

.

Somone needs to tell the Seyyeds, that they can do nothing, if the people of Iran went on General Strike, to topple them, and avert a war with the US.

.

Ali Mostofi

http://www.alimostofi.com


Q

Ali, you're right. Let's bomb now.

by Q on

Don't you let the "seyyeds" carry out as "normal".