US Election Winner May Face a Dangerous Iran

The current pattern exponentially heightens the potential for a military conflict

Share/Save/Bookmark

US Election Winner May Face a Dangerous Iran
by Shahir ShahidSaless
21-Oct-2012
 

Iran is likely to adopt a new and aggressive stance on the nuclear matter because Iranian leaders surmise that they can change the game. This position, however, may lead to an all-out war.

Following the European Union ministers meeting in Luxembourg on October 15, more sanctions were announced against Iran. According to the new set of sanctions all transactions between European and Iranian banks will be prohibited, except those with advance official permission or for humanitarian purposes, sources report. Analysts say that as a result of new sanctions Iran will lose the ability to clear its oil money in Euros. While Iran is already locked out of US transactions, these new EU sanctions can paralyze the country’s trade.

David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, in a speech to the United Jewish Israel Appeal in London, said: “I have said to Prime Minister Netanyahu that now is not the time for Israel to resort to military action.” He added, “The regime faces unprecedented pressure and the people are on the streets…We need the courage to give these sanctions time to work.”

Part of Mr. Cameron’s assertion is true. The economic situation in Iran is becoming perilous. As the national currency crisis unfolds, inflation is spiraling out of control. Sanctions have reduced Iran’s oil production to a 22-year low, while sanctions have also made it extremely difficult to access and transfer oil money. Mohsen Rezaii, Secretary of Iran’s Expediency Council, remarked, “They have made trade difficult for us. They don’t let us sell oil and when we sell oil, don’t let us get our money from the Chinese bank[s].” Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, who in the past dismissed the effects of sanctions, for the first time during an angry speech, said, “These sanctions are barbaric. This is a war against a nation.”

However, Mr. Cameron and policy-makers in the US completely ignore the fact that the status quo is precariously unstable. It would be a grave mistake to assume that the Iranian government will stand idly by while gripped by paralyzing sanctions, and with its very survival threatened.

The potential for retaliation by Iran against sanctions has been a concern for the West in recent years. Iran repeatedly states that it has the capability of closing the Strait of Hormuz. Last month’s massive minesweeping exercise in the Persian Gulf, led by the US, reflected this West’s concern.

Earlier this year, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates opened new pipelines that when they become fully operational will be able to bypass the strait and handle 6.5 million barrels of oil per day. The figure represents 40 percent of the oil exported from the region. However, still the majority of oil must be traded by using supertankers that should pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Besides Iran, Kuwait, Qatar, and Bahrain do not have any alternative route to ship their oil.

Until recently, observers reasoned that the likelihood of Iran closing the strait would be slim because Hormuz is the only route for Iran’s oil exports, and the main route for its food imports. This calculus, however, appears tottery and uncertain today, as Iran’s oil export plummets, clearing its oil money becomes extremely hard, and its economy steeply declines.

With sanctions tightening, dangerously reduced oil revenue may lead Iran’s leadership to the conclusion that a radical move in the Strait of Hormuz is a calculated risk that could ultimately change the game in favor of Iran.

Contrary to the US officials’ perception, keeping the Hormuz Strait open is not the issue. The crux of the strait issue resides in keeping it safe and secure, thus guaranteeing uninterrupted flow of oil. As Zbigniew Brzezinski, current international relations professor at John Hopkins University maintains, once the strait becomes a dangerous place the price of oil will skyrocket even it is not closed.

Iran can disrupt energy supplies – including oil and 20 percent of globally-traded liquefied natural gas - without closing the strait. In July 2012, Fars News, the news agency which reflects viewpoints of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), published a long, meticulously researched, and noteworthy paper titled, “A study about the role of the Strait of Hormuz in the balance of power between Iran and the West.” The paper read:

“…complete closing of the strait by the Islamic Republic of Iran for extended duration may lead to the formation of an international coalition against Iran…therefore it doesn’t seem a logical option. But another option for the Islamic Republic of Iran is to imperil those traveling through the Strait of Hormuz…The outcome of this action would be the formation of a crisis in the global economy and a divergence between oil consuming countries and America. Meanwhile, as the economies of Europe and America toil, any disruption in oil supply will intensify the crisis. In fact, closing the Strait of Hormuz would mean, ‘making naval transit unsafe and the region look like a war zone,’ so that no government feels immune to an attack by [our] conventional armed forces, unidentified boats, or naval mines.”

Iran may use proxies to carry out attacks without directly becoming involved or simply stop supertankers from passage through its territorial waters in the narrowest parts of Hormuz, under the pretext of inspection. As oil prices soar, the conflict between Iran and the US could spiral, and ultimately transform into a disastrous military conflict.

The root cause of the deadlock over Iran’s nuclear program is the demand by the US (and of course Israel) for “zero-enrichment.” This exaction will most likely meet with insouciance, regardless of how much pressure is imposed on Iran. Iran’s leadership, even if it wanted to, could not agree with any resolution resulting in the complete suspension of their uranium enrichment program, due to the reasons and perceived costs that this author have discussed before.

The current pattern exponentially heightens the potential for a military conflict, unless demands for the complete suspension of uranium enrichment are replaced by strict and intrusive monitoring by inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to limit Iran’s enrichment of uranium.

For the moment, US presidential elections have stifled new developments. Once the elections conclude, whether for the current US administration or a new president and his cabinet, Iran, most likely appearing dangerous, will take the center stage.

This article is part of Insider & Insight, a new AIC program aimed at providing different perspectives and analyses on key developments in US-Iran relations. The commentary and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not reflect the official position of American Iranian Council.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by Shahir ShahidSalessCommentsDate
Out of Control
1
Oct 08, 2012
Betting all-in
8
Sep 27, 2012
The Consequences
4
Sep 21, 2012
more from Shahir ShahidSaless
 
Darius Kadivar

To vote Obama is to Vote Trita Parsi ...PERIOD !

by Darius Kadivar on

Larijani: Iran prefers Obama 

 

My Final Answer to All You EYE RANIANS ! ... LOOK IN THE MIRROR !

 

TREACHEROUS ALLIANCE: Shapour Bakhtiar’s Post Mortem Message to NIAC’ers 


fullback

Time is now

by fullback on

It  is never too late to put more pressure on the Islamist Occupiers of Iran.  The Islamist Occpiers of Iran  , will  TRY  to engulf the region into a widespread war zone using their proxies in South Beirut to start another civil war in Lebonon  Last week Bombing in Beirut was direct orders from Khamanaie. However Bashar Assad will fall soon and Syria will turn its back to the Islamist Occupiers of Iran. Then it will be time for Iranians in Iran to bring these Thugs  down and take back Iran. The West must help, more sanctions and Surgicall military Strikes against the Islamist occupiers command and control and military sites of Sepah and Basij are needed to achieve this well worth objective. However between now and then is period of softening the Islamist Thugs.


vildemose

Transcript of the FP debate obama vs Romney

by vildemose on

 "

Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. And for them to be able to provide nuclear technology to non-state actors, that’s unacceptable. And they have said that they want to see Israel wiped off the map.

So the work that we’ve done with respect to sanctions now offers Iran a choice. They can take the diplomatic route and end their nuclear program or they will have to face a united world and a United States president, me, who said we’re not going to take any options off the table. ""

 http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/2012-presidential-debate-president-obama-and-mitt-romneys-remarks-at-lynn-university-on-oct-22-running-transcript/2012/10/22/be8899d6-1c7a-11e2-9cd5-b55c38388962_story_4.html

 

All Oppression Creates a State of War--Simone De Beauvoir


Kooshan

which group do you belong to:

by Kooshan on

1. The war advocate

2. The peace advocate

3. The victim of war

4. The benifactor of war

5. The benifactor of peace

 

You are one of these just because you are living the time!

 

I always wonder who's responsible for an innocent victim who happens to be put right in the middle of war.

 

Lets vote for peace whoever the president is. We are responsible to keep each other alive or cause death when the war happens.

 

 

 


Kooshan

Well, the key point is Sanctions Efficacy

by Kooshan on

If sanctions work, Iran will be another Cuba for next >50 years.

If sanctions fail, there will be no winner and we may go back the age of coal-mining and mad-max! 


vildemose

  بررسی نقش

vildemose


 

بررسی نقش تنگه هرمز در موازنه قدرت ایران و غرب - بخش چهارم وپایانی/ برآورد استراتژیک شاهراه نفت

خبرگزاری فارس: منظور از مسدود نمودن تنگةهرمز در حقیقت «ناامن کردن عبور و مرور دریایی و استقرار حالت جنگی در منطقه است»؛ به نحوی که هیچ دولتی اطمینان نداشته باشد که آیا مورد حمله قرار می‌گیرد یا نه.

  • امکان‌سنجی بستن تنگةهرمز

     

    All Oppression Creates a State of War--Simone De Beauvoir


    vildemose

     "Because maintaining the

    by vildemose on

     "Because maintaining the excellent foreign policy leadership of Obama and his team and avoiding a return of the worst foreign policy team in the history of the nation, the George W. Bush team, is so important, please sign up to help get Democratic voters to the polls in swing states with our partners at Workers’ Voice, the largest independent Democratic voter turnout operation in the country. You can participate no matter where you live."

     http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/22/1148269/-What-Romney-does-not-want-to-talk-about-Al-Qaida-war-on-terror-Osama-bin-Laden#comments

    All Oppression Creates a State of War--Simone De Beauvoir


    Cost-of-Progress

    When you think about this

    by Cost-of-Progress on

    it seems like the regime did not believe that acquiring nukes will be this troublesome. However, since getting their hands on nukes is seen by the "divine" as being central to the long-term existence of theocratic rule in Iran, the regime is likely to resort to any means to stay afloat. Add to this the fact that the mullahs and the bearded pukes have no regards for Iran and her people, the prospects in relation to these sanctions do not look very rosey.

    May nature have mercy on the Iranian people - being guilty of allowing yourself to be brain-washed by religion does not mean you deserve to suffer for a cause that you really do not agree with.


    vildemose

    wrong thread

    by vildemose on

     

     

    All Oppression Creates a State of War--Simone De Beauvoir


    vildemose

     Israeli Mossad "Romney

    by vildemose on

     Israeli Mossad "Romney is Mortally Destroying any chance of a resolution without war

     

    The Almonitor Middle East Newspaper interviewed Efraim Halevy who was chief of the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad.

    The paper reports that Halevy is very respected man who served under 3 Israeli Prime Ministers and led the secret negotiations with Jordan’s King Hussein that made way for Israel’s historic 1994 peace treaty with that country.

    In the interview, it becomes clear that Halvey thinks Romney is a liar who suffers from Romnesia:

    Al-Monitor: Many observers believe there is a nuclear deal to be had. But it's very hard to do, to even talk to them. Do you think it's possible to narrow the huge gulf between the two sides?

    Halvey: ... Negotiating with Iran is perceived as a sign of beginning to forsake Israel. That is where I think the basic difference is between Romney and Obama. What Romney is doing is mortally destroying any chance of a resolution without war. Therefore when [he recently] said, he doesn’t think there should be a war with Iran, this does not ring true. It is not consistent with other things he has said. […]

     http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/22/1148195/-Israeli-Mossad-Romney-is-Mortally-Destroying-any-chance-of-a-resolution-without-war

     

    All Oppression Creates a State of War--Simone De Beauvoir


    vildemose

    Well done. This is highly

    by vildemose on

    Well done. This is highly likely to occur since mullahs have ran out of options and they know neither Obama nor Romney are going to lift the sanctions anytime soon.

     

    All Oppression Creates a State of War--Simone De Beauvoir


    FACEBOOK