Breaking away

What is to be learnt from Kosovo's jubilation and Serbia's humiliation?


Breaking away
by Ben Madadi

Did anybody write on anything about Kosovo declaring its independence? It probably seemed of little significance. The country that will most probably be internationally accepted soon is indeed of very little relevance, with extremely little chances of appearing in the news any time soon, unless there would be some really serious humanitarian or catastrophic issues. And these things are quite rare for such small countries in Europe. However one thing that IS quite important is the fact that Kosovo created quite a unique precedence.

I don't remember the last time when some portion of a country (Serbia in this case) unilaterally declared independence and was taken seriously by the US, the UK, Germany, France, Turkey and some other countries, immediately. Many other countries followed a few days later. Serbs were expecting the move, but not knowing the exact date (which was quite intelligently orchestrated by Kosovo's leaders, and probably their foreign advisers), the declaration took them by surprise, which created a state of depression at first, but turned violent a few days later, so far having culminated in setting the US embassy on fire.

Neither Serbia, nor Kosovo, are important countries or regions but the question of regionalism, territorial integrity, ethnicity and nationalism and how to define them, and their relations with each other, has this time been raised on an International level, where countries have confronted the issue directly, being faced either to recognise a self-declared country or not! Some powerful countries openly criticised Kosovo's move and did not recognise the declaration of independence.

All the countries that did not recognise the independence have serious existent, or potential, secessionist movements of their own. Russia has real or potential problems with Chechnya, Daghestan and so on, China with Taiwan, Tibet and Turkestan, India with Kashmir, while Spain with the Basque region and Catalonia. These countries (and some others) did not recognise Kosovo's declaration for fearing it would set a dangerous precedence.

How did then Britain and France embrace Kosovo's declaration while they too have regions that may have serious secessionist aspirations? Scotland has for a very long time thought, and re-thought, separation from the rest of the United Kingdom, and let's be serious, Scotland is the second most important part of the kingdom! France has two hotspots, its own Basque region, and Corsica! The United States though is probably the only large (and extremely diverse) country in the world where there is no FEAR of secessionism. In fact in case the US would create a possibility for other countries to join the federation and set some standards for it to be met (as the EU has been doing) there would be plenty of candidates out there.

Going back to the event itself, it is important to analyse the issue and see who is right and who is not, though the exact truth must lie somewhere in between. Did Kosovo have the right to separate from Serbia? Well, in case we believe in democracy we must give the people what they really want, so if Kosovars wanted independence, then let it be so! Did the Serbs have the right to have Kosovo while Kosovars (Albanians who are 90% of the population) did not want to? Serbs can say that Kosovo belonged to them historically but that can only be a one-sided interpretation of history because Kosovo belonged to the Ottoman Empire far longer than it belonged to any Serb entity. Serbs felt humiliated because a part of their land was cut off and many countries immediately acknowledged it. They should have probably acted with more dignity and work with the Kosovars and PRETEND to agree with the unpredictable.

But then again, the last powerful leader Serbia had (Slobodan Milosevic) turned out to be a mass-murderer and Serbs had kind of lost appetite for strong leaders who would take bold decisions. And Serbia's current rulers saw it most politically comforting to go with the nationalistic public sentiment and deny the reality. Serbs should have avoided the whole national humiliation by giving the sense that they agree with the declaration of independence because afterall it was their historical mistake once with Tito's policies, and then with Milosevic's ethnic cleansing that created the REAL problem.

And looking at the international aspect of the event and the possible precedence that it might create it is important to note that most of the truly democratic countries, even with their own potential separatist movements, recognised Kosovo's declaration of independence and authoritarian countries with separatist movements of their own did not recognise the declaration. Therefore it is up to any person to judge who he or she sides with, democracy or autocracy. One serious exception (being different and less democratic than the rest of the other important countries recognising Kosov's independence) has been Turkey.

Turkey is supposed to be the land of the Turks though it is not the land of the Turks, and some probably 10-15 million Kurds, who are not Turks, live there. However Turkey was swift in recognising the independence of an Islamic region, ignoring the possible precedence it might have for Iraq's Kurdistan, hence for Turkey's Kurdistan later. This shows that Islam is nevertheless a more powerful factor for the Turkish public than nationalism and Turkish politicians could have probably found it difficult to explain any other decision to their unavoidable electorate.

But what is to be learnt from this, Serbia's humiliation, and the fact that large democratic countries fearing no real separatism of their own recognised the bold unilateral action taken by Kosovo? It is important to note that countries that have created effective decentralisation so that their regions, no matter how different in their aspirations or fundamental popular characteristics, can manage their own affairs, have no real fear of separatism because free people are more concerned about their daily lives rather than creating various small states of their own with potential economic and social problems and dysfunctionalities.

This is also the right path for other countries, to create decentralised governments giving as much power to regions as possible. Turkish leaders must also have the boldness to move toward this path, therefore creating the premise to avoid being caught off-guard when Iraq's Kurdistan may decide to declare its own independence! The same reality must apply to Iran, though Iran has the far worse situation of struggling with a regime that has little, if any, interest in what is best for Iranians.


Recently by Ben MadadiCommentsDate
Moving forward
Nov 06, 2008
Testing democracy
Nov 02, 2008
Playing dumb?
Sep 29, 2008
more from Ben Madadi

Stop Google’s Historical Revisionism simply by signing the onlin

by Anonymous on

Dear Dr Nourizdeh, Our Leader sincere Journalist,

As you might know, recently Google has submitted the fake Arabian Gulf name to the Google earth... here we have a petition objecting to this unauthorized fabrication of a name with the history of doc over 5000 years...

As you may know the fake Arabian Name was made in 60s by Jamal Abdolnase and has not historical or international factual base.
you can see about it at too: // as well as more on the Persian Gulf and the controversy... .

Recently a precious collection of historical documents been gathered in a book on Persian Gulf's historical back ground since 3000 BC... as you can see it used to be mentioned as SINUS PERSICUS in the historians jots by all valid resources... :

Here is the petition : //

The simplest thing we can do which costs nothing is to sign that and if possible populate in on ur webpage to invite other friends to do the same ASAP...

Thank you!


Ben M. Your fault is that you are so predictable

by Anonymous ... (not verified) on

Read this thread. It is up your alley


By the way, ZION the floating turd has been flushed !

Ben Madadi

Re: gol-dust

by Ben Madadi on

You and some others insist that I am working for the Zionists. But I am not workin for AIPAC, I am working for FPZTOW! Don't know what it means? Look here: //



by History Freak (not verified) on


It is so funny. These guys were terrorists until the Serbian nationalist, Milosevic, killed thousands of them including Bosnians and Croats and now, the Serbs are the West's number one enemy like IRAN and SYRIA. KOSOVO is the New Albania. What was the point of carving Marshall Tito's dream? The British should stay away from their affairs.



by gol-dust on

Ben, whatever your real damn name is, serve your masters and dream on you SOB! go back to tabriz so they would make you tommanriz! or better go to ghazvin or esfehan! 


very bad move

by MRX1 (not verified) on

by U.S, E.U and others. if every region, no matter how small can declare independence and get away with it simply because the inhabitants of that region are minority or what ever, this will set a bad precedence all over the planet. From almost 200 countries on the face of the earth now we may end up with 10000 countries! all poor, with no real power, hostile to others, open to ethnic cleansing and so on. One of the biggest achievements of man kind was to transform tribalism into nation state. It’s sad to see we are heading back to tribalism again!

Ben Madadi

Re: Iran / X = Several Estans

by Ben Madadi on

A country like Iran, or Turkey for that matter (however Turkey is far less diverse), does not necessarily need to be decentrialised in the sense of creating ethnic unions such as an ethnically-bound Azerbaijan, Kurdistan etc etc. It can be decentralised in as many aspects as possible, especially from a financial AND cultural point of view. The United States is a good example. Iranian ostans as they are today, and smaller, are okay. But the problem is CENTRALISATION that is unfair and disfunctional. Appointing governors, mayors and so on from the centre is not fair because that person may not understand and may not care about local problems, needs and aspirations.

However Iran is not a democracy, so we cannot take such suggestions seriously. Turkey can and it should, to be an example for others and to move much faster in its progress.


Good luck to Kosovos

by Kurdish warrior (not verified) on

As for Iran, being a Kurd myself I don't think that it will be partitioned, looking back at its history. We can't compare it with former Yugoslavia or Iraq which was put together via super powers. However a federal Iran where the regions governed by its own ethnicity is what most of Iranians wants (Specially Kurds, Balouch and khuzestani Arabs).


Pilger on Kosovo

by raha darband (not verified) on


As Iranians have demonstrated

by Iran / X = Several Estans (not verified) on

over the past 30 years that they are incapable of building a coalition and once and for all taking the control of their destiny, I predict that Iran will be portioned into multiple estans in the long run!

In the process, I hope that millions of mullahs, their family members, and supporters will be mass executed!

In the larger scheme of things, it is better to have a partitioned Iran with happy people than an Islamic Republic held together by force of mullahs where people are unhappy!

After all, sovereignty and territorial integrity of a country only makes sense and means something to the patriotic citizens of that country? What percentage of Iranians are true patriot? Less than 10%!?

Now the question is how many pieces do you think Iran would be partitioned into:

a) 2,
b) 3,
c) 4,
d) More than 4.

Then, Once Partitioned, what would they name these segments, Azabaijan,Kurdestan, Persianestan, Baloochestan, Khoozestan, Qomestan, etc.?

Finally, if you had a choice, which one of these estans would you settle in?


Around 200 Aryashahr

by Anonymousb (not verified) on

Around 200 Aryashahr residents in Tehran reacted angrily, after a girl who was stopped by the Islamic Guidance units for inappropriate Hejab, resisted arrest. The Guidance units started beating up the young girl when she started resisting arrest and their brutality stirred the crowds who came to the girl's rescue.

Islamic Guidance units, faced with angry protests, drove away from the scene in a hurry, forgetting to take one of their colleagues, who was duly set on by the angry protesters. As the crowds got bigger and bigger, they started shouting "Islamic Government, We don't want, we don't want" which can be clearly heard on the youtube clip.

Watch the people spontaneously shout "Islamic Government, We don't want, we don't want"


It took eight years for

by Balouchi (not verified) on

It took eight years for Kosovars to seperate themselves from Serbia witht he help or manipulation of USA and the same can be surmised in regards to Iraq which will soon be splintered into three seperate regions, God only know what would happen to Iran once the seperatist movement reaches them, after all it is divide and conquer.