Good question

When is the next war with Iran?


Share/Save/Bookmark

Good question
by Behrad Savafi
09-Nov-2007
 


The first week of the war is very crucial and as I see it the loss of life on the both side will be great. Causalities of the US force would be equal to all their causalities since they have been in Iraq, if not more

Recently, I visited one of my relatives who had returned from Iraq to Iran for good. They had been living in Iraq for generations and even during Saddam’s rule when many Iranians were expelled from Iraq, they stayed in there. I had seen him at least in two instances in Maleki’s entourage on television. It seemed to me that he might have had a high position in the Iraqi government. I had a long talk with him. We talked about everything: daily life in Iraq, “fat ladies” (referring to the American soldiers under heavy military gears and the way they walk), Black Water mercenaries, the future war with Iran, Kurds, Shiites, Sunnis, etc. It seemed to me that he was totally disillusioned with the future of Iraq and decided to return to Iran. I can not reveal his position, his name or where he worked in Iraq, but I can call him Abdullah.

I asked Abdullah about himself and life in Iraq. He depicted a very grim picture of the daily life in Iraq. He said, “What you see in the American media like CNN or read in major US publication is not the whole picture of what is going on in Iraq, but part of it and even that is a bit sanitized”. He talked about rapes and annihilation of Sunni villages by US troops and mercenaries and how they are not reflected much in US media.

When I asked him to explain more, he said, “What you see or read is only reports from “embedded journalist” paid by American news corporations who serve their corporations and their country in the time of war. Rarely the news comes from Iraqi sources or independent news media. The Anglo-American troops went to Iraq to tier it apart in to three small countries. In that way they can cause a lot of problems for Iran in decades to come. That would also take the world attention from Palestinian problem away and let Israel continue the slow motion holocaust of Palestinians. It is now a fact that the first explosion of shrine of Imam Musa kazem was not carried out by Iraqis or any Arab or Moslem individual, but either by Black Water mercenaries, MOSAD, or CIA. That was the first step toward start of Shiite and Sunnis division in Iraq.”

I asked him how true is the Iranian help to insurgence and killing of US troops? He said, “This is nonsense. If Iran was seriously involved, hundreds of Americans were killed each month not few dozens. This is an unpopular war and has lost American public support. The Bush administration wants to get public support. Many US soldiers are demoralized and do not want another war. The Shiites and Kurds are benefited from overthrow of Saddam, why should they kill American soldiers. This is propaganda to obtain American public opinion against Iran for further actions. The American public is very important in this war. Dick Cheney and George Bush know that they can not attack Iran just on the bases of accusations on nuclear weapon without evidence. These accusations were first started by CIA operatives in Iraq. If you notice first a low rank American officer claimed that Iran provides explosive for the insurgent. It was promptly denied by the top commanders in the field and pentagon officials, including General Casey. Then gradually it seems they gave in under great pressure from crazy Dick (Dick Cheney). If you remember amongst the weapons claimed to be captured from insurgents provided by the Iranians were weapons which Iran does not manufacture, and even some had Christian date on them, while the Iranians use different calendar. They amassed those weapons is such a hurry that they forgot about these subtle differences. Actually even general Petraeus was reluctant at the beginning to accuse Iranians of helping the insurgent, but eventually even he gave in under pressure from the White House. He is a soldier and he has to follow the chain of commands.

I asked him how he sees the prospect of George Bush attacking Iran. He said, “I do not believe US is in a position to attack Iran.” His general argument was like this: “in any case of American invasion millions of Iranians will go to fight them, and this time even harder than the time of Iran-Iraq war. In that war mostly religious zealots took part. War with America will mobilize the secular part of the Iranian society, even many who oppose the government, and will turn it into a nationalistic anti-imperialist war. That will give the government even greater efficiency. Besides that, the army, Revolutionary Guard and Basij have been totally changed in recent years to a real fighting force with sophisticated weaponry and training. They have arsenals of many new weapons that US does not know about them. In recent month they showed some of them so that US think twice before making any mistakes. Many American generals wet their pants of the idea of going to war with Iran. Not because they do not have fire power or can not wipe out Iran from the world map, but because they think they are serving their country and spreading democracy and the war with Iran will not be finished in 1, 2, or 5 years but at least a decade and it will be a bloody war, worse than Vietnam war. Above all, inefficiency of American military machine to fight a “war of people” like in Vietnam is well known. Although politician like Dick Cheney and George Bush directly and indirectly have threatened Iran, generals know what the war with Iran means. Iran is not like Germany to go into it just with a few thousand tanks. Iran is like Japan, you need to drop atomic bombs, and not two or three, but a dozen to make them surrender and we are not at a time this kind of things can be repeated. The war with Iran will not be army to army. US have to fight with each individual Iranians and that takes years. Besides that, the Iranian army is organized to fight an asymmetrical war with a powerful enemy. It does not have one command and control center which the Americans know about it and could destroy is in matter of hours, like Saddam’s army. It is like hydra, with many head. And any head which is cut out, it grows again. So that will be an unending war.”

I asked him about a limited war like “surgical strike” by Israeli or American air force. He said, “That will not happen. Israelis know not to engage directly with Iran, since they know they will instigate the wrath of Iran. If Israeli’s attack Iran, the Iranians have quite good map of all the Israeli nuclear installation and they know where to hit it with great accuracy and minimum charge and cause great pain to them. They always can say you attacked our civilian nuclear program, we attacked your military nuclear program. Besides that, Israelis have the Americans in their hand and they can force the American to do what they want to do. This is also improbable. In any case of US attack, Iran can retaliate severely. They can hit American bases in Iraq, Afghanistan, Persian Gulf, and many Arab countries from inside and outside. In the first few hours of the war tens of thousands of missile will fly toward US bases, many of them are smart bombs, many of them using stealth technology. The Iranian defense system is based on the 5:95 rules. That is, if 95% of the defense system were destroyed in the initial attack by an enemy, the remaining 5% must be so accurate and enough in numbers to destroy 95% of any enemy’s assets so that to cause the total defeat of the enemy or at least leave both sides in the same position as they had started.

I asked him, “You think Iran can overcome such a powerful military force?” He said, “There are two theories on the response of Iranians, one is severe reaction and massive retaliation against US and Israel adapted from Israeli’s tactic during Arab-Israeli war of 1963 when Israeli’s fought an enemy who seemed very powerful and outnumbered them. They have already mapped out the most sensitive American targets and they can hit them with accuracy of 95%. They know that American public is very sensitive to causalities, so their tactic is to go after their soft spots and software rather than hardware. They try to cause the maximum causalities in the shortest time and use American public against the generals in battlefield. They are aware of the immense American capability to replace tanks and air planes very quickly, but replacing human is not so easy for an army who has been in fight for almost 5 years.

The other theory is that the Iranians might not react quickly, but gradually in all the theaters of operation and cause gradual and steady casualty for US forces, like few hundred per month from within and from without the theater of operations. Iran can give tens of thousands of its supporters in Iraq and Afghanistan Iranian-made antiaircraft Stinger missiles or sophisticated antitank missiles and make those places like a hell for American troops. Iran can also bring other countries into the conflict and turn the war into a regional war and turn it into a low intensity and protracted long war. This is a kind of war that US can not afford at this time.”

I asked him, “Why the Iranians are so confident of themselves and so defiant?” He said, “They have the best intelligence network in the Middle-East, by far better than Israelis and Americans. I know a few cases in which they thwarted a few CIA and MOSAD operations successfully. The reason is that most of Arabs politicians in high positions provide them information, since they are fed up with their US-backed corrupt governments. A diplomat from an Arab country wherein US has a base there told me that once an Iranian intelligent officer asked him about the US command center in there. The diplomat told him why do you ask this kind of questions when you are going to missile it down. The agent got embarrassed and never talked to him. Even some Israelis cooperate with the Iranians and provide them with intelligence. The Iranians are very generous with money when it comes to this. I guess they also get some of their intelligence from Americans. There are many dissident in the Pentagon and US army and I guess sometimes they provide the kind of information that nobody can have that except American themselves. I think these dissidents want to prevent the war with Iran at any cost. They are patriotic and realistic and know that war with Iran will not be a quick one and will not end in a few months. They know that they will be in it for years to come and that will hurt the image of Americans.”

I asked him, “If US is not going to attack Iran directly, then when is this conflict going to end?” He said, “The war with Iran is not modeled after Iraq war, but it is like the clandestine war with Soviet Union. US will spend lots of money on propaganda and training of minorities to start descent over the next few decades, and then separation of Iran into three to four countries. Look how US right now provides money and training for Baluchis in Baluchistan, for Kurds in Kurdistan, for Arabs in Khuzestan, for Azerbaijanis in Azerbaijan. Since US troops invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, there have been lots of demonstrations and terrorist activity in the provinces neighboring these two countries. Right now US troops are training Mojahedin Khalgh for sabotage and clandestine operation inside Iran. Separation of Iraq to three states that will claim part of Iran’s territory has been on the agenda of pro-Israeli lobby and many think thank organization in US. Those Iranians who want to play the role of Ahmad Chalabi should think twice before inviting American troops to their cities, villages, and homes.”

At the end I asked him, “Then how would the nuclear issue be resolved?” He said, “I think the Americans already have accepted Iran as a nuclear power, but they try to turn it into harassment and get more political concession from Iranians. All the US presidents since the birth of Islamic republic got hurt burn from the Iranians, I think the present one will get a heart attack.”


Share/Save/Bookmark

 
default

Jahanshah Javid, Hezbollah in Disguise!

by Justice (not verified) on

Jahanshah Javid, Hezbollah in Disguise!
Hezbollah's Front Businesses in America!
Part one
//iranpoliticsclub.net/politics/shiite-season...
part two
//iranpoliticsclub.net/politics/shiite-season...


default

Irani Lover, no one likes to

by Nader - West Covina (not verified) on

Irani Lover, no one likes to see their country bombed. But, the grip that the Mullah regime has on the throat of Iranians, has, unfortunately, resulted in support among people for foreign intervention for the purpose of ousting the Mullahs. Furthermore, the U.S. among tens of other countries around the world (Including Iran) is engaged in arms sell and every country on the plant is engaged in arms purchase. The governments of Finland, Switzerland, Botswana, ..Among other acquire American weapons also. How come they don’t use those weapons on their neighbors or their own people? See my point? It’s not the U.S weapons that are to blame; it is the fascist regimes like Saddam and IRI. Iran is powerful compare to other Middle Eastern countries, no question, but their weapons technology is way outdated. Trust me. There are numerous weapon magazines and statistics available to support that argument. Finally, the reason that Hezbollah, and for that matter, any guerilla group, were hard to defeat is because they were hiding among civilians and Israel, because of the reaction of world opinion, was not and will never be able to engage in a full scale military assault on civilians unless as a last resort. Last year’s war in Lebanon definitely was not a last resort for Israel


default

The reality...

by Ajam (not verified) on

Thank you Behrad for an interesting article. Although it seems that the majority of the info offered here is based on speculations, yet the main point (IRI's extensive planning on asymmetrical warfare) is all but true! While having kept up with the arms race with Israel (e.g. developing Harpoon surface-to-sea missiles immediately after Israelies employed their tactical Dolphin Submarines), the IRI has found the American military's Achile's heel in its vulnerability to asymmetric, intermittent fighting (aka jang-o-goriz, the Persian area of expertise).

As a matter of fact one of the main focuses in the war games recently conducted by the IRI Navy and Revelutionary Guards in Persian Gulf was on various methods of blocking the strait of Hormuz in case of an American attack-- by planting mines or simply drowning a ship. That would be a quick and easy way of trapping the U.S. fleets in and interrupting the flow of oil! As a result of this the price of oil could shoot up to near $500 a barrel! This would drag the U.S. infantry and ground forces into Iranian soil and at that point The U.S. army will find itself facing a vast war front from Pakistan/ Afghanistan to Lebanon (after ivolvement of Syria).

What is going to happen after that is anybody's guess. But what is certain is that five million basijis will not role over and greet the American carpet bombings. In fact ( despite the abuse endured at the hands of IRI) it's the poor people who will stand up and fight for their country rather than the privileged stratum who comprise the main opposition to IRI. Moreover, the linkage that invading Iran provides would facilitate the free movement of religious zealots from Kashmere to Lebanon across the Middle East to fight the "infidles" and seek martyrdom!!!


default

to Agha nader

by iranlover (not verified) on

MR Nader i like your toun, i like people who dont have same ide but steel talk with respect.
actually the world poll has shown that iranian people dont want yankees to attack iran, the international poll result has shown that if some one attack iran the grip of mullahs on iranian would be stronger because iranian people would back up the mullahs against foreigners.
if you want to see the facts i have them.
i belive you when you say that iranian weapons our out dated but not all of them. yes iranian tank like zufagar is not like yankees Abraham but iranian has understood that if they want to fight US theier best weapon is asymtric warfare. a IRGC guy can do much better armed with a RPG29 then 2 zulfagar tak against abraham tank. russia give the chanse to iran with kind of sukhi plane they want but iran refused because they must buy 500 plane to fight against 500 plane. insteed they have mobile anti air system. which move all the time. iran has the best anti air defence now. iranian has modern UAV and actuallay better kommunication system then israel. we even have sateleit. i dont say that we can defeat US but we can fight solong so that US has to back off.
finaly israel did not carre about civilians, they bombed civilian area and kill for the most civilians and they use kluster bombs so israel did their best, ask a IDF soldier and he would course hezbollah but in the same time he would say they are lions. every military guy admire hezbollah resistence but i allso know that hezbollah had some high ranking iranian officer in their command center. israel did what they could and the same thing did hezbollah.the only thing israel did not was to use their atom bombs and hezbollad did not use their zel zel missile to attack jerusalem.


default

Irani Lover, no one likes to

by Nader - West Covina (not verified) on

Irani Lover, no one likes to see their country bombed. But, the grip that the Mullah regime has on the throat of Iranians, has, unfortunately, resulted in support among people for foreign intervention for the purpose of ousting the Mullahs. Furthermore, the U.S. among tens of other countries around the world (Including Iran) is engaged in arms sell and every country on the plant is engaged in arms purchase. The governments of Finland, Switzerland, Botswana, ..Among other acquire American weapons also. How come they don’t use those weapons on their neighbors or their own people? See my point? It’s not the U.S weapons that are to blame; it is the fascist regimes like Saddam and IRI. Iran is powerful compare to other Middle Eastern countries, no question, but their weapons technology is way outdated. Trust me. There are numerous weapon magazines and statistics available to support that argument. Finally, the reason that Hezbollah, and for that matter, any guerilla group, were hard to defeat is because they were hiding among civilians and Israel, because of the reaction of world opinion, was not and will never be able to engage in a full scale military assault on civilians unless as a last resort. Last year’s war in Lebanon definitely was not a last resort for Israel.


default

read this, what a general says

by Anonymous2 (not verified) on


default

to nader

by iranlover (not verified) on

actually it was we who helped israel with osarik, iranian air force bombed osarik first and we bomed the anti air system in that area after that israili air force come and bomn osarik but it was iran who helped them.


default

that is correct, in iran the

by iranlover (not verified) on

that is correct, in iran the people dont like mullah regime but if you ask young people on street what would you do if USA attack 90% of them said i would fight them to the end.
most of ous young iranian think if US ATTACK, we have to fight harder then iran iraq war. because yankees are invaders and we want to take revenge for those who died by US weapon in the hand of saddam.
your article was very good, you have understood how young iranian think and how much they love their country.
iran has develop very advanced weapons and they even have SCHKVAL or HOOT and the yankees call it hangar destroier because no one has any defence against this anti ship missile. have a israli friend and he told me that we were crushed by iranian weapons not hezbollah. two israili war ship were hit by iranian kowsar, 35 merkav tanks very blow up by iranian anti tank missile like toofan2. apache helicopters very shoot down by iranian fire shoulders misagh2.
hezbollah was hard to catch because they were operating with iranian communicaion system, and they were watching israili movement with iranian made UAV.
you can find pool on the internet how iranian yooung think like zogby international. and theier poll show that young iranian are nationalist and by the way iran is getting best war system from china and russia.
russia has given iran s300 tor1, panzer3.....


default

It is sad that some of us

by Nader - West Covina (not verified) on

It is sad that some of us have bought into the Stalinist, Regressive, Communist, fascist, Chvezian, socialist, Iran destroying, world destroying,,,,,,,, propaganda! No one is denying the fact that the Iraq mission was a disaster regardless of what were the motives behind the U.S interventions. The essential question is why does the Iranian Islamist and their allies, the leftist Iranian, hate U.S and Israel so much? Israel has done absolutely nothing since the day it was established to endanger our national security or work against our interest. Even if for the sake of our conversation, we assume that thy hate Israel because of its occupation of Arabic land after the 1967, we have still taken position against a country that never posed any danger to us, in fact provided assistance to us (Remember the Ozirac Nuclear Facility bombing). As a result, we have subjected ourselves, for absolutely no reason, to the consequences of any action Israel takes to serve the interests of its people, including military operation against the barbaric regime in Iran who is undeniably providing material and inspirational support for Israel’s enemies. Another essential question is why does the Iranian leftist never blame the wonderful Communism regime of Stalin for occupying Azerbaijan after WWII? Why aren’t they ever critical of the fascist IRI regime that is basically having let Putin plunder our wealth and dignity? Why aren’t they ever critical of the fact that it is Putin who has reduced our share of the Caspian Sea from 50% to 10%? Why such amazing double standard? Are those leftist denying the fact that if it wasn’t for U.S intervention, we would’ve lost Azerbaijan forever to our “communism brothers”? Are they denying the fact that the Iraqi army under Saddam Hussain was built, supported, armed and directed by communist USSR? The same army who is responsible for the death of nearly 1 million Iranians? Are they denying the fact that even beautiful socialist France itself, has admitted to initiating the Iraq WMD program? Isn’t this because they are so morally and ideologically bankrupt and ashamed for their support of Iranian people enemies?


default

What does Iran have?

by Anonymous85695 (not verified) on

My dear friend.I am not talking about official statements .Of course no one among iranian official never say that.But there is a reality,officially Israel also doesnt have Nuclear weapon.I suppose there is no doubt about Israels bomb.Iran has all rights to improve Nuc program and have N bomb as well!!!
And about Zionists,US propaganda yes there huge anti Iranian propaganda,but i dont undestand connection of such propaganda with my opinions?


default

Who says Iran has a nuclear weapons program!!

by Ari (not verified) on

Some of you people have really bought into all the propaganda that the Bush Administration, the neocons, the Zionists, Israel and the think tanks such as AEI, Brookings Institute etc.. are repeating, and in fact repeating their statements verbatum!!

Do you remember the spin on Iraq? Iraq didn't pose an imminent threat to the United States and her allies in 2003. Although the notion was ridiculous that the secularist Iraqi government would uphold strong ties to fanatic religious motivated Islamic terror groups, that it even supported the perpetrators of 9/11, most Americans believed these false assertions.

The mission was not accomplished in May 2003, the war was never a "cakewalk" and the Iraqis didn't welcome American troops "as liberators" as Dick Cheney had predicted.

In Iraq in 2003 and during the operation "Iraqi freedom," neither the UN inspectors and the CIA before the invasion, nor the several governmental teams after it ― among them the 1,200 person Iraq Survey Group ― detected "significant quantities of uranium from Africa" or any other signs of weapons of mass destruction.

There is absolutely no evidence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran according to the IAEA. The IAEA has conducted the most extensive inspection in its history and has found no evidence of diversion of material towards nuclear program in Iran. Or are you people saying that Cheney, Bolton, Podhoretz, Israel are more of an expert and have inspected Iran's nuclear facilities!!

On the contrary, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been able to verify the non-diversion of nuclear materials at the enrichment facilities in Iran. According to a report, released on August 27, the IAEA "has therefore concluded that it [the nuclear program] remains peaceful in use."

According to the IAEA, currently 439 nuclear power reactors operate in 30 countries. In the same way Iran, as a signatory state of the Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), is legally entitled to enrich uranium in order to use Atomic energy peacefully.

This is another deadly spin by the U.S. to divert attention from its failure in Iraq.

"The potential of another world war" helps Bush, as Democratic Dennis Kucinich puts it, to "bolster support for his monumentally failed foreign policy." But the war in Iraq is the war of Washington's political and economic establishment, not just "Bush's war," because he hardly has to deal with democratic opposition.

Before the war with Iraq, it seemed that journalists and social scientist neglected their duty to research thoroughly and to inform the public with reliable facts. Instead they became a mouthpiece for the U.S. government, they even took Colin Powell's embarrassing report to the United Nations on February 3, 2003, at face value.

Its time for people to start acting responsibly as opposed to the same warmongering that we are hearing from this Administrion, Israel, and the neocons that got us into the mess in Iraq.

I am more flabbergasted that many of you who are Iranians are making these statements.


default

It is interesting that the

by Nader - West Covina (not verified) on

It is interesting that the author is trying to paint the picture that the following discussion is a mirror of Middle Eastern public opinion. I really doubt this was ever a conversation, seems to me more like a leftist propaganda. Because at a time that our own fellow citizens are been oppressed and butchered daily by the medieval regime in Tehran, it is amazing to see how some Iranians are so obsessed with what the U.S does around the world that it seems like poking at and trashing the U.S is much, much more important to them than the destruction or the survival of their own country. This truly shows how much we deserve what happens to our country, and offcourse, for our leftist friends, who else to blame it on but the U.S. It’s obvious that the 1st step for the salvation of our country is for us to treat ourselves with what I like to call the “America obsession disorder”. We hate it so much that we trash it non stop, but at the same time, we would do anything to get to it, and we would do anything to be like it!!! Even the references the Islamic authorities use in their speeches to America, shows that this is nothing but a mental disorder, most probably caused by “Hasoodi”. And it seems that no one else around the world is suffering from it but our leftist and Islamist populations. That being said, It is true that the Middle Eastern public opinion (with the exception of Iranians inside of Iran) has been influenced by religious extremism to a point that every free election that is held there, the extremism win. The IRI intensive inspiration of religious fundamentalist ideas has finally prevailed. I have to say to the author, please go to Iran, have another “conversation” with any Iranian on the street, and see, unfortunately I should say, not only they wish that the U.S could help them overthrow this murderous regime, but even if Satan himself offered help, they would take it !


default

"Next War"

by observer (not verified) on

When he appeared in front of American news media he was all smile. He perhaps showed so much confidence in order to cover his inner feelings. Feelings that, however uncertain, indicated the fact that he knew deep inside his own mind that the regime was not ready to fight."Why war" he kept asking reporters,and answering every question with one of his own:"Why do you think that there needs to be a war between the two countries".

Deep down he knew because he was repeatedly told by his superiors in their many discussions before going to New York that compromise would come. That whenever any conflict would come to directly threaten the survival of the regime, they would sacrifice all to stay in power. Yes his smiles did reveal that bit of inner truth.


default

what does Iran have?

by Anonymous8562 (not verified) on

US will attack Iran anyway,even all Iranians will fight against US.Because Iran with nuclear weapan is more dangerous than war .
I think we should not exaggerate Iran's power,there are millions of Think thanks,institutions that are in aware of sitation in Iran,and eternal dynamics of Iran.But i think there will be considerable impact of attack to Iran:Hamas,Hezbollah,Afganistan,Shiites in Iraq,Petrol crises and etc.These are factors that IRan is using in its foreign policy and because of it Iran is more confident.
And dont forget about the silent bomb which is into Iran : ethnic minorities ,Azeris,kurds.


default

It doesn't matter if he had an Iraqi friend or not

by Ari (not verified) on

I don't understand why the dispute over whether the Iraqi friend is real or not, that is not the issue. Many of the issues that the writer has discussed are correct.

The issue is clear the U.S. Admin. has been planning to invade or force regime change in any nation in the Middle East which is not subordinate to the U.S. Gov. This has been the discussed in detail in the Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

Obviously Iran and Syria have been major targets, and more seriously Iran! Iran does not have the superior military force compared to the U.S. and that is a fact. However, this does not mean that it cannot and will not cause severe damage to U.S. interests. Even the Pentagon, CENTCOM, CIA, U.S. generals and Mossad agents are aware of this. If the U.S. believed that it was such a cake walk, it would have invaded Iran by now!

I also agree that American people are the most thoroughly mis-educated and generally media-mesmerized national population on the face of the planet. Even so, they do not like the way things are going as Iraq drags on and on and their paychecks shrink as the cost of living gets more and more expensive.

American people are sick and tiered of wars which has had severe repercussions on the U.S. economy, spiraling U.S. current account deficit, the plunging value of the U.S. dollar,borrowing from China to pay for the Iraqi war, the death of over 4,000 U.S. soldiers, hatred toward America at an all time high and the use of military power as a tool for foreign policy. The list is simply too long. Jesus, Condi is now trying to recruit U.S. diplomats to go to Iraq because of lack of sufficient soldiers, and she is finding it difficult to get any volunteers to even go to the safe haven of the "green zone".

Furthermore, you are going to have many U.S. generals and soldiers who are going to start defecting. Henry Kissinger is on record as calling the military something like "stupid animals" there merely to do the bidding of the elite. It could be that many in the military command structure have read this history and passed it around. It could well have helped them determine the face of one of military history's most famous adages: "Know Thine Enemy.

I agree Iranians like life and hate wars. This is why you are not finding one Iranian suicide bomber. However, any attack on Iranian soil will rally the Iranian people around the flag and they will fight to protect their country. I am not talking about those Iranians who are living a comfortable life, just like their American counterparts who want others to do the dirty work for them. However, there are many patriotic Iranians who will fight to protect Iran from imperialist conquest and U.S. hegemony.

At least this is my opinion.


default

After my pill

by XerXes (not verified) on

I just had my pill and I have to say, I actually agree with dynasofti


default

Abdullah de Nostredame

by Crystal ball (not verified) on

You sure your kin is not descended from Nostradamus?


default

What a bunch of Baloney!!

by Omid Parsi (not verified) on

Iranians could not resist 3 Americans diplomats armed with nothing but checkbooks in 1953! Is this article Taarof or Roodarweisty?! Sadly, I should think that "Hezbollah heech ghalatee nemitavanad bekonad"!! As for pride in fighting oppressive invaders, Iranians have shown their best bending over to Arabs and Moguls centuries ago, and, most recently, to the cockroaches presently in charge of their destiny. It's high time the psycopathic Islamist rhetoric touched base with reality: Islamism manifested its true nature with a loud bang on 9/11, As such it will NEVER enjoy the kid-glove, "detente" and "nation-building" ethic extended to communists. It will face the ultimately ruthless force and wrath of the free world. Think Falluja, not UN Security Council!!


dynasofti

Most Iranians are lovers not fighters

by dynasofti on

I had a good laugh reading your post.  When the kitchen gets hot , Iranians cannot withstand the heat and start waving the white flag and invite the Americans for tea.  Who are you kidding?  We are a nation of self serving, fun loving individuals who mostly think about acquiring wealth and having all the pleasures of life (worst than americans.)

No matter what your friend says, Iran is a third world country and not industrialized enough to mess with the west. Unless Russia or China help them, the war would put an end to the current regime in Iran and would be a plus for Iran.   How long are we going to isolate ourselves from the rest of the world?  We could be an economic power with all the educated and intelligent people we have.  Look at India how their economy is growing %10-12 a year and getting all the contracts from the west.  I think we are much smarter people on the average than Indians but look at our economy. It is in shambles.  While Indians are enjoying their best economy ever. You think with economy like ours and lack of willing people to fight, we can muster defeating the west? ... I doubt it.

 

 


default

My goodness ..

by mombo jambo (not verified) on

I wish I had a friend or a relative like him. My mY!


default

Help

by Anonymous12 (not verified) on

yeki in ghorse Xerxes ro behesh bede bekhore


default

Who was your relative?

by Nikkhah (not verified) on

A consultant of Mahmood Ahmadine...


default

calm down people

by XerXes (not verified) on

Man what's wrong with you people. Can't trust Iran will fight like the daliran that we are? If there was any doubts to the Iranian power (Maybe not to this extend) than by the American and Israelis had bombed us to nothingness. Iran is a Super power. And that's not a joke.


jamshid

Re: This is too good...

by jamshid on

Your "friend" says: "They (IRI) have arsenals of many new weapons that US does not know about them."

 

Yeah right! The US does not know about these top secrets, but your Iraqi friend does!

 

Here is another funny one. His friend says: "most of Arabs politicians in high positions provide them information". Are you kidding me? Were you writing this bull for 1st graders? And how the hell your "friend!" knows so many of these high ranking Arab officials? Did they discuss these together while having a friendly tea? Then in the next paragraph, you "demote" these high ranking arab officials to just a "diplomat"!!!

 

This is too good! His "friend!" then says :"In the first few hours of the war tens of thousands of missile will fly toward US bases..." Oh really?!!!! So your imaginary friend is also part of the top ranking Iranian military officials too???? Or is he just repeating the same bull than Iran's media is saying and we've all heard before? Wow what a friend!

 

Behrad thanks for the laughter, please next time tell us about your Afghan friend and his marvelous opinions, would you?


default

I agree with a lot of your info but...

by farrad02 on

I agree with a lot of your info but...I doubt it came from an insider who used to be in Iraqi government!

We didn't really need your connected friend to tell us all this! All that you present is very obvious!  It has been said many times and by many people.

It sounds like you used this imaginary individual as a vehidle to write this article.

I'm sorry, but reading your article, it gives the reader a sense that such a person doesn't exist! Just my opinion.

Good article though!

 

 


default

ghabele darke

by Anonymous12 (not verified) on

baba ina beheshoon pool kam midan, majbooran har rooz ye toomar arajeef benevisan ke kharjeshoon dar biyad. dorogh haye khodeshoon ke tamoom mishe dast be damanae doostane well informed shoon tooye aragh mishan.taraf az aragh oomade moratab az afkare omoomi dar US sohbat mikone.


default

Very interesting article.

by Reaver of Syntax (not verified) on

It is also interesting how your "relative" has exactly the same syntax and grammatical errors that you do. Similar - Ok, it's a cultural thing - Identical - it's a propagandist fabrication.

This kind of fabrication would only work on the uneducated and inattentive.

At least you got spellcheck to work.


default

Behaving irrational on the onset of revolt is unavoidable

by Irandokht (not verified) on

From a very "special and informed" friend, HISTORY:

Iranians are giving notice to all supporter of this mullah and religious Shia system to get off the IRI's wrecked ship. Otherwise, Iranian people like any other nation behave irrational on the onset of revolt. Iranians anger build up level is extremely high at red level. Time for IRI mullahs and their lackeys to jump off this broken savage, dark and backward ship. The end is near.


default

Yea haa

by Cyrus Sleep well Iran is Awake (not verified) on

Love to hear things like that. That's Iran man don't mess with it...I don't believe everything I read but I like reading this. And to some extend I believe them. Iran is a super power, this is not what I say, this is what the British, Americans and the western Europeans have agreed. Now how to deal with this newly born super power is another story.


jamshid

Re: Your imaginary friend talks a lot like IRI....

by jamshid on

Your imaginary friend is misinformed and a propganda tool for IRI. Do you really think you are dealing with 2nd graders here?

 

You are not using this technique on us, are you? I am refering to this technique: 

"Oh but I didn't say any of these, it was my "special and informed" friend who said it..." ???

 

You Islamists are funny.

 

Ok. you succeeded in diverting attention from the IRI crimes against Iranians and humanity, but only for a few minutes. The focus here is the crimes IRI is committing and will remain that until the IRI is gone.


FACEBOOK