Fair minded Jewish reporter reveals "Anti-Iranian Rage"
Progressive Radio News Hour / Stephen Lendman
04-Sep-2012 (8 comments)


Anti-Iranian Rage by Stephen Lendman, Author of, "How Wall Street Fleeces America" Washington and Israel wage dirty covert wars. Iran's been targeted for years. Imperial aims are prioritized. Rule of law principles don't matter. Israel wants sole regional dominance. America wants it globally. Lawless tactics continue.

>>>
recommended by MaryamJoon

Share/Save/Bookmark

 
Rea

Not trying to minimize anything, Frashogar

by Rea on

One has to know when and where to stop spreading sort of propaganda that even amateurs of international politics, like myself, find utterly ridiculous.

My 2 cts and out of here.


Frashogar

It seems you're trying to minimize FSA atrocities, Rea

by Frashogar on

Why is that? Cui Bono? Al Jazeera? The US State Department?


Rea

Of korrrs, dear Maryam

by Rea on

And Philippino fanatics have been crucified by FSA. ;o))


MaryamJoon

PressTV is Iran's Gov., but NYT and CNN hide they're Israel's

by MaryamJoon on

.


Rea

Of course, he's fair minded, even PressTV says so

by Rea on

"It was a glorious event. It was an important event. Iran gained great prestige for the event." lol ;o)

//www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/03/259664/nam-leaves-us-israel-with-black-eyes/


maghshoosh

There's a distinction b/w Khomeinism & Muslims, y not know it?

by maghshoosh on

Apparently, we have to assume that Jews are by default Zionist and, hence, bad, unless they specify otherwise for relief of our anxieties.  Accordingly, Muslims are Khomeinists by default and, hence, reprehensible, unless they adamantly deny it, thereby allaying our fears that we're about to be blown up.  Now we know how to tell a good Jew/Muslim from a bad one, when we have the misfortune of running into one or the other.


MaryamJoon

There's a distinction b/w Zionism and Jews ... why not know it?

by MaryamJoon on

.


maghshoosh

Fair-minded Muslim may wonder ...

by maghshoosh on

Whether or not he's Jewish, why is it necessary to specify the ethnic background of the "reporter"?  Is the poster suggesting that being both "fair-minded," however one judges that, and Jewish is a rare and, therefore, noteworthy combination?  Since the reporter doesn't refer to his own ethnicity, are we incapable of judging arguments w/o knowing the arguer's personal background?