News

A modest proposal

I think we need to give further consideration to mahmoudg's advocacy of surgical strikes. The next time there are Friday prayers in Tehran and other Iranian cities, the U.S. Air Force (USAF) should launch tactical nuclear weapons surgically directed at those locations (think of tactical nuclear weapons as "mini-nukes"). It should also surgically target all nuclear sites, military bases, government buildings, politicians' residences, and mosques.  Conventional weapons, while highly destructive, don't carry the same certainty of surgically destroying all the intended targets as tactical nuclear weapons. The number of people surgically killed will be very small compared to Iran's total population (perhaps no greater than a few percent or so--at most).

Look at how well Hiroshima and Nagasaki have bounced back. While the surgical nuclear contamination may prove a challenge to Iranian Hazmat teams, it will mean that property values will rise that much higher in unaffected areas. In fact, I am thinking of buying some tracts of land in Kohgiluyh o Boyer-Ahmad Province (but first I will check with my real estate agent to see how the public schools are there and to make sure that there aren't any sensitive sites there which might be surgically targeted by the freedom-loving USAF).

well, well

Every question directed at the actions of NIAC are valid and legitimate concerns of Iranian-Americans.  No one likes war, but surgical attacks are sometimes necessary to combat evil. NIAC seems to be bending backwards to cowtow to the requests of the Islamic Republic as to be genuinely concerned about the welfare of the iranian people.  If people (and there is a large number of them) want surgical attacks, it is to prevent a downright civil war (which will kill many more than the actual attack itself). When this regime sees its existence being threatened, as we have seen only a small sample of in the last 4 months, it will resort to genocide to survive. You can't not want war AND sanction.  You have got to choose one. 

Fred twisting words to suit his agenda

It is pretty much evident that all those who have any influence in the
halls of washington who have been smearing NIAC, want confrontation with
Iran. This does not mean that the average joe supports war. It means
that the average joe is believing the lies spread by neocons and
warmongers. Parsi's statement was directed at not the supporters but the
ones who actively work to torpedo any chance for diplomacy.

As for you twisting Parsi's words in his email to Zarif to suit your
agenda: It doesnt mean anything other than that he's thanking Zarif for
meeting with anti-war politicians in washington. you know, the same
politicians who ASKED Parsi to set up the meeting because Parsi knew them from his past interviews.

عیان شود هر که در او غش باشد

"آن‌ها از ما پرسیدند که شما خودتان آن‌جا را می‌شناسید و من گفتم بله.چون من کتابی نوشته بودم راجع به ایران و آمریکا و اسرییل، خب بیش از ۱۰بار با آقای ظریف مصاحبه داشتم. پس گفتم، من ایشان را می‌شناسم. می‌توانمشماره‌ی تلفن‌شان را به شما بدهم. همین.  بعدهم به آقای ظریف گفتم که کسانی هستند در کنگره‌ی آمریکا که ضد جنگهستند و این‌ها هم برنامه دارند که با شما تماس بگیرند. من هیچ کار

جداگانه‌ای نکردم"

 متن یکی از تماسهای  فاش شده پارسی با نماینده رژیم تجاوزگران جنسی :  

"از اینکه تصمیم گرفته اید با گیلکریست و محتملاً با لیچ دیدار کنید مسرورم. تعداد زیاد دیگری که شامل بسیاری دموکراتهای قابل احترام میشود نیز علاقمند به دیدار هستند." 

 این تاکتیک که تمام معترضین به لابیگری های نایک را با چوب "جنگ طلب" راندن دیگر نخ نما شده و کار از این حرفها گذشته.  متن نامه فاش شده حرف از اینکه "اینها برنامه دارند که با شما تماس بگیرند" و من دیگر هیچ کار جداگانه ای نکردم نمیزند.  لابیگر ارشد نایاک  باید تمامی مدارک رد و بدل شدۀ بین شخص خود و سازمان لابیگرش با تک تک عوامل رژیم تجاوزگران جنسی را منتشر کند تا عیان شود هر که در او غش باشد.   این هنوز از نتایج سحر است.

mp3 for those who cant read farsi:

بد نیست به فایل صوتی هم گوش بدین: //www.zamahang.com/podcast/2009/20091116_PM1_...