US had 'sporadic' contact with Jundullah: Report
PressTV / PressTV
31-Oct-2009 (2 comments)

Shortly after the bombing, State Department spokesman Ian Kelly described claims of US involvement in the attack as "completely false."

The official condemnations by foreign countries came while Jundullah group has not been designated as a terrorist organization, neither has it been place on a terrorism blacklists.

The group is generally described by Western countries as an "opposition group" or "militant" faction.

Meanwhile, former army chief of staff in Pakistan General Aslam Beg, speaking to The Associated Press, said that the border village of Mand has been used as a staging point for US contacts with Jundullah.

"US aid also was funneled into the region through the Pakistani ports of Kot Kalmat and Jiwani," he told AP.

In a separate article published by The Time, former Middle East case officer at the Central Intelligence Agency Robert Baer said the CIA had "sporadic" contact with Jundullah.

"American intelligence has also had contact with Jundullah. But that contact, as Iran almost certainly knows, was confined to intelligence-gathering on the country," wrote Baer.

In his article, the former CIA official also claimed that "a relationship with Jundullah was never formalized, and contact was sporadic."

>>>
recommended by Shah Ghollam

Balatarin
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
Shah Ghollam

First!

by Shah Ghollam on Sat Oct 31, 2009 06:04 PM PDT

So let me get this straight, so according to your logic, U.S contacting Jundollah is “bad”, ok.

 

Can you get anything straight? This is a problem I have been trying to resolve with you ever since you showed up in my radar. Let's handle this before engaging you in anything more serious.


  •  
Farhad Kashani

Shah Gholam,   So let

by Farhad Kashani on Sat Oct 31, 2009 03:18 PM PDT

Shah Gholam,

 

So let me get this straight, so according to your logic, U.S contacting Jundollah is “bad”, ok.

 

As we speak, U.S and your beloved Fascist regime are talking in Geneva, and prior to Afghanistan war, IRI out of fear of U.S attack, held talks with U.S. So, A- If contacting is “bad”, then how come you justify IRI – U.S talks? IRI and U.S are two enemies but still had talks, right? So you don’t have to be friends to have contacts, right?

B- Does always “bad” things come out of contacts, or good things also? What does happen during a “contact” between the two nations or groups? Is one succumbing to another? Is one giving away sovereignty to another? Or could it be just mere contacts?

 

IRI has utilized all of its resources to pathetically and miserably try to blame the uprising of the people and the bombing by an oppressed minority on “BBC”, “CIA” and “Zionists”, and still failed, why don’t you realize that, honestly? You honestly think anyone believes IRI crap? Or you’re just happy that IRI has fooled just enough people to support it and keep it alive and to act as its terrorism muscle in the world? You’re happy with that? Well those brainwashed people are losing grip of power and many of them like Mousavi and Karroubi have actually realized what a monster they created. You’re just happy with those few Basijis, and a few Islamists in the region, and a few Leftist nutjobs around the world?

 

I just hope some day you realize how dumb you and your IRI regime’s logic is, although I’m not gonna hold my breath.

  


  •