Dumb Blonde not so Dumb...

bahmani
by bahmani
30-Sep-2007
 

I was going to write something but found this instead. I think she says it well...

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GEOOiRxog4

Share/Save/Bookmark

more from bahmani
 
default

A question of

by Anonymousq (not verified) on

A question of numbers

//www.emadbaghi.com/en/archives/000592.php#mo...

What the IRI has done in terms of killing dissidents and committing other incalculable mismangment, corruption, thievary and other atrocities dwarf anything that both Pahlavis did during their era. It is well documented by the regime's own supporter.

Also see Akbar Ganji's interview

ما به مردم دروغ می‌گفتیم، گفتگوی نازی کاموری با اکبر گنجی، راديو زمانه

//news.gooya.eu/politics/archives/2007/01/056...

Iran: Carter's Habitat For Inhumanity
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:30 PM PT

Leadership: In the name of human rights, Jimmy Carter gave rise to one of the worst rights violators in history — the Ayatollah Khomeini. And now Khomeini's successor is preparing for nuclear war with Israel and the West.

Profile In Incompetence: Fourth In A Series
More on this series

When President Carter took office in 1977, the Iran of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was a staunch American ally, a bulwark in our standoff with the Soviet Union, thwarting the dream held since the time of the czars of pushing south toward the warm waters of the appropriately named Persian Gulf.

Being an ally of the U.S. in the Cold War, Iran was a target for Soviet subversion and espionage. Like the U.S. in today's war on terror, Iran arrested and incarcerated many who threatened its sovereignty and existence, mainly Soviet agents and their collaborators.

This did not sit well with the former peanut farmer, who, on taking office, declared that advancing "human rights" was among his highest priorities. The shah was one of his first targets. As he's done with our terror-war detainees in Guantanamo, Carter accused the Shah of torturing some 3,000 "political" prisoners. He chastised the shah for his human rights record and engineered the withdrawal of American support.

The irony here is that when Khomeini, a former Muslim exile in Paris, overthrew the shah in February 1979, many of the 3,000 were executed by the ayatollah's firing squads along with 20,000 pro-Western Iranians.

According to "The Real Jimmy Carter," a book by Steven Hayward of the American Enterprise Institute: "Kho-meini's regime executed more people in its first year in power than the Shah's Savak had allegedly killed in the previous 25 years."

The mullahs hated the shah not because he was an oppressive dictator. They hated him because he was a secular, pro-Western leader who, in addition to other initiatives, was expanding the rights and roles of women in Iran society. Under Khomeini, women returned to their second-class role, and citizens were arrested for merely owning satellite dishes that could pick up Western television.

((The mullahs hated the shah because he stopped paying them their monthly stipend.))

Raad the rest:

//www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=2...


default

What a great find. Good job.

by Anonymousq (not verified) on

What a great find. Good job.


default

yeah she is right on. digit

by Anonymous_Flowers (not verified) on

yeah she is right on. digit