Current Events

I expected another "shahollahi" Rebuttal instead it's smart and

Personal Attacks set aside, The Fellow Makes Several very Good Points on the historical distortions. I was wary to see another "Shahollahi" TV type emotional commentary instead I saw a very sound, documented and argumented rebuttal of Homa Sarshar's comments on Parazit.

BRAVO !

Related Pictory:

PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY: Shah Delivers Speech to Parliament (1951)

Related Blogs:

THE PAST IS A FOREIGN COUNTRY: How Would You Evaluate Iran's Democracy Index in 1953 ?

Isn't Calling for the Head of State's Death usually called "Treason"?

Constitutionalist Student Shares Views On Mohammed Reza Shah's Rule

Like it !

We need more young like him !!!

Many of us, we are so tired to see always same pseudo intello rewriting our history.this people like ( Milani, ebadi,ganji abbasi, banisadr x y z )must be retired and make some space for young generation of iranian, who grow up without being influenced by any ideology or dogma....

Same lies,bullshits for 30 years. they have a monople of talks in media.....in other words khafe kardand maro !!

T.P Ajax was the name of the CIA operation ! ( tudeh party emshi hahaha ) what i do remember from my grand mother is at that time people didn't want to become a communist nation ! and for that Iranians were much more aware then Afghans were !

Khosro Fravahr - Good Insights

I watch him; I've talked to him a few times.  He makes strong points.  I didn't see anyone rebut them. 

Many people that post here speak in conclusionary language - In contrast, Khosro Fravahr gave reasons and a discussion; I value the latter 100 times more. 

Any child can tell you if they like ice cream -  but it takes an adult to be able to describe how icecream is made and packaged; the best markets to sell it; and so on.  

I like iranian.com for

I like iranian.com for allowing both side to express their views.

Pamanbari!

Who watches this guy anyway?!

I agree with amirparvizforsecularmonarchy

 Not only do they try to keep Iranians divided; you can notice some posts on here, for example, trying to justify the US Navy shooting down an Iranian passenger plane on its normal flight path (in Iran's territorial waters in the Persian Gulf) that killed about 250 people ( 66 children).  Imagine what people would say in the U.S. if Iran had killed 66 American children by shooting down a passenger jet?  I know for a fact that the views of the majority of bloggers on this site do not represent the views of the majority of the Iranian public.  

---------------- 

The Goal/Motive is to keep Iranians divided, so they are weaker.

by amirparvizforsecularmonarchy on Tue Aug 23, 2011 09:16 AM PDT

One Plan is to create lies around Mossadeghs removal to weaken iranians and cause division.

The Goal/Motive is to keep Iranians divided, so they are weaker.

One Plan is to create lies around Mossadeghs removal to weaken iranians and cause division.

In order to do this they are actively using techniques from Joseph
Goebels propaganda approaches, take the 1953 mossadegh history as
portrayed/retold to many iranians ...

To be Factually Correct, it was Not a Coup in 1953, According to the
accepted law of the land, when parliament is dissolved the shah legally
has the right to replace prime minister and pick his own.  Therefore by
definition it was not a coup. Yet most iranians have at least heard
there was a coup 999 times so far in their lives.  Big Lie/Much
repetition.

The Myth that a Coup Occurred is in harmony
with Joseph Goebbels teachings, the lie needs to be Big and time and
again it must be repeated again and again for it to get traction.

The lies are intended to lead to division not unity for iranians, by
calling mossadeghs 1953 removal a coup, this moves away from fact
towards dishonorable fiction.  The Shah did request US assistance,
mainly political.  It was his own forces that removed mossadegh and he
personally ordered his officers to see to it that all money given by cia
to help organize the removal of mossadegh were not used but returned to
the cia. 

So the goal is to ensure a
lack of hambastegi, by giving people a weak glue to unite them (lies) instead of a strong glue the truth. 

Unity behind lies will not serve Iranians but cause division, Unity
behind the truth is the honorable way to proceed because by definition
it gives rise to the least future conflict and retains peoples unity.

Khosrow gave an articulated response.

Factually Correct that it was Not a Coup in 1953, @5.13 According to the accepted law of the land, when parliament is dissolved the shah legally has the right to replace prime minister and pick his own.

Therefore by defiition it was not a coup.

Also very helpful in educating viewers on the Myth that a Coup Occurred with Joseph Goebbels teachings, the lie needs to be Big and time and again it must be repeated again and again for it to get traction.

The lies in favor of Mossadegh, by calling his removal a coup, are harmful to Iranians and not honorable.  They are intended to ensure a lack of hambastegi on the truth.

Unity behind lies will not serve Iranians but cause division, Unity behind the truth is the honorable way to proceed.

Such honorable lady,

I truly enjoyed her interview and will look for her book

'Hambastegi' is the main key to victory 

Mehrdad