Sunday Times: A general who was once in charge of Israel’s nuclear weapons has claimed that Iran is a “very, very, very long way from building a nuclear capability”.
Brigadier-General Uzi Eilam, 75, a war hero and pillar of the defence establishment, believes it will probably take Iran seven years to make nuclear weapons.
The views expressed by the former director-general of Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission contradict the assessment of Israel’s defence establishment and put him at odds with political leaders.
Major-General Amos Yadlin, head of military intelligence, recently told the defence committee of the Knesset that Iran will probably be able to build a single nuclear device this year.
Binyamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, has repeatedly said that Israel will not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran. Israeli forces have been in training to attack Iranian nuclear installations and some analysts believe airstrikes could be launched this year if international sanctions fail to deter Tehran from pursuing its programme.
Eilam, who is thought to be updated by former colleagues on developments in Iran, calls his country’s official view hysterical. “The intelligence community are spreading frightening voices about Iran,” he said.
He suggested that the “defence establishment is sending out false alarms in order to grab a bigger budget” while some politicians have used Iran to divert attention away from problems at home.
“Those who say that Iran will obtain a bomb within a year’s time, on what basis did they say so?” he asked. “Where is the evidence?”
He has just published Eilam’s Arc, a memoir in which he reveals that he opposed the Israeli attack on Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak in 1981.
According to well-placed defence sources, Israel is speeding up preparations for a possible attack on Iran’s nuclear sites. Last week its defence forces released footage that showed training to refuel F-15 jet fighters in mid-air. “This was a warning not to Iran but to the Americans that we’re serious,” said an Israeli defence source.
But Eilam argues “such an attack [against Iran] would be counter-productive”.
“One strike is not practical. In order to delay the Iranian programme for three to four years, one needs an armada of aircraft, which only a super-power can provide. Only America can do it.”
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
???????????
by maziar 58 on Sun Jan 10, 2010 05:15 PM PSTNO need to play another 7 yrs. of wait and see game to keep IRR on the policy making game of the west and their allies.
this was a ?@#warning NOT to Iran but to ...............
ey val ! chaghoo ke dasteye khodash ra nemiborad. Maziar
Tell that to Fred
by MOOSIRvaPIAZ on Sun Jan 10, 2010 01:01 PM PSTFred is worried about a country. I'm not sure its Iran though.
رژیم رفتنی است
Amir19Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:25 AM PST
این رژیم جنایتکار جمهوری به اصطلاح اسلامی رفتنی است چه با بمب اتم چه بدون آن. اتحاد جماهیر شوروی سابق با داشتن آن همه بمب وقتی مردم از داخل آنرا نخواستند از بین رفت. 22 بهمت روز پیروزی نور بر ظلمت خواهد بود
Even he's wrong
by AlexInFlorida on Sun Jan 10, 2010 08:56 AM PSTIslamic Republic after 30 years of ongoing failures is today far weaker
economically and militarily than 1970's.
As far as independence goes Iran only has
the ability to purchase technologies others will sell them. No weapons
of value are home created. And this vulnerability hits home even more
when the government can't even buy a S400 system and lives under a real threat of being attacked which it can not defend against.
If Islamic Republic can't produce the scientists, which it does not have today or for the forseeable future, iran won't be able to make even one nuke on it's own.
But Israel is a NUCLEAR threat
by شکافجو on Sun Jan 10, 2010 08:14 AM PSTThe US Killing Fields proved worst than Cambodia
Not a big news.
by پیام on Sun Jan 10, 2010 05:10 AM PSTBut i.r. would give his mother in exchange for some nukes. The only reason they have not becoem a nuclear threat yet is that they are not capable of manufacturing such a weapon.