Playing dumb?

Iran's president is either terribly uninformed or...


Share/Save/Bookmark

Playing dumb?
by Ben Madadi
29-Sep-2008
 

Mr Ahmadinejad had an interview with CNN's Larry King recently, and of course, as usual with such people who have no positive plans or serious and constructive policies toward anything, the interview was nothing new. The same old rants complaining about this and that and bragging about this and that! I watched the interview and I'm sure many people did. The guy, Ahmadinejad, must not be taken that seriously, but he's the president of a relatively large country anyway. So, we have no way out but to take an irrelevant and unrepresentative, and obsessed (about his image mostly), person somewhat seriously, especially that the country (our country) he represents sits on one of the largest oil, and natural gas, reserves in the world.

Let's look at what he told Larry King and see where are all the lies and misleading answers and of course irrational and irrelevant speeches he gave! From the way he was talking you could say that he himself wasn't comfortable with his answers, and his gestures and movements, facially and physically, gave him away terribly! He was lying and he was misleading, and he knew it and his body couldn't hide his feelings. Just look at the videos and you will notice that time to time his uplifting on the chair, and of course his facial expressions, are clear signs of his discomfort about the things he was saying. And Larry King, as usual, as an experienced interviewer, was too kind and did not want to get too deep into controversial issues to prove the president wrong!

Anyway, I would like to bring up many of the things, lies and misleading issues, that Mr Ahmadinejad said, so that readers can make up their mind about this undemocratic leader of an unfortunate country, a rich and beautiful country that is being abused by an unrepresentative and undemocratic, yet expansionist and dangerous, regime! Here are some of the things he said, and some of my rebuttals follow after each presidential rant!

1) Mr Ahmadinejad says that the hostilities have been one-sided, and that it is the US who has been hostile toward Iran.

He forgot to mention the US embassy takeover and hostage taking after the revolution in which he has allegedly been a party!

2) "Keshvare Iran 7000 sal sabegheye tarikhi dare. Hich vaght mellate Iran aleyhe hich mellati harekati ro anjam nanade."

I don't know why he felt the need to fantasise something like this! We are living in year 2008 and he is talking about things he probably has no idea about! First of all where did he get the 7000-year figure? That the country Iran has a history of 7000 years. I thought a country called Iran was established almost 2500 years ago for the first time by the Achaemenid. Did anybody live in Iran's current territories before that? Well, people lived in America (Africa, Europe etc) too some 7000 years ago, but there was no country called America, as there was no country (politically united entity) called Iran, even 3000 years ago. He is also saying that the Iranian PEOPLE (mellat) has NEVER acted against any other people.

Again, why did he need to say something so irrelevant?! Has any other PEOPLE in this world ever acted against other peoples, ever? If so, who? If we are talking about political entities, it is a different matter then! The political entity called Germany acted against its neighbouring political entities during the two world wars. The political entity Iran has repeatedly acted against its neighbouring lands, taking them over and robbing them time and time again. This applies for the Iran before Islam (invasions of Greece, Babylon, Egypt etc), and for Iran after Islam (for instance, the siege of northern India and the total plunder of the area by Nader Shah Afshar says anything?).

3) Mr Ahmadinejad says that Iran did nothing but defend itself against Saddam who was incited and aided by the Western powers.

Of course, the inciting is not accurate, but the aiding is documented. What Mr Ahmadinejad omitted is that Saddam shortly after the war wanted to end the war (he realised he could not win), and it was the Iranians (the Iranian leadership) who did not agree, and thought they were going to conquer Najaf and Karbala.

4) About the nuclear issue the president has some good points, by mentioning the fact that other countries are developing much more sophisticated nuclear technology, and even weapons, and they are not feared, and so carefully and diligently inspected. He says "don't you think the Zionist regime needs inspections?"

What the president doesn't understand is that the West (those who are indeed ruling this world, and definitely the democratic world) are fearful of his regime, the fundamentalist Islamic regime of Iran. The fear is genuine and it is based on precedence. The Iranian regime has not stopped interfering in other countries' affairs to create instability, whether it is in Israel, Palestine, and Lebanon, or more recently in Iraq. The Iranian regime is one of the world's relatively powerful countries openly challenging the democratic world, and desiring to obtain bomb-making nuclear technology. The West is fearful and it is legitimately so. While the same West is not fearful of a nuclear Israel. This is a fact that Iran must understand. Yes, as Mr Ahmadinejad said, it is political rather than legal (Israel has not signed the NPT, so it is not breaking that treaty anyway).

5) The president, when asked about Israel, and its supposed prospect of annihilation, complains about the dire humanitarian state in which the Palestinians are living under the "Zionist" regime. Then when asked about the possible solution, Mr Ahmadinejad says that he wants a free referendum in which Israelis and Palestinians would participate in order to choose their system of statehood and leadership.

Mr Ahmadinejad is the man of an unrepresentative ruling clique who have taken 70 million people hostage for about 30 years and they are concerned about 3-4 million non-Iranians? No, they are not. So, listening to what they say is a waste of time. Why not let YOUR OWN people participate in a referendum, a free referendum, and choose their own form of government? I know they got screwed 30 years ago and voted the Islamic constitution, but maybe, just maybe, they are a bit more experienced now! It is also true that most of the same Islamic constitution has not been respected.

6) When asked about the Holocaust, Mr Ahmadinjead says that it is not even allowed to question, and to research, the possibilities, and whether it did take place the way it has been portrayed by the West.

Again Mr Ahmadinjead is either terribly uninformed or simply playing dumb. The Holocaust has been researched and studied extensively and what the official Western history is saying is pretty much the result of the studies that have taken place after the event. However the president is RIGHT in saying that further research and study must be done. And the European laws that forbid questioning the Holocaust are not doing anything good either for the victims or for the future generations, by giving room and possible credibility for people like Ahmadinejad.

7) Mr Ahmadinejad, again, says that he thinks that IF the Holocaust took place in Europe and because of the crimes of the European regimes, then why didn't they set up Israel in Europe?

He is quite right in his simply putting the words in a short and rational response. But then again, if he is the 'representative' of justice and speaks for human rights, then why not apply it first in his own court? Well, he is NOT speaking for anybody's good. He is just wasting our time to try to fool a few, and he has quite a success among many Muslims (actually Sunni Muslims) in countries, mostly other than Iran.

8) Mr Ahmadinejad seems to ignore the threat of an Israeli attack altogether by saying that Israel is weak and irrelevant compared to Iran.

I wouldn't be so sure he is NOT genuinely worried about an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites. Israel has not only a very powerful army that can match the Iranian army by ease (even putting the atomic bomb aside), but it also enjoys the support of the world's most powerful country, America.

9) When Asked about homosexuals Mr Amadinejad did not stay that polite and ambiguous any more and stated a clear response regarding the homosexuals, that homosexuality is disliked by the vast majority of Iranians, and that there are laws which punish homosexuality.

Mr Ahmadinejad is right to say that "kasi tazahorati nakarde" (no one has demonstrated) in his attempt to minimise the plight of homosexuals in Iran. Well, I guess they would either be hanged, or somehow disappear altogether if they dared protesting in the streets asking for their rights inside Iran. And he is also right that the vast majority of Iranians are against homosexuality and dislike it. This was true even in the US a few decades ago. Even Iranian Bahais, to this date, are disliked by the vast majority of Iranians, who are Shia Muslims. Even Sunni Muslims are not much loved I must say. So, Mr Ahmadinejad is rights about some of the odious realities of the mostly backward Iranian society he continuously brags about. In Mr Ahmadinejad's 'logic' if the vast majority of Iranians dislike something then the regime is obliged to hang, or oppress, or mistreat, those who LIKE that something? Why not start at the top and do something about the regime itself? Why not ask the Iranian people whether they like the ruling regime or not?

I really don't see much of a reason to sit and talk with people like this, whose legitimacy are seriously questionable. The actions of the Iranian regime are out there for all to see, and their apparent soft talking when they come to the West are nothing but attempts to buy more time for whatever they may be up to, against their own people and against the interests of the democratic world.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by Ben MadadiCommentsDate
Moving forward
33
Nov 06, 2008
Testing democracy
15
Nov 02, 2008
Smart choice
22
Sep 15, 2008
more from Ben Madadi
 
default

ShamsVasir: truth #1. Everything is connected to everything else

by B-taraf (not verified) on

1. Iranians cannot live in peace as long as Palestinian issue is there. Why? Go ahead and find out for yourself.
2. Don't throw anti-semitism BS at me. I can criticize the anti-human policies of Israel if I choose too because it's happening every day. Read the news about new atrocities commited by terrorist zionist jews in the occupied West bank. Even Olmert had to acknowlege it while you are denying it.
3. If you are so pissed off at the Iranian regime why don't you join the "resistance" instead of eating you chelokabab in USA and complaining.
4. A lot of mullas died to get where they now, do you have the same commitment to your own ideal as mullas in Iran?
Enough said.


Fred

For your eyes only, Dr. No

by Fred on

Dr. No:“The only remaining problem between Iran and the IAEA is over the laptop documents.”
Well not exactly.


Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamist Republic of Iran


Dr. ElBaradei:
“However, I regret that we are still not in a position to make progress regarding the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran. Although Iran has so far produced only a limited quantity of low enriched uranium, which remains under Agency safeguards, this is still a cause for concern for the international community in the absence of full clarity about Iran´s past and present nuclear programme. This concern has been expressed by the Board of Governors and in a number of Security Council resolutions.
I urge Iran to implement all the transparency measures, including the additional protocol, required to build confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of its nuclear programme at the earliest possible date. This will be good for Iran, good for the Middle East region and good for the whole world.”


Spin on.


//www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Statements/2008/ebsp2008n008.html


Mammad

Fred

by Mammad on

I did not claim that what I said was news. I only made an abservation. The IAEA knows about a nuclear free Middle East proposal. Mohamed ElBaradei has spoken about it frequently.

The only remaining problem between Iran and the IAEA is over the laptop documents. The IAEA cannot provide the original files, nor can it explain why such sensitive documents did not have "top secret" seals, or why they were smuggled out of Iran so easily, or why if they are so important and point to a certain direction, the West waited 4 years to bring them forward; they have had it since 2004.

In a recent interview ElBaradei essentially said that he does not believe in the authenticity of the documents, but he has to pursue them as the head of the IAEA.

Mammad


Mammad

Anonymous Observer

by Mammad on

Thank you for your Eid-Fetr greetings. I am grateful. I was fortunate to fast the entire month.

I agree with what you wrote. Iran's hardliners use nationalism whenever it suites their interests. Iran's democratic groups, including the reformers, do not play with nationalism as a tol of advancing their agenda.

Salimi Namin is a total idiot. I have read what he has written about history. He is an ultra-hardliner who tries to cover himself in soft cloth, but when he puts out garbage about Iran's history, he shows his true colours.  

Mammad


default

To B-taraf

by Shamse Vazir (not verified) on

There is a lot of injustice in the world. I am interested in Iran only. We used to have a business and a home in Iran. It was stolen from us along with everything we owned by the IRI and its Marxist allies. Why don't you ever talk about that? How dare you talk about Palestinians when IRI is stealing Iranian property? I guess anti-Semitism is more in line with the IRI supporters who don't give a damn about Iranians.


Kaveh Nouraee

Antarinejad isn't playing

by Kaveh Nouraee on

1) He has absolutely no working knowledge of matters pertaining to politics, economics, history, or social policies.

2) He truly believes that he is well versed in such matters and that it is others who are uninformed. His belief in this regard can be traced to his religious faith, and the notion that as "pious Moslem" he has been gifted with wisdom and knowledge that others lack.

This not only makes him dumb, but truly dangerous.


Mehdi

Fred: You believe in NPT? Then get israel to do the same

by Mehdi on

Can't get funnier than this. Israel refusing to participate in NPT is the loudest voice in the world on wanting NPT to condemn Iran!!!!!!!! Talk about sheeps in wolf outfit!!!


Anonymous Observer

Zion- Happy Rosh Hashanah & Mammad - Happy Eid Fitr!

by Anonymous Observer on

It's interesting that the two holidays coincide.  Perhaps it's a good omen for peace between all nations.  I liked the piece, although I do have to agree with some of the counterpoints.  It is true that the anti-American sentiment that manifested itself in the Iranian revolution had its roots in the 1953 coup, but it has gone too far.  In fact, it went too far when the embassy was captured and has continued since then.  Unless someone can correct me, I do not know of any two nations who had a disagreement attacking each other's diplomatic missions.  It is just unjustifiable.

BTW, civilizations in Iran existed as far back as 7000 years ago.  However, Persian domination of the Iranain territories did not begin until the Achaemenid period, which called their land Pars (or Persis in Latin).  The use of the word Iran began with the Sassanids who coined the phrase "Iranshahr", or the country of Iran.  Please read Dr. Daryaee's piece on this site from last week, which is quite accurate.  But be that as it may, I find it extremely disingenuous for this regime to brag about Iran's ancient history when they do everything they can to supress it, as Iran's history conflicts with their ideology.  From the Sivand dam to  burying newly discovered Sassanid cities with the water of Salman Farsi (how ironically appropriate) dam, this regime has done whatever it can to wipe Iran's history "off the map" as well, sort of speak.  Even the person that they (Ahmadinejad included) have placed in charge of protecting Iran's ancient history (Salimi Namin) is an Iran history denier who believes that Persepolis was an incomplete construction site built atop of old Elamite ruins.  He also is a follower of Porpirar, a nut job, and another Iran history denier (a former Toudeh official turned IRGC torturer  who never fininshed high school and who was formerly known as Bana Konandeh) who claims that the entire Iranian history is a Jewish fabrication, that the Achaemenids were a bunch of foreign invaders, the Sassanids never existed (which in turn brings on the conlusion that the Prophet Mohamed himself was a liar and a jewish conspirator as he talks about Sassanid kings), that no one lived in Iran after Xrexes and that we are all descendants of post Islam Arabs. Mr. Salimi Namin goes on "lecture tours" with Poupirar all over the country and advocates this absured view of Iran's history.  The IRI uses Iran's history when it suits them, i.e., to rally support behind its nuclear issue and to also rally the Iranian expatriot community.  It's just another example of its manupilative nature.

Persia is Eternal.


Fred

Dr. No reveals

by Fred on

 “At the same time, Israel, a nation that has violated or refused practically all the UN Resolution against it, insists that Iran should live up to it NPT obligations (which Iran has, anyway). You see the irony?

This revelation should be relayed to IAEA and its Islamist republic leaning head for they have not said so and have refused to give the Islamists' nuke program a clean bill of health.


default

Ahmadinejad has the right to question Holocaust and why it

by B-taraf (not verified) on

happened the same way that you have the right to question Ahmadinejad. A large majority of the world agree wiht in points about holocaust.

why nobody in the world is suppose to have any questions about Holocaust?
Why nobody can mention the fact that holocaust has changed into "holocaust industry" bringing in billions of dollars to zionists and creating a mafia like group who destroy anybody or any government who does not agree with them?
Why nobody can oppose the taking of Palestinan land and giving it to jews from every where?
Your supposedly high moral is absurd.


Mammad

Ben

by Mammad on

Some of the things you say in your article are true, in my opinion, and well-argued. But, at the same time, there are many things that are simply not true, or not documented, and remain speculations:

1. Why is it that taking the US embassy (which was illegal) is so important, but many Iranians, especially in this column would like us to forget the root cause of the hostilities, namely, the 1953 coup? I know, some people would immediately "jump" on me, saying that is not so, but, in my opinion, it is.

The fact is, the hostage crisis is used by the ruling establishment in the US as an excuse (just as the Iranian ruling elite does the same). The confrontation between Iran and the US has nothing to do with the hostage crisis. It has everything to do with the US wanting to control the Middle East.

2. There is absolutely no document that indicates that Saddam wanted to end the war "shortly after" he started it, as you claim. Did he withdraw his forces VOLUNTARILY from even one inch of Iranian territory? Nope! He, APPARENTLY, became interested in "peace" only after Iranian forces EXPELLED his forces from Khuzestan. Even then he became interested, if he did, only because his supporters, mainly Saudi Arabia, became terrified.

3. Arguing that Israel has not signed the NPT and, therefore, has not violated an international treaty is like saying that a person who does not have a driver's liscence is free to kill people by accident. At the same time, Israel, a nation that has violated or refused practically all the UN Resolution against it, insists that Iran should live up to it NPT obligations (which Iran has, anyway). You see the irony?

4. Israel can START an attack on Iran, but can never FINISH it. Even the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US opposed and aborted Dick Cheney's attempts for attacking Iran by asking the key question: What is the scenario for ENDING the conflict, if we started it? Cheney did not have an answer. But the Joint Chiefs and the CIA have said repeatedly that they cannot think of any plausible scenario for ending the conflict, other than using nuclear bombs.

This explains why George Bush recently said NO to Israel, when asked for a green light for attacks. Even Bush has come to his senses! Of course, no one should underestimate the possibility of the attacks, but no one should also blow it way out of the realm of reality.

Mammad


default

Don't intend to repeat what some of our great hamvatans have

by Ari (not verified) on

already stated more eloquently.

However, Mr. Mamdadi, as an Iranian I would have expected that you would have done your own homework about Iran's history before regurgitating the same false propaganda that we continue to hear everyday from the controlled media in this country; and the lines preached by the neocons, the Israeli Lobby, the Zionist regime and those in the U.S. political system which aim to once again subjugate and colonize our country!!

I believe you received accurate responses from Mehdi, Roshanbeen, Varjavand,Bavafa and others who fortunately, cleared up many of your amnesia about Iran.

Yes, fortunately there is the internet and you have freedom of speech. But freedom of speech should not be misconstrued as providing false information in order to mislead the public; and with all the information at your hand via the internet, history books etc. it is a surprise that you continue to repeat the same old, same old propaganda and disinformation that Iran's enemies have used to fool the masses.


Zion

Another well argued article

by Zion on

enjoyed reading it. Thanks.


default

Iran's President is terribly uninformed

by Faribors Maleknasri M.D. (not verified) on

He is it. He does not know that the Islamic Govenment in the Islamic Republic of Iran is HIS Regime. Unless he reads this article. The Islamic Regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran belongs to 7ty Million honorable Iranians. They have founded it. By sacrificing Blood and Life. Not even Imam Khomaini has ever called the islamic Government in Iran HIS regime. Whenever I try to read in "IRANIAN" i get after having read a few words stopped. can not continue reading. In this article i am being stoppde by reading the wordes President Ahmadinejad HIS REGIME an so on. I mean if the West fears the Iranian Nation so it is - the West - required, as the shirazis say: KUNESH RA BEZANEH BE ABE CHAIDEH. Please ask a shirazi what these words mean. I do not see any other way hiow the west can help itself. Given the Name his regim to beloved Mahmood comes from a discrete wish as if one wants to say: Deis Mahmood so dies the Islamic nation the Islamic Government the Islamic Republic. Surely it will not happen so. many many years the west and other enemies of the believers hopped and waited for Death of Imam Khomaini. after som many years they hope stil. Why not I ask myself. Greeting.


default

گول این حرفها را نخورید

امیر کبیر در خیابان نایب سلطنه مشغول خرید زولبیا و بامیه (not verified)


آقای احمدی نژاد از طرف خانواده مادری یهودی است. در زمان قاجار بسیاری از یهودیان بخاطر دستیابی به حجره های بازار تهران که مرکز بدون انکار گردش پول در ایران است، به دین اسلام روی آوردند.

اسرائیل از این موضوع کاملا مطلع میباشد و تعجب نکنید که اسرائیل پول بسیار خرج کرد تا با حمایت سفارت انگلیس اجمدی نژاد رئیس جمهور شود.

احمدی نژاد بخوبی ماموریت خود را برای اسرائیل انجام میدهد و آن بی آبرو کردن ایران در دنیا ست و اشائه خرافات اثنی عشری.

دو سال قبل از رئیس جمهور شدن آقای احمدی نژاد با سفارش آیت الله خامنه ای و مصباح یزدی، دو عضو قدیمی لژ فراماسونری، ایشان را به لژ راه دادند و عضویت ایشان تصویب شد و مورد قبول سفیر انگلیس نیز قرار گرفت.

آقای لری کینگ عمدا به احمدی نژاد میدان میدهد تا بتازد تا آنکه روزی بمانند صدام حسین مملکت خودرا بخاک و خون کشد.


default

too much time

by MRX1 (not verified) on

you spend too much time and energy writing about this piece of human waste, a degenerate scum Ahamadinejad who should be locked in prison some where along with his islamo facist lackey's on this web site!


default

Bavafa, regarding the hostages:

by Shamse Vazir (not verified) on

Actually Carter had already decided to put his support behind Khomeini and there was no coup plan. The US embassy takeover was a deliberate act by the Marxists to prevent the Mullahs from getting close to the US. Like idiots the Mullahs supported it. It turned out to be a very stupid act because it cost Iran ~9 billion dollars of assets plus it resulted in huge negative publicity. It was also criminal and against international law and amounted to an attack on US territory. If US really wanted to they could have used it a pretext to invade Iran.

Now if the IRI government was really afraid of a coup, it could have simply closed the embassy and requested that the American staff leave. That would have been the "brilliant" approach.


Arash Monzavi-Kia

Understanding AhmadiNutJob

by Arash Monzavi-Kia on

To understand this nutjob, one has to consider his psyche, beliefs and plans.

1. ANJ is self righteous. He has god on his side and is going against the demons. Comes from a poor background, which together with his unpleasant appearance and dull wit was always a source of frustrations. But not any more! Now he is on the right, cleansed of all the dumbness and ugliness of the past. See, that’s your average fascist foot soldier since Hitler, Stalin and Khomeini.

 2. ANJ believes that our world is coming to an end, in a bloody good-versus-evil shoot out. An all mighty messiah (the 12th Imam) is going to emerge after centuries of waiting, to kill all of the infidels and apostates, so that rivers will run red. ANJ is preparing for that coming, without which his whole existence is pointless. Now, that’s your typical evangelical nutjob, who comes in all shapes and colors.

3. ANJ plans to turn Iran to the ideal social, political and military base for his messiah. There is no other point to Iran (the only Shia dominated country), but to serve the god’s right hand, the turner of sun and moon, and the tuner of electrons and protons! So this base has to be equipped with all the first class weaponry, technology and capability.

To achieve those ends, ANJ and his Hezbollah cohorts, after some years of belligerent stupidity, have finally realized what to do. Instead of acting all lunatic and cuckoo, like their now dead Imam Khomeini, they have decided to play the ‘step-by-step’ diplomatic game. The problem is that, it is very difficult for a maniac to behave normally for long; so they need a lot of preparation and practice. What gives them hope and joy in this patience is that:

A. They are winning the Iraq chess match! U S of A is two steps from a disgraceful exit from the Middle East. Guess who is going to fill that power vacuum?

B.  The oil money is flowing like there is no tomorrow. The Chinese, Indians and a number of other third world countries are going up a notch, with a billion-person emerging middle class, whose 2nd wish is an automobile.

C. The balance of power in the Middle East and the world is turning away from the Western powers, and towards a multi-polar system. USA has shot most of his arrows in the Iraqi deserts, and has maxed on all his credit lines. Israel is now taken hostage by the swarm of Palestinians and Hezbollah, who are chipping away at his walls. And the good-old-Europe is at the mercy of her own social, demographic and economic woes.

With all this, why shouldn’t ANJ act all self confident and prepared? He really believes in his side, his chances and his hidden Imam’s promise. In that case, telling lies to a bunch of evil infidels is easier than drinking holy water!

Arash M-K


Bavafa

what a joke

by Bavafa on

"He forgot to mention the US embassy takeover and hostage taking after the revolution in which he has allegedly been a party!"

And I think you have forgotten the history of US medaling in Iran's affair, specifically in 1953. That was a brilliant act on the Iranian side to prevent another coup detat by the Americans. Perhaps this is why they are so pissed :)

"What the president doesn't understand is that the West (those who are indeed ruling this world"

I guess that is the difference between you and vast majority of Iranians who are defending the Iranian right to the nuclear technology is that you have accepted the "west" as your master and ruling you and Iranians have not.

"The Iranian regime has not stopped interfering in other countries' affairs to create instability"

Now this is truly laughable, considering that the US sticks his nose in every country in the world and is currently sharing a longer border with Iran then Canada.

"Why not let YOUR OWN people participate in a referendum, a free referendum, and choose their own form of government"

They did, and some 90% of them voted for the Islamic Republic (perhaps you weren't there) and currently some 60-70% people vote during each election which is far more then we can say for the West.

"But then again, if he is the 'representative' of justice and speaks for human rights, then why not apply it first in his own court?"

Just because he does not respect the human rights (at least to your and perhaps my standard) does not make his statement wrong. Also, remember he who is to say what is the ultimate human right (we still torture people in this country)

Mehrdad


Mehdi

Farhad Kashani: You forgot Fred and zion

by Mehdi on

They may leave a comment here in the future. You know, you don't have to read their comment, you know they always say the right thing (dictated by Mosad, how could it not be the right thing?). What a bunch of parrots!


Mehdi

samsam1111: My mistake - I though it was Hebrew

by Mehdi on

It is hard to tell, you know?


samsam1111

For an Ommatist , My sentences are hardly inteligible

by samsam1111 on

Your sentences are hardly inteligible 

Mehdi !  It,s true dude...exactly as You pointed out. The audience was meant to be Iranians. You on the other hand need a translator dude..here

انت تندرج في نظام لتقع. ايران ليست ملكا لكم

Farhad Kashani

Mr. Madadi, samsam111,

by Farhad Kashani on

Mr. Madadi, samsam111, Shamse Vazir, guys, remember, the more these IRI supporters bash you, the more you should know you're right, and it should give you the great feeling of knowing that you are on the people's side. Thats the tool to measure your position! Good job guys.


varjavand

Ben

by varjavand on

Mr. Madadi

 

This is not the first time you come to this site and spread nonsense about our beloved country. This time, you have used Ahmadinejad interview as the pretext. And, when you are faced with criticisms by the concerned readers, you simply shrug them off as genuine disagreements. My friend, some readers have tried to correct your spiteful statement s and nonfactual claims through their comments and they deserve a proper explanation or clarification from you.

 

If you cannot back them up, then zip it up!

Varjavand

 

 


Mehdi

samsam1111: you are turning into another Fred

by Mehdi on

Watch out! You are goiung where fred went. Your sentences are hardly inteligible. You sound more like a drunk Russian retard chasing Palestinians out of his "God given" land. Come back rationality.Try to say something intelligent once in a while, and not just a blind approval of Israel.


samsam1111

LOL ..Bacheh Ommatists talking "Meehan" & "Iran"

by samsam1111 on

7000 yrs civilization? How the hell that has any thing to do with an Ommatist like You folks? The only part that involves You is the post- Qadesiyeh V-ran thanks to Your cousins @ 637AD & the Haj Agha Icons You continue to glorify & promote...Now that Ommatism is bankrupt in the land We all hear em talk about Meehan & Iran..Cameleons..Where were You last 30 yrs when Your Khallife auctioned & censored off "Iran" heritage?..kha kha kha khalibandah

btw..Don,t distort the facts mullah style ..Iranian real History started 3400 yrs ago by the migration of 23 Arieo Vejoo Proto Indo-European tribes of central Asia & Russia into Iranian plateau.....What ever Ilamites or natives did prior to that is not part of Eran state/cultural entity. It,s simply Lagash & Ilamite heritage... Ommatist preaching Patriotism...It,s nuts..hehe

 


Mehdi

Shamse Vazir: You ONLY defend Israel

by Mehdi on

My comment has NOTHING to do with Palestine. I only use them as examples. But you Israelis have no answer, so you constantly try to misrepresent my comments. Only a complete comatose cannot see your lies.


default

Mehdi

by Shamse Vazir (not verified) on

Have you ever shown any concern for the poor Iranian kids? How about the hundreds of thousands who lost their lives in the war? How about all those whose dream are broken under the boots of the mullahs today. No all you *ever* mention is Israel / Palestine. You just repeat the same thing over and over. Here is a suggestion: You; Ahmadinejad and those who think like you should form a humanitarian group tasked to help the Palestinians. Then move to an Arab country where you are happy; stop meddling in the affairs of Iran and leave Iran to people who are interested in Iran and not in Israel or Palestine or any other nation.


samsam1111

بن جان اخه اين تووله عرب آدمه که بلاگش کنی

samsam1111


خب چون لری شووت اين  مليجک  ملا عربو ادم دونسته ..تو هم گول خوردی اين جوجه ملخو تيترش کردي..رژيم قادسيه دو تا خ داره که اگه زر گنده زدن بد نيست گوش کني .خ يک مرده و مونده خ دو خايمنه اي.. و يه بی خ هم بود بنام  خاتمي که خه اش رو کشيدن.. .اين با با  نمره ای نيست ميون گوسفندهايه پان امتيست..گناه و اشتباه ليبرال ميدياست که اين ساب ادمها و ملخ هايه قادسيه  رو ميدون ميده برايه نشخوار..بر اين گمان که اگر با ادمها نشست و برخاست کنن پس از چندی از بربريت دور شده و فرمول داروين به کمکشون مياد..اين تعوري اين ساده سرشتان بي مخه..يکيش هم اون شووت حسين او با  ما .... هي هي هي .....او با ماست ....نه با دووغه.   ..براستي که راستي راستي کردن تو پاچه امت پارسی....رو هم رفته دمت گرم مسيو  بن ,,, بچه شايسته سرزمين بابکان و اذران..درد و خاک کفشت بخوره تو سر بچه ملا و اسوشييتس موالي... مرسی و شاد زی

يک کامنت برايه دو تا بلاگ..چون ارزششو نداره


Farhad Kashani

Mr. Madadi, great article.

by Farhad Kashani on

Mr. Madadi, great article. Keep up the good work.