You may be surprised at the answer; there are already over 205 cosponsors of H.Con.Res. 362. Is yours one?
This bill calls on the president to stop all shipments of refined petroleum products from reaching Iran. It also “demands” that the President impose “stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains and cargo entering or departing Iran.”
Analysts say that this would require a US naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz, the critical chokepoint through which nearly a quarter of the world’s oil passes. Imposing such a blockade without United Nations authority (which the resolution does not call for) would be considered an act of war. Some congressional sources say the House could vote on the resolution as early as this week.
Critics of the bill claim that if the US Congress were to pass H.Con.Res. 362, it would send the signal to the Iranian people and the international community that the US is willing to engage in an aggressive and unwarranted act of war before direct diplomacy even begins. That interpretation is refuted, however, by strong interests in Washington who have pushed to promote the petroleum embargo as a voluntary hold on exports to Iran from a coalition of willing countries. Supporters claim that this proposal is actually an alternative to war and an effective approach to pressure Iran economically.
Sensing that the threat of war has once again increased -- especially in light of this month’s Israeli military exercises which simulated a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities -- IAEA Director Mohamad El Baradei warned last week that he would resign if any country attacked Iran.
Economic analysts worry that the risk of military escalation in the Persian Gulf could drive oil prices above their already record highs, possibly approaching $200 per barrel. During this highly charged political time, members of Congress are prone to give in to calls for tough talk and escalation against Iran. That approach, however, has failed for nearly three decades and produces nothing more than higher gas prices and a constantly growing risk of war.
Your members of Congress need to hear your opinion about this. Tell your members of Congress not to support this war resolution.
Trita Parsi is is a co-founder and current President of the National Iranian American Council (niacouncil.org) in Washington, DC.
Recently by Trita Parsi | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Bibi’s Three Steps Forward, One Back | 5 | Oct 13, 2012 |
Mistaken Path | 18 | Jun 22, 2012 |
Give Obama Elbow Room on Iran | 26 | Jun 15, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Guiltless Islamist republic
by Fred on Thu Jun 26, 2008 09:38 PM PDTTrita Parsi says: “Critics of the bill claim that if the US Congress were to pass H.Con.Res. 362, it would send the signal to the Iranian people and the international community that the US is willing to engage in an aggressive and unwarranted act of war before direct diplomacy even begins.” If the issue in question is the Islamist republic’s illegal full cycle nuclear activity in direct contravention of international treaties that it is a signatory to then to claim “direct diplomacy” has not been tried is disingenuous. The past number of years has been dedicated to protracted face to face negotiations which have resulted to the newly appointed head of the Islamist Parliament threatening the International community with a fait accompli. Despite the claim to the contrary by the pressure groups no one is advocating war, the proof being the very Congress that NIAC/CASMII are targeting now is controlled by Democrats that the duo were rooting for. The simple fact is the world is faced with a messianic Islamist regime with atrocious human rights record hell bent on becoming a nuclear power and the world is scared stiff of the prospect. All avenues to stop them should be explored prior to the despicable war option. In order to escape the charges of being an Islamist republic pressure group/lobby, NIAC/CASMII need to apply equal force on the Islamist republic.