Islamic Democracy, indeed

Well, what do you expect from an ISLAMIC republic?


Share/Save/Bookmark

Islamic Democracy, indeed
by Ben Madadi
21-Feb-2008
 

The Iranian government, through its actions time and time again, has shown that it does not believe in Iranians for its ideological survival. This has been seen again by banning thousands of Iranians from candidacy in the March 2008 Parliamentary (Majlis) elections. The Iranian regime is a very complex one and whether we accept or not there is also some democratic side to it. People do change in Iranian political arena, and they have done so very often.

For instance Rafsanjani who was often called Akbar Shah (reflecting his extreme king-like powers) was defeated by a relatively unknown figure, Ahmadinejad. The only person who has not been challenged is Khamenei, who is also given special powers by the Iranian post-revolutionary Constitution. Although Khamenei is the most powerful figure in Iranian politics he IS NOT a dictator. He does not have enough duties to make him a dictator. He is something like a powerful arbiter who has since used his authority in its reasonable limits, not showing truly dictatorial tendencies. He has just respected the constitution! And he has not written, or ever changed it.

The whole Islamic regime of Iran is a truly complex creature but knowing how it works has not exactly been the preoccupation of anti-IRI people. It is indeed useful to take an objective look and see how this monster actually functions. It functions quite well, but it is NOT a dictatorship, and it is not a democracy. It is something in between. However it is much more democratic than many other countries out there. This shows the regime's degree of confidence. It is able to let people release their anger once in a while in various elections, without the need to become truly democratic. And the regime itself actually acknowledges that it is not a democracy, but an ISLAMIC democracy. How this Islamic democracy works? Take a look at this: //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94... It is too complicated from an arithmetic point of view, and too worthless actually, to remember each and every bit of it.

The regime does not have a powerful security apparatus like the ones used in many dictatorial regimes such as Syria today or many Communist countries in the past. Although the regime does have means to suppress occasional popular uprisings it is confident enough to let people enjoy quite a bit of freedom of speech, not just in private but also in public. Iranians are not usually jailed, or bothered in any way, for criticising the regime or its personalities in private or in small gatherings. Dictatorial regimes often do not tolerate even private criticism but the Iranian regime is so confident it even allows some sort of public criticism as long as the criticism does not go as far as questioning the whole fundamentals of the regime.

So, the regime is indeed a confident one. It has been so for quite a while now and successfully. But it was not exactly the same during the first years of revolutions when you could even get executed because of some rumours of belonging to some opposition group.

How does this regime handle itself so well? The answer is quite simple actually. There are so many, incredibly many, individuals who enjoy the regime's existence that they constitute a powerful and large enough base for it to be perfectly functional (for its survival), confident, and at the same time partially democratic so that no powerful figure or grouping of the same base itself does not feel left outside the bigger slice of the enjoyment of power. Although many of the clique members may not ideologically agree with the regime, they do understand that their good times depend on the survival of the regime. Nevertheless we shall not under-estimate the power of the ideological base. There is indeed an ideological, conservative, base which is extremely powerful. But no matter what it is mainly the comfort of power (not ideology) that keeps the ruling clique attached to the regime.

Most of Iran's clergy support the regime because it gives them many advantages that they could not have during Shah's time. Most of them know this and they have seen and felt it. Beside the clergy there are also the Basij and others who are linked to powerful clerics. Most of the clerics believe in the Islamic regime. It is not just Khamenei. The regime can do very well without Khamenei or any other powerful figure. There are so many to replace every and each one of them. The regime has been built by Khomeini in such a beautiful (or sinister), practical and functional manner that it actually perpetuates and reproduces with relative ease and harmony.

The Islamic regime of Iran is perfectly aware of its lack of popularity and that is the reason it does not let the people choose whoever they want in elections. But there is democracy among the Islamists themselves so that they do not feel estranged by the system. Therefore the system works so well because it provides the best platform through which Islamists, just the true Islamists who have been blessed by some of the highest-ranking clerics, can quite fairly compete among each other and stay happy with the system, its competitive and functional structures, and the ever-existing promise of becoming someone some day.

This is not a regime for all Iranians. It doesn't even pretend to be one. But we need to acknowledge its merits too. It is a system that works so well. Don't be surprised to find the same old regime in power for decades to come! I won't be surprised. Especially knowing the FACT how irrational, emotional, disunited and weak the opposition is. We all know that the economy is doing poorly, because it is quite simple, the Islamists seem not to be good economists! They also know that having a good economy implies completely opening the doors to American and other democratic powers' investments inside Iran and this might create more sympathy among Iranians for the West, and its DEMOCRATIC values. Human rights record is horrible.

Well, Islamists apply fundamentalist Islam. What can we expect? The regime has been quite successful in finding ways to distance people from the West and its democratic values by finding scapegoats one after another. It has been quite a successful process and most Iranians are not very pro-West and have deep suspicions. There is also some historical ground to this popular suspicion of the West. It is useless to remind the readers about Mossaddegh, let alone others! But the IRI regime does not feel history is quite enough, and it is actually quite right about it.

Watch IRI TV and read the Iranian press (Iran has one of the lowest press readership rate in the whole world) and you will see headlines one after another blaming the West for everything imaginable and unimaginable, from not letting the Iranians to have access to nuclear energy, to oppressing Palestinians, Iraqis and so on. Although the version offered by the IRI is inaccurate, in the absence of the opposing view, it finds its way to be seen as the only version out there. At least this is very often the case for the vast majority of the people. And all these tricks do give some results. The West represents democracy and the IRI represents Islamic democracy and Iranians thinking that the West is far worse than the IRI actually prefer the less evil.

Is the IRI a humane, normal or acceptable system? No. But it is one of the most formidable systems out there. I have written about this before, though not exactly the same format, but it is useful to stress the realities every now and then in light of various news events. To fight this undemocratic and unpopular regime it is necessary to know how it works. Unfortunately many Iranians opposing the regime have little idea about the strength of the Iranian regime. And they do not want to open their minds to see where the facts lie. Let's not forget the vast amount of money that the IRI receives from selling crude oil. We may actually need to get used to this regime as long as it has oil. As long as oil flows the regime does not need so much popular support and by feeding the Islamic clique reasonably it can do quite well. It is actually not that complicated afterall. And what if the whole world stopped buying oil from Iran?

The Iranians, inside and outside the country, would blame the rest of the world for starving simple Iranians to death. This is not exactly the best solution. However we shall not go easy with this regime and hope for a good behaviour. Either one wants Islamic democracy where you have democracy for probably 1 million out of 70 million, or true democracy where you have democracy for all (okay, excluding children). We cannot have both ways. Islamic democracy fails to address the needs of the people because it has little to do with most of the people and what they want, and the results are out there for all to see in Iran. A rich country in ruins!

And by the way, let's hope that Iranians will do the least they can and ignore this whole mockery of inviting the people to vote one long-bearded fundamentalis over a more youthful but sinister-looking Antari-something fundamentalist!


Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by Ben MadadiCommentsDate
Moving forward
33
Nov 06, 2008
Testing democracy
15
Nov 02, 2008
Playing dumb?
72
Sep 29, 2008
more from Ben Madadi
 
Ben Madadi

Re: Anonymous6

by Ben Madadi on

No comment was deleted on this article (except two of yours which were saying that comments are deleted) even if some of them are not nice, or even quite rude! So, please don't fill the page with irrelevant stuff!


default

Well, what do you expect from an ISLAMIC Republic?

by Faribors Maleknasri M.D. (not verified) on

The question is ambiguous and consequently difficult to be answered. Neverthe less I try it:
1. There are a lot of Visitores of "IRANIAN" who do expect a lot from the ISLANMIC REPUBLIC of Iran, speak : from the honourable Iranian Nation. Some wish be given thier jobs in the Time of pahlavis with Alcohol, drugs, women and and and .
2. We have just had the Ardeshir. he for example expects from Iranians - and it takes no wounder - that they dismiss Mr. Mottaki ( who is one of my Idols! ) and give him the post. And not only that: There after he wants the job of Mr. Ahmadinejad, the president. And see: HE WOULD NOT GET THE CROWN PRINCE back to Iran!
3. another group expects that the strangers should be again the masters in Iran. they worked for strangers inearlier times, were well paid, they want the old times back.
4. The myth with women emancipation, freedom of speech and communication, no censorship and all these things which in western countries exist only on the paper, well these things but up to the western models, are also expected from honourable Iranian Nation. it means: Giving up the national identity, degenerating to a rootless mass, obeyding the strangers again as thier faithfull servant. Iranians have never wanted the things this way and they are -there are very strong signs for it - willing to prevent that thoise time would ever come back.
5. Just blaming the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC because of Censorship is the most enjoyable and easy Hobby. better one looks how the censoring is practiced inthe united states of america and other western countries. Courts end for usual with a non liquet in the most cases when they have to handle a case of censorship. Because the laws end in a cul-de-sac, dead end, deadn end street, impasse. Inthe ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of IRAN the Government has the controll over media. somis for example the "IRANIAN" not available in iran. and Iranian CHAT-Sites can not bring words which we can read hier in our "IRANIAN". Each time i read those words runs cold water over my back. I imagine then how an Iranian Grand Ma would react if she could read the words! In the western countries according to the laws nothing is sacred in the public in accordance to the personalfreedom and freedom of speech and communication. The question of these private rights - an important part of constitution which were primarily thought to protect the poeple against the gevernment - is and can not be answered by the Laws in the western countruies when private persons call upon thier privet rights against another person, who has also the same rights! In Iran are these impassesnon existent. I can not call it censoreship. Incidentically I respect the idea of every body else who likes to do that. I for myself, others for themselves.Greeting


default

Censorship and Freedom of Speech

by Anonymous6 (not verified) on

JJ and other admin,
Freedom of speech/expression is an absolute right in this society.

In your site you pretend to be an advocate of it by saying nothing is scared (what a joke!). Practically you are much worse than Mullahs. They don’t know anything better, you know and with your censorship with no real reason, downgrading yourself to the same level as mullahs!

This is my opinion that 'Ying Yang Paintings' in main page of Iranian.com is a trashy painting, and you don’t have any tolerance to hear it.

Go head again and delete my comment again as you did for past 12 hours.

Now is not the painting anymore it is your action and censorship that portrait you to the same low level as Mullahs


Ben Madadi

Re: Areyo

by Ben Madadi on

Thank you! I think I have had others pretty okay, or better ;) But being fair or balanced is not easy. I haven't been fair or balanced (judged by myself) in all my articles, though it is usually because of writing skills rather than intentions.


Ben Madadi

Re: Zion

by Ben Madadi on

My point is that the IRI, in order to satisfy its core base of believers and supporters, has created a system in which they (the core base) can compete relatively fairly. I do stand by this statement. People have changed in Iranian politics however because the core base in not as large as in a normal democracy these people do not change that much and that often as in a normal democracy. Of course the IRI is NOT a democracy. I didn't say this ;)


default

WoW! Well Well,Well

by Areyo Barzan (not verified) on

Well Ben!

I am actually impressed. This was a very fair-minded and realistic assessment. I believe this to be your best article yet. I actually agree with many of the points that you made in your article. However the most important point that you made was the necessity to know one's enemy and its points of strength and weakness before taking it on

I totally agree with you that today most of Iranian opposition are so fractured  over emotional and rationally bankrupted that they  would never see or even want to see this facts. they are not interested in knowing their enemy before engaging in a rational and systematic offencive against it. They simply refuse to get their act together and get a grip of the realities of the ground or actually get to know the nature of their problem before prescribing a solution for it.

Well let's hope that such articles and the discussions that would follow, would eventually take effect and make them to realize the need for taking their head out of their ass and engaging with realities on the ground as they are.

But then again….

 


Zion

Some Points

by Zion on

Dear Ben,

You say:
`whether we accept or not there is also some democratic side to it. People do change in Iranian political arena, and they have done so very often.`
This is not true. That people change in the political arena has nothing to do with democracy. It would have a democratic aspect if people changed in the real power positions without violence, including hidden violence, and with the consent of the people. People on the front also change regularly in Mafia systems.

Besides this I agree with your main point. The Islamic Regime in Iran is a very complex structure. The amalgam of all forms of hidden problems inherent in iran and exported from abroad in a complex and dangerous way. You raise a good point.


default

Khomeini or British???

by 007 (not verified) on

Outcry

The British spies did train KHOMEINI in Najaf, Iraq when SHAH OF IRAN was enjoying his wine drinking at Golestan Palace. Even HITLER and MUSSOULINI were British agents.


default

Hhow do you spell D E M O C R A C Y

by LostIdentity (not verified) on

DEMOCRACY is like a FLower:
Some want to use it;
Some want to abuse it;
Some want to cherish it
Some want to take care of it
Some want to genetically alter it;
Some want to misuse it;
Some want to make business out of it;
Some want to stay away from it (Allergic)

Who are you?


default

There are two sets of rule

by bird flu (not verified) on

There are two sets of rule and laws in the Islamic Republic. One for Khodi and one for Na-khodi. Here is an excerpt on definition of Fascism:

This may surprise most educated people. One of the more common government strategies today, especially in developing regions is fascism. Fascism is commonly confused with Nazism. Nazism is a political party platform that embraces a combination of a military dictatorship, socialism and fascism. It is not a government structure. Fascism is a government structure. The most notable characteristic of a fascist country is the separation and persecution or denial of equality to a specific segment of the population based upon superficial qualities or belief systems.

Simply stated, a fascist government always has one class of citizens that is considered superior (good) to another (bad) based upon race, creed or origin. It is possible to be both a republic and a fascist state. The preferred class lives in a republic while the oppressed class lives in a fascist state.

//www.couplescompany.com/Features/Politics/St...

general characteristics
of a fascist country:

1. Fascism is commonly defined as an open terror-based dictatorship which is:

Reactionary: makes policy based upon current circumstances rather than creating policies to prevent problems; piles lies and misnomers on top of more lies until the truth becomes indistinguishable, revised or forgotten.
Chauvinistic: Two or more tiered legal systems, varying rights based upon superficial characteristics such as race, creed and origin.
Imperialist elements of finance capital: Extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political domination of one state over its allies.

Though a dictatorship is the most common association with fascism, a democracy or republic can also be fascist when it strays away from its Tenets of sovereignty. In the 20th Century, many Fascist countries started out as republics.

Through the use of fear, societies gave up their rights under the guise of security. Ultimately these republics morphed into Fascist states.

2. Fascism is an extreme measure taken by the middle classes to forestall lower-working class revolution; it thrives on the weakness of the middle classes. It accomplishes this by embracing the middle-class' love of the status-quo, its complacency and its fears of: TOP

Generating a united struggle within the working class

Revolution

Losing its own power and position within society

In a more simplistic term the people currently in control fear that if they allow equal rights and equal consideration to those being oppressed, they will become oppressed and lose everything.

Generally those in power are of a smaller segment of society, but they hold the wealth and control of key systems like manufacturing, law, finance and government position, (i.e. the slave owners in the south prior to the civil war) and the oppressed vastly outnumber them, (the slaves during the same period).


default

Dear Ben: This was the first

by bird flu (not verified) on

Dear Ben: This was the first article I have read written by you. I'm not interested in offering solutions or dictating to people what they should do or not do. However, I take umberage when conventioanl political defintions are slaughtered. If you want to find a solution, you need to correctly analyze the problems. Faulty analysis leads to faulty solutions.


default

Islamic democracy???

by Kurdish warrior (not verified) on

Most educated people agree that there is no Islamic democracy. Religion is private matter and shouldn't be mixed with politics. The only way to save Iran from its destruction is to fight the IRI for secular federal Iran. When that day comes, all Iranians will be free.


Ben Madadi

Re: bird flu (interesting name) ;)

by Ben Madadi on

If you have read any of my previous articles you can see that I am NO fan of the IRI but I am totally opposed to the regime. I have always been and throughout the years of my writing for this website I have been quite steadfast on the issues I have adressed.

The Iranian regime is a dangerous, unrepresentative and unpopular one with horrible actions that it takes against Iranians and non-Iranians. But we need to analyse this regime realistically to understand how we can do anything about it. This was the main point of the article. Do you think that the only way to oppose the regime is to say "f... the regime!" ??? That won't do any harm.

Don't you think urging the public NOT TO go to vote is a much worse blow to the regime? ;)


default

Yes, definitely, there is

by bird flu (not verified) on

Yes, definitely, there is Islamic Democracy for the Islamists in a theofascist state. What? You don't think fascists can't be democratic among themselves??HAHAHA

Ben Madadi: Are you a used-car salesman?

Your grotesque and cheap linguistic manipultions are pathetic and reveal your utter moral bankruptcy. Joseph Goebles, chief propagandist of Hitler would be proud of you. You're putting lipstick on a pig and it's not going to work. It doesn't matter how good a salesman you are, you're not going to be able to sell something as toxic and as odious as Islamic Republic as a democracy.

This kind of semantic manipulation will only deceive the dumbset of people.


default

I felt as Ben's article was

by RostamehZaal (not verified) on

I felt as Ben's article was very well balanced and well written. Yes, he is right. While the Iranian Regime is not exactly Democratic, it's nothing like what Saddam's regime used to be in Iraq. It's not a totalitarian regime. The regime does not interfer in every aspect of people's lives and as we know many Iranians lead a double life and the regime knows it. It's also true that one could disagree with the regime as long as he or she doesn't question the basic foundations of the system. However some of the atrocities, such as the murder or the Journalist in Evin Prison and the the hanging the 16 year old Atefeh in the Caspian Sea region, are not excusable by any means.


default

Dear Ben, just because the

by Anonymous347 (not verified) on

Dear Ben, just because the genuine opposition groups to IR (I mean the real genuine ones not the fake garden variety kinds here and there fabricated by the regime itself) are incompetent, disunited and good for nothing, that does not mean IR is powerful and invinceable. As to why IR regime has lasted for 29 fucking years is mainly because it's got enormous oil revenues and above all there is this lack of a better tangible alternative to it.


default

Dear Ben, just because the

by Anonymous347 (not verified) on

Dear Ben, just because the genuine opposition groups to IR (I mean the real genuine ones not the fake garden variety kinds here and there fabricated by the regime itself) are incompetent, disunited and good for nothing, that does not mean IR is powerful and invinceable. As to why IR regime has lasted for 29 fucking years is mainly because it's got enormous oil revenues and above all there is this lack of a better tangible alternative to it.


Ben Madadi

Re:

by Ben Madadi on

Why do people jump into conclusions without even having read (probably) all of the article! How can I be a pro akhund? For God's sake! Don't be so hateful guys! Have some reasoning. The Iranian regime is a powerful one and we need to analyse it realistically to have chance against it. Some would actually label anybody who does not insult and swear a supporter of the subject?? Come on guys!


default

I should have stopped

by Iva (not verified) on

When I saw "islamic Democracy" ... What a joke ... yo Ben, you still trying to sell the idea of islamic cult can be democratic cult.


default

I stopped reading right here ->

by Iva (not verified) on

"People do change in Iranian political arena, and they have done so very often."

Yeap ... Let me see, Khomeini stayed till he died, Meshkini was there unitl his death and so was Tavsoli, and countless other ayatoolehs. Living animals are Khameni, RasmanJani, Sanei, and countless other dogs that we have been acustome to see them for 30 years. they just change title for themselves, President and then head of this and Rahbar of that ... Just because they throw their mad dogs like ahmaghinejad and Khatami in front DOES NOT TRANSLATE TO DEMOCRACY.

who is this Ben is trying to fool? I don't need to read more lies from mouth piece of akhonds ... I HAVE HEARD IT ALL.


default

what is wrong with you people

by maziar ameretat (not verified) on

i think the writer is writing a balanced argument, in which he is actually opposing the regime, though he is pointing out the realities. i think the problem is not with the government, but also with some of the iranians outside iran. all of us iranians always chat about how beautiful and gorgeous dubai and los angeles are, and how they are like heaven, but whenever it come to our country, we never say good things about the government. yet we always say that the arab emir is always helpful and generous. i think iranians should start liking their actual country right now, not the one they always imagine in their mind


default

what do you expect from a

by Anonymous00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 (not verified) on

what do you expect from a shameless monkey who changed is Iranian name to Ben. get lost...


farokh2000

Why do you write "Ben"?

by farokh2000 on

You must have a ton of time on your hands and feel you are doing a lot of good by writing this kind of trash.

Please do us all a great favor and stop writing garbage.

Find something else to do with your time, please!


default

Khomeini or British

by Outcry (not verified) on

"The regime has been built by Khomeini in such a beautiful (or sinister), practical and functional manner that it actually perpetuates and reproduces with relative ease and harmony."

IRI structure is carbon copy of church of England. Lower ranks are always under control of few and in Islamic Republic of Iran, those few at top are british lackeys.

Stop throwing garbage at our face.


FACEBOOK