Legal breakthrough on Child Execution

Share/Save/Bookmark

SCE Campaign
by SCE Campaign
01-Mar-2008
 

In an article that was published in Etemaad Meli daily newspaper in Iran, human rights Iranian attorney Mohammad Mostafaei challenged Iran's judiciary's for violating Iran's own laws by execution children. In this legal breakthrough Mostafaei clearly documented that not only child executions violates international conventions but it is also in direct violation of Iran's laws:


With a detailed attention to the laws and rules of our country pertaining to the execution of the children under the age of 18, we can conclude that issuing death sentence for children who have committed a crime before the age of 18 is against the strict law of Iran.

In reference to the article 49 of the Islamic Sharia's Penal Code, which is the authority relied upon by the judiciary in ordering executions:

Children are excluded from criminal responsibility:

The subtitle of this law (article 49) has referred to a child as a person who has not reached the maturity as defined under Sharia law. However no where in the Islamic Sharia Penal Code or other existing laws has there been a reference to the AGE of the penal responsibility of a child and the lawmakers have only referenced to Sharia Hadd (death sentence) without stating the age.

Indeed in Civil Code sections which pertain to judicial matters, as opposed to the Penal Code, the lawmakers in Subtitle 1 of Article 1210 have determined that the age of maturity for a boy is 15 years and for a girl 9 years. This article has relied on the age of puberty as the basis for civil maturity and has required proof by an expert for the elimination of rights in personal and civil matters.

However In reference to financial matters, Subtitle 2 of this article states that: "The property of a minor who has reached puberty can be given to him after the maturity has been proven and therefore the maturity must be established". In other words a minor after reaching the age of puberty and upon proof of maturity has the right to independently transfer or interfere in properties by contract or by legal order for those properties owned before reaching puberty but has no right to such interference before maturity has legally been established. Based on the principal of the "definitions to the benefit of the accused" within the criminal matters, one can not refer to civil laws when defining penal codes, and the (penal) laws must be specifically defined. There is a difference of opinion among experts regarding the age of penal responsibility and no specific age has been determined to be the age at which child becomes criminally responsible.

However by referring to international laws we can determine that the age of penal responsibility for children with respect to death penalties is 18 years of age. Item 1 of article 37 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child clearly states that "No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age ". In the year 1993 , based on the laws and due to the importance given to children , this was approved by the Islamic Parliament of Iran under the title of "Permission to Government of Islamic Republic of Iran to Join the Convention on the Rights of the Child" .

The aforementioned Article of the Convention without any objections was ordered to the executive branch and its articles were issued. Article 9 of Iran's Civil Code states: " Treaties and conventions which have been ratified in accordance with the constitution between the governments of Iran and other governments are defined as laws."

Therefore based on the ratification of this convention as law (by the lawmakers), and its approval by the respectful members of the council of experts, the age of maturity for death sentences and executions of persons who have committed a capital crime is 18 years. Consequently, all of the death sentences issued by the respectful members of the judiciary for crimes committed prior to attaining the age of 18 years, are in violation of Sharia law and should be reversed.

Unfortunately the respectful members of the Iranian judiciary have overlooked this principle of law and continue to consider the penal ages of 9 and 15 (lunar years).

Attorney of Law
Mohammad Mostafaei

Share/Save/Bookmark

more from SCE Campaign
 
David ET

READ !!

by David ET on

1- Mostafaei is an Iranian attorney representing 17 children on death row and has nothing to do with the so called $75club.

2- Since you don't seem to READ, I summarize this for you :

article 37 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child states that "No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age ".

Iran has signed it  AND:

Article 9 of Iran's Civil Code states: " Treaties and conventions which have been ratified in accordance with the constitution between the governments of Iran and other governments are defined as laws."

Thereafore article 37 of CRC is part of Iran's law and by child execution Iran is violating its own law.

PERIOD.  


default

Re: Laws of Nations .... (to: Irandokht)

by A3 (not verified) on

Just because enemies of iran fed and pampered by the management of "$75M Club" say so, it does not make it so. Iranian laws ALLOW that ANYONE at any age committing certain crimes pay the ultimate price by being hanged. Get your head out of your panty and read the iranian laws the way they are not the way US Club management is telling you it should be.


Fred

Not even one in a gazillion chance

by Fred on

As laudable as your organization’s endeavors have been, out of sheer desire for it to be so, from time to time, it has become  susceptible  to hyping a none event. As you must know the penal codes of the Islamist Republic is a hodgepodge amalgamation of Sharia law and civil codes. This combination atop of the leeway all its mostly untrained judges have in interpreting them to their Islamist heart’s desire and as a tool for showing loyalty to the regime has become a quilt patch of unruliness. Aside all these, the distinguishing principle of Shiite Sharia from others is its permissibility to be interpret in a thousand and one way by thousand and one different Hojat-ol-Islams which thankfully Islamist Republic suffers no shortages of. Finally, in this instance there is no “legal breakthrough” which would have been the case were it that a law was passed by the Islamist Republic’s ersatz parliament and publically endorsed by every single one of the many thousands of its magistrates,  judges, Hojat-ol-Islams, Ayatollahs, the Grand ayatollah and the head cheeses including the super duper head cheese. Even in that one in a gazillion chance instance if I were you I wouldn’t hold my breath. Just like many other thing in the context of the Islamist Republic, its judiciary is a misnomer for the apparatus for the suppression of dissent.


default

Right of life

by Anonymous 3 (not verified) on

It is amazing that for some pro-IRI, who argue "justice and democracy under the IRI", even children's lives cannot ignite a sens of humanity.

Ask a pro-IRI like Abarmard if the IRI has ever committed a crime? He would answer, "people do not deserve any Right of life".


IRANdokht

Maybe you should read more carefully

by IRANdokht on

The article clearly states that these actions are against Iran's own laws. Please read before you comment (what a concept)

In this legal breakthrough Mostafaei clearly documented that not only child executions violates international conventions but it is also in direct violation of Iran's laws 

IRANdokht


default

Laws of Nations should be respected ....

by Respect Laws (RW) (not verified) on

Because you are paid by the "$75M Club" management, it does not mean that you should question those laws. Why is US putting "drug dealers" in jail? I say drug dealers should be freed. After all, drugs are "helping" those who are addicted!!!!. Therefore, laws of each nation are based on each nation's culture, history, and religion and they should be respected. No matter how much the "$75M Club" is paying you to question the laws in Iran!