These days, I am reading Sa'adi again. I read his Gulistan when I was 15. I remember marveling at his wisdom and thinking if one followed this man's pieces of advice, one could overcome anything. Now, I once again marvel at his wisdom, but this time I marvel equally at his language. How could this be? This man writing 800 years ago, so fluently, in a language that I can easily read and understand today. He is amazing where language is concerned. You are not convinced? Well, try reading Shakespear without using a dictionary and a reading-aid. Don't get me wrong; I love Shakespear who is also amazing where language is concerned. But his language is not comprehensible to us, well, most of us. And he is from about 400 years ago. Yet, I can comfortably read Sa'adi who was from about 800 years ago.
Anyway, you know that Gulistan is written in chapters. The chapter I just finished is on contentment or Ghina'at which is the opposite of greed. I highly recommend this chapter. It got me thinking how much we want nowadays. Not just financially, but in every aspect of life. We want to have everything and often we want them all at once: education, career, family, love, money, recognition, ... And with each one of these, we still want far more. We used to want a husband or a wife as the case may be to provide and parent our children and accompany us to old age. Now we want all of that plus a soul mate and a lover and ... all in one. Or a career used to be a way to earn a living; now it has to be fulfilling and nourishing and challenging and ... Not that anything is wrong with any of these. It is just that how feasible is it? How feasible is it to want so much? Or to have it? And to be happy if we happen to have it? Having things has a price; the more we have, the more we pay. What is the currency? Time. We get less and less time to enjoy whatever we have, the more we have. Also, stress of maintenance. To hold on to what we have gets us to worry, to stress, to accumulate anxiety. And at the end, we have a lot of many things but perhaps very little satisfaction and happiness.
What is the next chapter about? I am not telling you!!
Recently by msabaye | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Freedom to be Poor, Ill, Forsaken | 2 | Oct 14, 2012 |
Newfoundland: Leave your Camera behind | 1 | Sep 29, 2012 |
Test (Result) | 3 | Sep 20, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Persian owes its richness to Arabic
by Farah Rusta on Mon Sep 28, 2009 02:54 PM PDTThe best legacy left by the Arab conquest of Persia, was its lexicon. We would not have had such poets as Rumi, Saadi, Nizami, and Hafiz, was it not for the richness of Persian due to the rich influence of Arabic on its vocabulary. Ironically, even Firdowsi would not have written his magnus opus was it not to counter the Arabic enrichment of Persian.
FR
good point
by msabaye on Mon Sep 28, 2009 01:26 PM PDTYou are right. I have had the same experience with some other poets, say Rudaki who is from over a millennium ago. Of course, not all poets are equally accessible as their use of language and vocabulary is different. You raised a very good point; I had not thought of it that way.
One way
by bajenaghe naghi on Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:34 PM PDTto explain the need to have more of everything is to say that to some it is a way of self fulfillment to acquire things, including a wife or a husband, as you mention in your blog. The other way to explain it is to say that there are so much more things to acquire today than were available 800 years ago. Life was simpler then and also people were less well off to afford buying things they did not really need, I guess. I remember as a child I had one or two toys that I constantly played with. I also took very good care of them. Now a days children have box full of toys and demand more. It seems that we live in a different world. not necessarily better or worse, just different.
msabaye
by Abarmard on Mon Sep 28, 2009 06:53 AM PDTI have read Sa'adi here and there and enjoy his stories and writings. One important note here is that the language of Sa'adi alone is not the reason one understands him clearly today, but the Persian as a powerful language. There are texts from 1200 years back that still make sense. The reason might be that the Persian language was more complete so the written and spoken language remained similar while new vocabularies were added to it. Those older words never left our language.
Interesting. Thanks for the blog.
«نصیحت پادشاهان مسلّم کسی راست،که بیم سر ندارد و امید زر»
فغانSun Sep 27, 2009 09:29 AM PDT
اگر سعدی در این زمانه میزیست ؛ به شرط خلاصی جان از دست «فمینیست ها»،یا به دلیل سنّی بودن ممنوع الانتشار میشد وکارش به داغ و درفش میکشید یا به اتّهام «آنتیسمیتیزم» و ملحقّات و شمول بی حساب وکتاب آن سر از دادگاه بین المللی لاهه در میاورد.
I am impressed! Did you know
by msabaye on Sun Sep 27, 2009 05:23 AM PDTI am impressed! Did you know it or did you look it up?
در فواید
Farah RustaSat Sep 26, 2009 05:25 PM PDT
در فواید خاموشی
FR