The other day I was thinking about a question which bushtheliberator asked me on Sun Feb 07, 2010. Here is the question:
"What country ended the dictatorship in Iraq, where there is now freedom of speech, and elections where votes count?"
I cannot believe anyone could be so foolhardy as to think that Iraq is better off now;
better now with 3.2 million refugees, less electricity than they had 7 years ago, better now with 1.7 million Iraqis dead, better now with their country to be occupied for another 20 to 50 years, better now with the most important museum in the world ravaged and its artifacts taken to UK and USA, better now with most of its university professors and its scientists gone to other countries, an enormous brain drain, better now with cluster bombs all over which will take another 50 years to explode and the cancer from depleted uranium.
Anyone who thinks that Iraq is better off is a monster who has no feelings, no compassion, no knowledge of reality. I do not know bushtheliberator or people like him, they need to be placed where they can do no harm to others.
Recently by Javadagha | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Evidences and Unanswered Questions | 9 | Sep 23, 2010 |
"Rumor of the Century" | - | Sep 19, 2010 |
Shameful. Disgusting. Inhumanity. | 6 | Sep 19, 2010 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Kurds
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Sun May 16, 2010 02:06 PM PDTare absolutely better off. No longer being gassed of attacked. No more chemical weapons dumped on them. They get to run their own business and lives. They sell their oil and keep the money. I challenge anyone to ask the Kurds if they prefer Saddam to USA. I guess they prefer autonomy to Arab occupation. Do you blame them? Why should they fight to bring back Arab tyrrany!
I am not here making apologies for the USA. But I am telling you reality. For the first time in centuries the Iraqui Kurds are free. Sure the rest of Iraq is hurting but not due to USA. Due to their own Islamic stupidity.
The Kurds are dealing with the USA while rest of Iraq chose to fight. Result is obvious. Same goes with the Tajik vs Pashtun parts of Afghanistan.
Dealing with US occupation is very simple: deal with them and they will spend mega bucks on you. Fight them and they will spend mega bucks fighting back.
.
by timothyfloyd on Wed May 12, 2010 09:24 PM PDTu
Source
by Javadagha on Sat Feb 20, 2010 05:57 PM PSTthexmaster do your own checking: when one types: sanctions AND Iraq AND deaths. Here is a sample:
A short overview of claims:
Madelaine Albright was asked on CNN if she felt the loss of over a million lives as a result of these sanctions was worth it. She said yes.
What is your source for 1.7 million dead?
by thexmaster on Fri Feb 19, 2010 08:53 PM PSTWhat is your source for 1.7 million dead?
Thanx Maziar
by masoudA on Fri Feb 19, 2010 04:48 PM PSTBesides - I advice those who think Iraq is worst off to certainly look into Iraq Kordestan province these days. Also, the only reason the rest of Iraq is the way it is - is because of KSA and IR, and the Molsem population that allows terrorists to mix-into them. Thank God Iran is not like that - a Moslem terrorist will never be able to mix and take refuge within the General Population.
Thank you Javad
by farokh2000 on Fri Feb 19, 2010 01:16 PM PSTI agree with you. I am not sure if you would really find anyone with a little bit of brain to think that Iraq is better off today under the occupation of 150,000 occupiers,murderes and rapists.
Before Saddam was installed by CIA in Iraq, they had a semi-socialist government that had provided free education, health care and lots of other social benefits for Iraqies.
Of course when you are in the ME and have a ton of Oil fields, you cannot be independent of the Wolves and sure enough CIA got rid of that Governement and put Saddam in place to serve them, just like 1953 in Iran, when they brought in the Shah.
Of course once Shah's usefulness to CIA expired in mid 1970's,like Saddam's in early '90s, then he had to go too and that Mullah, Khomini, who was supported/protected in exile by CIA for over 25 years was installed in Iran.
These Historic events are so similar that you don't really need to be a Rocket Scientist to figure out who is behind the curtain and what the real idea is.
Are Iraqies better off after all this?. Are Iranians better off with all that has happened to them in the last 50-60 years?, That is not even a good question to ask.
The people behind all of these events will never face justice because it is the Law of Jungel out there and different humans have done the same thing at different times to their fellow Human beings.
You would think in the 21st Century Humans would be civilized finally, right?
I guess they still talk a good talk but have no clue how to walk a good walk.
DOWN WITH IRR
by maziar 58 on Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:47 PM PSTAnd their supporters. well said masoud khan.
My Iraqi friends that work there hoping for at least 10 more years so they can make that MILLION$$ that never could dream of here with $ 10.00 /hr. salary and a small family to support. Maziar
It's good to agree, isn't it?
by Cost-of-Progress on Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:35 AM PSTMehrdad, it you ease up on the Arab-Israeli thing and focus more on the Islamist deconstruction of our motherland, we could be buddies, I promise!
I do agree that there's injustice in the occupied territories and beyond, but right now we have a fire in the house and cannot tend to the neighbors.
Vidmose jon, it is as clear as day that is the case.
____________
IRAN FIRST
____________
COP: see we have more and more in agreement then otherewise
by Bavafa on Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:12 AM PSTThough I like to add that the other side have also plenty (kak kooneshon) or what ever location to start this war. The war is only to benefit the terrorists on both sides and only the Iranian people and American people will be the loser here.
The only scenario that I think war would be good and beneficial, is if IRI leaders and the neo-cons/Zionist leaders get to gather and go at it. That would be a great day for me which I will wish both of them success to destroy the other side. Boy wouldn't that be a wishful thinking on my part?
Mehrdad
COP: exactly. That is their
by vildemose on Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:59 AM PSTCOP: exactly. That is their only way they will have a chance..
جنگ
Cost-of-ProgressFri Feb 19, 2010 10:51 AM PST
________
این آخوند ها کک تو تون بونشوون افتاده که جنگ را بندازن چون میدونن که جنگ دوباره مردمو متحد میکنه و دوباره میتونن ی چند ساله دیگه تاخت و تاز بکنن - جنگ یعنی این کثافت ها بیشتر در قدرت میمانند____________
اول ایران
____________
Javadagha: your fatal mistake is to ignore the obvious sign
by Bavafa on Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:41 AM PSTWho ever think Bush is the liberator, well I can not come up with polite enough adjective to describe the state of mentality of this person.
Mehrdad
Salvaging the IRI clan through war???
by vildemose on Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:36 AM PSTAbarmard: What are you talking about?? Are you promoting a war between the IRI and the US?? Who made you an authority to determine such fate for Iran and Iranians??
Provoking a war is the last refuge of a scoundrle basiji clan and their propagndist on this site.
Haven't your clan plundred Iran enough? Now, you're inviting a war to continue your insatiable hunger for profit and moft khori.
Do you want to protect your Basiji clan through war? Do you really think you will win??? You musth if you want a war...Is that the plan, Abarmard?? Is that the new Vevak's talking points?
"The display of fervid control the regime was forced into on 11 February 2010 reveals its desperation. A foreign assault, which would unite all Iranians behind a power they hate, could yet give it an infusion of strength - all the more reason for the west to ignore Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's provocations, and oblige his government to face the people without false comfort. Mir-Hossein’s Moussavi’s demands offer the regime an opportunity to restore governance to a path of legitimacy. It seems unlikely that the regime will turn back from its self-destructive path."
//www.opendemocracy.net/farhang-jahanpour/iran-what-happened-where-now
اگر محل نزارین
Cost-of-ProgressFri Feb 19, 2010 10:31 AM PST
لطفآ به این حزباللهی ها جواب ندین که این مزخرف هاشون را پست نکنن. اگر بی اعتنایی کنین دیگه این کس شر هارو پست نمیکنن.
اره عراق الان بد تر شده، ولی برای آخوند ها که بهتر شده بابا.____________
ایران اول
____________
If you think
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:17 AM PSTa ship is going to defend Iran against US you are mistaken. I am just telling you fact. The US has submarines with torpedoes that will sink it like a rock. Do you remember what happened to "General Belgrano". It was the pride of the Argantine navy. Got sent to the bottom of the ocean by a British (I am no fan of them) torpedo.
Smart Iranians do not pick a fight they know won't win. The US spends over 100 times as much as Iran on its military. There is no way to fight a military 100 times more powerful. It will just kill Iranian soldiers. I love my people and don't want them sunk to the bottom. This stupid bravado is going to cost precious lives.
To arm chair generals: please go put your money where your mouth is.
VPK
Out of context
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:09 AM PST"....But I just don't see the US sitting around and watching. They are mopping up Afghanistan now. Iraq is pacified. Next is Iran. It will behove us all to do prepare for it. "
You missed my disclaimer or more likely on prupose did not include it.
For the record: I oppose an attack on Iran by US or anyone else including IRR. If you don't understand English that is not my problem.
We should be prepared for it. It is the smart thing to do. I don't want Iran to turn into Iraq. Do you?
Here another quote out of context:
La Elaha - means there is no god. Of course the rest goes as "En Allah". So if you quote half of a verse in Quoran you get the opposite meaning. A partial sentence means nothing.
VPK
Thank you, that is the point of this post.
by Javadagha on Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:15 AM PSTThank you Abarmard.
The people who do not get it, accuse others as IRI supporters. What a crock!!
We are Iranians. We will defend Iran from Eye-ranians and other USA apologists such as Fred and MasoudA.
VPK joins Bushi group!!
by Javadagha on Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:02 AM PSTby Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Fri Feb 19, 2010 07:40 AM PST
"....But I just don't see the US sitting around and watching. They are mopping up Afghanistan now. Iraq is pacified. Next is Iran. It will behove us all to do prepare for it. "
With the above quote from Veiled Prophet of Khorasan, my point in this post is proven. Thank you.
True, Iraq is much worse
by Abarmard on Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:00 AM PSTAnd to top that, they are going to have foreign military for a long long time controlling their lives. For those who are only thinking about a small class that was created during the Shah, who think that their sole purpose is to go back and claim their wealth and so called trouble free life-style; perhaps such an outcome is desirable.
You have every reason to be outraged and in a way scared about those who preach freedom for Iran and view occupation and total foreign control as Democracy. I am certain that They mean well but don't know well enough.
This is about Iran
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Fri Feb 19, 2010 09:03 AM PSTnot Iraq.
Anyone who thinks that Iraq is better off is a monster who has no feelings, no compassion, no knowledge of reality. I do not know bushtheliberator or people like him, they need to be placed where they can do no harm to others.
No regime in the history of Iran has been as evil and despotic as IRR. So don't give me this BS about humanity. Bush may have been bad but compared to Khomeini and Khamenei he was nothing. The IRR wrote the book on being monsters.
VPK
Any Iranian
by masoudA on Fri Feb 19, 2010 08:57 AM PSTWho focuses on Iraq to protect the ISlamic Republic is worst than any monster - especialy if they live outside Iran and do not have to be exposed to that filthy government.