I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek

IRANdokht Jaan

May I answer your question below, cuz its over his head:

"they call it safsateh and maghlateh in arabic. Maybe you can tell me what it's called in Farsi dari..."

I belive in Farsi Dar-be-Dari its called Neo-Con, Rightists, Racist Blabber Bull-Shit!

Sorry I'm late...

this is looking like fun.  First off... let's stay focused.  This is ALL about GW.  I'm tired of talking about issues.  Let's just have fun with the good ole boy from Texas!

Arash... you are a nasty piece of work my friend.  Who licked the red off YOUR candy cane?

Samsam jaan... I can't believe you won't just give up!  You are SUCH a glutton for punishment.  I think you just have a crush on Marge and IRANdokht and keep trying to piss them off so they'll talk to you...:-)

It's ok... nobody really takes you serious.  Well except for maybe Zion but that's like Halloween all year long... too scary for me dude!  We know you really really REALLY don't believe that there is anyone left in the free world that supports Bush.

As far as the apology goes... I'm with IRANdokht.  We're WAY past an apology.  The only "I'm sorry" I want to hear from him is as he's checking into Sing Sing hotel for criminal activities against the American people.

Succes is the best revenge: Vote Obama

Everything is relative. But any conversation about Bush arises some questions.

“What is security”? If one contends that the US (or any part of the world) is more secure under Bush and that we should be thankful to him, then I have no choice but to respond in disagreement. The number of civilian deaths, terrorist acts and international diplomatic breakdowns do not support that claim. The world was a crappy but better place 10 years ago. But let’s pretend I’m wrong.

The first questions are “How was this security obtained”? And “was it worth it”? Consider civil liberties issues, international law, the economy, civilian deaths etc. If you don’t consider the cost of Bush’s pragmatism to have been unreasonably high, then you and I have different values.

Besides, is it fair to be more secure in the US or Iran, when hundreds of thousands of civilians, many of whom are children, are dying elsewhere? If we have to have some measure of insecurity, shouldn’t it be fairly distributed?

Thirdly, if we are to pay respect to Dick and Bush (no pun intended), we have to look at their pocket books too. How did they enrich themselves personally with this war and their policies? What were their business dealings behind closed doors?

Sam sam:

“Are you telling me to be sad that a man who killed & maimed(in unison with his mullah cousins) 1,000,000 Iranians , is removed by US”

Yes you should be. Because in this process, he has left the world on shakier grounds, has put those same Iranians in greater danger and has pushed us further back from getting rid of IRI.

A hatred for IRI shouldn't take over political logic. It always back fires. We will never be rid of rogue regimes with temporary policies.

How can one be pragmatic but without intellect? Doesn’t pragmatism require a high level of intelligence and analysis? Come on man, the guy is a retard, by your OWN admission.

Mrs. Simpson: Haven’t you noticed how imbeciles always leave work for others without even being aware of it? Bush couldn't care less who has to deal with the mess. He's rich and tired. Don't take it personal.
And Bill didn’t acknowledge anything to be noble or respectful. He said what he said because he had to, he was being pragmatic!

Dear Samsam, We owe Him No Thanks

First of all he provided no security for this country, but a million list of

suspect, including yourself .Your assumption that he has saved us from 

outsider is completely wrong if not false .This country during the so 

called "Cold War" ,hosted all kind of political asylum seeker  and allowed them to openly express their thoughts.That included our Tude Party,Mujahedeen, Fadaeian , but  surprisingly

USA had never had  to deal with the terrorist attack or create a million name list to protect the country? You and I  and millions travelled with no restriction .We never had to hide our thoughts

,our homes secretly being  scanned for radiation or worried to be  secretly shipped to unknown places? A fanatic is a fanatic ,time does  not change a fanatic and using force make him/her a more formidable beleiver.May be USA should have gone to war withthem long time ago and no hand shake of Saudis Royaland private reception at our ranch!

I have no doubt  at that time ,the authorities observed these groups and activities, but may be they had a better sense  to do their job of securing this country independently rather than being  conducted and ordrered by some influential groups and politicians and forced to fabricate intelligence.

Make it short, the answer to your claim  is no,  President Bush did not secure this country ,he paved the path for not only Muslims but others to feel threatened and pose as a threat to the future of this country.

Sometimes we need enemy  to advance or cause and sometimes

we make them because we are arrogant and thier existance means 

nothing to us.I let you decide.

P.S ,since you have some connection with Hamedan ,I could not resist to say this to you in Farsi ,this is a well known phrase used by all Hamedanis

"Sere khor in harfa cheye mizeni "

Cheers

Vote Tomorrow! Remind everyone!

Don't let down this late in the game.

Remind all your friends to vote and vote for Obama.

Many people talk the talk but forget to vote or don't care enough to stand in line and vote.

Your vote is especially wanted in battleground states of Virginia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida where there are plenty of Iranian-Americans!

Get up tomorrow and vote!

You're right Marge

I should not have side-tracked, I apologize.

It's mind-boggling how low the republican party is willing to stoop. Trying to impeach the president of the country over a BJ was not just ridiculous, was very costly and distracting too. The hypocrisy of it is  just sickening when their own guys are sending so many hundreds of thousands of this nation's children to get physically and mentally damaged or killed for their own monetary profit. They say it wasn't for the BJ but for the lie! which lie was more destructive?

"Ididn't have sex with that woman" or

"Saddam was behind 9-11", "Saddam possesses WMD", "they will greet us as liberators", "mission accomplished" etc...

is it the religious fundamentalism that is turning people into blood-sucking monsters or greed for money and power?  it doesn't really matter because I believe the two groups are using each other to achieve common goals, namely the dumbing down of the nation which is the foundation they need to grow stronger.

IRANdokht

Please don't make this about a war on Iran - BUSH ONLY

I want to focus on George Bush and the fact that he is getting off scott free for committing offenses that Clinton would have been sent to the chair for. When Bush abuses the military it's ok. When Clinton didn't, he was persecuted for oral sex fully funded by tax payer money - they didn't spare a DIME to chase the "truth" and like they did with Terry Schiavo they took us all down in the sewer with them. 

Can you imagine what the Republicans would be saying if Clinton went to war like this? They'd say that he was killing our boys and girls. He hates our military and a bunch of other crap. Let's also remember that clinton was a draft dodger. He was in Oxford. Bush was even more creative about how he dodged the war. He spent it coked out of his mind. 

This country and the Republicans are led by Christian fundamentalists. Who has the testicals to admit it?

Irandokht, let's be honest, they will cream themselves if Iran is bombed. They love it even if they won't admit it.

clarification

Samsam

When I read you were against military attacks, I realized that is exactly what I have heard from a few other members who seem to follow you around and cheer you on any chance they get. Unfortunately they have also explained that "surgical attacks" are going to be accepted by them. I needed to be clear on your stance and whether or not you are also following their agenda.

Thank you for clarifying that you do not. 

I am not sure if you are aware, but in most third world countries there are always border comflicts, one way or another. The danger of IRI becoming the greatest military power in the region after Israel, is the reason why Israel is tempted to attack Iran now and we have GWB to thank for that!!!  Not exactly what we should be grateful for!

IRANdokht

Irandokht

look ! You 1st asked me this question;

""This presidents wars in the middle east removed the two enemies of IRI and you are grateful for such act! ... Guess I was wrong. Go ahead, pay your respect to their best ally, we won't""

I reply that :

"" I,m never for a foreign military invasion or a foreign enemy to remove IRV . Removing both regimes was a threat removed from the lives of 70 mil Iranians & yes it may be a double edged sword for IRV , but that,s temporary & time will tell . Saddam didn,t kill mullahs . He killed average Iranis . Change has to come from inside & foreign powers must only give moral support in not legetimizing the regime..""

Then your magic pen turns 180 degree & outa no where attack me with baseless charge;

""threats (who were not attacking Iran)....I have one question for you Samsam: are you for surgical attacks on Iran like your friends are advocating too?  I just need to know what is the number of Iranian casualties that you guys feel are justified and worth sacrificing? Maybe I am not good at choosing my words, bit I am on the right side when it comes to people's lives.""

lol..not attacking Iran ?. Iraq was still in a state of war , shaky ceasefire, holding naft-shahr & territories, no peace deal, constant threat of renewed hostility & blood of 1 mil on it,s hand..who is doing maghlateh ha? .So which is it, You are whining about..What part of my writing got You, the rocket scientist with no safsateh, to come to this conclusion that I want Iranians to be bombed?..So If I don,t support some regime appologist to legitimize the regime , I,m a bomber ..ha..lol ..okay You win ..another proof that this ventfull dialogue is going no where..

Samsam

they call it safsateh and maghlateh in arabic. Maybe you can tell me what it's called in Farsi dari...

GWB removed the threats (who were not attacking Iran) and created a powerful IRI in the region. Powerful IRI means a more stable government of the ones who are oppressing, imprisoning, torturing and killing the iranian people.  The Iran Iraq war made them survive and become stronger (Republicans in WH at the time) and they became a power with GWB (another republican in WH)

it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see how the whole thing worked out. You can go ahead and tell me I am on the wrong side and keep strengthening the IRI rulers. The facts don't change. 

I have one question for you Samsam: are you for surgical attacks on Iran like your friends are advocating too?  I just need to know what is the number of Iranian casualties that you guys feel are justified and worth sacrificing? Maybe I am not good at choosing my words, bit I am on the right side when it comes to people's lives.

GWB owes the whole world an apology?  no!  He needs to be put on trial for crimes against humanity. Apology alone won't do.

IRANdokht

Irandokht , Taliban, Saddam & IRV

are all bad for average Irani folks . Are you telling me to be sad that a man who killed & maimed(in unison with his mullah cousins) 1,000,000 Iranians , is removed by USA? . I,m never for a foreign military invasion or a foreign enemy to remove IRV . Removing both regimes was a threat removed from the lives of 70 mil Iranians & yes it may be a double edged sword for IRV , but that,s temporary & time will tell . Saddam didn,t kill mullahs . He killed average Iranis . Change has to come from inside & foreign powers must only give moral support in not legetimizing the regime. but some thing tells me, you knew that about me already...uhmmm. I,m surprised that You sound regret having them gone..or may be your choice of wording was misunderstood..cheers!!!

and blue khadijah khanoom ; you are getting more incoherent as you go . take a happy pill ....or may be you are on one already...:)

I am surprised Samsam

This presidents wars in the middle east removed the two enemies of IRI and you are grateful for such act!  

I thought you were against the Ommatist regime of V-ran!!!  

Guess I was wrong. Go ahead, pay your respect to their best ally, we won't!

IRANdokht

"You" owe him a Thanks & apology for 8 years of security

He was the least intelectual yet one of the more pragmatist presidents in USA history . He was not my choice for president , screwed US economy (partly due to an unwanted war by Ommatists) & lacked a thorough vision, lacked elequence on message & dull on the agenda,  BUT , 70 million Iranians should thank him & his dad's invasion of Iraq(1991) for return of 25 Iranian towns and villages still in the hands of Saddam as of 1991 (example , Naft-shahr) & removal of 2 of Iran,s worst enemies ,Saddam,Taliban(2003) . As well, 15 million shias, 12 million Sunnis, 8 million Kurds , 7 million Hezaras, 18 million Tajiks, 6 million pashtuns ...etc owe their freedom , livelyhood from tyrany & genocide to right honorable President of the United States of America Mr George Herbert Walker Bush . As well 300 million Americans , rich and poor, including the blogger can go on living their daily lives minus weekly terror , thanks , to his leadership . He might be a clueless cowboy but He is an honorable cowboy . So zip now & show full respect to the President .

Yah!

Wild Wild Web comments for articles linked by iranian.com

I was browsing the comment section for some of the articles that those squirrels were posting for Thomas Friendman and Hooman Majd. Of course, they don't use the same names as they do here.

But when I saw the handles "Anti-Ayatoilet" and "Anti-Tazi" and my personal favorite "KhomeiniFuckOff", I smelled the footprints of iranian.com peeps. Other evidence included the repeated posting of the comments after they were deleted with the only amendment "WHY DON"T YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION YOU APOLOGIST ASSHOLE".

Iranian freedom fighters are very special people. 

Clinton Had Sex with One....

This SOB Screwed 300Million. Talking about doing everything the opposite way of what they promised! From stolen election (Coup d'Etat) of 2000 to the total crash of country's economy in 2008.  

PS. Arash Khan, Thanks for warning us about the "dignitaries". I did not know I was in their view a "post-Qadesieh Arab loving" (What the F is that?) bloger! :-)

PPS. So there is Pre-Qadesieh Arab loving bloger too? is Pre better than the Post? :-)

PPPS. Dude these "dignitaries" are so noble they even carp noble-ness.

Dear Margi

Arash M-K