Going Iranian on IRR

Share/Save/Bookmark

Fred
by Fred
22-Nov-2009
 

Should in the next few weeks IRR, the Islamist Rapist Republic, not abide the sane world’s legal demand to suspend its illegal nuke activities,  if not certainty a very high probability exists that there will be at the minimum some ratcheting up of the existing weak sanctions if not worse. 

Although the stated goal of the sanction regime is limited to forcing compliance of nuke rules on the IRR, there is also the high possibility that one of its outcomes be a general uprising against the ruling Islamist Rapists. After the savage way IRR has gone about suppressing the “election” fiasco this scenario has earned much more currency.

All ancillary and direct evidence point to Iranians who at one point were only asking for their “stolen votes”, but after being subjected to large scale indiscriminate Islamist savagery they’ve crossed all the IRR’s sacrosanct red lines including openly asking for the Head Rapist Khamenei’s head, an Iranian version of crossing the Rubicon.   

Because of structural design IRR cannot afford to forsake its belligerent posture internally and externally including and most poignantly its long stated and many times repeated goal to wipe a United Nation member state off the map creating the near certainty that at some point a regional conflagration is instigated.

By now the realization must have finally dawned on most, if not all, but the truth-averse that with the continued existence of IRR in any shape or form there will not be any peace in the Middle East.  

Although the Islamist Rapist Republic, its lobbies and nuke gofers most strenuously deny the above, but the collective body of evidence is overwhelming.   

There exists a historical chance to help enslaved Iranians help themselves and the world. Before it is too late and IRR imposes a devastating war on Iran and the region the sane world has to impose airtight sanctions and at the same time apply learned lessons of recent instances where the beacon of freedom, America, successfully helped millions to overthrow their tyrants and join the club of democratic nations.  

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by FredCommentsDate
ادا اطوار اسلامی
5
Dec 05, 2012
مسجد همجنسگرایان
1
Dec 05, 2012
Iranians are legitimate target
10
Dec 04, 2012
more from Fred
 
Reza-Rio de Janeiro

Moosir, you are off...

by Reza-Rio de Janeiro on

Of course No sane Human and Iranian would like to see anything bad happen to our country and people! Every body knows and agrees on that, but the real problem is the I.R. that despite its evil power to suppress Iranians inside, but  at the same time stands no chance to the other sides... These sides, when they are completely convinced that they have ran out of all options to deal with an evil entity called Islamic Republic Of Unfortunate Iran (that has plagued the Iranian nation and country as a whole) will attack . This evil is on the verge of committing a mass suicide and take Iran and the whole nation with it!

Islamic Evil Republic's ultimate goal is to destroy Iran and Iranians period. So from her ashes they can build an all Islamic country and nation that will substitute her present exsictence ... But GOD WILL FORBID the Evil ultimately, and Iran and Iranians will prevail and will defeat this plague, this evil forever instead.

Be omide peerozi bar ahreemanan.


Patriot

Dear Moosir

by Patriot on

I don't want the people of Iran hurt in any way.  If push comes to shove, though, and you know it will soon, aren't sanctions preferable to a military attack on Iran?

I know that negotiations are the way out of this mess, but as you can see, IRI is not willing to negotiate, because to negotiate would mean to give up IRI's self-chosen isolation which has kept it in power internally and has closed the way to international scrutiny about how Iran treats its people and its consistent violations of human rights. 

So, if they don't negotiate, what else can be done?  A military attack on Iran is the worst thing that could happen to Iran in the short run (innocent civilians will die) and in the long run (IRI will find the excuse it needs to close its borders again and  further crack down on people, remaining in power even longer).  Where negotiations are not accepted by Iran and a military attack is out of the question, what option other than sanctions, is there?


Reza-Rio de Janeiro

Excellent blog

by Reza-Rio de Janeiro on

Thanks for sharing your wise and intelligent thoughts with us. I for one completely agree with your thoughts about current state of affairs and Iranian situation...

 


mahmoudg

well done Fred

by mahmoudg on

your points are always on the mark.  My thought is, diplomacy and limited sanctions have failed us  thus and for the last 30 years.  Just last week, the building in Manhattan which was on the lost for the original sanction placed by Jimmy Carter (a sorry President for our country if i may say so).  Thirty years on, the Iranian government still owned and operated it, and used its rent proceeds to mastermind and support terrorist groups.  Come on, give me a break, these are all politcal games and until and unless, the regime in Iran is removed by Force (surgical attacks), and many of its pasdars and basiji's downed by fire, we will never see peace in Iran or the ME.


mahmoudg

well done Fred

by mahmoudg on

your points are always on the mark.  My thought is, diplomacy and limited sanctions have failed us  thus and for the last 30 years.  Just last week, the building in Manhattan which was on the lost for the original saction placed by Jimmy Carter (a sorry President fo our country if i may say so).  Thirty years on, the Iranian government still owned and operated it, and used its rent proceeds to mastermind and support terrorist groups.  Come on, give me a break, these are all politcal games and until and unless, the regime in Iran is removed by Force (surgical attacks), and many of its pasdars and basiji's downed by fire, we will never see peace in Iran or the ME.


Bijan A M

OK Moosir, you win….

by Bijan A M on

Sanctions will not do it.  What will? I agree, diplomacy is the way to go. But what if it fails?. You and I cannot control the reaction of Israelis or the world (for that matter). Are you willing to test your theory at the price of innocent lives? What if a war breaks out after Israelis used the bunker busters to attack Natanz facilities? What if Iran threw a shahab 3 to the center of population in Tel Aviv? What do you think is next? Would Iran have even a remote chance of becoming an independent democracy for our great grand children?

What is wrong to be a little more realist than idealist for just a second? Let’s calm down and look a little beyond the next 2 years. Ignore the likes of “NO Fear”. As religious as our nation might be, they can absorb the concept of secularism. They will be open to accept that their religions are a matter of their heart and mind and has no place in politics. Just give’em the chance to digest it.  BUY THEM THE TIME.


MOOSIRvaPIAZ

Fred still doesnt get it

by MOOSIRvaPIAZ on

Sanctions are not going to be effective. It will only hurt the Iranian people.

---

"Criminalizing Consequences of
Sanctions," Peter Andreas,
International
Studies Quarterly
49 (June
2005): pp. 335-60.

Read

One of the biggest flaws of the sanctions literature has been the
failure to discuss unintended consequences. Humanitarian costs have been
raised above, but what about other side effects? Peter Andreas looks at
the consequences of the multilateral sanctions directed at the former
Yugoslavia during the 1990s and finds a disturbing legacy. Economic
sanctions, it turns out, can unintentionally contribute to the
criminalization of the state, economy, and civil society of both the
targeted country and its immediate neighbors. By trying to evade the
sanctions, private entrepreneurs and public officials are encouraged to
disregard the rule of law. This fosters an unhealthy symbiosis among
political leaders, organized crime, and transnational smuggling
networks. These criminal networks can persist even after sanctions are
lifted, contributing to public corruption and undermining governance.

 

"Are Smart Sanctions Feasible?" By
Arne Tostenson and Beate Bull.
World Politics
54
(April 2002): pp. 373-403.

Read

The comprehensive United Nations sanctions on Iraq during the 1990s
were a humanitarian disaster, leading policymakers to recognize that for
any future sanctions regimen to be politically sustainable its human
costs would have to be limited. Thus was born the concept of "smart
sanctions" -- tailored measures, such as asset freezes, travel bans, and
arms embargoes, that would supposedly target an offending regime while
minimizing collateral damage to the country's population at large. The
question now is whether smart sanctions can achieve significant results
with fewer downsides than more conventional forms of economic coercion.
Arne Tostenson and Beate Bull review the evidence and conclude that the
answer is no: "Although smart sanctions may seem logically compelling
and politically attractive, such regimes are difficult to establish and
enforce because of numerous inherent operational problems and the
intricacies of the Security Council's political processes."