ونزويلا به چاوز ابله یک بیلاخ شق و رق داد!

farrad02
by farrad02
03-Dec-2007
 

بامداد دوشنبه، 3 نوامبر 2007، کمیته نظارت بر انتخابات ونزوئلا اعلام کرد که براساس نتیجه شمارش آرا در همه پرسی روز یکشنبه، تعداد آرای مخالف 51 درصد و شمار آرای موافق 49 درصد بوده و به این ترتیب، پیشنهادهای هوگو چاوز، رئیس جمهور، با اکثریت آرا رد شده است.

هوگو چاوز خواستار تغییر در دهها ماده از قانون اساسی ونزوئلا شده بود تا با رفع محدودیت تصدی مقام ریاست جمهوری، که در حال حاضر حد اکثر دو دوره متوالی تعیین شده، دوره زمامداری خود را تمدید کند.

آقای چاوز از مردم ونزوئلا خواسته بود به طور گسترده در همه پرسی شرکت کنند و براساس گزارش های خبری، مراکز اخذ رای دست کم در کاراکاس، پایتخت، شاهد حضور شمار قابل توجهی از مردم بود.

نقل از بی بی سی پرژن.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by farrad02CommentsDate
یکی اینو بگیره!
1
Dec 07, 2009
Latest Russian snub reveals IRI regime's deception!
3
Nov 16, 2009
The 5 stages of Hoder's evolution!
2
Nov 04, 2009
more from farrad02
 
default

site

by Shahriyar (not verified) on

The owner of the site must be zionist, a real iranian do not write the way that you do on your site.To be Iranian is a very hard job and the real one know who is fake.


default

I am with Ferri

by XerXes (not verified) on

You got it, and many don't.


default

The title is inappropriate

by Javad agha (not verified) on

I agree the title of this news/article is inappropriate.

-

According to the news, this is the result after 88% of the votes being counted (51% against and 49% for his agenda).

-

It is difficult to judge Chavez as an Iranian, but it helps to study Venezuela and talk with its people. The rich are unhappy and the poor are very happy and supportive. Many Cuban doctors are treating the poor with government help. The poor is paying almost nothing for medical care and basic necessities which they could not afford before.

-

Regarding the Putin, he used his power to limit corruption and the money earned from the high price of oil and gas, helped Russia get rid of its debt. Interesting poll showed that Russians admire Putin more than any other Russian leader (including Stalin). He has brought some lost glory to Russia.

-

Back to Iran, I also agree that one cannot sit outside and as in wrestling say lengesh koon….We have our unique problems and culture. As someone mentioned before, khar hamoon khar-e- ama paloon avaz shodeh. During Shah we had King for life and his Savak was controlling the people, now we have a Mullah and his basij controlling the streets.

-

Many Iranians cannot afford not to work, as it was suggested. The housing, food, etc., costs have gone up and one must work to pay the bills. One month will not be enough for oil workers not to work. We need more than one month.

-

Lazy bum Ey-ranians and An-ranians have not learned what it takes to bring about a change after living so many years outside of Iran. Iranians inside cannot afford to financially, but many are willing to take a chance. Ahmadinejed will not get re-elected, we will see another plain cloth mullah lead Iran.

-

Mullah’s act like many other people or countries, they are friendly until their benefits are in danger, then they unite. Our people also are learning and uniting, the good thing is that the majority of Iranians inside Iran are nationalists, therefore change will come albeit slowly.


default

Chavez

by ferri (not verified) on

Salam,

Unfortunatelty, I have to say your site is becoming rude and childish everyday.... What sort of political dialogue is BILAKH?

At least the majority can oppose in that country unlike the corrupt regimes supported by the West.

Come on guys....please


default

Manufactured coup against

by READ (not verified) on

Manufactured coup against the Shah:
Excerpts from the "A Century of War":

"In November 1978, President Carter named the Bilderberg group's George Ball, another member of the Trilateral Commission, to head a special White House Iran task force under the National Security Council's Brzezinski. Ball recommended that Washington drop support for the Shah of Iran and support the fundamentalistic Islamic opposition of Ayatollah Khomeini. Robert Bowie from the CIA was one of the lead 'case officers' in the new CIA-led coup against the man their covert actions had placed into power 25 years earlier. Their scheme was based on a detailed study of the phenomenon of Islamic fundamentalism, as presented by British Islamic expert, Dr. Bernard Lewis, then on assignment at Princeton University in the United States.

Lewis's scheme, which was unveiled at the May 1979 Bilderberg meeting in Austria, endorsed the radical Muslim Brotherhood movement behind Khomeini, in order to promote balkanization of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines. Lewis argued that the West should encourage autonomous groups such as the Kurds, Armenians, Lebanese Maronites, Ethiopian Copts, Azerbaijani Turks, and so forth. The chaos would spread in what he termed an 'Arc of Crisis,' which would spill over into Muslim regions of the Soviet Union.

The coup against the Shah, like that against Mossadegh in 1953, was run by British and American intelligence, with the bombastic American, Brzezinski, taking public 'credit' for getting rid of the 'corrupt' Shah, while the British characteristically remained safely in the background.

During 1978, negotiations were under way between the Shah's government and British Petroleum for renewal of the 25-year old extraction agreement. By October 1978, the talks had collapsed over a British 'offer' which demanded exclusive rights to Iran's future oil output, while refusing to guarantee purchase of the oil. With their dependence on British-controlled export apparently at an end, Iran appeared on the verge of independence in its oil sales policy for the first time since 1953, with eager prospective buyers in Germany, France, Japan and elsewhere.

In its lead editorial that September, Iran's Kayhan International stated: In retrospect, the 25-year partnership with the [British Petroleum] consortium and the 50-year relationship with British Petroleum which preceded it, have not been satisfactory ones for Iran … Looking to the future, NIOC [National Iranian Oil Company] should plan to handle all operations by itself. London was blackmailing and putting enormous economic pressure on the Shah's regime by refusing to buy Iranian oil production, taking only 3 million or so barrels daily of an agreed minimum of 5 million barrels per day.

This imposed dramatic revenue pressures on Iran, which provided the context in which religious discontent against the Shah could be fanned by trained agitators deployed by British and U.S. intelligence. In addition, strikes among oil workers at this critical juncture crippled Iranian oil production. As Iran's domestic economic troubles grew, American 'security' advisers to the Shah's Savak secret police implemented a policy of ever more brutal repression, in a manner calculated to maximize popular antipathy to the Shah.

At the same time, the Carter administration cynically began protesting abuses of 'human rights' under the Shah. British Petroleum reportedly began to organize capital flight out of Iran, through its strong influence in Iran's financial and banking community. The British Broadcasting Corporation's Persian-language broadcasts, with dozens of Persian-speaking BBC 'correspondents' sent into even the smallest village, drummed up hysteria against the Shah.

The BBC gave Ayatollah Khomeini a full propaganda platform inside Iran during this time. The British government-owned broadcasting organization refused to give the Shah's government an equal chance to reply. Repeated personal appeals from the Shah to the BBC yielded no result. Anglo-American intelligence was committed to toppling the Shah. The Shah fled in January, and by February 1979, Khomeini had been flown into Tehran to proclaim the establishment of his repressive theocratic state to replace the Shah's government. Reflecting on his downfall months later, shortly before his death, the Shah noted from exile, I did not know it then perhaps I did not want to know but it is clear to me now that the Americans wanted me out. Clearly this is what the human rights advocates in the State Department wanted What was I to make of the Administration's sudden decision to call former Under Secretary of State George Ball to the White House as an adviser on Iran? Ball was among those Americans who wanted to abandon me and ultimately my country.[1][1]

With the fall of the Shah and the coming to power of the fanatical Khomeini adherents in Iran, chaos was unleashed. By May 1979, the new Khomeini regime had singled out the country's nuclear power development plans and announced cancellation of the entire program for French and German nuclear reactor construction. Iran's oil exports to the world were suddenly cut off, some 3 million barrels per day. Curiously, Saudi Arabian production in the critical days of January 1979 was also cut by some 2 million barrels per day. To add to the pressures on world oil supply, British Petroleum declared force majeure and cancelled major contracts for oil supply. Prices on the Rotterdam spot market, heavily influenced by BP and Royal Cutch Shell as the largest oil traders, soared in early 1979 as a result.

The second oil shock of the 1970s was fully under way. Indications are that the actual planners of the Iranian Khomeini coup in London and within the senior ranks of the U.S. liberal establishment decided to keep President Carter largely ignorant of the policy and its ultimate objectives. The ensuing energy crisis in the United States was a major factor in bringing about Carter's defeat a year later. There was never a real shortage in the world supply of petroleum. Existing Saudi and Kuwaiti production capacities could at any time have met the 5-6 million barrels per day temporary shortfall, as a U.S. congressional investigation by the General Accounting Office months later confirmed. Unusually low reserve stocks of oil held by the Seven Sisters oil multinationals contributed to creating a devastating world oil price shock, with prices for crude oil soaring from a level of some $14 per barrel in 1978 towards the astronomical heights of $40 per barrel for some grades of crude on the spot market. Long gasoline lines across America contributed to a general sense of panic, and Carter energy secretary and former CIA director, James R. Schlesinger, did not help calm matters when he told Congress and the media in February 1979 that the Iranian oil shortfall was 'prospectively more serious' than the 1973 Arab oil embargo.[2][2]

The Carter administration's Trilateral Commission foreign policy further ensured that any European effort from Germany and France to develop more cooperative trade, economic and diplomatic relations with their Soviet neighbor, under the umbrella of détente and various Soviet-west European energy agreements, was also thrown into disarray. Carter's security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and secretary of state, Cyrus Vance, implemented their 'Arc of Crisis' policy, spreading the instability of the Iranian revolution throughout the perimeter around the Soviet Union. Throughout the Islamic perimeter from Pakistan to Iran, U.S. initiatives created instability or worse." --

William Engdahl, A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, © 1992, 2004. Pluto Press Ltd. Pages 171-174. [1][1]

In 1978, the Iranian Ettelaat published an article accusing Khomeini of being a British agent. The clerics organized violent demonstrations in response, which led to the flight of the Shah months later. See U.S. Library of Congress Country Studies, Iran. The Coming of the Revolution. December 1987. The role of BBC Persian broadcasts in the ousting of the Shah is detailed in Hossein Shahidi. 'BBC Persian Service 60 years on.' The Iranian. September 24, 2001.

The BBC was so much identified with Khomeini that it won the name 'Ayatollah BBC.' [2][2] Comptroller General of the United States. 'Iranian Oil Cutoff: Reduced Petroleum Supplies and Inadequate U.S. Government Response.' Report to Congress by General Accounting Office. 1979.
//www.amazon.com/Century-War-Anglo-American-P...


Ben Madadi

BIG EVENT!

by Ben Madadi on

Really interesting! Chavez didn't rig the vote???!!! Very interesting.


default

REPLY : SHAVEZ, 2. PUTIN, 3. IRI

by Faribors Maleknasri M:D: (not verified) on

ad 1+2: On example of these gentlemen one can see how democratic the daily and political life in IRI is. The IRI was not founded after a state coup organised by strangers. How long and how many ignorants dreamde year from Post Khomaini aera? Now they are dreaming of post Khamenei and Ahmadinejad Aera. These individuals are not aware of the fact that IRI can be destroiey only if a Post Iranians - I mean the ones who live in IRI and have sacrificed Life and blood to successfully found the IRI - aera can be constructed. actually the ones who helped to found the IRI lay all in Beheshte Zahra. They did not want any award for their being revolutionaries. Now? one comes to the result: MISSION IMÜOSSIBLE. A post iranians aera will never exist. I see i have complett now also the point 3. Greeting


default

Curious Joe, it's easy to

by more curious (not verified) on

Curious Joe, it's easy to sit outside and after wasting a pors of chelokabab burp something like what you said: "Why aren't the Iranians ashamed of themselves to keep on being subservient to an ass-hole who has declared himself a Commander-in-Chief for life. Why don't the Iranians flush that shit down the toilet?"
.
Next time you go to toilet to flush the wasted chelokabab, ask yourself "Why shouldn't I go to Iran and change the regime myself?" So you and others won't be ashamed of Mr. Curious Joe.


Curious Joe

How about a Bilakh to IRI and Khamanei?

by Curious Joe on

If Chavez was anything like Khamanei, you could be sure that the voting would have been rigged, as has been the case to keep Khomeini and Khamanei in power for life.  If that is not barbaric, I don't know what is.

Why aren't the Iranians ashamed of themselves to keep on being subservient to an ass-hole who has declared himself a Commander-in-Chief for life.  Why don't the Iranians flush that shit down the toilet?  Are Iranians that backward to accept anyone at the top FOR LIFE?  These days, Iranians are probably tired of pouring into the streets and revolt.  They know too well that the bus-loads of thugs and basijis, paid by Khamanei and his “Guards” will arrive at the revolutionary scene and use their machetes and guns to kill any protester.  Obviously, the only solution is not to pour in the streets.  Simply stay home and refuse to go to work.  A nationwide strike (especially the oil workers) for 30 days will get rid of this regime in a jiffy.  Unfortunately, the resulting chaos will probably bring in a military guy (the new leader of Iran) who will be worse than Idi Amin of Uganda.  At least Khamanei does not serve the head and blood of his enemies at his dinner table (we hope !).  Idi Amin did.It seems that Khomeni/Khamanei have given some lessons to the US on how to rig elections by pre-selecting candidates for the presidency.  In year 2000, the US voting was rigged by Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris in Florida -- sending the case to the Supreme Court -- whose judges were more in cahoots with George W Bush than with Al Gore.  The same shit repeated itself in 2004 when the Diebold and Sequoia machines were used to manipulate the vote counts by 3 million in George W’s favor.

The curious thing is that the Sequoia voting machines were made in Venezuela.  One wonders why Chavez did not use those machines in yesterday’s election.  One also wonders if Chavez is getting 2% (under the table) on every contract signed in Venezuela – like the Khamanei and Rafsanjani do in Iran.  Maybe, Sequoia Company in Venezuela double-crossed Chavez in yesterday's elections over the 2% deal.  Who knows...