Britain attacks Iran!
Good God. After the suicide bombing in the Sistan and Baluchestan province that killed a bunch of Revolutionary Guard thugs, you’d think Khamenei and Company could have come up with something better than that.
Sunni problem? We have no Sunni problem. It was those nefarious British, and Americans, up to no good again…
When it comes to laughable propaganda, the mullahs are going for the gold. Of course the Russians and Chinese are strong contenders, and I still think Iraq is hard to beat for sheer, unbridled stupidity (Remember Bagdad Bob? The Americans will never enter Bagdad! Never! So he says as the tanks roll behind him.), but the mullahs are certainly giving them all a run for their money. Who knows, Ahmadinejad’s there-are-no-gays-in-Iran quip and Holocaust denials might just be enough to put the Iranians over the top.
What a joke. What an embarrassment these fools are.
Iran is a better country than this.
Recently by DM | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Wicked Wisdom | 113 | Jan 28, 2010 |
This Revolution Might Take a While | 15 | Jan 13, 2010 |
Jumping the Shark | 3 | Dec 03, 2009 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
mahmoudg
by Nousha Arzu on Tue Oct 20, 2009 03:11 PM PDTWell said, and I too, will toast you and drink to that fine day!
Cheers!
Death to the anti-Iranian cult, death to the bedouin balderdash and desert fairy tales!
LONG LIVE THE GLORY OF KUROSH
Iran was better than this 30 years ago
by mahmoudg on Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:27 PM PDTWhen some semblance of democracy was in place. But Islam had to come and hijack all that was good about Iran and Persians. It was a 1400 year old plan and the Arabs thought they can finish Iran off. Ohhhhh, how wrong they were. Just in the last 8 years we have seen the beginning of the demise of the Arabs and their pathetic cult they call Islam. To the day where we can rid Iran of A-rabs and Islam.
That the best you can do ....Osssstaad?
by Cost-of-Progress on Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:25 AM PDTCome on now, all that Islamic wisdom (yeah I know it's an oxymoron, you moron) and that's the best you can do?
Well, a few days ago you attacked me because I said that people like you are terrified that once this fucked up regime is removed, it will also be the demise of baboons like you.
I was right - I know. Start shaving that beard and look for something to wear other than an abbaa.
Nousha and Cost of..., how could you boys miss the...
by Ostaad on Tue Oct 20, 2009 07:33 AM PDTclear
resemblances?!!! Let me tell you boys how it works. If you come closer...come closer, don't be shy, and look at my avatar very carefully, you'll realize that I'm just holding a mirror. Look at those eyes, don't you see yourselves? Now you see what I'm talking about ;<{)
Cost of progress,
by Nousha Arzu on Tue Oct 20, 2009 01:17 AM PDTThanks for the heads-up. If that is his real photo, then it all makes perfect sense. For the life of me I don't know how IRI apologists sleep at night, knowing that so much blood has been spilled by this regime in the last 30 years, so many INNOCENT lives taken, so many dreams ruined, so many taleted men and women ruined, raped and murdered.
Not to mention what this repugnant, rapist, Arabized regime has done to our proud and beautiful Iran, and its former good name. In short, they have made us synonymous with Islamic terrorism, backwardness, the turban, ignorance, and to add salt to our wounds, they have given us as our international identity, the ugly face of Ahmadinejad.
The great Kurosh, the founder of our motherland, is dizzy turning in his grave.
People like Ostaad are accessories to the greatest crime in the history of Iran. They are accessories to rape, torture, murder and theivery of a monumental scale. If not in this life, they will pay for their malfeasence and complicity to evil in the fires of Hell.
LONG LIVE THE GLORY OF KUROSH
ahahaha
by Shah.Heir on Mon Oct 19, 2009 06:13 AM PDTmazy jaan i too have some words for khamenei and this whole backward regime but i dont want jj to censor me and throw me out again.;0) zendeh baad !
Who is he?
by Cost-of-Progress on Mon Oct 19, 2009 06:02 AM PDTHe's an IRI apologist attacking anyone who says anything against the islamic thugs occupying our motherland. Search for anything negative he's ever said about the regime...I don't think there is any.
His avatar photo is truly HIS photo!!
No, Ostaad, the real joker,
by Nousha Arzu on Mon Oct 19, 2009 01:05 AM PDTI'm sad to say, is you. I mean, who are you? This is part of your jibber-jabber:
"Regarding Iran's lack of public revealing of what evidence there is to prove the US/UK funding and/or involvement, I'm sure the evidence is there because Iran did not implicate Israel as the usual suspects were named. This points to some intel and discretion... I'm sure something big will come out of this. Maybe even an rapprochement between the US and Iran in Afghanestan."
This stuff is laughable!
Iran did not implicate Israel, not because it has some sort of smoking gun "intel" as you so professionally put it, but because by implicating America, they're pretty much also implicating those wiley Jews who run America! And as far as your prediction for a rapprochement in Afghanistan... I will chalk this up to the old saying that opinions are like bugars and a**h**les, we all got 'em. But your "guess" is just a guess, and nothing else, and by the look of things on the nuclear front, there will be no rapprochement between Iran and the US on ANY matter until the nuclear issue is settled.
But don't let me stop you, please continue with the jokes. We all need a good laugh now and then.
Cheers.
LONG LIVE THE GLORY OF KUROSH
$$$$$$$
by maziar 58 on Sun Oct 18, 2009 05:11 PM PDTI can see the CIA meddling in kurdistan by providing money and ammonitions to peshmarge......
or the same with jandollah in east please watch currenttv.com/vanguards to see the story by mr.Baer
BUT remember from the day u.s direct hand was out from Iranian profit machine.the europeans with russia included profitting billions in trade with Iran add to that china and now venezuela and bolivia.........
those are the billions $$ PICTURE I was pointing to.
P.S kash painter boodam -o- gonshik ra bejaye ghannari be een akhoonda va taraf darash ghaleb mikardam.
disclaimer: I am not a politician simply an Iran doust. Maziar
DM, at this point neither of us have all the facts,
by Ostaad on Sun Oct 18, 2009 04:38 PM PDTand I don't think as ordinary people we ever will. But I'm curious to know how much of the $400 mil has already been funded and where it has gone. Regarding Iran's lack of public revealing of what evidence there is to prove the US/UK funding and/or involvement, I'm sure the evidence is there because Iran did not implicate Israel as the usual suspects were named. This points to some intel and discretion.
I think, and this is strictly my hunch not backed up by any evidence, that Iran has not revealed its reasons because it also is involved in hanky panky in Afghanestan and it is worried its resources and/or activities will be revealed if it reveals too much of what it knows.
It's is pretty customary for the protoganists to play their hands very close to the chest fearing that EVERONE's secrets will be revealed.
At this point I'd rather lay low and be a sponge. I'm sure something big will come out of this. Maybe even an rapprochement between the US and Iran in Afghanestan.
Time will tell.
You make a valid point,
by DM on Sun Oct 18, 2009 03:19 PM PDTYou make a valid point, Ostaad, in that there have been rumors that the Bush Administration planned to fund Baluchi opposition groups. But as you note, no proof whatsoever has been offered to support this rumor. If the IRI really had such proof, I would think they would trumpet it. And even if these rumors were eventually to prove true: 1. it hardly explains all the rest of the ridiculous propaganda; 2. It doesn't take away from the fact that the Baluchi opposition is a homegrown affair and that the IRI is all-to-pathetically-eager to use the recent bombing as yet another opportunity to cast the US and Britain as the bogeymen in a transparent effort to deflect criticism from themselves .
DM, no one had mentioned the Swiss, etc.
by Ostaad on Sun Oct 18, 2009 02:37 PM PDTThe fact is there been $400 mil on the table to "destabilize" Iran proposed by Bush and approved by congress. It is also a fact the Brits have never shied away from partaking in meddling in Iran's affairs especailly when the possiblilty of making money was added to the list of incentives.
You have a point that Iran has not produced credible evidence that the Brits were involved. That will surface in due time. The fact that Israel was not implicated is a good indication that there is some intel elements are involved in Iran's accusations rather than just "muttering" about foreign involvement. I wish the IRI regime had not cried wolf so many times before. But the truth WILL come out soon and some people will have egg on their faces.
good thing you are not a painter...
by Shah.Heir on Sun Oct 18, 2009 02:23 PM PDTbecause the picture is far from clear. your point is???
$$$$$$
by maziar 58 on Sun Oct 18, 2009 01:53 PM PDTshah heir PLEASE compare $ million allocation funds by george Bush vs. $billions profit by the WEST to keep that regime in power......!
you'll get the picture. Maziar
Thanks for commenting all.
by DM on Sun Oct 18, 2009 01:36 PM PDTThanks for commenting all. No, I don't have any evidence that the Brits were not involved. Nor do I have any evidence that the Swiss, Norweigans, South Africans, etc. were not involved. The more relevant question is whether the IRI has produced any credible evidence that the Brits were involved. And the answer to that question is no. That, of course, doesn't stop the regime from muttering darkly about "foreign influences" every time something happens that they don't like. (See, recent "election")
So you are saying that...
by Shah.Heir on Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:27 PM PDTthe millions of dollars that the Bush government had allocated to regime change in Iran has nothing to do with these Baluchi insurgents funding?
I see both of your points
by Khar on Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:05 AM PDTDM: Don't blame others for your own misery and stupidity. and we have done that for decades.
Ostaad: Let's not give thses Dogs any excuses to use against the people.
On the same token how do we know that this is not a plot created by IRI to use as an excuse to crack down on people?!
Green movement is indedeed walking a fine line.
DM, do you have any personal knowledge that...
by Ostaad on Sun Oct 18, 2009 03:17 PM PDTthe Brits were not involved? If you do you should cough it out instead of trying to be a lousy comedian and treat it as joke! You may express your incredulity all you want, but let me remind you that a lot of people, local people, were killed in that attack, who were neither part of the guard nor the regime! That fact doesn't seem to have crossed your mind for obvious reason, foolishness is sure only one of them.
The problem that simpletons like you seem to overlook is the Iranian people involved in the uprising will end up paying a high price for this act of terror. Those commanders will be replaced, but the regime now has been handed the perfect excuse to treat the uprising with much harsher measures, and that is NOT a good thing. But what do you care, right now you're jumping up and down and defending the Brits.
Soon you will realize the "joke" is on you!