Recently by Nazy Kaviani | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Baroun | 3 | Nov 22, 2012 |
Dark & Cold | - | Sep 14, 2012 |
Talking Walls | 3 | Sep 07, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
ز گهواره تا گور دانش بجو...
Roozbeh_GilaniFri Dec 02, 2011 07:40 AM PST
I sincerely hope that there was a medical team specialising in Geriatric care on standbye throughout this meeting, just in case.....
I must have missed the point by finishing my studies and leaving the academia in my twenties, and getting a job. These days, "Iranian students", from those climbing the British embassy walls in Tehran, to the ones holding "hands off my Nuke" meetings @ Berkley, all seem to be mostly senior citizens/pensioners.
And now, how about some real Iranian students?
P.S. What's that synthetic thing on the table for and what is it
by Tiger Lily on Fri Dec 02, 2011 07:35 AM PST?
There is no such thing as "threat of war".
by Esfand Aashena on Fri Dec 02, 2011 07:31 AM PSTHamsade I think "threat of war" is meaningless. "Threat of war" is to "prepare" the public opinion to go to war. Wasn't there a "threat of war" for Saddam? Or for Taliban? or in the case of Israel for Lebanon or many other cases?
The panelists believe what they believe in and they said in each of their cases it's their opinion. Do you see anyone in IAEA or US or UK or anyone else for that matter saying Iran has a right to nuclear energy? Or it's not IAEA job to check the Iranian missile program, if in fact that is what they're asking?
Are you saying that what IAEA, US and UK are saying are all 100% true? If not, then what do you think is not true about IAEA, US or UK's stance?
Besides "threat of war" will not be taken seriously if they say it over and over and over and over and over .... until we're at war and then everything we know of, good or bad, guilty or innocent, Islamic or Secular, friends and family, ALL are destroyed. War is hell.
Everything is sacred
next up: niac's conference against sanctions
by hamsade ghadimi on Fri Dec 02, 2011 07:19 AM PSTi was dismayed, to say the least, that none of the panelists mentioned the duplicitous nature of iri when it comes to revealing its intent. the intent is to become unattackable so that they can go on raping, imprisoning, and executing the opposition so that they can continue to loot iran.
also, none of the panelists expounded on iri's investment on nuclear energy while their mighty oil industry is significantly under-developed. where does iran get its refined petroleum from? what is the true purpose of developing nuclear program? economics gain or political gain?
the panelists acted as legal defendants of iri and failed to argue both sides of the issue: "yea they signed an agreement but it's not legally binding" (code word for "taghieh"). just as having nuclear weapons has value (threat of using it), the threat of war has value (not necessarily going to war). even if there's one in a billion chance (sahimi's parts per billion argument) that iri wants to develop a nuclear weapon, i am whole-heartedly against the entire nuclear program.
Can somebody please tell me
by Tiger Lily on Fri Dec 02, 2011 07:14 AM PSTwhat I'm supposed to do with this pictures?
جمع دوستان جمعه! بگرد تا بگردیم!
Esfand AashenaFri Dec 02, 2011 07:07 AM PST
I am most definitely against a war with Iran under the guise of overthrowing Islamic Republic. I do not want to build anything from the ashes of war. I do not want a war so the Islamic Republic can be overthrown.
It is the job of the Iranian people to overthrow this regime. During this difficult economic times everyone wants to keep his/her job! So let the Iranian people keep their job! Do not lay them off. Do not fire them. They will do their job!
Nazy jaan this is probably your most personal photo essay! I saw that Ari jaan was taking notes, did he ask a question?! He was laughing so did he ask a question or make a joke?!
Well if there were more i.com contributors there could've been altercations leading to calling security, then tear gas and you could've all had a little more fun! NOT!
Everything is sacred
Fred
by Dr. Mohandes on Fri Dec 02, 2011 06:59 AM PSTAren't you happy you finally get to see a Picture of Your nemesis:)))????
A perfect world
by Fred on Fri Dec 02, 2011 06:37 AM PSTIn a perfect world, one would back up claims with documents.
In a perfect world, in the name of nationalism, one would not wish to empower a “brutal regime” with nukes.
In a perfect world, one would disclose close working association with the “regime that violates the basic rights of its citizens.”
But since it is not a perfect world, keep on trucking.