WAR

This article is a follow up to "How Will Iran Retaliate?" which was posted on Iranian.com on August 6, 2012 and got 4,591 hits. I mention this because where the end of that article pointed to is picked up in this article.

When I switched on the car radio in California on Sept 11, 2001 my first thought was that Noah Adams of Morning Edition was playing a joke, but then his voice stayed very grim, and had long speechless dead air between the tragic news.

I drove to where I knew where a TV would be on. A stunned crowd was packed inside the bar at a 24 hour casino and we all gasped when each tower came down.  I immediately went to my office and started reading everything I could find on the Internet. Besides a few hours of sleep and picking up take-out food my brain was glued to cyberspace for over 17 hours a day for two weeks.

After two weeks my intuition told me that there existed a 50-50 chance that a military attack would take place against Iran.

Knowing that it was impossible for me to remain in America during a war against Iran everything I owned was sold and I was back in Iran after many years in the United States.

Today what my intuition picked up eleven years ago has come into clear focus.

At that time I had no idea what "Project for a New American Century" was, or what it stood for. And I had not read "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm", a creation of Richard Perle and Benjamin Netanyahu. And back then I had no idea what a central role Natenyahu had played -- and unfortunately is still playing – in trying to create a Middle East to match his stunted vision, which as everybody knows, includes the bombing of Iran.

Now that Iran is on the verge of being attacked by Israel things are starting to make sense. Below are some articles and videos I invite you to read and watch and after you have had a chance to digest the content, ask yourself: "What is going on?"

The direction my conclusion is pointing to is very hair-raising and very disturbing. I will leave it to you reach your own conclusions as I don't want to influence your take on any of it.

Here are the links:

"9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out"

//www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/654-colorado-pbs-tv-leads-the-way-airs-q911-experts-speak-outq-streaming-worldwide-818-at-7pm-mdt.html

This a documentary produced by Engineers and Architects, and maybe the most important film that has been made by such square and logical people. The fact that a PBS station has decided to broadcast it says a great deal. A twenty minute excerpt can be viewed at the above link and the entire documentary will stream live on September 18, 2012.   

"What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks? High-Fivers and Art Student Spies"

//atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/1129-what-did-israel-know-in-advance-of-the-911-attacks-high-fivers-and-art-student-spies.html

Eleven years ago I had heard of several student furniture movers celebrating from across the shore amongst the clutter of information regarding 9-11 but I had no idea what a central issue it is and what it all leads to. Christopher Ketcham's article is truly brilliant and so far has not been refuted by anybody that I am aware of.

"Highly-Credible People Question 9/11"

//911summary.com/military.php

This site is amazing in that it cuts right to the chase and highlights statements made by very high up officials that don't fall into the conspiracy-nut job-Truther category. If you just want to get right to the issue, then this site is for you.  

"Sleeping With the Devil: How U.S. and Saudi Backing of Al Qaeda Led to 9/11"

//www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32374.htm

This was a real eye opener. Like most people I had heard about how Osama Bin Laden once worked with the CIA but this article lays it all out and it is truly fascinating. (Most likely a program along the same lines is being conducted against Iran.)

What follows are several links to articles by Prof. Alan Sabrasky that points to the culprits of 9-11 and before you write him off as a conspiracy advocate take note of his credentials:

"Prof. Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., [University of Michigan], 1976]) is a ten-year U.S. Marine Corp veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College. He is also a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. Dr. Sabrosky's teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government he held concurrent adjunct professorship at Georgetown Unversity and John Hopkins University Scholl of Advanced International Studies." From Wikipeadia.  

//mycatbirdseat.com/2010/09/treason-betrayal-and-deceit-the-road-to-911-and-beyond/

//mycatbirdseat.com/2012/07/demystifying-911-israel-and-the-tactics-of-mistake/

//www.veteranstoday.com/author/sabrosky/

What is extremely disturbing is that Prof. Sabrosky gave a TV interview on July 13, 2011 and mentioned Danny Jowenko, a demolition expert that had watched a video of World Trade Center 7 collapse – without being told what he was watching! – and his response was; "This is a controlled demolition which was carried out by a team of experts."

Danny Jowenko died in a car crash three days after that interview was broadcast.

//www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/23/dutch-demolition-expert-danny-jowenko-dies-in-car-crash/

Finally I would suggest you read about "A Clean Break", especially the comments made at this link:

//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm

And finally you may be interested in what Paul Craig Roberts wrote on the eleventh anniversary of 9-11. The author was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate.

//www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32421.htm

The series of photographs above are of the collapse of World Trade Center 7 building showing that the time it collapsed is equal to freefall speed, which means there was no resistance to the collapsing structure, which means it must have been a controlled demolition. Therefore, if one building was a controlled demolition so were the other two.