Pro-Baha'i Censorship and the Double Standards of Iranian.Com

Death_To_Fascism
by Death_To_Fascism
17-Sep-2009
 

[Crossposted to USENET]

 

This is the second time I have had an account blocked by the pro-Baha'i censor of Iranian.Com. Without warning, and with the typical hypocritical double standards that is the whole guiding standard of this site and which is the two-faced journalism of Jahanshah Javid, my Zulfiqar110 account was summarily blocked. Mr Javid might claim whatever he wants, but apparently all abuse from the Baha'is on this site is acceptable whereas response in kind or defense of self from the Iranian.Com pro-Bahai lynch mob is not. Obviously the Baha'is here have lobbied intently to have me silenced from this forum.

Now besides myself, many others have claimed that the Baha'i bias of this site is conspicuous. This proves that one of the major financial contributions to this site is coming from Baha'is so that they get to dictate actual policy and censor whomsoever they wish, and where nothing is sacred except them.

This is not over, and my public fight against the entrenched power elite behind this website and its agenda has only just begun!

 

DEATH TO FASCISM! DEATH TO BAHA'I FASCISM!

 

 

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by Death_To_FascismCommentsDate
Open Letter to Ali Reza Maybodi
8
Sep 17, 2009
مزرعه حیوانات
5
Jul 09, 2009
National Iran Resistance (Twitter #NIR)
-
Jul 06, 2009
more from Death_To_Fascism
 
sophia

Sag-koochooloo

by sophia on

  Sag-koochooloo- As I have suggested to other posters on this site (including Mr Faryar Mansouri), they really should acquaint themselves in a far more detailed and scrupulous manner with the context, content, trajectory and concrete implications of various statements made by the parties in question.   They should also better acquaint themselves with the documentable actions and statements made by the organization in question regarding this and other individuals. I am most certainly not convinced that you yourself, or numerous other parties, are fully and properly appraised of these matters. You may also believe that offering information regarding previous statements attributed to Mr Azal adds a previously unknown factor into the equation, but I can assure you it does not.

default

Sophia

by sag koochooloo on

The threads provided are to show that you client has made such allegations about Bahais in other forums, and to show the reaction of the forum owners to his claims.

Also your clients slander of individuals in other forums that prompted a response from the Moderator/ Owner there (Sam Ghandchi, Editor/Publisher of IRANSCOPE) emailing other members of the site and warning them of this individual's slanderous claims.

These are all facts. His words, allegations and language are his. 

Your client has also made allegations about the owner of this site, Jahanshah Javid and his family, the link given by 'Shepesh'.

==============================================

comment from Shepesh on

ALSO: Please find link below where Zur/ NUR discusses whether JJ or his wife is a Baha'i. I do not know what his motivation is with regards to JJ.

//newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Talk/talk.religion.bahai/2009-06/msg00164.html

Another one where NUR discusses JJ, unbelivable language, May 22, 7:07 am

Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai, soc.culture.iranian From: NUR <wahidaza...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 23:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Local: Fri, May 22 2009 7:07 am Subject: Jahanshah Javid is a suicidal closet homosexual: Paul Andrew Hammond defending the closet homosexual and suicidal Jahanshah Javid

//groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/browse_thread/thread/92d57b42a7c6d314/6d9c9ac0eba2adcb?lnk=raot

=========================================

 

His paranoid and insulting behaviour follows him where ever he goes and people are now tired of being at the receiving end of it.


sophia

Let's wait and see...

by sophia on

It will be interesting to see if the two posts below by Seagull and sag-koochooloo (a site member for 4 hours, 27 minutes at the time of this posting) stay now, given the ones that have been recently deleted. 


default

BottShekan, in the name of the Goathead

by Seagull (not verified) on

Bring a lowyer to post here, what a hostage taking situation.

Wahis is playing reverse Psycho logy. At one hand he digraced the sowrd of Ali by calling himself Zulfaghr110, then he went on Botshekani by taking Allah the last Bote from Bismil Allah al Rahman and changed it to Bismi Goathead, then he cried wolf about Iranian.com giving him not enough platform, then he brought another schizoid as a lowyer to intimidate, and harras people into cowardness, just like they do in Iran. And on the other hand he stole the spotlite from the daily crimes against Iranians, deflected from the crimes committed by his masters in Iran and he is making noise just to scare, intimidate and silence the IRANIANs.

He and his layer can kiss the rear of all Iranians, specially the hairy ones.

 


Anvar

Brother *abdAllah* - I’m Not Worthy

by Anvar on

Dear Mr. *abdAllah* - I’m glad you’re enjoying yourself, but I must politely decline your kind invitation since I’m not worthy of being in the same chat room with the esteemed ‘Dr Azal’, my Azali friend, and you *abdAllah*, my (presumably) devout Muslim brother.

I was reading your earlier comment in this blog which I’ll just reprint here:

[[[[[ by abdAllah on Sat Sep 19, 2009 06:02 PM PDT
Dear cyclicforward,
Although I'm not fan of madness of Mr. Azal and I dont think that is a best way of expressing his thought toward to his opponent, how ever I dont think JJ has much choice when Mr. Azal posts gets  let say 5O flags or mor , and I think when JJ see all this flags ,he has no choice but to block him. now, is this mass flagging some one like this , it is organizeed or not ? I dont know.
]]]]]
//iranian.com/main/comment/reply/81019/21...

It seems like you were “not a fan of madness or Mr Azal” just a couple of days ago but now you’re inviting ‘Dr. Azal’ to a voice chat!  You also gave advice on “best way of expressing his thought toward to his opponent…”  I’m glad I’m not your opponent or I would have thought that you were just practicing what you preached by extending the invitation to me.

By the way, did you get all your insatiable questions about World War I & II prophecies answered?  Your interest and curiosity about the Baha’i Faith just warms my heart.  I hope you’d share your findings with us soon. 

As for using the chat room, you asked: “I dont know if Bahais have to get permision from UHJ or not.”  The answer is no.

However, for future references, would you kindly ask your Marja Taqlid this question for me?  If an Infidel entered a chat room, would the whole room become Najis?  I’d hate to ruin a good chat room for others.  But never mind if you’re not a Muslim.  Perhaps, you’re an Azali, or even the first disciple of ‘whatever his name is days’.

Let me know if you ever need to visit a Baha’i House of Worship.  You’d enjoy it.

Thanks again for your genuine invitation.  Unfortunately, your nice post has already been flagged 49 times.  Don’t worry though.  This “mass flagging” is not an “organized” effort.  ;-)

Anvar


default

..."In the Name of the Godhead".... who revealed the 19 commands

by Seagull (not verified) on

some questions for the fallowers to be; 

What happens to Allah and Islam once the 19 commandments gets followers? 

What about Mohammad RassulAllah! Is prophet Azal the end of Khatamolnabiyeen and the provisions of Islam?

Is this 19 commandments going to take the place of the holy Quran?

What about Mahdi, is this prophet Azal the Mahdi???

??????????

 


sophia

By all means......

by sophia on

Should "these people" believe there is a case to answer pertaining to certain statements made by Mr Azal (which you will note is the legal name of the person in question), then naturally they are welcome to attempt to pursue legal action. However, it would also be wise that should such persons choose to pursue such action, that they be more fully acquainted with the relevant facts and issues than you appear to be, Shepesh. 


default

Serious allegations need action not threats in public

by Shepesh on

Nima You are now getting in very serious terriory when you accuse people/religeon of such things in public without them being to defend themselves. What you need to do is (if you had any grounds) take this matter up legally where a fair decision will be made by a court if your allegations are true. Otherwise you paint a very bad picture of your own character, spreading vicious unsubstantiated rumours about a group of people.

Make no mistake, once you make statements in public in which you say you want to destroy Haifan Bahais (and there are currently 7 people in Iran on Death Penalty Trials defended by Shirin Ebadi's Human Rights Group )  it is a very serious matter. These people will have the right to sue you for defamation and ongoing harassment which puts innocent people's lives at risk.

1. you proceed to materially and economically attempt to destroy people you so label;

2. criminally violate their privacy on multiple levels;

3. tear up their families;

4. generally enroll as many people as you can (even people outside of your cult) to participate in your cult's ostracisms/marginalization of its ideological nemeses;

5. widely lie and defame them in the most malicious, criminal terms, ad nauseum.

6. The only reason there is no imprisonment or physical force/violence as yet (which there actually also has been)


abdAllah

Any one here for voice chat ??

by abdAllah on

It has been very interesting exchange here, and it would've been more interesting if Dr. Azal and Mr. Anvar held live vice chat in either in Beyluxe room or Pall talk, (live monazereh)

Dr. Azal would you be kind and accept to come to the voice chat room if I ask you ? and same request to mr .Anvar would you accept an invitation to one of this room for live conversation and debate ?

this way also if any one has question of either one of you ,they would be able to ask you by turn.

look like you guys have lot to say just need the fair ground, this also help to clear any nonsense (if there is any) 

or, if you are already present in any of these rooms pleas let us know which one and what is the name of the room,

I'm sure it would be very interesting conversation .

topic could be compromise and negotiated.

I dont know if Bahais have to get permision from UHJ or not.

plz Answer


Haj-Khanum

How very Divine??

by Haj-Khanum on

How can a

"Manifestation of the Divinity"  ritually urinate over a book, any book not just Kitab-i-Aqdas and remain divine??

Other Manifestations get angels and you...Poor Nima Hazini must urinate.


N_U_R

The boundless stupidity of An-var

by N_U_R on

[Crossposted to USENET]

 

You ranted:

I think in your haste, you didn’t get what I wrote about your
membership status.  Whether it was proactive or reactive, initiated by
the Baha’is or you, is not that important.  The fact is that you and I
both know that there’s no place for you in the Baha’i Faith.

 

No haste, An-var. But first answer the question: was Layli a man or a woman (layli zan bud ya mard)?

What ever has given you the impression that I wish any place in your cult other than as its avowed nemesis and sworn, bloody enemy? I am on public record committed to the overthrow of the Haifan Baha'i organization and wishing its complete evisceration from the pages of history due to its being the most dangerous ideology since Fascism, Stalinist Communism and fundamentalist Islamism. Surely, you are jesting suggesting I wish a place in your cult? If I was under any lingering illusions prior to 2002, I have not been under a single one as of November 2002 when I publicly declared myself a Manifestation of the Divinity and ritually urinated over a copy of Mirza Husayn 'Ali Nari Baha's Kitab-i-Aqdas upon such declaration with the Revelation of my 19 Commandments.

 

You ranted:

According to his own “Thorns in a Sewer…” post down below, this is how the Baha’is in Australia were advised to treat him:  “Unfortunately,
Mr Hazini  has for some time been engaged in attacking the integrity of
the Cause. The friends are therefore advised to leave him to himself.”  No fines or penalties, no hanging, no flogging, no torture, no imprisonment, no force, nothing!  Just
leave him to himself!

 

But then after such public statements made by your cult leadership you proceed to materially and economically attempt to destroy people you so label; criminally violate their privacy on multiple levels; tear up their families; generally enroll as many people as you can (even people outside of your cult) to participate in your cult's ostracisms/marginalization of its ideological nemeses; widely lie and defame them in the most malicious, criminal terms, ad nauseum. The only reason there is no imprisonment or physical force/violence as yet (which there actually also has been) is because as yet you do not hold the political machinery of a state under your thumbs -- which is what I am committed for the rest of life to help prevent. When, God forbid, the day arrives that you Fascists have the political machinery of a state under your thumbs, you will shame Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot and Khomeini combined in the brutality you will unleash!

Also, get something else straight: to you Fascists I am not merely a bully. I am an outright MERCILESS TYRANT who does not mince words, brook compromises or pull any punches!

Finally, the only thing you have firmly convinced me of so far in these discussions here where you have changed your tune and backtracked several times in a row now, is that you are either congenitally stupid or a gigantic liar like most of the rest of your co-cultists. I believe there is a mixture of both in your specific case.

 

DEATH TO HAIFAN BAHAISM!


Anvar

Dear *Shepesh*

by Anvar on

Thank you for your kind thoughts.  Suffering is not exclusive only to the religious and certainly not limited to the Baha’is.  As you know, humanity’s ailments are not geographically contained and afflict all genders, races, ethnicities, age groups, and beliefs.

Instead of feuding over our small differences, we should utilize what we have in common and focus on solving the bigger problems that cause all of us to suffer.

Wishing you well.

Anvar


default

.

by Shepesh on

.


Anvar

*Shepesh* - Good idea (but feasible?)

by Anvar on

Thanks for sharing your suggestion and the additional info.  It is a good idea to have only one account per individual, but I’m not sure it would be technically feasible.  The accounts seem to be bound to the individual’s email address and there’s no way to limit the number of anyone’s email addresses to one.  Limitations by IP address may also not be practical as there are many proxy servers and IP maskers that can be used to get around the restrictions.  Of course, the moderators would know best whether what is suggested here is implementable or not

In light of that, I would suggest that a new Term of Service be established requiring all to ‘promise’ to use only one user account.  Yes, we can still easily cheat or lie, but like anything else in life we would be morally accountable for how we choose to act.

As for the sad case of this individual – I’m no longer surprised by any of the paranoia, rough language, baseless accusations, or twisted mentality that he exhibits in his writings.  According to his own “Thorns in a Sewer…” post down below, this is how the Baha’is in Australia were advised to treat him:  “Unfortunately, Mr Hazini  has for some time been engaged in attacking the integrity of the Cause. The friends are therefore advised to leave him to himself.”  No fines or penalties, no hanging, no flogging, no torture, no imprisonment, no force, nothing!  Just leave him to himself!   He’s an insecure bully who picks on the peaceful whom he knows have nothing but love and sympathy for him.

Anvar


default

Anvar

by Shepesh on

I suggest that the Moderator also makes sure that there is only one "username" or account per individual, otherwise the same person will make comments under different names in the same discussion. This undermines the purpose of balanced discussion boards.

Secondly, one account per individual would ensure that once an account has been blocked the person cannot return and continue unacceptable and offensive behaviour under a new username, as we are seeing with this individual twice now.

ALSO: Please find link below where Zur/ NUR discusses whether JJ or his wife is a Baha'i. I do not know what his motivation is with regards to JJ.

//newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Talk/talk.religion.bahai/2009-06/msg00164.html

Another one where NUR discusses JJ, unbelivable language, May 22, 7:07 am

Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai, soc.culture.iranian From: NUR <wahidaza...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 23:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Local: Fri, May 22 2009 7:07 am Subject: Jahanshah Javid is a suicidal closet homosexual: Paul Andrew Hammond defending the closet homosexual and suicidal Jahanshah Javid

//groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/browse_thread/thread/92d57b42a7c6d314/6d9c9ac0eba2adcb?lnk=raot


Anvar

Based on personal principles…

by Anvar on

*Princess* - Thank you for supporting the suggestions.  Nobody enjoys being insulted.  However, the unfortunate assaults, either physical or verbal, allow us to be tested and provide us with opportunities to examine our own integrity.  Do we “take an eye for an eye” or do we “turn the other cheek?”  The shame is for one who does the injury not the one who gets injured.

*Wahid* - What I wrote about deleting undesirable comments was not because of your imaginary “pressure” or supposedly “embarrassing” me (you’re just embarrassing yourself).  My comments were based on personal principles on which I’ll elaborate.  

I will not divulge private communications, with the site admins, objecting to deleting of blogs but you are more than welcome to read what I wrote, about the same topic, in *Souri* and *rosie is roxy is roshan*’s blogs:  (as you can see, it has nothing to do with you)
See my posts: “Another view…” and “Flagging is like Floging”
//iranian.com/main/comment/reply/78898/21...
//iranian.com/main/comment/reply/77077/20...

I think in your haste, you didn’t get what I wrote about your membership status.  Whether it was proactive or reactive, initiated by the Baha’is or you, is not that important.  The fact is that you and I both know that there’s no place for you in the Baha’i Faith.

I don’t silence people by force or censorship.  I convince them by words and logic or expose their malevolence to others who might not be familiar with the principles of the faith.  Isn’t that your target audience anyway?  The ones who are not fully familiar with this relatively new religion or those who are already rabidly anti-Bahai.  

Anvar


Princess

RE: Please read if you DELETE POSTS!

by Princess on

Anvar,

Great suggestion! I agree with everything you say and suggest in this post. I really hope the moderator will seriously consider you suggestion. It would help this community so much.

Thanks again.

Princess 


N-U-R

My, what a little exposing pressure can accomplish....

by N-U-R on

[Crossposted to USENET]

 

In the interests of safeguarding the integrity of the public record -- which whoever amongst your own community is exerting pressure on JJ to censor and erase (no surprise there!) -- I posted my response below to you to four USENET newsgroups and several other non-USENET sites, and forwarded copies with links to well over two dozen contacts.

But, An-var, you left out summarily deleting accounts in mid-stream of a debate! This has happened to me now thrice! And we have another individual here below unrelated complaining about experiencing similar. So much for the secular democracy some people here on this site claim to be wanting to bring to Iran! The IRI or Pahlavi censors couldn't have done it any better! Which leads me to the fact that clearly this place is soap-box for specific special interests and lobby agendas, and that the vox populi of real people is utterly irrelevent - as the behind the scenes lobbying excluding, marginalizing and censoring people you Baha'is don't like is amply proving.

Now with your last post one of several things is probably going on: 1) The fact that I am crossposting my messages here to multiple places online is having its desired effect and thereby seriously embarrassing you people for the censorship you exercise and fully support, and which I am exposing; or 2) you, An-var, are for whatever reasons, stepping out of line from a specific Baha'i Internet Agency directive to have all critics of your cult summarily silenced. here If 2), then I applaud your effort, but would warn you to be careful otherwise you will receive a midnight telephone call from your Auxilliary Board Member for Protection or ITC Counsellor, as Juan Cole, John Walbridge and many others did, for bucking against BAO (Baha'i administrative order) policy in the stream of execution.

Now, that stated, are you sufficiently satisfied now that I voluntarily and of my own personal volition withdrew and resigned from the Haifan Baha'i cult in November 1996?


Anvar

Please read if you DELETE POSTS!

by Anvar on

I find certain comments and blogs to be highly offensive, but I still would humbly request that, as a rule, offensive posts not be deleted.  Of course, there are exceptions to the rule.

Here are a few reasons for the request:
- Feeds the paranoia of the authors and conspiracy theorists
- Follow up comments lose their points of reference and may appear baseless
- Not courteous to those who take the time to set the records straight

However, if you still decide to delete comments, please identify yourself and give a reason why the action was taken.  For example, offensive content, obscene language, too many flags (how many?), etc.

In a debate, I would like to either persuade my opponents or be persuaded by them.  I don’t want them silenced or taken out.

Let’s influence minds so that people stop offensive behavior on their own.  At least, allow others to learn something positive by observing the negative.

Thanks,
Anvar


N-U-R

Thorns in a Sewer - chew on this, an-var!

by N-U-R on

[Crossposted to USENET]

 

AUSTRALIAN BAHAI BULLETIN, December 2000, Page 2.

Status Clarification

A number of Baha'is have expressed  concern about statements being made by  Mr Nima Hazini, who  is presently  resident in Queensland. Their concern arose from  their belief that he is a member of the Baha'i community. In  fact, Mr Hazini  wrote the  National Spiritual Assembly of the United States on November 25, 1996, during the period he was residing in that country, withdrawing from the Baha'i community. Unfortunately, Mr Hazini  has for some time been engaged in attacking the integrity of the Cause. The friends are therefore advised to leave him to himself.

-

My response here today to An-var which was been censored by the censor JJ and the account associated with it blocked/deleted:

 

Typically your idiocy knows no bounds! Again, no one kicked me out of your stinkin cult. I voluntarily withdrew, resigned from Baha'ism
myself in November 1996. Go request clarification about my status from your Stalinist institutions! If you like, I can even post my own
November 1996 resignation letter; or better yet, the status clarification printed about me by the Australian Baha'i Bulletin
published by the National Spiritual Assembly of Australia in its
December 2000 issue which unequivocally stated for the record that I
had voluntarily withdrawn and resigned from your cult.

Second, the only realization about the exagerrated persecution claims regarding you Baha'is  in Iran is coming from the mass deception (avvam fareebee) systematically perpetrated by your big corporate money lobbying efforts in the United States and Western Europe, and the greedy, two-faced chumps, like JJ here (whose greedy chumphood is attested by all who knew him in New Mexico), whom you have managed to buy outright and put on perpetual retainer in your pockets to toot horns for you in the media. Other than that, your whole house is a house of cards built on hot air and typical Bahaim flatulence.

Third, Montazeri very poignantly and matter of factly and explicitly
said his views about you fascists had not changed one iota since the
Khomeini (Counter-)Revolution in the very statement you Fascists then latter doctored attributing to him. You are of course aware that
Montazeri before and after the '79 (Counter-)Revolution characterized you people explicitly as a "Misled Cult" (firqeye zaale) -- which you are. He also said in that same statement that people amongst you with contacts with foreign entities should be avoided contact with and dealt with according to the law. You people don't seem to understand or get that Montazeri wasn't pleading for any granting of legitimacy to you Fascists. He was rather arguing that the laws regarding the rights of citizenship be observed universally -- including with criminal cultists such as you all.

Now it is a rather hillarious faux pas and Freudian slip by a moron
such as you, but also a solid testament to the fact that you all know
I have vast credibility where it counts and have been a deadly menace to your unchecked NED-guided, pro-Zionist agenda, that you try to attribute to me the formulation of IRI policy regarding your stinkin' community in Iran from TRB on USENET! Thank you for the heads up on that score. I will be quoting you indefinitely from here on out to all your cult apparatchicks who keep saying I have no credibility. Here is you unequivocally say I do.  Yet the innanity and stupidity of that point of view is manifestly obvious. What? Did you think no one would notice that you had doctored one of Montazeri's public statements and tried to milk it in the media for your own purposes? Did it not occur to the greedy bastards in Iranpresswatch, and that two-faced so-and-so editor of it Ahang Rabbani, and the MuslimNetworkforBahaiRights that Montazeri has a website wherein he puts all his statements? Are you people that arrogant to think no would challenge you on your attempt at mass, public fraud?I guess not -- and therein lies your own collective Achilles heel.

Finally, you Haifan Baha'is are a dangerous NWO cult and a menace to not just Iran but to this planet as a whole, and YOU MUST AND WILL BE STOPPED! It is an act of pure selflessness and Divine Beneficence to be committed to any path designed to tear you lying fascists down and send you to where you belong - oblivion!

Now, once again, your lizard rock grows cold while the sun continues
to boil the nonexistent brain (which is actually fecal matter) between
your lizard ears. Go crawl back under it before you hurt yourself any
more than you already have, you hear, sb.


Anvar

Weeds in a Flower Garden

by Anvar on

Backward AMIN - As I indicated before, I would gladly reconsider my current understanding of your resignation/expulsion status from the faith, but I never saw you denying the credibility of this site:
//www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Nima9.htm

It would not be surprising if kind Baha’is made certain arrangements with you for you to save face and keep your family from further public embarrassment.  In either case, your expulsion was imminent.  You can refer to the Baha’i Administration as authoritarian; I refer to it as protective of the good name and reputation of the faith.   

People with similar mentality as yours, have gathered together to create groups like Jewish Defense League, Irish Republican Army, Al-Qaeda, militant Jihadist, etc. that damage the good names of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.  Does anybody really object to a mechanism in which Baha’is disassociate themselves from a handful of rouge members like you?  Do you think Majnuns or Talismans should be allowed to create secret sub-groups to harm humanity in the name of the Baha’i Faith?  

A beautiful flower garden must be kept clear of unseemly weeds.

People like you are no asset to the faith, humanity, or even this site; perhaps, just 3/5 of an asset.  Figure it out if you’re good at math.  If not, I let others spell it out for you!

You have absolutely no credibility with decent, thoughtful, and open minded people.  The very few people, on this or other sites, whom you think befriend you, are only using you.  They use you to either reaffirm their preconceived misimpressions of the Bahai’s or to advance their own evil anti-Baha’i agenda.  No matter what, you are just a tool!  A device as well as a stooge (in case you’re unfamiliar with the slang down under).

In your typically dishonest way, you are trying to attribute *sophia*’s words (“…formulation of IRI policy…”) to me.  I only exposed your collaborations with other agents of hate that harm the Baha’is in Iran.  When the Germans were finally pushed out of France, some Frenchmen did not treat the collaborators kindly.  I recommend that you, and all other rabid anti-Baha’is, seek refuge in a Baha’i House of Worship when the day comes.  The same goes for all other duplicitous anti-Baha’is who express fake interest or ask seemingly innocent, yet loaded and mischievous, questions.  Give up on all the silly games and expend your energies for the betterment of humanity.  

Anvar,
Still Brighter than NUR, in more ways than one


abdAllah

Cyclic forward , is not all JJ

by abdAllah on

Dear cyclicforward,

Although I'm not fan of madness of Mr. Azal and I dont think that is a best way of expressing his thought toward to his opponent, how ever I dont think JJ has much choice when Mr. Azal posts gets  let say 5O flags or mor , and I think when JJ see all this flags ,he has no choice but to block him. now, is this mass flagging some one like this , it is organizeed or not ? I dont know.

p.s Not I agree or disagree with JJ .


cyclicforward

Death to Facism

by cyclicforward on

I think you are really sick and you need to see a shrink. By the way, if JJ doesn't want you here, then why don't you get lost. There are so many other websites on this plant that you can post your sick comments on. Start with IRI sites, they would love your there, specially the ones that belong to AN.


faryarm

Kourosh Jaan

by faryarm on

lol :)

im in stitches..4711 ? 

faryarm 


Kourosh Aryamanesh

Shame on you Bahai's

by Kourosh Aryamanesh on

تا اونجايی که معلومات ما از دين شما قد ميده ، ما متوجه شديم که عرق خوری و فروش مسکرات و مطربی در کاباره و دخالت در سياست همه باعث طرد اداری و روحانی ميشه. حالا کاری نداريم که اين ادکلن 4711 چه کار کرده که طرد شده ولی اختلال روانی جزو اين موارد نبوده. هيتلر هم به هر کی که دچار اختلال روانی بود رحم نميکرد . پس نتيجه ميگيريم که شما فاشيستين. ولی محض رضای خدا ، يک نامه به بيت العدل اعظم بنويسيد که به اين بابا دوباره ويزا بدن. شايد اونموقع به يکی ديگه بند کنه.. تعجب من از اينه که اين لعبت مگه کار و زندگی نداره که اينقدر وقت داره اين همه اراجيف سر هم کنه. جل الخالق


default

Fetnah the deflector

by Seagull (not verified) on

Zulbalals blog here for 2 reasons,

Firstly, his hojjatieh bosses told him to pull the plug on Zulfaghar110 after it backfired disgracing the symbolic sword of Ali and showcasing the hate-front of the azize baradaran.

2nd, this snake used the occasion also to deflect attention from the events in Iran hoping to persuade the audience to hate and blame others and forget about the baton weilding basiji brothers of his who are chasing the Iranian youth on the streets of Iran to create more fear, intimidation and tragedy. Liston to the threats he makes just like his bosses, a true gee head east with an appetite of the village people.

 


default

Zuf/ NUR and your other aliases

by Shepesh on

Your logic: if you stand up for those who are being persecuted you must be one of them . Well surprise surprise Moron, not everyone is as prejudiced as you. You do not have to be same religion as those being abused. Say I am a Bahai if it suits your illogical rants, if I WAS one I would be proud of it. But I am not, but happy to share this world with them rather than bitter rejects like you.

 

For those who want to see this guy’s picture:

//www.geocities.com/baahith/Oldstuff.html

Where he got his inspiration for his look from (second on the right in the video):

 

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9OO0S5w2k&feature=player_embedded#t=26

 


Anvar

Too Much Heat & Not Enough Light

by Anvar on

Yes *sophia* - I have no choice but to light the candle at both ends as your client and his Peanuts always produce too much heat and never enough light.  Certain blogs are just too dark and soulless.

You must be on a hefty retainer, judging by how quickly you respond to Backward AMIN’s pages to show up here.  Surely, you are not providing your services on a pro bono basis since this is clearly not “for the public good.”

“…as per Mr Azal's explicit invitation” you seem to have your marching orders, and since even a ham sandwich can get indicted, why don’t you contextualize the situation for me/us better?

As for your question about "formulated policies"…:  Let me reiterate myself.  At the time when the vast majority of the people in the world, as well as users on this site, have finally realized the unjust persecution of the Baha’is in IRI, this vengeful zealot tries so desperately to cause further harm to the innocent.  Just because of the size of his ego caused him to get kicked out of the chosen faith of his own family.  As a supposed attorney, I can understand why you may have to represent him, but as a human being, surely you can’t defend his indefensible reprehensible behavior.  Can you?

If you truly care about or represent Backward AMIN (=NIMA), advise him to quit his harmful actions and stop being the butt of so many jokes on the Internet.

At this juncture, I choose not “to extend the playing field.”  Not because I’m not an excellent player, but because I do not want to beat a dead horse or kick a man when he’s already down (and out).

Anvar


qalandar

.

by qalandar on

 

.

 

So, what are you afraid of?