Reza Shah's achievements

According to Sadegh Zibakalam

09-Mar-2010
Share/Save/Bookmark

more from Tapesh
 
No Fear

How wrong some of these posters were.

by No Fear on

بعد از مناظره جنجالی شبکه 4 دیگر به تلویزیون دعوت نشدم/ با بند بند وجودم از نظام دفاع می کنم زیباکلام گفت: البته من خیلی کم به این میزگردها و برنامه ها دعوت می شوم، البته مسئولین صداوسیما هم به خوبی می دانند که من خیلی دنبال گفتن چیزهایی نیستم که خوشایند آنان باشد و هرچه به عقلم برسد را مطرح می کنم، ظاهرا مسئولین صداوسیما بعد از آن مناظره ای که من از عملکرد رضاشاه دفاع کردم ، به این نتیجه رسیده اند که دیگر از من برای شرکت در این نوع برنامه ها دعوت نکنند. دکتر صادق زیباکلام، استاد دانشگاه تهران و صاحبنظر امور سیاسی در گفتگو با خبرنگار پارسینه در پاسخ به این سئوالی در مورد پیامدهای میزگرد جنجالی و پربازتاب در شبکه 4 پیرامون ملی شدن صنعت نفت گفت: بعد از این مناظره من دیگر به تلویزیون دعوت نشدم.

وی افزود: البته من خیلی کم به این میزگردها و برنامه ها دعوت می شوم، البته مسئولین صداوسیما هم به خوبی می دانند که من خیلی دنبال گفتن چیزهایی نیستم که خوشایند آنان باشد و هرچه به عقلم برسد را مطرح می کنم، ظاهرا مسئولین صداوسیما بعد از آن مناظره ای که من از عملکرد رضاشاه دفاع کردم ، به این نتیجه رسیده اند که دیگر از من برای شرکت در این نوع برنامه ها دعوت نکنند.

زیباکلام در پاسخ به این سئوال که فکر می کنید با وجود چهره های اصلاح طلب یا منتقد دیگر، چرا شما به این نوع میزگردهای تلویزیونی دعوت می شوید گفت: فکر می کنم از ابتدای انقلاب و حتی قبل از انقلاب برای مسئولین نظام اثبات شده است که من با وجود اینکه نظرات منتقدانه ای دارم اما با تمام وجود از نظام دفاع می کنم.

وی تصریح کرد: من با بند بند وجودم به نظام جمهوری اسلامی اعتقاد دارم و اگر نظام به خطر یا در معرض تهدید بیفتد با تمام وجود از آن دفاع می کنم، چون بحث انتقاد از عملکرد دولت و دفاع و باور داشتن به اصل نظام را جدا می دانم. 


Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

tabriz_balasi

by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on

 

You are free to have your opinion. I would never to anything to prevent that. You are free to say what you want I would not try to stop you. I do respect all people including you. 

The main argument you are giving is that: Muhammad was right because Quoran said so.  Here is the problem with the logic: Muhammad dictated Quoran. And Quoran supports him. Now just for a minute lets assume that Quoran was the word of Muhammad and not God. See how the logic goes. Of course he would come up with a book that supports his actions! Have you ever heard that someone would condemn their own actions?  

History is filled with people who claimed to be representatives of God. How do we know they were really sent by God? How do you know they were not making it up. If people want to take something as word of God they better be sure of it. Otherwise they could be in for a real surprise when the really go to God. How would God react to people who followed a false prophet? I don't know but I rather not follow anyone. I prefer to make my own decisions based on my own beliefs. I do not kill or steal or go after other people's wife or cheat. I do this on my own not because I read it in some  holy book.

I have read the Quoran and found nothing divine in it. Instead there are all kinds of threats and things I don't believe God would say. I am not denying God. I am denying the claim that Quoran is the word of God. How do you prove Quoran is from God. 

 


default

to Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

by tabriz_balasi on

Well, I am madly in love with Muhammad, and i mean it when i say madly ... I don't want to explain why here, but that besides the point.  the point is we have differences of opinions and we should respect each others opinions.  one group should not force his opinions on others.  Since we both believe in that, and since we love our Iran, that makes us brothers no matter what.  there should be a government in iran that is by the people for the people, and the rights of minorities is preserved.  so, i am a soldier in the Army of free Iran and I should be free to hold any opinions, as long as i am not forcing it on other people. 

Since you said very unfair things about Prophet Muhammad, i Just want to make some corrections by writing few words on each of your points.  thank you for atleast taking the time to give reason, rather than insults, first step towards free and democratic Iran.

 

  • This man married a 6 year old and had sex with her when she was 9. --- my answer --- Quran established 9 years as an adult girl, so Muhammad didn't do anything agaist the Quran.
  • Whenever he wanted something he would fake a Surah from God that
    would say he should get that thing --- my answer --- No he wouldn't, how do you know that?  you can't possibly know that.
  • He married an older woman for money --- my answer --- all historical documents show that he was crazy about Khadijeh as he stayed with khadijeh till she passed away, Muhammad was 55 when his wife, mother of all muslims, passed away.  Muhammad was offered everything as far as wealth to give up his mission, but he refused, and you are saying he married older woman for money.
  • He ran a group of bandits that robbed other Arabs--- my answer --- Elders of Makkah did not allow Muhaymmad to continue with his mission in Makkah, so they kicked him out of Makkah. they put Muhammad under sactions, then Muhammad took action that he did.
  • He betrayed and murdered the Jewish clan of Banu Qurayza. Thanks for him there are no more Jews in
    Arabia.
    --- my answer --- here you are wrong ! Banu Qurayza betrayed him and yes he took a severse action against them.
  • He elevated the Arab pagan Moon
    God to a position of The God.
    --- my answer --- Ok, here you lost me.  Quran is very clear on what we mean by Allah, Allah is the creator of the universe, God of ebraham, moses, jesus.
  • He lowered the position of women
    to mere slaves.
    --- my answer --- they used to kill new born girls before he put a stop on it.  His daughter Fatima and His wives Khadijah and Ayesh were very involved their community.  
  • He lived by the sword waging war
    on his neighbors.
    --- my answer --- Muhammad did not invade any other nation, it was the Khalifas Omar and Abubakr and Othman that made an empire.  and i have no opinion on Omar or Abubakr and Othman, Allah knows everything.
  • His idea of debate was to killer
    the other person.
    --- my answer --- when in the history of mankind were debates used to settle things !!! debate has mostly to do with who is a better debater, not who is right. Ahmadinejad is a good debator but he is a lying pig.

By the way, Agha Muhammad khan, Reza shah, and Khomenie were all blood thirsty basterds.   

be an act at all times in the name of Allah.


Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

tabriz_balasi

by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on

 

You gotto be kidding on Muhammad. You are really misinformed about Muhammad and need to read up. Not selfish? He was the definition of selfish. I am sorry for anyone who models their lives after Muhammad. Heck you are better off modeling after Charles Manson. Just why do you think he was pure?

Muhammad is the last person in the world I would model myself after. Here are some of his actions:

  • This man married a 6 year old and had sex with her when she was 9. This is undisputed fact.
  • Whenever he wanted something he would fake a Surah from God that would say he should get that thing.
  • He married an older woman for money. 
  • He ran a group of bandits that robbed other Arabs.
  • He betrayed and murdered the Jewish clan of Banu Qurayza. Thanks for him there are no more Jews in Arabia.
  • He elevated the Arab pagan Moon God to a position of The God.
  • He lowered the position of women to mere slaves.
  • He lived by the sword waging war on his neighbors.
  • His idea of debate was to killer the other person.

ghalam-doon

"Ajab Olagh Boodeem Keh Enghelab Kardeem"

by ghalam-doon on

I think he says more than that. He says the same thing about the constitutional revolution. He mentioned that after the constitutional revolution, the country was falling apart. Until after the coup by Reza Shah who took control of the army and quashed the rebellions by force. Zaiba-kalam is against any kind of social movement. He wants a strong central government that can put down any kind of rebellion. 

It seems to me the only thing that matters for Ziba-kalam is this entity called Iran with its borders and its territorial integrity. So when someone like Agha Muhamad Khan or Reza Shah comes along and uses force and intimidation, he becomes a "khaadem".

 


default

Full 49 min video

by Kaveh Parsa on


Darius Kadivar

It simply Proves that the IRI has No Logical Foundation

by Darius Kadivar on

To start with.

this is why this entire debate is interesting cause when they try to reason and enter a coherent dialectic to justify their Republic and their Revolution, they cannot come up with anything valid and end up contradicting themselves.

Ziba Kallam is politely telling them ( and maybe himself) /

"Ajab Olagh Boodeem Keh Enghelab Kardeem ..."

LOL

Fereydoun Farokhzad - Padeshah :

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeVcOBHLDyE

VIVE LA RESTORATION !

Hee Hee


fussygorilla

How to?

by fussygorilla on

Since I am presently in a country that has banned access to Youtube and the video you have posted is on that, could you tell me how to download all the 4 segments without going to Youtube?

I am only curious as to how far this so-called "liberal" guy goes in showing his true colors as a foreign agent through distortion of history to those Iranians who don't know that history.


Immortal Guard

The Moral of the Story is...

by Immortal Guard on

The moral of the story is that we are in big trouble when the British (or anybody else for that matter) know our history, geography, geology, landscape and temperaments better than ourselves.


default

to mahmoudg !

by tabriz_balasi on

we all hate this regime and want democracy and free elections and freedom of speech and protection of minority rights.  for many of us, Muhammad is an inspiration and a revolutionary.  Muhammad never lied to people, but i understand that he was cruel at times but it was a very cruel world at that time, and he managed to unite all arabs into a unit.  his revolution had a philosophic, spiritual, military, operations, social service, all these aspects at one. yand i believe that he was inspired by his very soul to do things he did.  Muhammad's actions were the purist of actions, because he had gotten rid of all his selfishness.  we (muslims) should learn from his teaching how to live in this strange and cruel world.

but all of us here are iranians, as we should respect our difference, given that we all want democracy and we all want to get rid of this regime.  I might have a difference of opinion with you on Islam, but when it comes to protecting our freedoms, you and I should die for each other.

 

Muhammad is my life.  be an act at all times in the name of Allah.


ghalam-doon

Safety Valve

by ghalam-doon on

He might be the safety valve of the regime. He says whatever he wants, whether it is on IRIB or Western media and gets away with it.

That is MHO.

Now back to "Maryam Roshani" and her huge...


mahmoudg

They start with Reza Shah....

by mahmoudg on

and end up finally admitting that the Shah was an angel compared to the disease, Iranians inflicted upon themsleves in the form of the Islamic Rapist Republic.  History has a way of correcting its mistakes.  In the case of Iran this is a 1400 year old mistake and will only be cleansed when Islam is sidelined and we freely can criticize it and call its founder Mohamad the A-rab a child molestor.


default

so it's okay if Khamenie kills Kurds and Baloochs !!!

by tabriz_balasi on

these guys used to call Reza Khan a Gholdor Murderer, which he was a Gholdor and a fucken killder of his own people. and Now they realize that they are doing the same thing as Reza Khan, killing their own people, well, NOw it's okay to be Gholor, after all Reza Khan wasn't that bad, you have to kill your own people to keep iran into one peice.  and more painful that this is some of you pothetic people here that think this is a sign of freedom of speech.  So, you guys still have your doubts about the lack of freedom of speech in iran.  there is NO freedom of speech in Iran, it is a dictatorship !!!! HOw many times they can fool you.  Ziba Kalam wears a pink shirt and pretends to be enlightened and modern, while the other bastered is there to fuck us more.

 

Prophet Muhammad is my life, be an act at all times in the name of Allah.


choghok

No Fear, all BS

by choghok on

"Enjoy these relative freedoms"???

 
Jafar Panahi was put in jail with his family and his guests. People are shot and killed in the streets, tortured, raped and killed in the  Ahmaghinejads jails and you call it relative freedoms? If you enjoy these relative freedoms then stop being a hypocrite go a head and move there. 

 
In Khatamis time he stopped the basijis from harassing people, he stopped intelligence ministry that works for Ali yek dast to stop killing and exposed them so they were forced to kill Saied Emami, papers actually criticized him and when Ali yek dast run judiciary wanted to close them down he said that he did not approve the closing. Get a clue and stop with your nonsense.  

 


Darius Kadivar

Even More Amazing

by Darius Kadivar on

Very interesting developments In Ziba Kallam's assessments.

The IRI stooges look so embarrassed not to be able to counter his arguments.

LOL

My Hats Off !

I Wish Him Well and hope he won't be hurt for breaking the taboos !

Truly Brave Man !

 


maqshush

URLs for the fuller Zibakalam/Salimi-Namin debate

by maqshush on

Looks like I didn't succeed in correctly embedding the full debate below, so here are the URLs:

1)  //www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwTZmgd1Vtw

2)  //www.youtube.com/watch?v=EX0v_TzT-wc

3)  //www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lOYJtHzACs

4)  //www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dS972DWfYE

 



maqshush

Fuller version of Zibakalam/Salimi-Namin exchange

by maqshush on

Since some find this exchange on Reza Shah (RS) quite interesting, w/ IC's permission, I'm embedding the fuller version of the debate (in 4 segments).

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/pwTZmgd1Vtw&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/pwTZmgd1Vtw&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/pwTZmgd1Vtw&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/pwTZmgd1Vtw&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/9lOYJtHzACs&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/9lOYJtHzACs&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/-dS972DWfYE&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/-dS972DWfYE&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

IMO, this is mostly a debate between the official IRI narrative of modern Iranian history (prevalent in the state media) vs a more nationalistic and liberal interpretation of the same history.  According to Salimi-Namin, RS's "modernization" is characterized by foreign (British) domination and suppression of what he deems as true "Iranian identity" (and refers to Zibakalam as a supporter of British rule), while Zibakalam emphasizes RS's nationalism (and characterizes himself as "liberal to the core").


reza007

خیمه شب بازی

reza007


جمهوری اسلامی استاد خیمه شب بازیست مگر کسی اجازه داره که از رضا شاه دفاع کنه وبعد مورد تجاوز قرار نگیره...ها ها ها .خر خودتونید


Maryam Hojjat

Awareness,Ation, Freedom! Armthimis

by Maryam Hojjat on

Gol gofty.  In Iran under dictatorship none of dictators has invested to educate people about their culture, history, arts & civilization.  All these present and past dictators wanted to keep people ignorant in particularly IRI dictators who are a bunch criminals, thieves and liers.

In regard to this video dr. Zibacalam it is a pretense or show which is another trick IRI/IRR has been using to fool the world.

Payandeh IRAN & true IRanians


Fouzul Bashi

He knows what he is talking about then

by Fouzul Bashi on

Another reason to respect him and his fair judgement as a historian.


Farah Rusta

He says the same things about Khatami

by Farah Rusta on

Don't believe me? Ask Sargord Pirouz, ...  sorry I meant No Fear. (LOL)

FR


Fouzul Bashi

to be fair

by Fouzul Bashi on

Ziba-Kalaam was given a fair bit of time to defend Reza Shah's services to Iran but he could have used his time more efficiently and avoided repetitions.  However, the sound quality was horrendous (to my experience), it was so low.  I greatly appreciated his point about not viewing history and personalities in simple-minded fanatical black and white and see things in their complexity.


No Fear

Findout the facts before blowing off your steams here.

by No Fear on

No one is cutting anyone here. This debate started the day before the video above, That day, Zibaakalam was on the phone and salimi namin was present in the studio. The following day , it became the opposite.  Zibaakalaam talked more than the other participants and was given plenty of time to explain his views.

Enjoy these relative freedoms while it lasts. When Rafsanjani & Co are back to their business in 3 years, then you realize what you thought was green as a toad, is actually grey like a wolf.


پیام

قربون آدم چیز فهم.

پیام


حرف حق که خوب دیگه شک نداره.


Arthimis

He was getting hot about

by Arthimis on

He was getting hot about Reza Shah and the host/control room cut him off...!!! Typical I.R. show... Did he get to finish proving how these two heros of Iran, Agha Mohamad khaan Ghajar and Reza Shah made and kept Iran for and to what it is today??? I doubt Mr. Ziba Kalaam was allowed to finish what he started! And even if he did, Who is really listening, understanding and agreeing with TRUTH in Iran?! Too bad some (perhaps most) Iranians don't even know their own history, let alone their true culture and civilization!!!! That's why they are in such a horrible and miserable state! And I mean all of us!!! It is truly shameful...

Awareness , Action, Freedom.


default

there is no freedom of speech in Iran.

by tabriz_balasi on

ziba kalam gets premission to say stuff like this and khamenie stooges allow him so that they can tell the world that we have free speach in Iran.  we all know what happened to people that expressed their doubt on an obviously rigged election, they got killed and rapped.  Islamic republic is pothetic.  If prophit muhammad or emam ali were here today, they would wage a holy war against this tyranic regime.  

 

be an act at all times in the name of Allah.


AMIR1973

No Fear: Ahmadinejad & Khatami are both Islamist scum

by AMIR1973 on

IRI cyber groupie No Fear, 

IRI is a Islamist thugocracy with no freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of or from religion, or freedom for individuals to choose even what clothes they can wear !!! It has a rich history of stoning adulterers to death, flogging people as punishment, hanging real or alleged criminals from cranes in public, sending its assassins to murder and mutilate its political opponents (including elderly men and women), raping teenage girls and then executing them (because a virgin would enter "paradise"), of torturing and killing gays, Bahais, prostitutes, etc. But, if you want to demonstrate your true conviction and support for the tremendous advances in free debate under its Monkey president, then I suggest you get the hell out of the decadent, evil imperialist West and take up residence in that sh*tty Islamist Third World hellhole. Can I say "Bon Voyage" to you? (Not likely, as IRI cyber groupies would much rather live in the U.S., U.K., Canada, etc. any day of the week)


jamshid

Daring, but

by jamshid on

I won't be surprised if he is fired from the university.


default

Debate all you want

by KouroshS on

But we will cut you down to pieces, if you dare taking it out on to the streets and to peacefully make demands. That is a NO No .

Debates are not worth Jack shoot if they are not followed throgh with appropriate changes and when people are prohbited from chanting and demonstrating, how many zillion time does this have to be repeated on this site? My god.

Broken Taboos my behind.


No Fear

Nothing New ... Under Ahmadinejad many taboos have been broken

by No Fear on

Here is more proof that more debates and freedoms have been granted during Ahmadinejad's administration.  I have been saying this for quite sometimes now, but no one seems to acknowledge this fact.

This program was not a live feed. Even under your beloved Khatami era, IRIB would have censored ZibaaKalaam in no time.

Debates are encouraged during Ahmadinejad's era. Remember the presidential debates? That was the first time Iran witness such things.