Part 1:
Part 2:
Part 3:
Recently by Ghormeh Sabzi | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | 5 | Dec 02, 2012 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 2 | Dec 01, 2012 |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | 2 | Nov 30, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Velvet Revolution
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Thu Jun 24, 2010 05:50 PM PDTif they prevent that then there will be a more traumatic one. It is too bad. Velvet means no one hurt. More violent one means plenty of people hurt. But of course that is what IRI wants.
Why is he wearing a bullet-proof vest?
by ghalam-doon on Thu Jun 24, 2010 05:27 PM PDTIs his life in danger? :)
This guy is a prof. of philosophy at Univ. of Toronto in Canada. Apparently this is part of a lecture series. As you might know, he was imprisoned while in Iran and "confessed" he was in contact with some US elements to stage a "velvet revolution" in Iran. They let him leave the country since unlike Hussein Derakhshan, he had friends in high places including the current leader of the Liberal Party of Canada.
common sense?
by spatima on Thu Jun 24, 2010 04:31 PM PDTis it me or this guy is just stating what is obvious to everyone?
In hope of a Free, Independent and Secular Iran
Why is he so surprised?
by Farah Rusta on Thu Jun 24, 2010 07:45 AM PDTDid I miss something? He says it is very interesting (in a sarcastic way) that while this regime has no politcal and moral legitemacy, it is at the same time resorting to extreme violence!!
Where is the element of surpise or "being interesting" when such a regime uses extensive violence against the people ? Isn't this an obvious feature of such regimes?
I was expecting a deeper and a more mature argument from Jahanbeglou.
FR