The first snow of the season fell in Tehran this week, but female ski bums planning to carve fresh lines at one of the three resorts in the Alborz mountain range will be able to hit the slopes only if they are accompanied by a male guardian
>>>Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Congratutulations to Ruling Clerics
by FG on Fri Nov 11, 2011 01:57 PM PSTCONGRATULATIONS!
Sunnis and Kurds in Iraq who got a taste of Al Queda-style rule
described it as "living in hell." Increasingly Iran fits that
description.
Ruling Islamists say, "The best way to win back the people's love is by cracking down on all social freedoms." Stealing ideas from the Taliban and Saudis, Khamenei now bans women from skiing on their own. Women must be accompanied by a male relative.
Who still loves the mullahs? The most reactionary clerics, a dwindling number of blind religious zealots and a certain well-bribed IRCG oficers. Meanwhile bribe money for lesser lesseer types is in short supply. Ahmadinejad and his sizable faction of supporters verge on defection.
Ahmanijadis have no problem with most regime crimes but notice the frustrating consequences of economic and diplomatic isolation, clerical interference, the inefficiency of IRCG economic monopolies and the explosive political risks of increased islamization (comparable to forcing most Iranians--including the educated--to eat feces).
Most reformists will skip the next election and let the Bad Guys duke it out. Instread of wasting votes, any reformist who does show would be wise to vote for the lesser of two evils--Ahmadinijad's faction.
At a minimum, a victory by Admadinejads might increase social freedoms. Better yet it would assure infighting among the Two Bad Guys would continue with the more dangerous clerics holding a much weaker hand. If the clerics one, I'd anticipate a bloody purge of all perceived enemies--starting with Ahmadinejad himself.
The most intriguing electoreal outcome would be a victory by one side which is then stolen by the opponent. Reformists will have no dog in the subsequent fight but should be amused in watching it play out.
WillIranians ever get out from under this regime without revolution? I'm skeptical. Having inspired the Arab Spring, they failed to oust their own tyrants for reasons that were in part inevitable...back then.
First, Green leaders fooled themselves too long by insisting this regime could be salvaged through reform. Sedondly, Iranians balked at the idea of another revolution after experiencing 1979. Thirdly, the rulers took advantage of class divisions while Green leaders let them get away with it by failing to appeal to workers. Most importantly the regime, still had too many true believers who hadn't been "burned enough" to become realists.
PREDICTION
As conditions ripen, Iranians will grasp that revolution may be their only option for change. All the mullahs offer is "bleakness and oppression forever."
The longer the revolution is delayed, the greater the probabillity it will succeed. This is seed-sowing time, especiallyamong security force conscripts. Their reliability diminishes inversely with suffering or disillusionment among populations from which they are drawn.
In the end, why would anyone fight for the mullahs except religious fanatics and IRCG officers with well-stuffed wallets?