Fokoli Islamists & Jundullah

Fred
by Fred
19-Oct-2009
 

The news of senior members of IRR, the Islamist Rapist Republic, despicable Guard/Basij armed enforcers being murdered by a homicide bomber the other day is bad news for Iran and Iranians.

 As the so called religious-nationalists, the charlatan Ali Shariati type fokoli Islamists, who thought they can set the agenda by being more Islamist than the career Islamists have found to their utter detriment that is not how it goes, so is trying to out-murder the career murderers.  

Trying to out-murder them, given the IRR’s track record, a nearly impossible feat to begin with, even if achieved; the outcome is not what Iranians have been struggling for so long. 

 Throughout the recent events in Iran  even though  IRR’s rooftop sharpshooters randomly picked off peaceful demonstrators, their Islamist brethrens raped and tortured Iranian men, woman and children freedom seekers, some to death- none of the surviving victims have advocated retaliatory violence for they know through experience violence begets violence.  

What Jesus said, especially the first part which is usually deleted from the quote is so apt:

“Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.”

 The “Soldiers of God”, Jundullah, or whatever group is behind the recent homicide bombing should know they are no friend of freedom or for that matter Iran and Iranians, most of all the much oppressed Iranian-Baluchies. They should “put up again thy sword into his place.”

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by FredCommentsDate
ادا اطوار اسلامی
5
Dec 05, 2012
مسجد همجنسگرایان
1
Dec 05, 2012
Iranians are legitimate target
10
Dec 04, 2012
more from Fred
ex programmer craig

Well, Q

by ex programmer craig on

Correct me if I'm wrong, Craig, but I thought you stressed "facts" just below, why is it that your post lacks any facts or evidence, and only childish subjective conclusions? 

Just off the top of my head, I'd say that the FACT that the Iran/Iraq war caused 20x the number of deaths than the US/Iraq war qualifies as a FACT. That's why I called it a FACT.

So, consider yourself corrected. You are wrong.

And what else is new? Every time anyone confronts you about anything you don't have an easy answer for, you dodge. That'd be fine if you did the sensible thing and exited the conversation, but you never do. You always hang around pretending to be in the right even when it's obvious to everyone you're being evasive. That South Korea thingie we were talking about earlier... man... I cannot believe you didn't just unplug your computer and come back a few days later mumbling about zionists wiped your hard drive or something.


Q

I think the phrase "dream on" was invented for this occasion

by Q on

Correct me if I'm wrong, Craig, but I thought you stressed "facts" just below, why is it that your post lacks any facts or evidence, and only childish subjective conclusions?

Would this be one of those occasions where someone "doesn't admit defeat" ?

Curious...


ex programmer craig

Q

by ex programmer craig on

EVEN if that's true, YOU are firmly at the bottom of the 1/3.

So you are admitting you made a fool of yourself by staying in that thread and insisting you were right for days after you got your ass kicked by a majority of people on IC? And you lol about that? 

And dude... seriosuly, go back and look at that thread... I stopped participating after 1 day, because I felt a bit sorry for you. And it isn't easy to get me feeling sympathy for an unapologetic fascist or whatever the hell your alleged ideology is.

I thought you already knew my ideology, why do you need to ask, if
you already know?

Wasn't me asking. I was just observing as other people asked, repeatedly, and you ignored them. I don't know enough about Iran to even guess what your ideology might be. I just know you dislike the west (US in particular) and you absolutely HATE Israel. And you like the Islamic Republic so much you have never once gone on record criticizing them on any matterof substance.

So what is Ahmadinejad's ideology? Yours is the same as far as I'm concerned. You say all the same things he does, you support all the same things he does, you condemn all the same things he does. Do you deny it? 

If you didn't know, were you lying this whole time,
calling me pro Ahmadinejad? Yes you were.

Pretty bold words, coming from a guy who called me a zionist on day one. Without even knowing anything about me whatsoever.

And if you've got any more "10 seconds" to spare, kindly go debunk the rest of what I put to you? I don't have time to go count how many points I raised but I typed a lot so there must be many.

 

 


Q

LOL! totally lost it, just like I said...

by Q on

I think 2/3 or the people on Iranian.com got a chance to prove you wrong - with actual facts!

EVEN if that's true, YOU are firmly at the bottom of the 1/3.

Or when somebody questions you about what your ideology is.

I thought you already knew my ideology, why do you need to ask, if you already know? If you didn't know, were you lying this whole time, calling me pro Ahmadinejad? Yes you were.

And your other other rule seems to be when all else fails accuse whoever you are arguing with of being a zionist.

Really? So you should be able to show me when I've called you a Zionist. Should be easy if it's a "rule" right?

See? 10 seconds!


ex programmer craig

Right

by ex programmer craig on

My rule has been that if it can be thoroughly debunked with 10 seconds or less time worth of brain activity, I might as well do it. 

Q, it's pretty obvious that your rule is that you never ackowledge when you've been beat, and you think that means you are undefeated. That humongous rant about South Korea for instance... I think 2/3 or the people on Iranian.com got a chance to prove you wrong - with actual facts! - and you kept coming back for more. IRANdokht is obviosuly either a lot smarter than you or a lot less pigheaded, because she chooses her fights very carefully now that she can't delete the opposition. And even then, she usually restricts her input to patting some useful idiot such as yourself on the back.

Your other rule seems to be that you feel you don't have to respond when you make a claim and somebody challenges it. Or when somebody questions you about what your ideology is.

And your other other rule seems to be when all else fails accuse whoever you are arguing with of being a zionist.

Actually I think I could come up with even more the-world-according-to-Q axioms but I'm getting tired of typing. And I very much doubt there is anyone on IC who hasn't figured you out by now anyway, as you're pretty shallow. I think even JJ would acknowledge that if you asked him.

Seeing Craig jump to the rescue of Fred is a little like the blond leading the blind!

Now, that's a new one. As far as I can recall I've never even engaged in a discussion with Fred. Am I being assigned to the Fred gang now? I'm OK with that, but from what I've seen he doesn't need much rescuing. Maybe that'd change if you stepped up your game?


Q

Irandokht jan,

by Q on

Taraf zadeh sime akhar.

You may have the right approach, there is no possible way to make sense out of the increasingly angry rants and ideological attacks. My rule has been that if it can be thoroughly debunked with 10 seconds or less time worth of brain activity, I might as well do it. So, I have been very busy.

Seeing Craig jump to the rescue of Fred is a little like the blond leading the blind!


ex programmer craig

numbers

by ex programmer craig on

Since you like to throw numbers around without any context, Q, here's one for you to chew on: the Iran/Iraq war killed 20 times more people that the US/Iraq war. Can we figure out a way to quantify how much abuse you have heaped upon the US over the war in Iraq, so that we can be sure you are fair and heap 20x that amount on the Islamic Republic?

And don't even talk to me about Iraq starting the war... Iraq wanted peace after 1 year... and besides, you've already established context is irrelevant.

And you know what? I think people on this website might actually appreciate you criticizing the Islamic Republic. It'd be a first for you, right?


ex programmer craig

ID & Q

by ex programmer craig on

To tell you the truth, I had stopped reading ExPC's comments...

Interesting comment to make after creatively interpreting a few of those comments, ID. It seems you can't take it upon yourself to dleete my comments anymore, so you pretend not to read them eh? But interestingly enough, you're always around to chime in when I tangle with one of your non-friends :D

Q, since when have you been capable of differntiating bewteen a victim and a perpetrator? If you are truly capable of that much empathy, then you have no excuse whatsoever for siding with the IRI. The IRI is after all the biggest perp of all, when it comes to crimes against the Iranian people. That's a numbers game you can't win no matter how you misinterpret the facts.

And yes, I would like to hear what JJ has to say about you using Mousavi's pic as your avatar, after you so obviously and so publicly sided with AJ and Khameini last summer.

 


IRANdokht

Q

by IRANdokht on

I can't believe you just realized that ExPC is not  sympathetic towards the people of Iran or any other country that would suffer destruction by the bombs of US and Israel...

It must be the victims' fault!

He's comparing being bombed or perished under sanctions to smokers dying. How apathetic can one be!

To tell you the truth, I had stopped reading ExPC's comments and I believe I will continue to do so again, now that I got yet another confirmation on how useless they are.

IRANdokht


Q

LOL!

by Q on

You "wish" JJ would censor what you call "subliminally associating Mousavi" with my comments?

Wow! Paranoid much? I really would love to hear JJ's opinion on this request.


Q

Craig, it's clear you have no clue what you're saying

by Q on

But just to make sure everyone else gets your mentality.

You are blaming the victim (Iranian People) for Sanctions that will kill them.

When people support a government that is engaged in widspread criminality and brutality against its own people and against people in other countries, that's a choice.

Please spin for us, how I misunderstood you.


ex programmer craig

PS to Q

by ex programmer craig on

Are you trying to subliminally associate Mousavi with your comments on this website? That's actually a pretty clever form of subterfuge, but I wish JJ would put a stop to it.


ex programmer craig

Q

by ex programmer craig on

I'm not the one putting my foot in my mouth with these ridiculous arguments that have no context at all except whatever is politically expedient for Q. The babbling about "choices" just makes it worse. We all have choices... every one of us. When people support a government that is engaged in widspread criminality and brutality against its own people and against people in other countries, that's a choice. You, Q, have made that particular choice with the IRI. You are the very LAST person who should be complaining on this website about the injustice of sanctions. You raised your hand and said "sanctions please!" when you gave the Islamic Republic a free pass for its criminal misconduct. And to make matters worse, you have made that choice for all the Iranians in Iran who oppose the Islamic Republic. And you have the audacity to pretend that you feel sorry for them now? What the hell is that about? Is that like a guy raping a woman and then expecting her to cry on his shoulder so he can comfort her about it afterwards?

I'd "lol" at you, except its not very funny.


Q

Yawn! Maybe if you forced people to smoke against their will,

by Q on

you might have a prayer of a coherent argument. I'm not sure you understand that victims of war and sanctions have NO CHOICES.

And that's only after you (will FAIL to) show that amount of people died of cigarettes in Iraq during the same time.

Craig, just some friendly advice with respect to your future "pearls of wisdom": you might want to stop wasting your energy putting your foot in mouth. Surely it's easier just to leave it there for next time.


ex programmer craig

Q

by ex programmer craig on

... and sanctions kill but nothing compared to cigarettes...

Such statements just serve to prove that you have no moral compass, Q. There is no right and wrong. It's just a numbers game. Or so you would have us believe.


Q

Terrorism kills but nothing compared to Sanctions

by Q on

where at least 500,000 children perished in Iraq as a result of sanctions. This death toll rivals only the US invasion.

I'm surprised, Fred, how you can possibly claim to be against murder, but still advocate "airtight" sanctions?

Love the fox news reference "homicide bomber" by the way. Wouldn't expect any less from you.

Made me laugh again!


kharmagas

Sycophant Monarchists (to Souri)

by kharmagas on

Souri, it has nothing to do with tolerance. The only way the monarchists can come to power is by foreign intervention, and the key to that is AIPAC and serving AIPAC:

Sycophant: " In a modern context a sycophant (from the Greek συκοφάντης sykophántēs) is a servile person who, acting in his or her own self-interest, attempts to win favor by flattering
one or more influential persons, or by saying lies against a fellow
citizen
for gaining a kind of profit. These actions are executed at the
cost of his or her own personal pride, principles, and peer respect. Such a manner is also called obsequiousness."

Ironically Fred brought up that term right below. 

 

 


Souri

Tolerance my dear!

by Souri on

Dk,

you said :

"There is a difference Khanoum between Independant Thinking and having a Conviction and defending it against Tides."

My CONVICTION is very clear and I always sticked to it, since the beginning. I think in order to reach to the UNITY that (we all agree) is needed for the freedom of Iran, we have to practice TOLERANCE!

If you had paid attention to all my posts since the day one, I have always showed my objection to the "extremism".

You are one of those extremists, dear DK. So are the people who offend and insult others, in any and all debates whether it is political or not.

You don't like my way? too bad. But there's a difference between disagreement and belittling.

All our differences is here.

If we try to offend and belittle other people, we may win to silence them, but we loose our own credibility in the eye of a silent majority too.

You seem not to agree with my views. You call "hypocrisy" what I am calling "Tolerance". I know I can't convince you, as you have a strong will to stick to your own CONVICTION.

But, one day you will realize that the only road to UNITY is TOLERANCE. And this is valid also for the people who attack you.

Good luck!


Fred

Khow it all Haji

by Fred on

Doc if you weren’t so big on yourself you would have seen you just confirmed my last comment about your megalomania. But being an uber-Islamist liar that you are this condition of yours is a given. Take care Haji! 


Darius Kadivar

Mamad Same thing I told Souri Applies to YOU

by Darius Kadivar on

Fereydoun Farrokhzad - Irani Boodan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4b8VF_uKXo

I have Nothing else to say to your Kind !

Best,

DK


Darius Kadivar

Souri Khanoum With Friends Like You Who needs Enemies?

by Darius Kadivar on

If Anyone has Changed, Little Lady, It's certainly You and the Cohort of pseudo Cyber Friends in search of attention.

For there is something more unpleasant and RUDE than foul language. IT's to be INTELLECTUALY CORRUPT by Refusing to take RESPONSABILITY for what we say or Write.

But if I can Reassure You, Your Not Alone to Blow in Wind's direction. It is a widely spread symptom amongst most of our fellow compatriots particularly when they are living in the West and comfortably have nothing to lose.

There is a difference Khanoum between Independant Thinking and having a Conviction and defending it against Tides. Not because it makes one popular but because one BELIEVES in What one Say's and takes Responsability for it regardless of what One's Popularity Polls may say ... 

In French You Call such people who have the courage of their opinions "Intellectuel Engagé".

In Short it means BEING HONEST ! Be it to yourself !

You Milady Belong to the ANN TELLECTUAL Who Remains DESENGAGE TOUS LE TEMPS !.

Yesterday You would Shout "VIVE LE CHAT" Tomorrow You will Shout "A BAS LE CHAT" ... ( No Relation with CHAT Persan Nor Le CHAH de Perse But Equally applicable in Your Case and those of your fellow likeminds )

  

Not Only would I repeat EVERY WORD and IN THE SAME ORDER Since Last January But I would Repeat it to the Same People in Question Today !

Firstly Because I was Right To Be Suspicious of Iran's government's involvement in the Gaza Crisis :

Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal meets with Iranian officials (china News)

and Secondly Because The Events that unfolded in Iran Proved that I was Right !

As When Iranians back home started to Shout their Opposition to the Regimes Domestic and International Policies during at Qud's Day :

"NAH GAZEH NAH LOBNAN, JANAM FEDAYEH IRAN"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ4rcezZtv0

"MARG BAR CHINE, MARGE BAR RUSSIA" in Response to "Death to Israel":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRRbQxgvqy4

Unlike YOU and Other DIASPORA FOKOLI ANN-TELLECTUALS of the Islamic Kind that Resurface regularly on this site or at their Favorite Lobby Cocktail dinners ... Our Dear and Brave Fellow Compatriots back home in their large majority have PERFECTLY understood the MANIPULATION by the Islamic Republic Think Tanks both Inside and Outside Iran.

So Meditate My Dear "ANONYMOUS" Souri "Khanoum" that while you express yourself "INDEPENDANTLY" others (who don't have the same Luxury as us to express themselves freely) in our dear country are either ARRESTED ( including fellow Iranian.com Bloggers like Hossein Derakhshan ) or  assassinated in Trying to Defend OUR RIGHT to Speak and Think Our Minds:

CHAPOUR BAKHTIAR ON 'REGIME CHANGE' (14 khordad 1368 (5 august 1989)

Dialogue of murder:A cautionary tale that must not be forgotten by Cyrus KADIVAR

So instead of Hypocritically rushing to my Rescue My Little Lady, I suggest you to Think TWICE Before You Try and Justify Your OWN IRRESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOUR !

Fereydoun Farrokhzad - Irani Boodan :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4b8VF_uKXo

Best,

DK

 

 

 


Mammad

DK

by Mammad on

At one time I was an IRI apologist! Then, I became something els!

So, what are you? An apologist for the coup regime of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, his dictatorship, and his quasi-fascist regime of 1970s, and an advocate of Reza Pahlavi, a person who has no accomplishment in life, no serious education, has not worked a single day in his life, and has lived all of his adult life in the US. And, the only reason that he is even talked about is that he is a son of his father!!

I have always said this, and I repeat it again:

Regime-e velaayat-e faghih farzand-e khalaf-e regime-e Pahlavi mibaashad.

Only regimes like Pahlavi's give rise to regimes like velaayat-e faghih. They both are terrible, horrible, criminal, and anti-Iran.

People like me have never ever supported the regime of velaayat-e faghih. People like me have suffered at the hands of both Pahlavi and IRI. But, people like me do not allow their personal views, sufferings, and feelings cloud the bigger picture: People come and go. Regimes come and go. What must survive and thrive is Iran. Therefore,

DEFEND WHAT CAN BE DEFENDED, AND REJECT WHAT MUST BE REJECTED

Mammad


Mammad

Debating you Fredo?

by Mammad on

Who the devil are you? I never debate guys like you. You know nothing! Two people debate if their levels of knowledge are more or less the same, but have different views. The only things you know are, (1) spreading hatred on behalf of AIPAC; (2) spying on people and be proud of it; (3) Labeling people, and giving them names, and (4) advocating misery and destruction for Iran by "airtight sanctions" "marterial (bomb) support" and military attacks on Iran.

Just look at your "comment:" Aside from your usual name calling like Haji, etc., what does it show? That you did your usual spying work, have gone and looked at my scientic work and made some silly comments, without knowing the first word about my scientific research. You do not know the connection between scientific problems A and B, and but given the expert that you are, allow yourself to pass judgement!! And, by the way, chemists work with chemical compositions, not chemical engineers!

That is the depth of your knowledge which is not even skin deep! It is subnano, atomic size!! 

I repeat: You have not read one page of Dr. Shariati's work, or Shamloo's for that matter, or Soroush for that matter, or Kadivar for that matter. All you know is that you hate Muslims and Islam. That is just too plain evident.

Scream! Shout! Hit your head against the wall in frustration! Slander people! Accuse them! Label them! Give them names! Spy on them! Lie about them! In other words, do your usual stuff, the type of things you are good at!!

Mammad


Darius Kadivar

Merci Nousha Arzu & Benroos, & Ebi, & Fred Jaan

by Darius Kadivar on

Thank you for your kind support.

Appreciated.

I am sure you have already seen this link by now but This may serve some fellow compatriots which seem to have gone astray in their priorities ...

CHAPOUR BAKHTIAR ON 'REGIME CHANGE' (14 khordad 1368 (5 august 1989)

Warm Regards,

DK


Nousha Arzu

DK

by Nousha Arzu on

Even though I have not commented much in the past, I have always appreciated your posts, and hope you continue with your sentiments with utmost zeal, specially in the face of bitter ignorance and insults.

God bless the late Shah -- God bless his soul!

I only wish he had appointed Shapour Bakhtiar six months earlier, when it had a chance to make a difference, perhaps in place of Sharif-Emami, Mr. 10%. Two weeks before the Cinema Rex fire, which we now know was the handiwork of the mullahs and their Palestianian terrorists -- on August 5, 1978 -- the Shah gave his famous Constitutional Revolution speech.

On that day, the King should have told the nation that he was sick with cancer and leaving the country for treatment, appointed Bakhtiar, with his son as the constitutional monarch, or better yet, with Farah as the reigning Queen until Reza Pahlavi reached the age of majority. As you know, before the tazi Arabs invaded Iran with their backward cult in 651 AD, Iran had had 3 reigning queens in its history.

In the early part of 1978, beginning in January, all the way through the summer of that year, there had been massive protests all around the country. By August 5, two weeks before the fateful Cinema Rex Fire, the monarch should have known, with his nation and his health in jeopardy, it was time to make a major change.

Shapour Bakhtiar would have been the perfect choice to mend fences with those fools in the Jebhe Melli (Sanjabi et al, who later kissed Khomeini's hand thinking he would become Iran's first post-Shah prime minister -- what a treasonous jackass he was!).

I digress, but the main point is, continue with your defense of the institution of monarchy -- for Iran, it is worthy of a fresh look, devoid of the irrational, stale 30-year old revolutionary misinformation. Today, we should no longer be held hostage to the lies spread by the Islamic fascists and their mules (the Tudeh and the Mujaheds) in order to gain power.

That was then, this is now. 

 

LONG LIVE THE GLORY OF KUROSH-e-KABIR 


Souri

benross

by Souri on

I'm still awake and working on a project ....maybe all night.

What you mean by the last paragraph of your comment? I didn't get it.


"Then what is the point of them participating in our political debate, if it is not for disrupting it? They can write poems and stories. They can participate in cultural and apolitical activities in this site. But they should stay out of political debate. They do not belong. I guess this is a fair deal."


You mean if people (anyone) want to once in a while participate in a political debate (oh sorry YOUR political debates) they are not allowed to? They should stick to the apolitical or cultural blogs or writing stories?

I really didn't get your point. You mean, if I've decided to not actively participate in the political blogs, then I should stay silent forever? I don't care about your offensive words on Toudeh, that you repeatedly state (which was very misplaced here though) but how on the earth you can explain your attitude of trying to silence people?

I don't know how long you have been in this site, but FYI, I am here since more than ten years and since I am registered  two years ago, I have been always reading the political blogs w/o posting too many comments. This is my way.

Do you have any objection to this?

I can't believe you are asking people (me) to stay away from YOUR discussion. Usually you speak more wisely.

In case if you still didn't get it, this is a site for everybody to discuss everything. It belongs to each one to choose what discussion they want to participate to, or only read it or skip it.


benross

Souri

by benross on

DK is far too often being bullied. Just because he is exposing and documenting what he cares for. The level of cruelty he is subjected to by some members of this site is beyond belief, which was often coming with some token nicety, as if you pet a dog after abusing it. This also shows the true character of those people.

And I agree, DK is a very nice person and he is not very good at being aggressive. It is not in his blood. And when he tries to defend himself aggressively, he is not very good at it!... which has its charm!

Now you jumped in this debate supporting the same reactionary line of thought that justified the Toodé party devastating policy. You were not defending Mammad personally. It was leftover garbage of Toodé in Al-Ahmad transmitted to the hallucinations of Sahriati that you were defending. That's instinctive and probably beyond your control, you who never participated in political debates had this unstoppable urge to participate in this one! After all, it was about Toodé garbage and connecting it to Islamic mass! As you see I can see your side of the story too. But at some point, we should all try to stop name calling each other, insulting each other for having different views.

But when it comes to defending IRI, why on earth here? All national resources that are at disposal of IRI, all those papers, TV and radios are not enough? what they have left for Iranians who do not believe in IRI other than few forums such is this one? What they are seeking? Turn me and likes of me to supporters of IRI? Then what is the point of them participating in our political debate, if it is not for disrupting it? They can write poems and stories. They can participate in cultural and apolitical activities in this site. But they should stay out of political debate. They do not belong. I guess this is a fair deal.


Souri

Cyber friends

by Souri on

DK,

"To the cyber friends", was the subject of an email that I sent to you and some other people, almost two years ago.

I was seeing you trough a completely different angle. You were a very polite and articulated and good manner person, until the "Gaza" discussion in last January.

As I remember, I had even defended you a few times, when people were accusing you of being a supporter of bombing Iran. I'd even given your example to Ms Rusta to show her how you deal with the negative comments, in a respectful manner.

But you have radically changed your attitude since January and you are becoming arrogant and insulting to almost everybody who disagree with you. Still, I have never been disrespectful to you until today.

I don't know you personally, not I do know anybody else in this site, for that matter. I can only agree or disagree with the ideas and attitude which are expressed by the people in this site. It is not my fault if you decided to change your attitude.

When you call me names like attention seeker, idiot and hezbe baadi, doesn't matter. I just want to ask you if you are not also "Hesbe baadi" then why you align yourself with the people who are the most anti-Monarchist of the site and give them a tap on the back, each time they try to bully me?

I don't ask you for respect. If you don't have it, you can't show it. But I never stub you in the back! What do you mean by this? When? How? Stab in the back???

But when I read all comments full of curse words, I always remember that someone once said that you were close with Farah Diba. I always ask myself, how would she feel if she get to read those insults posted by you?

She is a respectful and also respected woman.  Do you think with this attitude, you are doing good to her reputation ?

 

 


I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek

Fred is an institution

by I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek on

Asking him to change or "tone it down" is like asking Obama to speak incoherently. The name calling is part of his act. Stop fighting it. Embrace the tyranny of Fred. Hey Fred!! Did you see that ridiculous news of some American selling military secrets to the Israelis? HAHA I wonder if that info will help bust your moolahs and bring freedumzzz to Iran? Let's pray this is the case. Only Jewish Hebrew prayers though. Take your duah and suck it Muslims and muslim interns who seek to destroy this nation leader of the "sane" world.


Darius Kadivar

ahmad_ Mon Pauvre Petit Islamisteh Mamany ... ;0))

by Darius Kadivar on

Oh Mon Petit Bebe ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS7nqwGt4-I

Little Baby's Ego Was Hurt ? Oh Mamany ...

LOL