Freedom for Iran
MOST VIEWED
به زبان فارسي
RECENT QUIZZES
RECENT PICTORY
GOOGLE SEARCH
USER LOGIN
Islamic “Democide” in Iran
08-Feb-2008
The dictionary defines “Democide” as "The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder."
Democide means for governments what murder means for an individual under municipal law. It is the premeditated killing of a person in cold blood, or causing the death of a person through reckless and wanton disregard for their life. Thus, a government incarcerating people in a prison under such conditions that they die in a few years is murder by the state.
With that in mind, the Islamic Republic of Iran is the greatest mega-murderer in recent history, killing thousands of people a year without any due process.
The former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mr. Rafsanjani, along with one of the greatest mass murderers in recent history, the Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini Hendi, are directly responsible for the death of millions of Iranians.
The Intelligence Ministry of the Islamic Republic often arrests and prosecutes people not necessarily for what they did, but for who they are and what they are capable of doing. Their targets have been those groups of people who were acclaimed or fluent in foreign languages, educators, members of different organizations, leaders of communities, leaders of different parties, writers, poets, intellectuals, and especially the journalists.
To avoid public outrage, arrests usually occur in the dead of night. Individuals later find themselves held in "detention" for days, weeks, months and even years without any formal charges whatsoever. By obtaining self-incriminating confessions, the Islamic Republic is focusing on destroying individuals' reputations, dignity and honour, while sowing the seeds of contention, enmity, friction and the tearing to pieces of the best human characteristics. Such is the plight of the Iranian people.
Currently, the regime is holding Haleh Esfandiari, a 67-year-old Iranian-American woman who is the director of the Middle East Program at the Washington-based Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars. Ms. Esfandiari came to Iran months ago to visit her 93-year-old mother and was prevented from leaving Iran. On May 8, 2007 she was arrested.
Following weeks of interrogation about her work, she was accused of spying for Israel. She has been transferred to Iran’s notorious prison, Evin. For four months the ministry officials repeatedly interrogated her in the same fashion that they integrated Ziba (Zahra) Kazemi, an Iranian-Canadian journalist, who was murdered by the agents of the intelligence ministry of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Ms. Esfandiari has been trapped in Iran since December when, according to the Wilson Center, three masked men with knives stole her luggage and passport as she headed to the airport to leave the country. In the weeks before her arrest, she was called in for daily questioning on her activities.
In April 2006, a prominent Iranian-Canadian, Ramin Jahanbegloo, was arrested on similar charges. Human Rights Watch said the Iranian government’s mistreatment of Esfandiari recalls that of Ramin Jahanbegloo, an Iranian-Canadian philosopher. After nearly four months of detention and interrogation, Jahanbegloo was forced to “confess” that his scholarly works had contributed to the planning of a “Velvet Revolution”
The government of the Islamic Republic in Iran is not run by human beings, but by thugs and murderers. President Ahmadinejad, affectionately known by the Iranians as “the Monkey,” is the leader of the thugs. Naturally, it would make it difficult for other nations to reason and work with these human look- alikes. Regretfully, the world has become accustomed for nearly 29 years to the events in Iran and has continued commerce with them despite the fact the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to harass, torture, intimidate and kill its victims, the Iranian people, on false pretenses. Some things never change.
The oil seems to be more important to these nations than the human rights and the lives of the Iranian people. The Iranian people find this to be outrageous, disgusting and truly appalling.
In the cycle of prison horrors and terrors, the Islamic Republic of Iran uses many old Soviet's techniques, ranging from harassment, intimidation and tortures, to mechanical devices designed to inflict gross tissue damage. They employ psychological and physiological techniques, (an example is Ziba Kezemi, an Iraninan-Candian journalist), such as solitary confinement and sleep deprivation. These techniques are commonly being used on the Iranian youth by the Islamic Republic’s lackeys while the Islamic Republic dreams of world domination.
Khomeini and his supporters have copied the Stalinist techniques of establishing informers in every neighborhood. This, coupled with fierce punishments for suspected traitors and their families, created a fear among the population that made rebellion almost impossible. More noticeably, they created and recruited a group of torturers and secret policemen, mostly from the neighboring Islamic countries who were hated by the population. This hate was conducive to the leaders of the Islamic regime, for it ensured the loyalty of these henchmen, these foreign thugs
The Islamic Republic of Iran’s ambition is to acquire the bomb by any means available to them. One thing that constantly worked for them was the ability to create chaos and crises, both in Iran and other Muslim countries. But, first and foremost, they need to bring the Iranian population to its knees. They need to create Islamic jihadists by force and by brainwashing techniques. In order to accomplish this evil mission, the brutalization of the Iranian people becomes necessary.
The Islamic Republic of Iran is seeking either to end the world or make the world so chaotic as to force the arrival of its imaginary hidden Imam, the Mahdi. What a travesty!
A word of caution: do not be naïve. Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a cult of death and misery.
Terms such as “Political Islam,” or “Radical Islam,” or “Militant Islam” for instance, are contributions of the Useful Idiots. These terms do not even exist in the native parlance of Islam, simply because they are redundant. Islam, by its very nature and according to its charter—the Quran—is a radical political movement. It is the Useful Idiot who sanitizes Islam and misguides the populace by saying that the “real Islam” constitutes the main body of the religion; and, that this main body is non-political and moderate.
Even a cursory examination of Islam’s history and Islamic texts conclusively proves the exact opposite of peacefulness. Islam was, and continues to be, a movement of unbridled violence.
Hence, it is a fact that Islam is misrepresented. It is misrepresented very effectively by non-Muslim individuals and institutions who are generously rewarded by the modern day Islamic conquerors.
This time around the Muslims are using the immense amount of petrodollars they extract from the addicted non-Muslims. The sword is temporarily replaced by just as deadly a weapon— the petrodollar. Before long, the Muslims aim to add a more deadly modern version of the sword—the Islamic bomb. With the bomb in one hand and the other hand on the oil spigot, the non-Muslim world will be brought to its knees by the religion of peace and brotherhood.
To make matters worse, the agents of death, the Mullahs, divert the sorely needed funds at home to sponsor and support adventurous Islamic trouble-making abroad. They supply weapons, provide funds, and train any and all takers who share their wanton campaign of terrorism anywhere in the world.
To understand the true Islam, one needs to pay close attention to the words of the late Ayatollah Khomeini, the father of Islamic terrorism. On the occasion of the birthday of the Prophet Mohammad, Ayatollah Khomeini said:
“Qur'an says; kill, imprison! Why are you only clinging to the parts that talk about mercy? Mercy is against God. Mehrab means the place of war, the place of fighting. Out of the mehrabs, wars should proceed, just as all the wars of Islam used to proceed out of the mehrabs. The prophet has [had] sword to kill people. Our [Holy] Imams were quite military men. All of them were warriors. They used to wield swords; they used to kill people. We need a Khalifa who would chop hands, cut throats, stone people. In the same way that the messenger of God used to chop hands, cut throats, and stone people; in the same way that he massacred the Jews of Banu Qurazyza, because they were a bunch of discontented people. If the Prophet used to order the burning of a house or the extermination of a tribe, that was justice.”
At this conjuncture, a meaningful and comprehensive political, moral and economic measure by the United States and others offers the best chance of ending the Mullah's reign of terror and diffusing the existential threat they pose to the world. The Bible says, “To whom much is given, much is required” Perhaps it is for this reason that the people of the United States of America, once again, are called upon to make huge sacrifices to defeat another tyranny. It is important that this great nation stays the course and, enlists its power in support of freedom-loving Iranians to topple the ruling Islamofascists who are bent on wreaking death and destruction on the world.
The world is a laboratory where the experiment with Islam shows irrefutable results. To the extent that Islam rules any society, that society is stagnant, backward thinking, repressive and violent. The Islamic Republic of Iran represents the cutting edge for the newly petrodollar invigorated Islam. It is determined to complete its task of ending the world of “Dar-ul-Harb”—the non-Muslim world to be warred upon—and establishing the “Dar-ul-Solh,” or “Dar-ul-Salam”—the Muslim world of the Ummeh under the rule of the Mahdi. If achieving this aim hinges on the conflagration of the Third World War, the mullahs are happy to make it happen.
It is also important to keep in mind Albert Einstein’s warning, “The world is a dangerous place not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.”
The threat of Islam is real. If you wish your children to grow up and have a bright future, you must do all you can to defeat Islamism now before we all vanish by the ever-creeping Islamofascisim.
MOST DISCUSSED
| Title | Date | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Truth behind the propaganda | Jul 11 | 171 |
| Iranian AIPAC | Jul 11 | 88 |
| Being there | Jul 14 | 64 |
| Where it hurts | Jul 16 | 55 |
| پیشگویی | Jul 10 | 55 |
IRANIANS OF THE DAY
| Person | About | Day |
|---|---|---|
| Mansour Matloubi | Professional poker player | Jul 18 |
| Elaheh Seifolmolook | Mistress of Henna | Jul 18 |
| Fe Zandi | Fashion designer | Jul 17 |
| Lili Dehghani | Participating in Canadian Idol, singing Amazing Grace | Jul 17 |
| Ali Pourgol | My father, a great teacher and author | Jul 17 |
| Shahab Tolouie | Flamenco player and singer in Prague performs in a synagogue | Jul 17 |
| Kian Tavakoli | Wine maker | Jul 17 |
| Tara & Sohrob Khojasteh | Making Kiosk's pizza-e-ghormehsabzee | Jul 16 |
| Aram Danesh | Guitar player | Jul 16 |
| Vartan Gregorian | Life as an immigrant from Iran in America | Jul 16 |
Manufactured coup of
by jo (not verified) on Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:34 PM CSTManufactured coup of 1978:
Excerpts from the "A Century of War":
"In November 1978, President Carter named the Bilderberg group's George Ball, another member of the Trilateral Commission, to head a special White House Iran task force under the National Security Council's Brzezinski. Ball recommended that Washington drop support for the Shah of Iran and support the fundamentalistic Islamic opposition of Ayatollah Khomeini. Robert Bowie from the CIA was one of the lead 'case officers' in the new CIA-led coup against the man their covert actions had placed into power 25 years earlier. Their scheme was based on a detailed study of the phenomenon of Islamic fundamentalism, as presented by British Islamic expert, Dr. Bernard Lewis, then on assignment at Princeton University in the United States.
Lewis's scheme, which was unveiled at the May 1979 Bilderberg meeting in Austria, endorsed the radical Muslim Brotherhood movement behind Khomeini, in order to promote balkanization of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines. Lewis argued that the West should encourage autonomous groups such as the Kurds, Armenians, Lebanese Maronites, Ethiopian Copts, Azerbaijani Turks, and so forth. The chaos would spread in what he termed an 'Arc of Crisis,' which would spill over into Muslim regions of the Soviet Union.
The coup against the Shah, like that against Mossadegh in 1953, was run by British and American intelligence, with the bombastic American, Brzezinski, taking public 'credit' for getting rid of the 'corrupt' Shah, while the British characteristically remained safely in the background.
During 1978, negotiations were under way between the Shah's government and British Petroleum for renewal of the 25-year old extraction agreement. By October 1978, the talks had collapsed over a British 'offer' which demanded exclusive rights to Iran's future oil output, while refusing to guarantee purchase of the oil. With their dependence on British-controlled export apparently at an end, Iran appeared on the verge of independence in its oil sales policy for the first time since 1953, with eager prospective buyers in Germany, France, Japan and elsewhere.
In its lead editorial that September, Iran's Kayhan International stated: In retrospect, the 25-year partnership with the [British Petroleum] consortium and the 50-year relationship with British Petroleum which preceded it, have not been satisfactory ones for Iran … Looking to the future, NIOC [National Iranian Oil Company] should plan to handle all operations by itself. London was blackmailing and putting enormous economic pressure on the Shah's regime by refusing to buy Iranian oil production, taking only 3 million or so barrels daily of an agreed minimum of 5 million barrels per day.
This imposed dramatic revenue pressures on Iran, which provided the context in which religious discontent against the Shah could be fanned by trained agitators deployed by British and U.S. intelligence. In addition, strikes among oil workers at this critical juncture crippled Iranian oil production. As Iran's domestic economic troubles grew, American 'security' advisers to the Shah's Savak secret police implemented a policy of ever more brutal repression, in a manner calculated to maximize popular antipathy to the Shah.
At the same time, the Carter administration cynically began protesting abuses of 'human rights' under the Shah. British Petroleum reportedly began to organize capital flight out of Iran, through its strong influence in Iran's financial and banking community. The British Broadcasting Corporation's Persian-language broadcasts, with dozens of Persian-speaking BBC 'correspondents' sent into even the smallest village, drummed up hysteria against the Shah.
The BBC gave Ayatollah Khomeini a full propaganda platform inside Iran during this time. The British government-owned broadcasting organization refused to give the Shah's government an equal chance to reply. Repeated personal appeals from the Shah to the BBC yielded no result. Anglo-American intelligence was committed to toppling the Shah. The Shah fled in January, and by February 1979, Khomeini had been flown into Tehran to proclaim the establishment of his repressive theocratic state to replace the Shah's government. Reflecting on his downfall months later, shortly before his death, the Shah noted from exile, I did not know it then perhaps I did not want to know but it is clear to me now that the Americans wanted me out. Clearly this is what the human rights advocates in the State Department wanted What was I to make of the Administration's sudden decision to call former Under Secretary of State George Ball to the White House as an adviser on Iran? Ball was among those Americans who wanted to abandon me and ultimately my country.[1][1]
With the fall of the Shah and the coming to power of the fanatical Khomeini adherents in Iran, chaos was unleashed. By May 1979, the new Khomeini regime had singled out the country's nuclear power development plans and announced cancellation of the entire program for French and German nuclear reactor construction. Iran's oil exports to the world were suddenly cut off, some 3 million barrels per day. Curiously, Saudi Arabian production in the critical days of January 1979 was also cut by some 2 million barrels per day. To add to the pressures on world oil supply, British Petroleum declared force majeure and cancelled major contracts for oil supply. Prices on the Rotterdam spot market, heavily influenced by BP and Royal Cutch Shell as the largest oil traders, soared in early 1979 as a result.
The second oil shock of the 1970s was fully under way. Indications are that the actual planners of the Iranian Khomeini coup in London and within the senior ranks of the U.S. liberal establishment decided to keep President Carter largely ignorant of the policy and its ultimate objectives. The ensuing energy crisis in the United States was a major factor in bringing about Carter's defeat a year later. There was never a real shortage in the world supply of petroleum. Existing Saudi and Kuwaiti production capacities could at any time have met the 5-6 million barrels per day temporary shortfall, as a U.S. congressional investigation by the General Accounting Office months later confirmed. Unusually low reserve stocks of oil held by the Seven Sisters oil multinationals contributed to creating a devastating world oil price shock, with prices for crude oil soaring from a level of some $14 per barrel in 1978 towards the astronomical heights of $40 per barrel for some grades of crude on the spot market. Long gasoline lines across America contributed to a general sense of panic, and Carter energy secretary and former CIA director, James R. Schlesinger, did not help calm matters when he told Congress and the media in February 1979 that the Iranian oil shortfall was 'prospectively more serious' than the 1973 Arab oil embargo.[2][2]
The Carter administration's Trilateral Commission foreign policy further ensured that any European effort from Germany and France to develop more cooperative trade, economic and diplomatic relations with their Soviet neighbor, under the umbrella of détente and various Soviet-west European energy agreements, was also thrown into disarray. Carter's security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and secretary of state, Cyrus Vance, implemented their 'Arc of Crisis' policy, spreading the instability of the Iranian revolution throughout the perimeter around the Soviet Union. Throughout the Islamic perimeter from Pakistan to Iran, U.S. initiatives created instability or worse." --
William Engdahl, A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, © 1992, 2004. Pluto Press Ltd. Pages 171-174. [1][1]
In 1978, the Iranian Ettelaat published an article accusing Khomeini of being a British agent. The clerics organized violent demonstrations in response, which led to the flight of the Shah months later. See U.S. Library of Congress Country Studies, Iran. The Coming of the Revolution. December 1987. The role of BBC Persian broadcasts in the ousting of the Shah is detailed in Hossein Shahidi. 'BBC Persian Service 60 years on.' The Iranian. September 24, 2001.
The BBC was so much identified with Khomeini that it won the name 'Ayatollah BBC.' [2][2] Comptroller General of the United States. 'Iranian Oil Cutoff: Reduced Petroleum Supplies and Inadequate U.S. Government Response.' Report to Congress by General Accounting Office. 1979.
http://www.amazon.com/Century-War-Anglo-American-P...
Akhund Bashi, man ridam be tu va Islam
by Farhad joon (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:00 PM CSTاندر تصدیق مقامات خر
شاعر خوش کلام دانشمند باز کردی به ینگه دنیا بند؟
کزچه این زادوبوم خرپرور نکند التفاط بر این خر؟
ننشیند بپای گفتارش نپسندد سیاق افکارش
از چه سنگین نمیکند کفه اش ندهد دکترای فلسفه اش؟
لیک دانی که ینگه دنیا ئی نیست غافل زمقصد غائی
خوب داند که این الاغ چموش نیست جز آن الاغ حلقه بگوش
گرچه ژاژی دو گانه می خایند هر دو از یک طویله می آیند
این عبوس است گرچه،آن خندان هردو هم مسلکند و هم دندان
همه،ازصدر خانه تا دالان روضه خوانان،شیوخ،رمالان
وان گدائی که صدرمصطبه است با اهن و تلپ و کبکبه است
جمله اعضاء تیم ایشانند جیره خوار قدیم ایشانند
ریشه جان خویش ازو دارند همه پالان خویش ازو دارند
ارث شان برده از عمو زاده از کوئین،با عبا و لباده
پرورش داده شان بزور و بزر تا رسیدند این زمان به ثمر
حالیا مار بر سر گنج اند دست او مهره های شطرنج اند
میدهد گه وزیر را حرکت گاهی از رخ طلب کند برکت
چون شود فیل کشته در بازی میکند اسب جفتک اندازی
گاه گیرد پیاده ای سر خویش میدهد شاه کوسه ها را کیش
مات اما نگردد آخر کار غیر مشتی چو بنده و سرکار
کیش با اخم، یا که با خنده است ملت است عاقبت که بازنده است
پس مشو خام،اینهمه بازی است خنده هم عین جفتک اندازی است
سر نخ تا بدست ارباب است آدمی کون درست کمیاب است
Javab
by Akhund_Bashi (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 09:33 PM CSTبله خوب، متشكرم كه سوال كرديد و از من پاسخ طلبيديد. الهم اسالوكه انی. بله شما بايد بدانيد كه اسلام شما را آدم كرد وگرنه به خودتان نگاه كنيد و اين مقاله را بخوانيد تا بفهميد چقدر در جهالت هستيد. در حالی كه مسلمانان در راه پيدايش آزادی اند، شما در فكر تنفر و فتنه هستيد. اسلام نژادپرستی را از ميان برد، و حالا شما خواهان آنيد؟ لذا كمی بفكر آييد و براه راست قدم برداريد.
بسم آلله الرحمن الرحيم. و سلام
بچه های ایرانی Bebind be Iran che gohi zadn PAKHSH KONID
Zaran (not verified)Fri Feb 08, 2008 08:27 PM CST
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=cjF0_XAkObk
جوانان و روشنفکران ديروز انقلاب کردند تا جوانان ونوجوانان امروز در آتش نادانيهاي آنها بسوزند
Mr. Imani: Watch this
by sugar dust (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 08:04 PM CSTMr. Imani:
Watch this video:
ديدنيها >> امسال سال جلوگیری از جوانان شیعه برای زرتشتی شدن است!
Preventing Iranian youth from converting to Zoroastrianism, mullah says in his sermon:
بروید اینجا و این ویدیو را نگاه
کنید یه آخوندی داره از بازگشت به زرتشتیت جوانان
حرف میزنه
من که شاخ در آوردم
http://news.gooya.com/didaniha/archives/2008/02/06...
Home >> Middle East >> Iran
by Anonymousq (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 07:26 PM CSTHome >> Middle East >> Iran
Email Print
Iranian Revolutionary Guards Perpetuate Terror Within and Without
Majid Sadeghpour, Ph.D. - 1/21/2008
"Cold blooded murders", a friend of mine cried out recently as she recalled gruesome memories from Iran while reflecting on the newly levied sanctions against Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). Encouraged and emboldened, her voice was filled with anger, determination, and a newfound hope that echoed the braveness of dissident university students in Iran of today. All a reminder that the Presidential executive orders 13382 and 13224 carry a subtle but dual benefit affecting not only Iranian regime's activities abroad, but also its enemies within.
Our knowledge of IRGC's past and present terrorist behavior within Iran is abstract, at best. The real example she provides would perhaps serve as a reminder of their brutality. Recalling a memory from a sleepy Caspian Sea town north of Tehran, she describes a mid-summer afternoon's horrifying memory. As it is a Muslim custom, a neighbor's family was washing their recently executed daughter's body, in preparation for burial. Fresh blood streamed out of the house and onto the neighborhood pavement, she recalls. "I stood there wondering; why so much blood". Little did she know at the time, as she evokes the memory today, that post-execution, a certain part of the young woman's body had been mutilated by IRGC members. For those who wonder, the medical term is Hepatectomy. Historical context of such brutality is beyond the scope of this article. For what crime, one might ask? She was 18 years old, and member of a dissident group called Fadayan Khald who opposed the mullah's undemocratic government.
In the past 3 decades, IRGC's have been responsible for the execution of over 120,000 dissidents and students, including some of Iran's brightest minds. From mullah's "cultural revolution" of 1980-89, to the current wave of executions, or the recent crackdown of protesters (at Allameh, Tehran, and Polytechnic universities), the revolutionary guard's main goal was and still is to safeguard the regime against internal social, political, and security threats.
http://www.globalpolitician.com/24039-iran
If I Have Offended You....
by Zoroaster (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 06:37 PM CSTIf I have offended you, O Wise Lord, whether by thought or word or deed, whether intentionally or inadvertently, I earnestly seek to make amends by offering you praise.
If I have reduced the honor in which you are held, I proclaim your glory with even greater fervor.
May your will rule in the hearts of all your creatures.
May every animal and plant, as well as every man and woman, live according to your laws, for the seed of righteousness lives in every living thing.
Hokoomat Muhammadi, Jalad Khomeini..Bebinid be Iran che kardan
by Jamshid khan (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 04:00 PM CSThttp://mashrote.multiply.com/video/item/25
Farhade Olag Bache
by Dooste_Akhund_Bashi (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 03:19 PM CSTTof to soorate shoma dota Farhad56,59. Shomaha az Khoda be kabar va jahanmi hastid. Samsheereh Islam barayeh gardane shoma haramzadehha hazereh!
sorry, It should read "Using
by Anonymous99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 02:27 PM CSTsorry, It should read "Using Your logic".
Akhund-bashi: Using logic ,
by Anonymous99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 02:26 PM CSTAkhund-bashi:
Using logic , Shah was also "just" and right in eliminating his oppositions...This is typical of Akhoonds...no morals, no scruples, unprincipled thugs, no dignity...
The regime has justified all of its atrocities by invoking Allah and Islamic laws...The legislators in Iran is God and Khamanie is god's agent on earth...You're too ignorant for words.
Afshin jan
by Keer-Koloft (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 02:08 PM CSTThis babe of mine Amil/Anonymous99 don't care if Iranians have horns or not. What they want to know if Iranians are keer koloft. They have a big hole in their rear to fill. Why do you think I am trying to offer a keer!
To Akhund_Bashi
by Farhad59 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 02:04 PM CSTAkhund_Bashi
Benazarm ke madaret to raa az koonesh biroon avordeh. Man ridam bar Mohammad va al-e Muhammad. Ahmaghe khare bisavad arab, Iran is called The Ismamic Republic, akhe cheghadr to gavi ke nemifahmi. Jomhoori Islami faghat va faghat dareh ahkaam Quran raa anjam mideh, hamantor ke payghambar goft, akhe chera dari mardom raa gomraah mikoni. In jenayat dar iran hameh be esme islam aziz ast. In islam aziz ast ke khahar o madare hame ro gaideh. Baseh dige ba oon ghiafeye nahs o kasif arabit. Baba jam konin berin, mardom digeh ino fahmidan. Mardom islam vaghei raa shenakhtan. In mozakhrafat raa berin too felestin befrooshin.
Logical Answer
by Akhund_Bashi (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 01:45 PM CSTبسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
متشكرم كه به من فرست داديد جوابتان را بدهم. جنايتهای رژيم جنايتهای دينی نيست. اينطور نباشد كه شما بگوييد جنايتهای رژيم جنايتهای دينی است، نخير نيست. اگر هر خر ديگری هم در ايران بود، مثلا همين نويسنده خر، شما فكر نميكنين كه مثل قصاب مخالفانش را می كشت؟ بله، پس جنايتهای رژيم جنايتهای دينی نيست لاكن جنايت است، با دين يا بی دين.
اشهد انه محمدا رسول الله
Bamyaan Repeat - in Iran My
by IR's cultural genocide (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 01:05 PM CSTBamyaan Repeat - in Iran
My article on the Mullahs’ ongoing destruction of the pre-Islamic archeological sites - world heritage - among which the tomb of King Cyrus the Great:
http://www.savepasargad.com/european_languages.htm
Indictment of Mr. Esfandiar Rahim-Mosha'i, head of Islamic Republic of Iran Cultural Heritage Organization, for Crimes against Humanity
http://www.savepasargad.com/january/Indictment%20of%20Mr.%20Esfandiar%20Rahim-Mosha'i.htm
Crimes of the IRI: The men
by anon99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:52 PM CSTCrimes of the IRI:
The men and women whose stories you can read on this page are now all citizens of a silent city named Omid ("hope" in Persian). There, victims of persecution have found a common life whose substance is memory.
Names of the victims of the IRI's Holy crimes:
http://www.abfiran.org/english/memorial.php
RE: Some (IRRELEVANT) Common Sense
by Anonymous1 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:50 PM CSTBefore taking the time to copy paste IRRELEVANT comments, or even taking the time to write up IRRELEVANT comments, why don't you people read the article and come up with RELATED comments ?
Afshin: Stay on topic
by Anonymous99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:48 PM CSTAfshin: Stay on topic please. No one is talking about war.
Some Common Sense
by afshin on Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:19 PM CSTMr. Imani, you should visit Iran. You might find that Muslims don't have horns afterall. Then you can give your little fingers a break from copying and pasting garbage from neo-fascist, I mean neocon websites to here. How much of a clueless cluster fuck can you be man? Who died and placed our moral compass in your hands. After all this shit, haven't you realized, that religion is bad, all religion is bad, no matter what?!?!?!?!? Have you learned anything? What a foolish man you are. You may think you can come here and stir some shit, but at the end of the day, Iran is still there and will always be. Many much bigger people than Bush and Olmert have come and gone in the course of history, yet Iran is still there. In the grand scheme of things the last 30 years have been but a proverbial hiccup in our millenia of recorded history. Many empires were broken at the footsteps of Iran, yet every conquorer was absorbed and we persevered. Now for a little dose of reality to you and other like minded turds. Because of Iran's topography (In case you're too stupid to know what that means, get a dictionary), population, wealth, weapons stockpiles, and also the fact that Iran will be in a defensive position (as opposed to offensive), You will need to consider many if not all of the following:
1. Be willing to kill many people, and when I say many, I mean well over 5 million. The civilian death toll in Iraq thus far by most unbiased accounts is well over a million.
2. Invest more than one million foot soldiers (boots) on the ground. Iraq is about half the size of Iran and is relative flat. Iran on the other hand has a different topography. it's shielded by the Alborz and Zagros mountain ranges.
3. Be in a position to spend a lot of money. To put it in perspective, the US is spending about 4 Billion (yes that's a B) a week to conduct a losing war in Afghanistan and Iraq, which even combined don't have the same population and amount of weaponary as Iran does. Expanding the theatre of operations to Iran would cost at least another $10 billion a week. That's in addition to the $12 billion a week the Pentagon has as its budget. In other words, pretty much about 70 cents of every tax dollar will be spent to fight a war. Now do you savvy??
4. You may be able to land some pretty heavy punches against Iran, afterall the US is a superpower, actually it's not. the US is a mega-hyper-power. But be prepared to bleed and bleed heavily. Once the territorial integrity of Iran is overtly violated what has been a policy of detente will be quickly discarded, and they will come at all of America's assets in the region with a ferocious fury. It's not the same Iran in September of 1980 that was caught off guard. All officers are at post, all weapons are on standby, and everyone's waiting. And more importantly, they're itching for a fight.
5. If the Iranian people ever had a chance of becoming a democratic country and crawl from under the yolk of this regime, that will be gone for a very very long time. As Hitler, and even George Bush can tell you, nothing enables the crushing of domestic dissent more than an external threat.
6. By their very nature, Iranians are pro-western people. Of all the countries in the middle east, including Israel, I would have to say that the Iranian people are the most pro-western. Sure the government may claim otherwise. But isn't it odd that Ahmadinejad has visited NY for every UNGA meeting since being elected? Most assuredly, even the most pro-American of Iranians will be unhappy when cluster bombs and depleted uranium start to fall on Iran.
7. Be prepared to see $200-$300 oil. Yes. You think $3.50 for a gallon of premium gas is a lot to shell out? Try $12 a gallon. The rate of inflation will reach double digits as will unemployment in the United States.
8. The reality is that we're currently in "peak oil". Don't expect the rest of the world to roll over and play along if the US invades yet another oil rich country under the pretext of WMDs. Somehow I think we've seen this episode before, and from what I remember the ratings sucked!
9. Americans are good people. Their greatness has enabled their awesome power over the last 2 centuries in general and the last 5 decades in particular. But as great people go, they cannot be fooled for long. By America engaging in yet another illegal war under false pretenses this can shake the very foundation of American democracy. People won't sit idling along while the government commits crimes in their names. Before the Iraq invasion, most 9/11 families came out in protest against the war stating for it not to happen in their name. Those voices and others will not be silent if Iran is invaded.
The United States has adopted a policy of sanctions against Iran for almost three decades without any tangible results. Time and again these policies have proven fool hearty and even naive. Iran has legitimate energy and security concerns. The United States has an obligation to its people to make every effort to resolve outstanding issues peacefully without bloodshed. Might does not always make right. I love America, and nothing hurts more than the thought if Iran and the US engaged in a war. It's almost like when both your parents are fighting. What do you do? What do you say? Both have valid concerns. To a certain extent, both are very right, yet at the same time, they are very wrong.
And these conflicts cannot be simplified to a matter of religion. That too would be naive. The US is not prosperous because of its judeo-christian tradition. Hitler didn't murder 10 million people in concentration camps because he was christian. The streets of Babylon didn't have lamps a thousand years ago because they were Muslim. Alexander didn't conquor Persia because he was a Pagan, and Yasdegerd didn't lose to the Arabs in Ghadesieh because he was Zorastrian. If history has taught us anything, is that religion can seldom if ever serve as a true barometer of morality and ethics. Often times it is in the name of religion, any religion, and all religions that HUMAN BEINGS commit the most vile and grotesque acts. It is by that very definition the true opiate of the masses
Amnesty International
by Anonymous99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:08 PM CSTAmnesty International recorded 69 executions between July 2005 and the end of January 2006. According to Iranian media, there were 10 executions, and 21 new death sentences were given out, between Jan. 20 and Feb. 20, 2006. According to www.stopfundamentalism.com , Iran executed at least 181 people in 2006.
There is no reason to believe that the number of executions will fall in the near future.
http://www.stopchildexecutions.com/execution_death...
http://meydaan.org/English/wwShow.aspx?wwid=364
"Amnesty International is
by Anonymous99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:56 AM CST"Amnesty International is greatly concerned by continuing violations of the rights of members of Iran’s ethnic minorities, including Iranian Azerbaijanis, Kurds, Baluchis, and Arabs. Within the past two weeks, hundreds of Iranian Azerbaijani linguistic and cultural rights activists have been arrested in connection with demands that they should be allowed to be educated in their own language; Kurdish rights activists have been detained, and demonstrators killed or injured; and a Baluchi accused of responsibility for a bomb explosion on 14 February 2007 was executed just five days later."
http://www.amnesty.org/en/alfresco_asset/0a890bc8-...
"Ethnic Azeris are the largest minority group in Iran. Although generally well-integrated into society, growing calls for a greater freedom of expression of their ethnic and cultural identity in recent years have been dealt with harshly by the Iranian authorities. Iranian Azeris have complained about the lack of Azeri language schools, and there have been reports that newspapers written in Azeri (a form of Turkish) have been banned. At the end of June 2005, scores of people were reportedly arrested following an Azeri cultural gathering at Babek Castle in the city of Kalaybar. Similar events in previous years have also met with repression."
http://www.amnesty.org/en/alfresco_asset/b7b9600c-...
"Despite the Arab population remaining largely loyal to Iran
during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, the central government in Tehran has continued to
view Arab Iranians with suspicion. Iranian Arabs claim this has led to discriminatory
policies and unequal access to resources aimed at social development. Such
discrimination has led to economic deprivation and frustration among Iranian Arabs, which
has tended to spill over into unrest and subsequent repression, the most recent cycle of
which began in April 2005 and has become known among the Ahwazi Arabs as the Ahwazi
intifada. Without measures to address the social economic and other grievances which are
among the root causes of such unrest, the cycle looks set to continue."
http://www.amnesty.org/en/alfresco_asset/36287fe3-...
From
by Anonymous99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:43 AM CSTFrom :http://zaneirani.blogspot.com/
Iran: crimes against humanity
Three hundred jailed Turkmen have been threatened to death. In addition Zamel Bavi, a 29 year old prominent Iranian Arab human right activist and several others were hanged in Ahvaz. Four more by the names of Bavi, Saki, Mazraa and al-Mansouri are accused of armed insurrection and await execution.
http://zaneirani.blogspot.com/
New York Times: [Judiciary Spokesman Alireza Jamshidi] also announced punishments for 54 followers of the Bahai faith who were arrested early last year in Shiraz, in southern Iran. He said three had received prison terms of four years on charges of “propagating against the regime.” The other 51 received suspended prison terms and were released on the condition that they take courses taught by the state-run Islamic Propaganda Organization, Agence France-Presse reported. Iran’s theocracy does not recognize the legitimacy of Bahaism.
Iran: Crimes against Humanity
In a letter, Behnam's attorney Mohammad Mostafei informed Stop Child Executions that the execution order of Behnam Zare was sent by Ayatollah Shahrudi to Shiraz Iran and the execution can be performed at anytime. In adition two Iranian sisters convicted of adultery face being stoned to death, and a twenty two year old Iranian man is sentenced to death for drinking alcoholic beverages at home.
http://zaneirani.blogspot.com/
Declaration by the
by Anonymous99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:33 AM CSTDeclaration by the Presidency on Behalf of the EU Concerning Death Sentences in Iran
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?refe...
This week, two Iranian
by Anonymous99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:31 AM CSTThis week, two Iranian sisters, Zohreh and Azar Kabiri, ages 27 and 28, respectively, were sentenced to death by stoning in Karaj, 40 km west of Tehran. It is their second sentencing: They've already received 99 lashes each at the hands of their government for the crime of "illegal relations," in a trial conducted without a defense attorney. The court decided to try them again for the same crime, now finding that they were guilty of actual "adultery" - an offense punishable by death in Iran.
In this specific case, evidence of Zohreh and Azar's alleged adultery is limited to a video filmed on a secret camera planted by Zohreh's husband. Though he insists the women had extramarital affairs, even the court acknowledged that the video footage doesn't show them engaging in any sexual acts. Jabbar Solati, their lawyer, insists that there is absolutely "no legal evidence whereby the judge could have the knowledge for issuing a stoning sentence."
When it comes to women and the law in Iran, this isn't hard to believe. Often, women who have been raped are charged with adultery and killed for the "crime" of being raped. What's more is that under Iran's Sharia law, the testimony of a woman has only half the value of that of a man. And because women in Iran have a far higher rate of illiteracy than men, they are often duped into signing confessions for crimes they didn't commit.
The brutal details of death by stoning are described in Iran's penal code. Article 102 explains that prior to the stoning, men must be buried up to their waists in a pit, and women up to their breasts, so their upper bodies are exposed but they cannot move. The size of the stones is crucial. Article 104 explains that the stones must be large enough to inflict pain, but "not large enough to kill the person by one or two strikes." An excruciating death is the goal - most are reported to take around 20 minutes.
I've watched a video of one such stoning in Iran. It's impossible to describe the absolute horror of watching hordes of men lift up stone after stone, crying out that "God is great," while a woman, trapped in a dirt pit, is slowly and violently disfigured by the rocks.
According to Iran's National Council of Resistance, there are currently 11 people - nine women and two men - awaiting death by stoning for adultery convictions. Although the head of Iran's judiciary issued a moratorium on the practice of stoning in 2002, the official law has not been changed and stonings have persisted, though concrete figures are hard to come by. Just a week ago, 49-year-old Abdollah Farivar, a father and music teacher, was sentenced to the same gruesome death that awaits Zohreh and Azar.
Had Zohreh and Azar's story been published half a century ago, your reaction might have been shock. Then, when the Western human rights movement was just getting under way, newspaper readers were beginning to encounter stories of individuals suffering terrible oppression at the hands of their governments.
The tactic of bringing such stories to public attention began, by many accounts, in May 1961, when a group of activists, writers and lawyers in London convinced The Observer to print the photographs and stories of six political prisoners detained in countries around the world for their beliefs. Led by lawyer Peter Benenson, the campaign had the aim of enraging readers and rallying public opinion, and thus shaming the abusive governments through severe international pressure. Public reaction to this 1961 "Appeal for Amnesty" was overwhelming. The informal group quickly became Amnesty International, now a household name, and looking back, it's clear this was a foundational moment in the Western human rights movement.
Now, it's increasingly rare to read specific appeals about particular individuals. Instead we receive e-mail blasts informing us about massive campaigns - against child labor, against religious suppression, against honor killings. While such organization is a testament to how massive the movement has become, these appeals can often feel abstract, and it's hard to summon up the motivation to mobilize in the face of such a bleak reality.
But one thing is certain: The name-and-shame tactic practiced in 1961 still works. Stop Stoning Forever, a group led by brave local activists in Iran, has managed to save four women and one man from death since its founding a year ago. They have been able to do so, they say, because of international publicity generated around these cases.
As of this writing, two short articles, prepared by peripheral news outlets, have been published about the case of Zohreh and Azar Kabiri. Two articles are not enough to change their fate.
It's easy to read this story with cynicism or resignation. Don't. It's true that the web of injustice in Iran is far, far bigger than these two sisters. But to be paralyzed by the enormity of the problem is to ensure their death. Instead, choose to read this story with rage - and let that fire move you to create the kind of ruckus they so desperately need.
In Iran: Head of Judiciary Ayatollah Shahroudi: tel: 98-21-2274-1002; fax: 98-21-3390-4986.
In the U.S.: Interests Section of Iran: tel: 202-965-4990; fax: 202-965-1073.
In Canada: Embassy of Iran, Ottawa: tel: 613-232-5712.
In the U.K.: Embassy of Iran, London: tel: 0207-225-3000; fax: 0207-589-4440.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/952501.html
Can't fool me babe
by Keer-Koloft (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:00 AM CSTAmil, babe, now you put a comment for yourself under Anonymous99? Are you trying to get away from me? No way man, your rear belongs to me.
Amil: Thanks again for your
by Anonymous99 (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:54 AM CSTAmil: Thanks again for your keen observations. I read this article about a year ago and liked it very much.
Apparently, you're doint a great job since the Islamist collaborators have dispatched their American Jihadist to the rescue...hahaha
Keep on what you're doing. America is in peril. We don't want America to end up like the IRI under Sharia...
Killing with F-16I is civilized killing
by Wondering (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:07 AM CSTThat's why Israel only kills with those. They kill so nicely.
Re: Jim L.
by Iranian- on Fri Feb 08, 2008 09:53 AM CSTWelcome brother. Sorry that you have to see such ugliness. I agree with you. This site is in English and they don't require true identification for a person to put Blogs here. I have no Idea who this guy Amil Imani is?
This site does not prevent hate litrature against Muslims. But you must remember, Muslims have ememies and they surely visit this site regularly.
Amil the speed freak
by Anti-racist Activist (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 09:42 AM CSTAmil is either a meth addict and/or gets paid handsomely by his masters. What else would explain the volume of crap he is able to put out on a daily basis?
I wish that JJ would set some very minimum standards for what can be posted on this site. Vile rants such as Amil's should not be given space in this forum. Let Amil choke on his own hatred somewhere else.
As a Muslim American
by Jim L. (not verified) on Fri Feb 08, 2008 09:30 AM CSTI find this to be extremely racist. It carries the attitude that are common among fascists specifically During Nazi Germany. As an African American I am disgusted with this propaganda. I can't imagine this person be Iranian, a descendant of Cyrus or Omar Khayyam. Weren't all Iranian scientists and all the Iranian discoveries during the Islamic era or did Iran experience a break in between and people were born again Muslims? My confusion as a westerner would be if you want all the people to leave their religion, what would you replace it with? Communism? Is this guys communist?
Anyways, I find that Islam historically benefited the Iranians and the hate of this writer is like blaming blacks for the poverty in America.
Post new comment